Cases from cite.case.law:

GOMEZ LAWN SERVICE, INC. v. THE HARTFORD,, 98 So. 3d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Failure to so advise the employer shall bar a petition under this chapter.... ” Section 440.41(1), Florida . . . Likewise, section 440.41(l)’s plain language imputes the Employer’s knowledge to the Carrier. . . . required by section 440.185(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989) (repealed), without reference to section 440.41 . . . to ongoing medical treatment; thus, they have no bearing in the initial notice of injury, or section 440.41 . . .

PETTY, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION,, 80 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 2012)

. . . [a] provision to carry out the provisions of s. 440.41.” . . . Section 440.41, Florida Statutes (2008), entitled "Substitution of carrier for employer,” explains that . . .

RABAN, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CMS,, 13 So. 3d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 440.41, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

HOME QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. a v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 381 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . §§ 626.9541(l)(h), 627.062(1), 627.091, 627.191, 627.211, 627.410, 440.38, and 440.41. . . .

GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY v. McCARTNEY M. C., 672 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 440.41(2), Florida Statutes (1993), provides: "Jurisdiction of the employer by the judges of . . .

ACME OIL COMPANY v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,, 496 So. 2d 150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Pursuant to Section 440.41(1), Florida Statutes (1981) “notice to or knowledge of an employer of the . . . made to the employer, notice to the workers’ compensation carrier was imputed by operation of Section 440.41 . . .

AUTO- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, 402 So. 2d 560 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 440.41(1) F.S. (1978) provides that “Notice to or knowledge of an employer of the occurrence . . .

SAM ROGERS ENTERPRISES v. WILLIAMS,, 401 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . The deputy reasoned that under § 440.41, the employer was the carrier’s alter ego for purposes of § 44Q . . . In conjunction with this argument, the employer/carrier also contends that § 440.41’s provision imputing . . . Under this rationale § 440.41(1) would operate to impute notice to the carrier since that section was . . . It seems to us, however, that § 440.41, which has as its stated purpose the effective administration . . . We have chosen to construe § 440.34(2)(b) consistently with § 440.41 and the purpose of the Workers’ . . .

FLORIDA ERECTION SERVICES, INC. v. McDONALD,, 395 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 440.41, Florida Statutes (1979). To paraphrase from the opinion of Mr. . . .

G. SULLIVAN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 367 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Indeed, Section 440.41 provides that the carrier may actually be substituted for the employer as the . . .

R. BLENSKI, v. LaFOLLETTE,, 581 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1978)

. . . name of another for the purpose of soliciting charitable contributions, all in violation of section 440.41 . . . Section 440.41(3)(c) exempts from registration those who collect less than $500 a year if all “fund raising . . . conduct or use of the names fell within the definition of use for soliciting contributions in section 440.41 . . .

GARDNER, v. D. F. S. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 358 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1978)

. . . appliances and completed his training or education under a rehabilitative program pursuant to F.S. 440.41 . . .

INTERNATIONAL PILING, INC. a v. AMERICAN NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 345 So. 2d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . It is also argued that Florida Statute 440.41 (1967) provides no basis for jurisdiction of the Industrial . . . Appellant reasons that if 440.42(3) does not apply to the instant case, then 440.41 cannot be employed . . . an insurance claim was unclear, the claims court had the authority to interpret the policy under § 440.41 . . .

BEST, v. HOLLOWAY MATERIALS, 272 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Chapter 440.41, which provides that notice to the employer is notice to the carrier, does not apply to . . . The Full Commission correctly held that Florida Statutes § 440.41 F.S.A., providing for substitution . . . The Commission erred, however, in holding that § 440.41, by implication, requires that a claimant seeking . . . The obvious purpose of Florida Statutes § 440.41, F.S.A., is to provide certain rules facilitating the . . .

FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, v. RICH, d b a, 220 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1969)

. . . . § 440.41 (1967), F.S.A., authorizes the Industrial Commission to substitute a carrier for an employer . . .

NEAL v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, 31 Fla. Supp. 94 (Leon Cty. Cir. Ct. 1968)

. . . Under §440.41, Florida Statutes, an insurance carrier of an employer is responsible for the discharge . . .

STATE, CARTER v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION,, 28 Fla. Supp. 143 (Leon Cty. Cir. Ct. 1967)

. . . Under section 440.41, Florida Statutes, an insurance carrier of an employer is responsible for the discharge . . .

KOTARSKI, E. v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a, 244 F. Supp. 547 (E.D. Mich. 1965)

. . . The Florida workmen’s compensation statute, in section 440.41 (Fla.Stat.Ann. § 440.41) empowers the Commission . . .

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. v. W. REAGAN W. REAGAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO., 159 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 1963)

. . . Sec. 440.41, F.S.A. recognizes and authorizes this. . . .

RAINBOW POULTRY COMPANY v. RITTER RENTAL SYSTEM, INC., 140 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1962)

. . . Sec. 440.41, Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A. . . .

HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. J. C. KING, S. D. d b a SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW HAVEN, v. J. C. KING, S. D. d b a, 114 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . fails to express that intent, or does so ambiguously, the Industrial Commission has power under Section 440.41 . . . to interpret the contract to express the intent of the parties. * * * ” Section 440.41, Florida Statutes . . .

BRENT, v. T. BRENT,, 107 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . Section 440.41, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides for the substitution of a carrier for the employer in cases . . . Section 440.41 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

VAN WINKLE v. CARIBBEAN CONSTRUCTION CORP., 12 Fla. Supp. 64 (Fla. Industrial Comm'n 1958)

. . . Section 440.41. 11. . . . upon the carrier in the same manner and to the same extent as upon the employer under our Act (section 440.41 . . .

v., 28 T.C. 1169 (T.C. 1957)

. . . and January 1952 the funds received by petitioner from the insurance companies in the amount of $275,-440.41 . . . may assume without deciding that the expenditures of $3,452 are allocable to the proceeds of $275,-440.41 . . .

GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO. v. HANSEL B. SMITH, R. V. BARDEN, FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, 156 Fla. 662 (Fla. 1945)

. . . Section 440.41, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A. . . .

v., 35 B.T.A. 795 (B.T.A. 1937)

. . . such supplemental cost set up on the books of account was definitely established to the extent of $68,-440.41 . . .

ARMOUR CO. v. RENAKER, 191 F. 48 (C.C.E.D. Ky. 1911)

. . . amounting in all to the sum of $535.67, which, if deducted from the above balance, left a balance oL$l,440.41 . . .