Florida Statute 476.034 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 476
BARBERING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 476.034

476.034 Definitions.—As used in this act:

(1) “Barber” means a person who is licensed to engage in the practice of barbering in this state under the authority of this chapter.

(2) “Barbering” means any of the following practices when done for remuneration and for the public, but not when done for the treatment of disease or physical or mental ailments: shaving, cutting, trimming, coloring, shampooing, arranging, dressing, curling, or waving the hair or beard or applying oils, creams, lotions, or other preparations to the face, scalp, or neck, either by hand or by mechanical appliances.

(3) “Barbershop” means any place of business wherein the practice of barbering is carried on.

(4) “Board” means the Barbers’ Board.

(5) “Department” means the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

History.—ss. 3, 28, ch. 78-155; ss. 2, 13, 15, 25, 30, 34, 62, ch. 80-406; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 1, 19, 20, ch. 85-297; s. 31, ch. 89-344; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 164, ch. 94-218.

F.S. 476.034 on Google Scholar

F.S. 476.034 on Casetext

Amendments to 476.034

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 476.034

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 476.034.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 476.034

Total Results: 9

Green v. Green

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-12-03

Citation: 501 So. 2d 1306, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2530

Snippet: indicated his estimated net worth to be $3,875,476.34. Also in December 1982, the husband estimated his

Lemoine, Et Vir v. Spicer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-04-25

Citation: 1 So. 2d 730, 146 Fla. 758, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1224

Snippet: man is an 'exconvict'); Blake v. Smith,19 R.I. 476, 34 A. 995 (a charge of the keeping of a house of ill-fame)

Hernando Hard Rock Co. v. American State Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-07-26

Citation: 129 So. 769, 100 Fla. 307

Snippet: 654, 45 So. R. 509; and Moore v. Clem,45 Fla. 476, 34 So. R. 305. The rule stated in these cases and

Hammers v. Southern Express Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-06-12

Citation: 80 Fla. 51, 85 So. 246

Snippet: Company v. O’Donnell, 49 Ohio St. 489, 32 N. E. Rep. 476, 34 Am. St. Rep. 579; Eager v. Jonesboro, Lake City

Bailey v. Van Pelt

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-08-12

Citation: 78 Fla. 337

Snippet: Cases v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 234 U. S. 476, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 986; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co

Boca Grande Investment Co. v. Blanding

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-05-05

Citation: 77 Fla. 536, 81 So. 886

Snippet: interrogatories of the bill. Moore v. Clem, 45 Fla. 476, 34 South. Rep. 305; Hunt v. Turner, 54 Fla. 654, 45

Delegal v. Delegal

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1913-02-25

Citation: 65 Fla. 190, 61 So. 444, 1913 Fla. LEXIS 436

Snippet: bill of complaint. See Moore v. Clem, 45 Fla. 476, 34 South. Rep. 305; Hunt v. Turner, 54 Fla. 654, 45

Hunt v. Turner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-06-15

Citation: 54 Fla. 654

Snippet: scandal and impertinence. Moore v. Clem, 45 Fla. 476, 34 South. Rep. 305. The exceptions in the instant

Holzendorf v. Terrell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1906-06-15

Citation: 52 Fla. 525

Snippet: v. Adams, 22 Fla. 177; Moore v. Clem, 45 Fla. 476, 34 South. Rep. 305; Robertson v. Dunne, 45 Fla. 553