Florida Statute 475.25 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 475
REAL ESTATE BROKERS, SALES ASSOCIATES, SCHOOLS, AND APPRAISERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 475.25

475.25 Discipline.—

(1) The commission may deny an application for licensure, registration, or permit, or renewal thereof; may place a licensee, registrant, or permittee on probation; may suspend a license, registration, or permit for a period not exceeding 10 years; may revoke a license, registration, or permit; may impose an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 for each count or separate offense; and may issue a reprimand, and any or all of the foregoing, if it finds that the licensee, registrant, permittee, or applicant:

(a) Has violated any provision of s. 455.227(1) or s. 475.42. However, licensees under this part are exempt from the provisions of s. 455.227(1)(i).

(b) Has been guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, dishonest dealing by trick, scheme, or device, culpable negligence, or breach of trust in any business transaction in this state or any other state, nation, or territory; has violated a duty imposed upon her or him by law or by the terms of a listing contract, written, oral, express, or implied, in a real estate transaction; has aided, assisted, or conspired with any other person engaged in any such misconduct and in furtherance thereof; or has formed an intent, design, or scheme to engage in any such misconduct and committed an overt act in furtherance of such intent, design, or scheme. It is immaterial to the guilt of the licensee that the victim or intended victim of the misconduct has sustained no damage or loss; that the damage or loss has been settled and paid after discovery of the misconduct; or that such victim or intended victim was a customer or a person in confidential relation with the licensee or was an identified member of the general public.

(c) Has advertised property or services in a manner which is fraudulent, false, deceptive, or misleading in form or content. The commission may adopt rules defining methods of advertising that violate this paragraph.

(d)1. Has failed to account or deliver to any person, including a licensee under this chapter, at the time which has been agreed upon or is required by law or, in the absence of a fixed time, upon demand of the person entitled to such accounting and delivery, any personal property such as money, fund, deposit, check, draft, abstract of title, mortgage, conveyance, lease, or other document or thing of value, including a share of a real estate commission if a civil judgment relating to the practice of the licensee’s profession has been obtained against the licensee and said judgment has not been satisfied in accordance with the terms of the judgment within a reasonable time, or any secret or illegal profit, or any divisible share or portion thereof, which has come into the licensee’s hands and which is not the licensee’s property or which the licensee is not in law or equity entitled to retain under the circumstances. However, if the licensee, in good faith, entertains doubt as to what person is entitled to the accounting and delivery of the escrowed property, or if conflicting demands have been made upon the licensee for the escrowed property, which property she or he still maintains in her or his escrow or trust account, the licensee shall promptly notify the commission of such doubts or conflicting demands and shall promptly:

a. Request that the commission issue an escrow disbursement order determining who is entitled to the escrowed property;

b. With the consent of all parties, submit the matter to arbitration;

c. By interpleader or otherwise, seek adjudication of the matter by a court; or

d. With the written consent of all parties, submit the matter to mediation. The department may conduct mediation or may contract with public or private entities for mediation services. However, the mediation process must be successfully completed within 90 days following the last demand or the licensee shall promptly employ one of the other escape procedures contained in this section. Payment for mediation will be as agreed to in writing by the parties. The department may adopt rules to implement this section.

If the licensee promptly employs one of the escape procedures contained herein and abides by the order or judgment resulting therefrom, no administrative complaint may be filed against the licensee for failure to account for, deliver, or maintain the escrowed property. Under certain circumstances, which the commission shall set forth by rule, a licensee may disburse property from the licensee’s escrow account without notifying the commission or employing one of the procedures listed in sub-subparagraphs a.-d. If the buyer of a residential condominium unit delivers to a licensee written notice of the buyer’s intent to cancel the contract for sale and purchase, as authorized by s. 718.503, or if the buyer of real property in good faith fails to satisfy the terms in the financing clause of a contract for sale and purchase, the licensee may return the escrowed property to the purchaser without notifying the commission or initiating any of the procedures listed in sub-subparagraphs a.-d.

2. Has failed to deposit money in an escrow account when the licensee is the purchaser of real estate under a contract where the contract requires the purchaser to place deposit money in an escrow account to be applied to the purchase price if the sale is consummated.

(e) Has violated any of the provisions of this chapter or any lawful order or rule made or issued under the provisions of this chapter or chapter 455.

(f) Has been convicted or found guilty of, or entered a plea of nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction which directly relates to the activities of a licensed broker or sales associate, or involves moral turpitude or fraudulent or dishonest dealing. The record of a conviction certified or authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the state shall be admissible as prima facie evidence of such guilt.

(g) Has had a broker’s or sales associate’s license revoked, suspended, or otherwise acted against, or has had an application for such licensure denied, by the real estate licensing agency of another state, territory, or country.

(h) Has shared a commission with, or paid a fee or other compensation to, a person not properly licensed as a broker, broker associate, or sales associate under the laws of this state, for the referral of real estate business, clients, prospects, or customers, or for any one or more of the services set forth in s. 475.01(1)(a). For the purposes of this section, it is immaterial that the person to whom such payment or compensation is given made the referral or performed the service from within this state or elsewhere; however, a licensed broker of this state may pay a referral fee or share a real estate brokerage commission with a broker licensed or registered under the laws of a foreign state so long as the foreign broker does not violate any law of this state.

(i) Has become temporarily incapacitated from acting as a broker or sales associate with safety to investors or those in a fiduciary relation with her or him because of drunkenness, use of drugs, or temporary mental derangement; but suspension of a license in such a case shall be only for the period of such incapacity.

