Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 452 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 452 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 452

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR
Chapter 452
BONDS OF EMPLOYEES OF COMMON CARRIERS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 452
CHAPTER 452
BONDS OF EMPLOYEES OF COMMON CARRIERS
452.01 Common carrier not to require employee to furnish surety bond of certain company.
452.02 Foreign corporations as surety.
452.03 Bond to cover definite term; cancellation; proviso.
452.04 Bonds violating chapter void.
452.05 Violation of regulations as to employment bonds; penalty.
452.01 Common carrier not to require employee to furnish surety bond of certain company.—No common carrier authorized to do business in this state, when requiring of an employee that he or she give it a bond or undertaking of any nature whatsoever, shall require such employee to have such bond or undertaking executed as a surety by any particular person, or by any one or more of any number of such persons, named by such common carrier; and no such common carrier shall reject any such bond or undertaking for any reason other than the financial insufficiency of such bond or undertaking.
History.—s. 1, ch. 6519, 1913; RGS 4041; CGL 5963; s. 179, ch. 97-103.
452.02 Foreign corporations as surety.—No common carrier authorized to do business in this state, when requiring of any employee that he or she give it a bond or undertaking of any nature whatsoever, shall require as surety thereon any person not a resident of this state; nor shall such common carrier accept as such surety any company, corporation, or association unless the same is a corporation duly organized under the laws of Florida, or who shall have designated an agent residing within this state upon whom service of legal process against it may be had as provided by law for foreign corporations doing business in this state, and shall also have in this state a general office where it shall require that every such bond or undertaking shall be approved, and canceled, and where a complete record thereof shall be kept.
History.—s. 2, ch. 6519, 1913; RGS 4042; CGL 5964; s. 180, ch. 97-103.
452.03 Bond to cover definite term; cancellation; proviso.—Every bond or undertaking of any nature whatsoever given by an employee of any common carrier authorized to do business in this state shall be made to cover a definite term; and no such bond or undertaking shall be canceled without the consent of all parties thereto, except for a breach of one or more of the conditions thereof. Any such employee who shall have given any such bond or undertaking may, upon breach of any of the conditions thereof by the other party thereto, cancel the same by giving the surety or sureties thereon and the common carrier for the benefit of whom the same shall have been made, at least 10 days’ notice in writing, setting out in full the reason for canceling the same, said notice to be signed by such employee and sworn to by him or her in this state before any officer authorized to administer oaths. Any such notice to a company, corporation, or association may be served by leaving the same with any person upon whom service of legal process upon such company, corporation, or association may be had. Any surety of any such bond or undertaking may, upon the breach of any of the conditions thereof by the common carrier and employee for whom the same shall have been made, cancel the same by giving such employee at least 10 days’ notice in writing, setting out in full the reason for canceling the same, the said notice to be signed by an agent or manager of such surety, then a resident of this state and then authorized to approve or disapprove similar bonds or undertakings for such surety, and to be sworn to by the person signing the same in this state before an officer authorized to administer oaths; provided, that nothing herein shall affect any right of action accruing to any person upon the breach of a contract.
History.—s. 3, ch. 6519, 1913; RGS 4043; CGL 5965; s. 181, ch. 97-103.
452.04 Bonds violating chapter void.—Any bond, contract, or undertaking made in violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be void.
History.—s. 4, ch. 6519, 1913; RGS 4044; CGL 5966.
452.05 Violation of regulations as to employment bonds; penalty.—Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.—s. 4, ch. 6519, 1913; RGS 5672; CGL 7877; s. 382, ch. 71-136.

F.S. 452 on Google Scholar

F.S. 452 on Casetext

Amendments to 452


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 452
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S452.05 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - VIOL REGS RE EMPLOYMENT BONDS COMMON CARRIERS - M: S
S475.452 1 - FRAUD - REPEALED 2006-210 - M: F
S475.452 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REPEALED 2006-210 - M: F
S562.452 - LIQUOR-SELL - CURB SERVE INTOXICATING LIQUOR SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S562.452 - LIQUOR-SELL - CURB SERVE INTOXICATING LIQUOR 1ST VIOL - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 452

Total Results: 20

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: lands, or other things.” Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. at 452; see Nelson, Adjudication in the Political Branches

Celsius Holdings, Inc. v. D3M Licensing Group, LLC, Strong Arm Productions USA, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: Appellees. No. 4D2023-0452 [December 11, 2024]

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: lands, or other things.” Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. at 452; see Nelson, Adjudication in the Political Branches

Jose Fernandez v. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, Etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: First American Title Insurance Company v. Kessler, 452 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), this Court adopted

Mark H. Schofield v. Monroe County, Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: 1092, 1095 (Fla. 2011) (quoting Blanco v. State, 452 So. 2d 520, 523 (Fla. 1984)). The County

Oracle America, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: rule. See Dep’t of Bus. Regul. v. Salvation Ltd., 452 So. 2d 65, 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (“It is axiomatic

Oracle America, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: rule. See Dep’t of Bus. Regul. v. Salvation Ltd., 452 So. 2d 65, 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (“It is axiomatic

Oracle America, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: rule. See Dep’t of Bus. Regul. v. Salvation Ltd., 452 So. 2d 65, 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (“It is axiomatic

Grand Harbor Golf & Beach Club, Inc. v. Grand Harbor Golf Club, LLC, L.P.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: v. Naranja Lakes Condo. Assoc., 498 So. 2d 451, 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). A party obligated to maintain

Carlos De La Melena v. Joanna Patricia Montezuma Panez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-22

Snippet: See § 90.606(3), Fla. Stat.; Blanco. v. State, 452 So. 2d 520, 523 (Fla. 1984) (“A trial judge’s ruling

Erica McDonald, as Parent and Natural Guardian of J.M., a Minor v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association, and Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc. D/B/A Tampa General Hospital; And University of South Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-20

Snippet: government”); cf. Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438, 452 (1929) (“Conspicuous among such matters are claims

April Thomason v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-20

Snippet: principle announced in Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), and holding that “police in Florida need

Wester v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: those engaged in organized crime.’” U.S. v Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 589 (1981) (citing RICO, 84 Stat. 923)

Emanuel Abramov v. NextGear Capital, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-06

Snippet: Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control Dist., 604 So. 2d 452, 454 (Fla. 1992))); McCloud v. State, 260 So. 3d

Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-30

Snippet: Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of Durham Cnty., 452 U.S. 18, 24 (1981)). Instead, courts have recognized

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Victoire Fontus

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-30

Snippet: necessary.”); Companioni v. City of Tampa, 51 So. 3d 452, 456 (Fla. 2010) (requiring objecting party to move

Burgos v. Sequeira, Vargas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. M.N., 199 So. 3d 452, 455-56 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (reversing order of dismissal

State of Florida v. Harris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: 148–49 (2013) (quoting Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452, 460 (2011)). However, the State must prove why it

McLane Foodservice, Inc. v. Elizabeth Wool

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: DecisionHR USA, Inc. v. Mills, 341 So. 3d 448, 452 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) (quoting Miami Dade Coll. v.

Steven Edward Stein v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-19

Snippet: in a “different light.” See Sweet, 293 So. 3d at 452. The State’s case was strong and included Stein’s