Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 463.014 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 463.014 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 463.014

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 463
OPTOMETRY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 463.014
463.014 Certain acts prohibited.
(1)(a) No corporation, lay body, organization, or individual other than a licensed practitioner shall engage in the practice of optometry through the means of engaging the services, upon a salary, commission, or other means or inducement, of any person licensed to practice optometry in this state. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit the association of a licensed practitioner with a multidisciplinary group of licensed health care professionals, the primary objective of which is the diagnosis and treatment of the human body.
(b) No licensed practitioner shall engage in the practice of optometry with any corporation, organization, group, or lay individual. This provision shall not prohibit licensed practitioners from employing, or from forming partnerships or professional associations with, licensed practitioners licensed in this state or with other licensed health care professionals, the primary objective of whom is the diagnosis and treatment of the human body.
(c) No rule of the board shall forbid the practice of optometry in or on the premises of a commercial or mercantile establishment.
(d) No licensed practitioner may practice under practice identification names, trade names, or service names, unless any dissemination of information by the practitioner to consumers contains the name under which the practitioner is licensed or that of the professional association in which the practitioner participates. Any advertisement or other dissemination of information to consumers may contain factual information as to the geographic location of licensed practitioners or of the availability of optometric services.
(e) No licensed practitioner shall adopt and publish or cause to be published any practice identification name, trade name, or service name which is, contains, or is intended to serve as an affirmation of the quality or competitive value of the optometric services provided at the identified practice.
(2) A corporation or labor organization may employ licensed practitioners to provide optometric services to bona fide employees of such corporation and members of their immediate families or to bona fide members of such labor organization and members of their immediate families, provided the provision of such services is incidental to the legitimate business of such corporation or labor organization. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the employment of licensed practitioners by corporations or organizations formed primarily for such purposes.
(3) Prescribing, ordering, dispensing, administering, supplying, selling, or giving any drug for the purpose of treating a systemic disease by a licensed practitioner is prohibited. However, a certified optometrist is permitted to use commonly accepted means or methods to immediately address incidents of anaphylaxis.
(4) Surgery of any kind is expressly prohibited. Certified optometrists may remove superficial foreign bodies. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “superficial foreign bodies” means any foreign matter that is embedded in the conjunctiva or cornea but that has not penetrated the globe. Notwithstanding the definition of surgery as provided in s. 463.002(6), a certified optometrist is not prohibited from providing any optometric care within the practice of optometry as defined in s. 463.002(7), such as removing an eyelash by epilation, probing an uninflamed tear duct in a patient 18 years of age or older, blocking the puncta by plug, or superficial scraping for the purpose of removing damaged epithelial tissue or superficial foreign bodies or taking a culture of the surface of the cornea or conjunctiva.
(5) No rule of the board shall prohibit a licensed practitioner from authorizing a board-certified optician to fill, fit, adapt, or dispense a contact lens prescription as authorized under chapter 484.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 79-194; s. 318, ch. 81-259; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 26, ch. 83-329; ss. 15, 20, 21, ch. 86-289; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 6, ch. 93-101; s. 7, ch. 2013-26.

F.S. 463.014 on Google Scholar

F.S. 463.014 on Casetext

Amendments to 463.014


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 463.014
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 463.014.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 463.014

Total Results: 6

Naoo v. Florida Dept. of Health

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-03-14

Citation: 922 So. 2d 1060, 2006 WL 617948

Snippet: wanted the Board to address in relation to section 463.014, Florida Statutes, and rule 64B13-3.008. Dr. Haines

Fowler v. Department of Health, Board of Optometry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-07-31

Citation: 821 So. 2d 1246, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10814, 2002 WL 1758255

Snippet: Florida is subject to discipline pursuant to section 463.014, Florida Statutes (1997), because he violated the

Cole Vision v. Dept. of Bus. and Prof.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-02-14

Citation: 688 So. 2d 404, 1997 WL 60865

Snippet: the hearing officer's construction of section 463.014(1)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes, implemented by

Fisher v. Schumacher

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-05-07

Citation: 72 So. 2d 804, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1454

Snippet: this premise appellants point out that Section 463.14 (1) F.S.A. inhibits optometrists “to advertise

City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & Son

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-12-12

Citation: 192 So. 646, 141 Fla. 75

Snippet: of How, 105 Wis. 41; Geweke v. Niles, 368 Ill. 463, 14 N.E.2d 482, 117 A. L. R. 262, and annotations.

Quinn v. Phipps

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-04-11

Citation: 113 So. 419, 93 Fla. 805, 54 A.L.R. 1173, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 1180

Snippet: words. O'Donnell v. Clinton, 145 Mass. 461, text 463, 14 N.E. Rep. 747. One who leads another reasonably