(j) Has rendered an opinion that the title to any property sold is good or merchantable, except when correctly based upon a current opinion of a licensed attorney at law, or has failed to advise a prospective purchaser to consult her or his attorney on the merchantability of the title or to obtain title insurance.

(k) Has failed, if a broker, to immediately place, upon receipt, any money, fund, deposit, check, or draft entrusted to her or him by any person dealing with her or him as a broker in escrow with a title company, banking institution, credit union, or savings and loan association located and doing business in this state, or to deposit such funds in a trust or escrow account maintained by her or him with some bank, credit union, or savings and loan association located and doing business in this state, wherein the funds shall be kept until disbursement thereof is properly authorized; or has failed, if a sales associate, to immediately place with her or his registered employer any money, fund, deposit, check, or draft entrusted to her or him by any person dealing with her or him as agent of the registered employer. The commission shall establish rules to provide for records to be maintained by the broker and the manner in which such deposits shall be made. A broker may place and maintain up to $5,000 of personal or brokerage funds in the broker’s property management escrow account and up to $1,000 of personal or brokerage funds in the broker’s sales escrow account. A broker shall be provided a reasonable amount of time to correct escrow errors if there is no shortage of funds and such errors pose no significant threat to economically harm the public. It is the intent of the Legislature that, in the event of legal proceedings concerning a broker’s escrow account, the disbursement of escrowed funds not be delayed due to any dispute over the personal or brokerage funds that may be present in the escrow account.

(l) Has made or filed a report or record which the licensee knows to be false, has willfully failed to file a report or record required by state or federal law, has willfully impeded or obstructed such filing, or has induced another person to impede or obstruct such filing; but such reports or records shall include only those which are signed in the capacity of a licensed broker or sales associate.

(m) Has obtained a license by means of fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment.

(n) Is confined in any county jail, postadjudication; is confined in any state or federal prison or mental institution; is under home confinement ordered in lieu of institutional confinement; or, through mental disease or deterioration, can no longer safely be entrusted to competently deal with the public.

(o) Has been found guilty, for a second time, of any misconduct that warrants her or his suspension or has been found guilty of a course of conduct or practices which show that she or he is so incompetent, negligent, dishonest, or untruthful that the money, property, transactions, and rights of investors, or those with whom she or he may sustain a confidential relation, may not safely be entrusted to her or him.

(p) Has failed to inform the commission in writing within 30 days after pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, or being convicted or found guilty of, any felony.

(q) Has violated any provision of s. 475.2755 or s. 475.278, including the duties owed under those sections.

(r) Has failed in any written listing agreement to include a definite expiration date, description of the property, price and terms, fee or commission, and a proper signature of the principal(s); and has failed to give the principal(s) a legible, signed, true and correct copy of the listing agreement within 24 hours of obtaining the written listing agreement. The written listing agreement shall contain no provision requiring the person signing the listing to notify the broker of the intention to cancel the listing after such definite expiration date.

(s) Has had a registration suspended, revoked, or otherwise acted against in any jurisdiction. The record of the disciplinary action certified or authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the state shall be admissible as prima facie evidence of such disciplinary action.

(t) Has violated any standard of professional practice adopted by rule of the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board, including standards for the development or communication of a real estate appraisal, as approved and adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, as defined in s. 475.611. This paragraph does not apply to a real estate broker or sales associate who, in the ordinary course of business, performs a comparative market analysis, gives a broker price opinion, or gives an opinion of value of real estate. However, in no event may this comparative market analysis, broker price opinion, or opinion of value of real estate be referred to as an appraisal, as defined in s. 475.611.

(u) Has failed, if a broker, to direct, control, or manage a broker associate or sales associate employed by such broker. A rebuttable presumption exists that a broker associate or sales associate is employed by a broker if the records of the department establish that the broker associate or sales associate is registered with that broker. A record of licensure which is certified or authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the state is admissible as prima facie evidence of such registration.

(v) Has failed, if a broker, to review the brokerage’s trust accounting procedures in order to ensure compliance with this chapter.

(2) A license may be revoked or canceled if it was issued through the mistake or inadvertence of the commission. Such revocation or cancellation shall not prejudice any subsequent application for licensure filed by the person against whom such action was taken.

(3) The department shall reissue the license of a licensee against whom disciplinary action was taken upon certification by the commission that the licensee has complied with all of the terms and conditions of the final order imposing discipline.

(4) The commission may adopt rules allowing the director of the Division of Real Estate to grant to a licensee placed on probation additional time within which to complete the terms of probation, but the rules must allow the licensee to appeal any denial to the commission.

(5) An administrative complaint against a broker, broker associate, or sales associate shall be filed within 5 years after the time of the act giving rise to the complaint or within 5 years after the time the act is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.

(6) The department or commission shall promptly notify a licensee’s broker or employer, as defined in this part, in writing, when a formal complaint is filed against the licensee alleging violations of this chapter or chapter 455. The department shall not issue a notification to the broker or employer until 10 days after a finding of probable cause has been found to exist by the probable cause panel or by the department, or until the licensee waives his or her privilege of confidentiality under s. 455.225, whichever occurs first.

(7) The commission shall promptly report to the proper prosecuting authority any criminal violation of any statute relating to the practice of a real estate profession regulated by the commission.

History.—s. 26, ch. 12223, 1927; CGL 4087; s. 3, ch. 24090, 1947; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949; s. 10, ch. 26484, 1951; s. 5, ch. 29983, 1955; s. 1, ch. 61-108; ss. 1, 2, ch. 70-421; s. 3, ch. 75-112; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 1, ch. 78-117; s. 9, ch. 78-366; ss. 19, 42, 43, ch. 79-239; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 21, 38, ch. 82-1; ss. 21, 45, ch. 82-179; s. 61, ch. 83-329; ss. 13, 28, 30, ch. 88-20; s. 2, ch. 89-76; s. 15, ch. 90-228; s. 15, ch. 90-341; s. 18, ch. 90-345; s. 5, ch. 91-89; s. 5, ch. 91-289; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 147, ch. 92-149; ss. 10, 141, ch. 94-119; s. 3, ch. 94-337; s. 2, ch. 97-42; s. 373, ch. 97-103; s. 2, ch. 98-116; s. 123, ch. 98-166; s. 6, ch. 98-250; s. 4, ch. 99-384; s. 183, ch. 2000-160; s. 1, ch. 2000-198; s. 1, ch. 2001-274; s. 34, ch. 2003-164; s. 4, ch. 2006-210; s. 56, ch. 2009-195; s. 47, ch. 2010-106; s. 10, ch. 2012-61.

F.S. 475.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 475.25 on CourtListener

Amendments to 475.25

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 475.25

Total Results: 146

FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N v. Webb

367 So. 2d 201

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1978 | Docket: 1330027

Cited 31 times | Published

to exceed two years for a single violation. Section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes (1975). By suspending

State Ex Rel. Bie v. Swope

30 So. 2d 748, 159 Fla. 18, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 673

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1947 | Docket: 3264077

Cited 25 times | Published

the Circuit Court, previously granted under Section 475.25, Florida Statutes, 1941, is not now determined

Brod v. Jernigan

188 So. 2d 575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1966 | Docket: 1490362

Cited 22 times | Published

promise" and his conduct a "breach of trust". F.S. Section 475.25(1) F.S.A., in the part relied upon here by

State Ex Rel. Vining v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N

281 So. 2d 487, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5019

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1973 | Docket: 1261660

Cited 21 times | Published

in an escrow account in violation of Fla. Stat. § 475.25(1)(i), F.S.A.; four counts of breach of trust

Fla. League of Cities, Inc. v. Admin. Com'n

586 So. 2d 397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1991 | Docket: 1487719

Cited 17 times | Published

(maximum 2-year real estate license suspension under § 475.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1975)); Decola v. Castor, (maximum

Reid v. Florida Real Estate Commission

188 So. 2d 846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1966 | Docket: 465393

Cited 14 times | Published

dishonest dealing within the intent and meaning of Section 475.25(1) (a), F.S.; guilty of a crime against the

Fleischman v. Dept. of Professional Reg.

441 So. 2d 1121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1983 | Docket: 1338025

Cited 13 times | Published

entirely on his own account. Upon the holding that Section 475.25(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1981) does not, as

Pokress v. Tisch Florida Properties, Inc.

153 So. 2d 346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1963 | Docket: 2507137

Cited 11 times | Published

be the case, it would not be a violation under § 475.25(1) (f), as it existed prior to 1961, to pay a

Berry v. Mullin (In Re Mullin)

91 B.R. 175, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1469

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 1641965

Cited 9 times | Published

and Florida Law. Fla.Stat. § 475.05, § 475.25(1)(d) and § 475.25(1)(k) (1988); Fla.Admin.Code Ann. 21V-14

Kibler v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REG.

418 So. 2d 1081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1982 | Docket: 1288868

Cited 9 times | Published

appellants and one Richard Testut had violated section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes. Mrs. Bishop "sustained"

Pearl v. Fla. Bd. of Real Estate

394 So. 2d 189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1981 | Docket: 1692302

Cited 9 times | Published

controlled substances evidence moral turpitude under Section 475.25(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1977), which provides

Thorn v. Florida Real Estate Commission

146 So. 2d 907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1962 | Docket: 455503

Cited 9 times | Published

that Thorn had violated the intent and purpose of § 475.25(1) (f), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., in that Thorn

White v. Weatherford (In Re Abrass)

268 B.R. 665, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 411, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1361

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2001 | Docket: 1488012

Cited 8 times | Published

White is successful in his claim, Florida Statute § 475.25[27] provides *687 that FREC can take certain disciplinary

Munch v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION

592 So. 2d 1136, 1992 WL 859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1992 | Docket: 1429445

Cited 8 times | Published

in a business transaction," in violation of Section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes; and Count II accused

Florida Real Estate Commission v. Harris

134 So. 2d 785

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1961 | Docket: 1343427

Cited 8 times | Published

court asserting the unconstitutionality of Section 475.25(2), Florida Statutes (1957), F.S.A. and to

Weiss v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG.

677 So. 2d 98, 1996 WL 415937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1996 | Docket: 1273430

Cited 7 times | Published

on appeal is that the penalty was too harsh. Section 475.25(1) allowed FREC to mete out a variety of punishments

Tassy v. Hall

429 So. 2d 30

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1983 | Docket: 1221728

Cited 7 times | Published

cooperating arrangement with Florida brokers. Section 475.25(1)(h), Florida Statutes, expressly permits

Holland v. Florida Real Estate Comm.

352 So. 2d 914, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1977 | Docket: 1682262

Cited 7 times | Published

complaint alleging that petitioner had violated Section 475.25(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1975). This statute

Florida Real Estate Commission v. Rogers

176 So. 2d 65, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3176

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1965 | Docket: 1154059

Cited 7 times | Published

the period of suspension for a violation of Section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes. O'CONNELL, J., concurs

Lewis v. Dept. of Professional Regulation

410 So. 2d 593, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1982 | Docket: 1518559

Cited 6 times | Published

on January 31, 1980, charging Lewis violated section 475.25(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). The complaint

Carp v. Florida Real Estate Commission

211 So. 2d 240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1968 | Docket: 1475378

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Real Estate Commission, under Fla. Stat. § 475.25, F.S.A., which provides, in pertinent part: "475

Walker v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF BUSINESS

705 So. 2d 652, 1998 WL 20674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1998 | Docket: 1555000

Cited 5 times | Published

concealment" in violation of the provisions of section 475.25(1)(m), Florida Statutes (1995).[2] Based upon

Bekiempis v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REG.

421 So. 2d 693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1982 | Docket: 1372743

Cited 5 times | Published

intentional misrepresentation, as contemplated by Section 475.25(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1975), occurred. Appellee

Everett v. Mann

113 So. 2d 758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1959 | Docket: 1490988

Cited 5 times | Published

involving moral turpitude within the meaning of § 475.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides in part

Llera Realty, Inc. v. BD. OF REAL ESTATE

385 So. 2d 1131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1980 | Docket: 1700575

Cited 4 times | Published

registration as real estate brokers or salesmen; Section 475.25, Florida Statutes (1977), through the onus

Pauline v. Borer

274 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1973 | Docket: 1260875

Cited 4 times | Published

against petitioner charging violation of F.S. § 475.25(1)(a), F.S.A. (referring to breach of trust, concealment

MacGregor v. Florida Real Estate Commission

99 So. 2d 709

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1958 | Docket: 1570997

Cited 4 times | Published

undertake a relationship of trust and confidence." Section 475.25 defines the several varieties of misconduct

Goodson v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.

978 So. 2d 195, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2008 | Docket: 1508778

Cited 3 times | Published

charged with violating numerous provisions of section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes, regulating the practice

Pluto v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION DIV. OF REAL ESTATE

538 So. 2d 539, 1989 WL 11957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1989 | Docket: 472489

Cited 3 times | Published

in a business transaction, in violation of section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1985). The appellants

Morris v. DEPT. OF PROF. REGULATION

474 So. 2d 841, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1985 | Docket: 1749861

Cited 3 times | Published

license as a broker for one year, pursuant to section 475.25, Florida Statutes (1983). He argues the commission

LaRossa v. DEPT. OF PROF. REGULATION

474 So. 2d 322, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1985 | Docket: 1486220

Cited 3 times | Published

guilty of violating subsections (b) and (k) of section 475.25(1) and that the appropriate penalty would be

Santaniello v. DEPT. OF PROF. REG./BD. OF REAL ESTATE

432 So. 2d 82

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1983 | Docket: 1677636

Cited 3 times | Published

42(1)(j), Florida Statutes (1979), and therefore section 475.25(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), by filing a

Graham v. Florida Real Estate Commission

119 So. 2d 88

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1960 | Docket: 451358

Cited 3 times | Published

certiorari and quash the order of suspension. Section 475.25 F.S.A., (1957) authorizes the commission to

Nelson v. DEPT. OF BUS. & PRO. REGULATION

707 So. 2d 378, 1998 WL 66573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1998 | Docket: 1675805

Cited 2 times | Published

Department alleged that Nelson was in violation of section 475.25(1)(f), Florida Statutes (1993),[2] by being

Hambley v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION, DIV. OF REAL ESTATE

568 So. 2d 970, 1990 WL 145587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1990 | Docket: 1526653

Cited 2 times | Published

administrative complaint with violations of section 475.25(1)(h), Florida Statutes (1987), because on

Antel v. DEPARTMENT OF PRO. REGULATION

522 So. 2d 1056, 1988 WL 29177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1988 | Docket: 1660970

Cited 2 times | Published

NOTES [1] § 475.17(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). [2] § 475.25(1)(f), Fla. Stat. (1985). [3] § 475.17(1)(a)

Aquino v. DEPT. OF PROF. REG.

430 So. 2d 598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1983 | Docket: 445989

Cited 2 times | Published

disqualification applicable to Petitioner pursuant to § 475.25, F.S.[1] The foregoing order, in essence, makes

Sellars v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N

380 So. 2d 1052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1980 | Docket: 1402431

Cited 2 times | Published

estate broker's license for: (a) Violation of section 475.25(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), which proscribes

Astore v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N

374 So. 2d 40

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1979 | Docket: 430728

Cited 2 times | Published

by administrative complaints with violations of § 475.25, Florida Statutes, the complaints having been

Hime v. Florida Real Estate Commission

61 So. 2d 182, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1749

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1952 | Docket: 1291204

Cited 2 times | Published

those who violate the trust imposed in them. Section 475.25, F.S.A., catalogues the offenses for which

Comas v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

40 So. 3d 878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2010 | Docket: 2529639

Cited 1 times | Published

Estate Comm'n v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1979); § 475.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1999-2008).

METEOR MOTORS v. Thompson Halbach & Assocs.

914 So. 2d 479, 2005 WL 2861538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2005 | Docket: 1781822

Cited 1 times | Published

services within his own jurisdiction. See, e.g., § 475.25(1)(h), Fla. Stat. (2004); Winchester v. Amrhein-Hatcher

Milliken v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS

709 So. 2d 595, 1998 WL 150492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1998 | Docket: 1279029

Cited 1 times | Published

to distribute is not a crime which violates section 475.25(1)(f) because it does not involve moral turpitude

Santaniello v. DEPT. OF PROF. REG./BD. OF REAL ESTATE

432 So. 2d 84

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1983 | Docket: 1677397

Cited 1 times | Published

and concluded that appellants had violated section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). The board accepted

Linkous v. DEPARTMENT OF PROF. REG.

417 So. 2d 802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1982 | Docket: 1721944

Cited 1 times | Published

are subject only to the penalties provided in section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes (1981), which provides:

Adams v. ST. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES

406 So. 2d 1170, 1 Educ. L. Rep. 1048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1981 | Docket: 450000

Cited 1 times | Published

establish moral turpitude within the purview of Section 475.25(1)(e)." In our view, however, the moral standard

Kopf v. Florida Real Estate Commission

379 So. 2d 1327, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1980 | Docket: 64574428

Cited 1 times | Published

therefore, susceptible to punishment under Section 475.-25(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), is not contested

Kline v. Devcon Realty Corp.

285 So. 2d 641, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1973 | Docket: 1491462

Cited 1 times | Published

fiducuary duties to appellant and that they violated F.S. 475.25(1)(a), F.S.A., as well as certain regulations

Hall v. King

266 So. 2d 33

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1972 | Docket: 1708762

Cited 1 times | Published

broker's registration under the authority of Section 475.25(2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides

Horne v. Florida Real Estate Commission

163 So. 2d 515, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1964 | Docket: 60221324

Cited 1 times | Published

give sufficient weight to the legal effect of Section 475.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. This statute provides

Hoffman v. Condermann

146 So. 2d 776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1962 | Docket: 60208246

Cited 1 times | Published

Chapter 475, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., in particular § 475.25, for certain acts committed by him in connection

Shelton v. Florida Real Estate Commission

120 So. 2d 191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1960 | Docket: 1286859

Cited 1 times | Published

certiorari is here sought by the petitioner. Under section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the real estate

Rollas v. Dept. of Business & Professional Reg.

243 So. 3d 474

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2018 | Docket: 6300767

Published

provided the act was a violation proscribed in section 475.25 or section 475.42. After

Hendricks v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

183 So. 3d 1172, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2016 | Docket: 60252943

Published

pro*1174scribed in s. 475:25 or s. 475.42.” Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), includes “fraud

Smith v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation

182 So. 3d 767, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19490, 2015 WL 9584861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2015 | Docket: 60252815

Published

the Commission concluded' that he violated section 475.25(l)(u), Florida Statutes (2013), and decided

Smith v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation

159 So. 3d 1017, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4252, 2015 WL 1334082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2015 | Docket: 60246400

Published

license was due to be suspended pursuant to section 475.25(l)(u), Florida Statutes, which subjects a broker

Comas v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

40 So. 3d 878, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2010 | Docket: 60295181

Published

Estate Comm’n v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1979); § 475.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1999-2008).

Cambas v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

6 So. 3d 668, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2251, 2009 WL 631978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2009 | Docket: 1215424

Published

were not subject to discipline pursuant to section 475.25(1)(f), Florida Statutes (2002). Asserting that

Taylor v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

975 So. 2d 626, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3022, 2008 WL 583697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2008 | Docket: 64853966

Published

complaint claiming that appellant had violated section 475.25(1)(f), Florida Statutes (2005), which provides

Bemenderfer v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

955 So. 2d 659, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7118, 2007 WL 1342705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 64850446

Published

guideline penalty for a violation based on section 475.25(1)(e) (authorizing punishment for any violation

Romano v. Department of Business & Professional

948 So. 2d 938, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956, 2007 WL 485975

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2007 | Docket: 64849150

Published

“Commission”), which found him guilty of violating section 475.25, Florida Statutes, suspended his real estate

Djokic v. DEPARTMENT OF BUS. AND PROF. REG.

875 So. 2d 693, 2004 WL 1196563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2004 | Docket: 1684087

Published

violations of section 475.25(1)(d)1. [the section (1)(d) charge], as well as section 475.25(1)(k) [the section

Jones v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL

873 So. 2d 1266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7529, 2004 WL 1175267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2004 | Docket: 1732911

Published

upon or is required by law," in violation of section 475.25(1)(d)(1) and "dishonest dealing by trick, scheme

Saltmarsh, Cleveland & Gund, P.A. v. Pappas

799 So. 2d 348, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15634, 2001 WL 1355310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2001 | Docket: 64810003

Published

referrals under certain circumstances. See e.g., § 475.25(l)(h), Fla. Stat. (1995)(describing conditions

Starr v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

729 So. 2d 1006, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4180, 1999 WL 174233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 64787423

Published

specifically found she had violated the provisions of section 475.25(l)(m) (“Has obtained a license by means of

White v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

715 So. 2d 1130, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10487, 1998 WL 518501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1998 | Docket: 64782165

Published

in a business transaction, in violation of section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes. White negotiated a

Phillips v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

737 So. 2d 553, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10333, 1998 WL 476174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1998 | Docket: 64789431

Published

Florida *554Statutes (1995), in violation of section 475.25(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1995). Phillips did

Mazurek v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

711 So. 2d 199, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5512, 1998 WL 241219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781076

Published

conclusion that Mazu-rek was guilty of violating section 475.25, Florida Statutes, (1997). She contends that

Arias v. State, Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

710 So. 2d 655, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4333, 1998 WL 187440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1998 | Docket: 64780848

Published

Estate, finding that the agent had violated section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), suspending

Haas v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

699 So. 2d 863, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11132, 1997 WL 609169

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1997 | Docket: 64775993

Published

order except for the indefinite suspension. Section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes, provides that the commission

Vogt v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

698 So. 2d 1374, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10585, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1997 | Docket: 64775645

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 475.25(1X0, (1)(p), Fla. Stat. (1995); Florida Real Estate Comm’n v. Williams

Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

683 So. 2d 670, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1996 WL 697262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1996 | Docket: 64769382

Published

appellant licensee was subject to discipline under section 475.25(l)(m), Florida Statutes for misrepresenting

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 7, 1996 | Docket: 3255368

Published

3 Section 455.227(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). 4 Section 475.25(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). 5 25 So.2d 4, 4-5 (Fla

Viti v. Florida Department of Business

657 So. 2d 1277, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7790, 1995 WL 427715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1995 | Docket: 64757870

Published

FREC erred by finding him guilty of violating section 475.25(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1993), and imposing

Gauthier v. Florida Real Estate Commission

654 So. 2d 580, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3705, 1995 WL 214644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 64756082

Published

would constitute a violation proscribed in section 475.25.” See § 475.482(1), *582Fla.Stat. (1991).1

Schumacher v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

611 So. 2d 75, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13040, 1992 WL 385472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1992 | Docket: 64693141

Published

which found Schu-macher guilty of violating section 475.-25(l)(e), Florida Statutes, for failing to promptly

Son v. Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

608 So. 2d 75, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10956, 1992 WL 296130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1992 | Docket: 64691775

Published

administrative complaint against Son pursuant to section 475.25(l)(f), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990). That

Florida Bar re: Advisory Opinion

602 So. 2d 914, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 425, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1218

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1992 | Docket: 64669063

Published

may only obtain a civil injunction. Fla.Stat. § 475.25; Rule 10-5, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

Dullea v. Department of Business Regulation, Florida Real Estate Commission

599 So. 2d 207, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5048, 1992 WL 93651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1992 | Docket: 64667532

Published

proscribed in s. 475.25 ...” (emphasis added). Section 475.25 sets forth a number of violations for which

Anglickis v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

593 So. 2d 298, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 392, 1992 WL 9709

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1992 | Docket: 64665130

Published

Counts I and II alleged that appellants violated section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1987)1 for culpable

Norris v. Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

579 So. 2d 390, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4712, 1991 WL 82519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1991 | Docket: 64658676

Published

Florida Real Estate Practice Act occurred per Section 475.25(l)(f), (n), (p), Florida Statutes (1989). This

Ramsey v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

574 So. 2d 291, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1047, 1991 WL 16304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1991 | Docket: 64656338

Published

real estate broker for an alleged violation of section 475.25(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1989). The Commission

Wallen v. Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

568 So. 2d 975, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7731, 1990 WL 149806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1990 | Docket: 64653885

Published

for the resolution of such disputes under section 475.-25(l)(d)l., Florida Statutes (1989), i.e., arbitration

Black v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

553 So. 2d 224, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2616, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6264, 1989 WL 133748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1989 | Docket: 64646761

Published

discipline under Chapter 475 is appropriate. See § 475.25(1) & (2), Fla.Stat. (1987). REVERSED AND REMANDED

Scharrer v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

536 So. 2d 320, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 16, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5649, 1988 WL 135686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1988 | Docket: 64639495

Published

subject to disciplinary action pursuant to Section 475.25(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1985). The fact that

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 16, 1988 | Docket: 3256538

Published

to carry out the powers expressly granted.4 Section 475.25, F.S., authorizes the commission to carry out

Cluett v. Department of Professional Regulation, Florida Real Estate Commission

530 So. 2d 351, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3364, 1988 WL 75888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1988 | Docket: 64636695

Published

officer found that Mary Cluett had violated section 475.-25(l)(b) and (k). The hearing officer recommended

Lewis v. State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate

529 So. 2d 751, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1570, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2827, 1988 WL 67784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1988 | Docket: 64636373

Published

licenses of all the appellants, pursuant to section 475.25 Florida Statutes (1987). Ferris v. Turlington

Accurate Financial Corp. v. Burman

519 So. 2d 689, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 318, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 332, 1988 WL 6056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1988 | Docket: 64632511

Published

disciplinary action for making such payment. Section 475.25(l)(d)(l), Florida Statutes (1985). Therefore

Hector v. Department of Professional Regulation, Florida Real Estate Commission

504 So. 2d 469, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 775, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1987 | Docket: 64626001

Published

reprimanded Hector for an alleged violation of section 475.-25(1), Florida Statutes. We reverse. On March

Previews, Inc. v. Murff

502 So. 2d 1317, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 607, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1987 | Docket: 64625264

Published

the act or service was performed. Further, Section 475.25(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1985), provides, in

Lloyd v. Department of Professional Regulation

473 So. 2d 720, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1157, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1985 | Docket: 64613481

Published

salesman’s license be revoked for violating section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). The Florida

Golub v. Department of Professional Regulation

450 So. 2d 229, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1984 | Docket: 64604834

Published

COWART, Judge. This case involves how section 475.-25(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1981), which requires

Piccione v. Department of Professional Regulation

440 So. 2d 474, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1983 | Docket: 64600597

Published

misrepresentation, concealment, etc., and violated Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). In my opinion

Winchester v. Amrhein-Hatcher, Inc.

