The 2023 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Defendants argue that Counts One, Two, Three, Six, and Seven are barred because, under the Supreme Court's decision in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994), such an action would be a collateral attack on Plaintiff's criminal conviction. (Doc. 16 at 5-10; Doc. 17 at 11 (incorporating section containing Heck argument into Sheriff Rambosk's Motion to Dismiss)). Plaintiff responds that Heck does not apply to plaintiffs who are not in custody or were in custody for too short a time to effectively pursue habeas relief. (Doc. 20 at 7-8).Pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment will be granted if the movant demonstrates there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(a). A genuine dispute is one in which "'the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.'" In re: Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510 , 309 So.3d 192, 193 (Fla. 2020) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). Further, "'[i]f the evidence is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted.'" Id. (quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50).Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). The moving party bears the initial burden of stating the basis for its motion and identifying those portions of the record demonstrating the absence of genuine issues of material fact. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323; Hickson Corp. v. N. Crossarm Co., 357 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (11th Cir. 2004). That burden can be discharged if the moving party can show the court that there is “an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case.” Celotex, 477 U.S. at 325.As a preliminary matter, Plaintiffs did not respond to the motions at all (as noted above). After a movant makes its initial showing, the burden of production moves to the other party. Cable/Home Commc'n Corp. v. Network Prods., Inc., 902 F.2d 829, 841 (11th Cir. 1990). The nonmoving party must “go beyond the pleadings” and, using evidence such as affidavits, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions, “designate specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial.” Id. (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986)). Plaintiffs designated no such facts, and to the extent such facts might be within the documents Defendants submitted, the court “need not[] consider record evidence that has not been properly cited.” N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 56.1(F); see also Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1478-79 (6th Cir. 1989) (“The trial court no longer has the duty to search the entire record to establish that it is bereft of a genuine issue of material fact.”); Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Willoughby, 863 F.2d 1029, 1035 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (finding a party's “failure to designate and reference triable facts” was fatal to the party's opposition to a motion for summary… As discussed, Plaintiff admits in his deposition testimony to shooting a taser in the vicinity of then-Sergeant Steel, and he can point to no other officer being under criminal investigation for misdemeanor battery on a fellow officer much less another officer charged for misdemeanor battery on a fellow officer. Yet, at the same time, Plaintiff asks the Court to pretend that the taser incident never occurred and the relevant decisionmakers imposed the adverse employment actions solely as retaliation for his complaints of financial mismanagement. The Court is unpersuaded by Plaintiff's argument and concludes that there is no genuine issue for trial. See Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50.Evidence presented by the nonmoving party in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, and all reasonable factual inferences arising from it, must be viewed in the light most favorable to him or her. See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). Nonetheless, the nonmoving party still bears the burden of coming forward with sufficient evidence of every element that he or she must prove. See Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 324-25, 106 S.Ct. at 2553-54. A motion for summary judgment should be granted if “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a); Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 322, 106 S.Ct. at 2552.After noting that circumstances involving a conflict check system may constitute grounds for finding an intentional violation of Rule 2014, the Bankruptcy Court then quoted In re Fullenkamp: "[G]iven the various relationships between the parties, the Court is comfortable that [the] failure to discover the relationship was not . . . the result of a woefully inadequate conflict check system." Id. (quoting In re Fullenkamp, 477 B.R. 826, 834 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted)).The first procedural default exception is also inapplicable. “In order to show cause for not raising a claim in an earlier petition, a petitioner must show ‘some external impediment preventing counsel from constructing or raising the claim.'” High v. Head, 209 F.3d 1257, 1262 (11th Cir. 2000) (citation omitted). On this point, Petitioner claims that the legal basis for his claim was not reasonably available due to his sentence appeal waiver. Civ. Dkt. 16 at 2-3. While this is a viable means of establishing cause, see Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 488 (1986), it is not available in the instant case. Indeed, as mentioned above, Petitioner's claim could have been reviewed on direct appeal for constitutional error in his plea colloquy. See Bousley, 523 U.S. at 623. Petitioner also could have raised the claim at sentencing. He nevertheless failed to bring it forth until now.In deciding a motion for summary judgment, a court must resolve all ambiguities and draw all inferences in favor of the non-moving party. Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970); Jackson v. BellSouth Telecomms., 372 F.3d 1250, 1280 (11th Cir. 2004). Upon doing so, the court must determine whether a rational jury could find for the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). Where reasonable minds could differ on the inferences arising from undisputed facts, a court should deny summary judgment. Allen, 121 F.3d at 646.Summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party demonstrates “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). A dispute is genuine “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). A fact is material if it may “affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” Id. “The moving party bears the initial burden of showing the court, by reference to materials on file, that there are no genuine issues of material fact that should be decided at trial.” Allen v. Bd. of Pub. Educ., 495 F.3d 1306, 1313-14 (11th Cir. 2007). Stated differently, the moving party discharges its burden by showing “that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986).. . . Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399, 409, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986). . . . Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), Purkey is mentally incompetent to be . . . Ford , 477 U.S. at 425, 106 S.Ct. 2595 (Powell, J., concurring) (emphasis deleted). . . . Quarterman , 551 U.S. 930, 949, 127 S.Ct. 2842, 168 L.Ed.2d 662 (2007) (quoting Ford , 477 U.S. at 426 . . .
. . . Mississippi College , 626 F.2d 477, 479, 485 (C.A.5 1980) (ministerial exception inapplicable to faculty . . .
. . . solution to the problem, severing any problematic portions while leaving the remainder intact." 561 U.S. 477 . . . Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc. , 521 U.S. 457, 469-470, 477, 117 S.Ct. 2130, 138 L.Ed.2d 585 (1997) . . . Coakley , 573 U.S. 464, 477-478, 134 S.Ct. 2518, 189 L.Ed.2d 502 (2014) ; but see ante, at 2359 (BREYER . . .
. . . Continental Bank Corp. , 494 U.S. 472, 477, 110 S.Ct. 1249, 108 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990) (alteration in original . . .
. . . Shearson/American Express, Inc. , 490 U.S. 477, 484, 109 S.Ct. 1917, 104 L.Ed.2d 526 (1989), and that . . .
. . . Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 (2010), we reiterated . . . Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 493, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 (2010). . . . Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 523, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 (2010) ( . . . Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 499, 500 n. 6, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 . . . Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 (2010). . . .
. . . Vinson , 477 U.S. 57, 64, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . Vinson , 477 U.S. 57, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986). . . . Title VII at the last minute on the floor of the House of Representatives," Meritor Savings Bank , 477 . . . Mississippi College , 626 F.2d 477, 484-486 (CA5 1980) ; see also Brief for United States Conference . . .
. . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), which holds that a claim challenging . . .
. . . Wilson , 477 U.S. 436, 451, 106 S.Ct. 2616, 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986) (plurality opinion). . . . Wilson , 477 U.S. 436, 453, and n. 15, 106 S.Ct. 2616, 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986) (plurality opinion). . . . Wilson , 477 U.S. 436, 451, 106 S.Ct. 2616, 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986) (plurality opinion); see supra, at . . .
. . . Stachura , 477 U.S. 299, 106 S.Ct. 2537, 91 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986). . . . Rivera , 477 U.S. 561, 574, 106 S.Ct. 2686, 91 L.Ed.2d 466 (1986) (plurality opinion). . . . See Stachura , 477 U.S. at 306-307, 106 S.Ct. 2537 ; Carey , 435 U.S. at 260-264, 98 S.Ct. 1042 ; Dobbs . . .
. . . New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 477, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) ; Southern Union Co. v. . . . U.S. at 510, 115 S.Ct. 2310 ; Richardson , 526 U.S. at 817, 119 S.Ct. 1707 ; Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 477 . . . New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 477, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). . . . Shearson/American Express, Inc. , 490 U.S. 477, 484, 109 S.Ct. 1917, 104 L.Ed.2d 526 (1989). . . .
. . . C. 477, 485-486, 402 S. E. 2d 386, 390 (1991). . . .
. . . No. 19-477 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; Evans v. Techs. . . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505. . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Hugh v. Butler Cty. . . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (internal citations omitted). Walden v. . . .
. . . Gonzales , 477 F.3d 1126, 1129 (9th Cir. 2007) (similar). . . . Grava , 205 F.3d at 1181 n.3 ; see also Fedunyak , 477 F.3d at 1129-30. . . .
. . . Murray, 477 U.S. 527, 535, 106 S.Ct. 2661, 91 L.Ed.2d 434 (1986) ("[I]t is the very prospect that a state . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc ., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), contending that his mental illness at . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 252-53, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (comparing methodology . . .
. . . Khabeer , 410 F.3d 477, 483 (8th Cir. 2005). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Charlottesville Savings & Loan Ass'n , 477 F.2d 40, 44-45 (4th Cir. 1973) ). 12 C.F.R. § 226.2(a)(13) . . .
. . . Dep't of Educ., 130 F.3d 477, 480-81 (1st Cir. 1997) (relying on Arizonans to hold that a reimbursement . . . Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 483, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 (2010). . . .
. . . Stachura , 477 U.S. 299, 306 n.9, 106 S.Ct. 2537, 91 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986). . . .
. . . Hampton , 477 F.3d 38, 49 (2d Cir. 2007) ); see Gen. Motors Corp. v. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). . . . See Liberty Lobby , 477 U.S. at 256-57, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ("The movant has the burden of showing that there . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . See , e.g. , Wanjiku , 919 F.3d at 477 (noting that a forensic "preview" takes one to three hours; the . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). B. . . .
. . . Taylor , 477 U.S. 131, 144-45, 106 S.Ct. 2440, 91 L.Ed.2d 110 (1986) ). . . . Par. of Jefferson , 185 F.3d 477, 490 (5th Cir. 1999) ("Where the evidence can support findings either . . .
. . . Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), with regard to insanity, "we leave . . . Id. at 317, 122 S.Ct. 2242 (alterations omitted) (quoting Ford , 477 U.S. at 416-17, 106 S.Ct. 2595 ) . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 247-52, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Arizona , 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . . Merciez , 477 F.3d 442, 445-46 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Cartwright , 336 F.3d at 493 ) (brackets in original . . .
. . . Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-25, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Mr. . . .
. . . Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) ; Preiser v. . . .
. . . Hampton, 477 F.3d 38, 54 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Kansas v. . . .
. . . App'x at 477 (holding that "[a] reduction in force is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for discharge . . .
. . . United States , 183 F.3d 474, 477 (6th Cir. 1999) ). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; