448.110
State minimum wage; annual wage adjustment; enforcement.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
448.110 State minimum wage; annual wage adjustment; enforcement.—
(1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Minimum Wage Act.”
(2) The purpose of this section is to provide measures appropriate for the implementation of s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution, in accordance with authority granted to the Legislature pursuant to s. 24(f), Art. X of the State Constitution. To implement s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution, the Department of Commerce is designated as the state Agency for Workforce Innovation.
(3) Employers shall pay employees a minimum wage at an hourly rate of $6.15 for all hours worked in Florida. Only those individuals entitled to receive the federal minimum wage under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations shall be eligible to receive the state minimum wage pursuant to s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution and this section. The provisions of ss. 213 and 214 of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as interpreted by applicable federal regulations and implemented by the Secretary of Labor, are incorporated herein.
(4)(a) Beginning September 30, 2005, and annually on September 30 thereafter, the Department of Commerce shall calculate an adjusted state minimum wage rate by increasing the state minimum wage by the rate of inflation for the 12 months prior to September 1. In calculating the adjusted state minimum wage, the Department of Commerce shall use the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, not seasonally adjusted, for the South Region or a successor index as calculated by the United States Department of Labor. Each adjusted state minimum wage rate shall take effect on the following January 1, with the initial adjusted minimum wage rate to take effect on January 1, 2006.
(b) The Department of Revenue and the Department of Commerce shall annually publish the amount of the adjusted state minimum wage and the effective date. Publication shall occur by posting the adjusted state minimum wage rate and the effective date on the Internet home pages of the Department of Commerce and the Department of Revenue by October 15 of each year. In addition, to the extent funded in the General Appropriations Act, the Department of Commerce shall provide written notice of the adjusted rate and the effective date of the adjusted state minimum wage to all employers registered in the most current reemployment assistance database. Such notice shall be mailed by November 15 of each year using the addresses included in the database. Employers are responsible for maintaining current address information in the reemployment assistance database. The Department of Commerce is not responsible for failure to provide notice due to incorrect or incomplete address information in the database. The Department of Commerce shall provide the Department of Revenue with the adjusted state minimum wage rate information and effective date in a timely manner.
(5) It shall be unlawful for an employer or any other party to discriminate in any manner or take adverse action against any person in retaliation for exercising rights protected pursuant to s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution. Rights protected include, but are not limited to, the right to file a complaint or inform any person of his or her potential rights pursuant to s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution and to assist him or her in asserting such rights.
(6)(a) Any person aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against an employer violating this section or a party violating subsection (5). However, prior to bringing any claim for unpaid minimum wages pursuant to this section, the person aggrieved shall notify the employer alleged to have violated this section, in writing, of an intent to initiate such an action. The notice must identify the minimum wage to which the person aggrieved claims entitlement, the actual or estimated work dates and hours for which payment is sought, and the total amount of alleged unpaid wages through the date of the notice.
(b) The employer shall have 15 calendar days after receipt of the notice to pay the total amount of unpaid wages or otherwise resolve the claim to the satisfaction of the person aggrieved. The statute of limitations for bringing an action pursuant to this section shall be tolled during this 15-day period. If the employer fails to pay the total amount of unpaid wages or otherwise resolve the claim to the satisfaction of the person aggrieved, then the person aggrieved may bring a claim for unpaid minimum wages, the terms of which must be consistent with the contents of the notice.
(c)1. Upon prevailing in an action brought pursuant to this section, aggrieved persons shall recover the full amount of any unpaid back wages unlawfully withheld plus the same amount as liquidated damages and shall be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. As provided under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, pursuant to s. 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. s. 260, if the employer proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the act or omission giving rise to such action was in good faith and that the employer had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her act or omission was not a violation of s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution, the court may, in its sound discretion, award no liquidated damages or award any amount thereof not to exceed an amount equal to the amount of unpaid minimum wages. The court shall not award any economic damages on a claim for unpaid minimum wages not expressly authorized in this section.
2. Upon prevailing in an action brought pursuant to this section, aggrieved persons shall also be entitled to such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation, including, without limitation, reinstatement in employment and injunctive relief. However, any entitlement to legal or equitable relief in an action brought under s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution shall not include punitive damages.
(d) Any civil action brought under s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution and this section shall be subject to s. 768.79.
(7) The Attorney General may bring a civil action to enforce this section. The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief. In addition to injunctive relief, or in lieu thereof, for any employer or other person found to have willfully violated this section, the Attorney General may seek to impose a fine of $1,000 per violation, payable to the state.
(8) The statute of limitations for an action brought pursuant to this section shall be for the period of time specified in s. 95.11 beginning on the date the alleged violation occurred.
(9) Actions brought pursuant to this section may be brought as a class action pursuant to Rule 1.220, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. In any class action brought pursuant to this section, the plaintiffs shall prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, the individual identity of each class member and the individual damages of each class member.
(10) This section shall constitute the exclusive remedy under state law for violations of s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution.
(11) Except for calculating the adjusted state minimum wage and publishing the initial state minimum wage and any annual adjustments thereto, the authority of the Department of Commerce in implementing s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution, pursuant to this section, shall be limited to that authority expressly granted by the Legislature.
History.—s. 2, ch. 2005-353; s. 399, ch. 2011-142; s. 73, ch. 2012-30; s. 1, ch. 2023-222; s. 220, ch. 2024-6.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases (31 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Kubiak v. S.W. Cowboy, Inc.
Kubiak v. S.W. Cowboy, Inc. (2016)
“In Counts IV and V, Plaintiffs assert identical claims under the FMWA, Fla. Stat. § 448.110 . 8 *1351 Id. ¶¶ 113-24 .”
Carlo Llorca v. Sheriff, Collier County, Florida (2018)
“, and the Florida Minimum Wage Act (“FMWA”), Fla. Stat. § 448.110 . The deputies claim that the sheriffs violated the overtime provisions in the FLSA and the minimum wage provisions in the FMWA by failing to compensate them for time spent: (1) donning and doffing police gear;…”
Shaw v. Set Enterprises, Inc. (2017)
“X § 24 and Fla. Stat. § 448.110 . See [DE 20]. Plaintiffs are exotic, dancers (“Entertainers” or “Dancers”) who formerly performed at two strip clubs (“Clubs”) operated by Defendants The Set Enterprises, Inc.”
Perez v. Palermo Seafood, Inc. (2008)
“Fla. Stat. § 448.110 . 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant to the FLSA.”
In Re RBC Dain Rauscher Overtime Litigation (2010)
“Fla. Stat. § 448.110 (2). The FMWA is “the exclusive remedy under state law for violations” of Section 24.”
Winfield v. Babylon Beauty School of Smithtown Inc. (2015)
“” On December 12, 2005, the Florida legislature passed the Florida Minimum Wage Act, Fla. Stat. § 448.110 (“FMWA”), as the “exclusive remedy under state law for violations of s.”
Nicopior v. Moshi Moshi Palm Grove, LLC (2019)
“X § 24, and Fla. Stat. § 448.110 . Ms. Nicopior alleges that Defendants failed to pay her any wages as a server and failed to pay her the required overtime rate for hours worked more than forty hours per week.”
Martinez v. FORD MIDWAY MALL, INC. (2011)
“§ 448.110(3), Fla. Stat. (2009). Under the plain text, Employer was required to pay Claimant a minimum wage for all hours worked during the course of employment.”
Bennett v. Hayes Robertson Group, Inc. (2012)
“Rule 23 Certiñcation: Florida Minimum Wage Claims (Count I) With respect to Count I, Plaintiffs seek to certify a single class under Rule 23 to litigate Defendants’ alleged violation of Section 448.110 of the Florida Statutes. 2 The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ Motion, the…”
Rimel v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2017)
“Therefore, Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Uber asserting state law claims for: tortious interference with prospective business relations (Count I), breach of contract (Count II), unjust enrichment (Count III), conversion (Count IV), unfair competition (Count V),…”
Dionisio v. Ultimate Images & Designs, Inc. (2019)
“§ 206 for Unpaid Minimum Wages (Count II), and a claim for violation of the Florida Minimum Wage Amendment, Article X, § 24, of the Florida Constitution, and Florida Statute § 448.110 (Count III). See id. On March 27, 2019, Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint asserting…”
Solano v. a Navas Party Production, Inc. (2010)
“ved for summary judgment on six grounds: (1) Plaintiff should not be heard because he comes to the Court with unclean hands due to his status as an illegal immigrant and his failure to pay taxes; (2) F-Navarrete is not liable under the FLSA because he does not qualify as…”
— 448.110(10) — 1 case
— 448.110(2) — 1 case
— 448.110(3) — 4 cases
Martinez v. FORD MIDWAY MALL, INC. (2011)
“§ 448.110(3), Fla. Stat. (2009). Under the plain text, Employer was required to pay Claimant a minimum wage for all hours worked during the course of employment.”
Kubiak v. S.W. Cowboy, Inc. (2016)
“In Counts IV and V, Plaintiffs assert identical claims under the FMWA, Fla. Stat. § 448.110 . 8 *1351 Id. ¶¶ 113-24 .”
Copeland v. BDC United LLC (2025)
— 448.110(6) — 6 cases
Rohde v. HKM Pinellas LLC (2023)
— 448.110(6)(a) — 4 cases
— 448.110(6)(b) — 5 cases
Pimentel v. Strength20, LLC (2024)
— 448.110(6)(c) — 3 cases
Yasmin v. Triple T II, Inc. (2020)
— 448.110(6)(c)(1) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.