436 So. 2d 274, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1983 | Docket: 64599050

Published

the sharing of a commission as authorized by Section 475.25(1), (h),. Florida Statutes (1981). The judgment

George v. Department of Professional Regulation

432 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1983 | Docket: 64597390

Published

appropriate penalty consistent with the dictates of section 475.-25(1), Florida Statutes (1981), see Linkous v

Kout v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Real Estate

405 So. 2d 435, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1981 | Docket: 64585897

Published

found by the officer established violations of Section 475.25(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). Our analysis

Bruner v. Board of Real Estate, Department of Professional Regulation

399 So. 2d 4, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1981 | Docket: 64582911

Published

grounds for revoking or suspending a license, and section 475.25(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1979) provided that

Tomberg Realty, Inc. v. Board of Real Estate

392 So. 2d 998, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18643

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1981 | Docket: 64579836

Published

to his personal account were in violation of Section 475.25(l)(i), Florida Statutes (1977) which requires

Roberts v. Ayers

380 So. 2d 1057, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1979 | Docket: 64574821

Published

4th DCA 1969). The cause of our reference to Section 475.25(l)(c) was petitioners’ contention that their

Mann v. Florida Real Estate Commission

377 So. 2d 715, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1979 | Docket: 64573095

Published

findings of fact will not support a violation of Section 475.25(l)(a), Florida Statutes. See Brod v. Jernigan

Marcus v. Florida Real Estate Commission

372 So. 2d 993, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64570978

Published

Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978); Section 475.25(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1975).

White v. Florida Real Estate Commission

371 So. 2d 568, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1979 | Docket: 64570408

Published

in a real estate transaction in violation of Section 475.25(l)(a) Florida Statutes (1977); in failing to

Dreyer v. Florida Real Estate Commission

370 So. 2d 95, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1979 | Docket: 64569925

Published

contracts were executed. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 475.25(1) F.S. provides in pertinent part that the

Roberts v. Florida Real Estate Commission

365 So. 2d 447, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1978 | Docket: 64567683

Published

These facts are claimed to be a violation of § 475.25(l)(c) and (d) F.S., a part of the real estate

Carlton v. State, Division of Occupations, Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation, Florida Real Estate Commission

354 So. 2d 77, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17283

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1977 | Docket: 64562364

Published

petitioner’s suspension to a period of one year. Section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes (1975), permits the Commission

Rifkin v. Florida Real Estate Commission

349 So. 2d 665, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1977 | Docket: 64560017

Published

found that petitioner had acted contrary to section 475.25(l)(a), Florida Statutes, the hearing examiner

Mick v. Florida State Board of Dentistry

347 So. 2d 138, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1977 | Docket: 64559133

Published

petitioner attacked the constitutionality of § 475.25(2), Florida Statutes (1971), which provided that

Rifkin v. Florida Real Estate Commission

345 So. 2d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1977 | Docket: 64558342

Published

Flag Realty, Inc., violated the provisions of Section 475.25(l)(e), Florida Statutes,1 in that they were

Frederick v. Florida Real Estate Commission

329 So. 2d 355, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1976 | Docket: 64552996

Published

and misrepresentation in violation of Fla.Stat. § 475.25(1) (a) (1971); Count II alleged that petitioner’s

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 27, 1976 | Docket: 3258307

Published

or implied, in a real estate transaction." Section 475.25(1)(a), F. S. The registration of a registrant

Ryan v. Brown

326 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1976 | Docket: 64552206

Published

upon him by law, all in violation of Fla.Stat. § 475.25(1) (a).1 Petitioner’s motion to quash the information

Klein v. Vining

310 So. 2d 366, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1975 | Docket: 64545372

Published

475.42, Fla.Stat., F.S. A. [more specifically § 475.25(1) (a), Fla. Stat., F.S.A.] between March, 1971

Ursoleo v. Florida Real Estate Commission

281 So. 2d 532, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1973 | Docket: 64533898

Published

escrow funds in violation of Florida Statutes, Section 475.25(1) (i), F.S.A.; count two charged petitioner

Nechtman v. Saker

271 So. 2d 26, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5659

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1972 | Docket: 64529523

Published

respondent commission which found him in violation of § 475.25(1)(c), Fla.Stat, F.S. A, and suspended him pending

Grieser v. Myers

267 So. 2d 673, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1972 | Docket: 64528045

Published

adjudicating them guilty of violating F.S. Section 475.25(1)(c), F.S.A.,1 and subjecting them to a reprimand

Davis v. Florida Real Estate Commission

263 So. 2d 251, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1972 | Docket: 64526391

Published

question for his own account, in violation of § 475.25(1) (a) Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The determinative

Hall v. King

254 So. 2d 223, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 11, 1971 | Docket: 64522905

Published

upon the ground for revocation as stated in Section 475.25(2), Florida Statutes, F. S.A., the pertinent

Waltman v. Florida Real Estate Commission

254 So. 2d 32, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1971 | Docket: 64522835

Published

violations of the Real Estate License Law, F.S. § 475.25, F.S.A., and suspended their registration as brokers

Florida Real Estate Commission v. Williams

240 So. 2d 304, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2352

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1970 | Docket: 64517039

Published

constitute violations of the provisions of Section 475.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The factual allegations

Roose v. Florida Real Estate Commission

239 So. 2d 510, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1970 | Docket: 64516612

Published

the petitioner guilty of violation of F.S. Section 475.25(1) (3), F.S.A., and directed the respondent

Williams v. Florida Real Estate Commission

232 So. 2d 239, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1970 | Docket: 64513488

Published

the petitioner violated F.S. § 475.25(1) (a), (c) and (e), and § 475.25(3), F.S.A. The prayer in the

Karl v. Florida Real Estate Commission

229 So. 2d 610, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1969 | Docket: 64512538

Published

for revoking or suspending his registration. In § 475.25, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the statute provides grounds

Kozerowitz v. Stack

226 So. 2d 682, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2169

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1969 | Docket: 64511432

Published

questioned. Count Two charged petitioner violated F.S. § 475.25(1) (d), F.S.A., by operating as a real estate

Cannon v. Florida Real Estate Commission

221 So. 2d 240, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1969 | Docket: 64509283

Published

a broker for alleged violation of F.S.1967, Section 475.25(1) (c), F.S.A. 1 *241The dispute precipitating

Thomas v. Florida Real Estate Commission

215 So. 2d 315, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1968 | Docket: 64507201

Published

so ordered. . Fla.Stat. §§475.25(1) (a), 475.42(1) (d), F.S.A. . Fla.Stat. § 475.25(1) (a), F.S.A.

Kozerowitz v. Stack

219 So. 2d 469, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1968 | Docket: 64508630

Published

that the appellant was guilty of a violation of § 475.25(1) (d) Fla. Stat., F.S.A., for having operated

Scheuerman v. Florida Real Estate Commission

215 So. 2d 29, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1968 | Docket: 64507120

Published

adjudging petitioner guilty of violating F.S.1967, Section 475.25(1) (a), F.S.A., and ordering her registration

Rivard v. McCoy

212 So. 2d 672, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1968 | Docket: 64506164

Published

concealment and breach of trust in violation of § 475.25(1) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., for failure

Lawrence v. Florida Real Estate Commission

207 So. 2d 470, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5931

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1968 | Docket: 64504219

Published

Commission that the petitioner had violated F.S. § 475.25(1) (a), F.S.A. The violation of the statute, and

State ex rel. Cannon v. Churchwell

195 So. 2d 599, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1967 | Docket: 64499947

Published

whether such improper use constitutes a violation of § 475.25(1) (a). Based on these assumptions relator argues

Bouchelle v. Florida Real Estate Commission

188 So. 2d 60, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1966 | Docket: 64497188

Published

Bouchelle was charged with the violation of Section 475.25(1) (a) of the Real Estate License Law1 by having

Sandin v. Florida Real Estate Commission

187 So. 2d 355, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1966 | Docket: 64497006

Published

disbursement is alleged to be a violation of F.S.A. § 475.25(1)(i). The pertinent portion of the Information

McDowell v. Florida Real Estate Commission

182 So. 2d 624, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1966 | Docket: 64495505

Published

found guilty on two counts of violating F.S.A. § 475.25(1) (i), and his registration was suspended for

Hargis v. Florida Real Estate Commission

174 So. 2d 419, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1965 | Docket: 64492874

Published

adjudged petitioner guilty of violating Florida Statute 475.25 (l)(a), F.S.A., with respect to six counts

Gewant v. Florida Real Estate Commission

166 So. 2d 230, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1964 | Docket: 64490129

Published

a registered broker. It is urged further that § 475.25 is sufficient authority for bringing this action

Rogers v. King

161 So. 2d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1964 | Docket: 60219626

Published

said statute and punishable as provided by Section 475.25(1) (d), Florida Statutes 1961, F.S.A.2 COUNT

Miller Co. v. Florida Real Estate Commission

156 So. 2d 667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1963 | Docket: 60215766

Published

and (i) of § 475.25(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. It is the contention of petitioners that § 475.25(1) (a) providing

Moore v. Florida Real Estate Commission

154 So. 2d 179, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1963 | Docket: 60212591

Published

negligence within the intent and meaning of Section 475.25(1) (a), F.S.” The question posed by petitioner

Taylor v. Florida Real Estate Commission

143 So. 2d 862

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1962 | Docket: 60206633

Published

deposit when directed to do so by the seller. Section 475.25 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. recites the duty of the broker

Pritchett v. Florida Real Estate Commission

143 So. 2d 45, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1962 | Docket: 60206066

Published

in an opinion by Judge Kanner, said: “Under section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the real estate

Ward v. Florida Real Estate Commission

141 So. 2d 811, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1962 | Docket: 60205087

Published

trust in business transactions in violation of Section 475.25(1) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A, to the extent

Fry v. Benson

132 So. 2d 617, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1961 | Docket: 60198228

Published

concluded that this was a breach of trust, etc., under § 475.25(1) (a), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. As Chapter 475 provides

Murphy v. Florida Real Estate Commission

117 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1959 | Docket: 60194068

Published

applications for registration as real estate salesmen. Section 475.25(1) (e), F.S., F.S.A., provides that registration

Anderson v. Florida Real Estate Commission ex rel. Condermann

105 So. 2d 918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1958 | Docket: 60191044

Published

appellees the duty of enforcing its standards.” Section 475.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides the grounds

Potter v. Curry

104 So. 2d 127, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1958 | Docket: 60190396

Published

commission charged the broker with violation of Section 475.25(1) (a), Fla. Stat., F.S.A., alleging as follows: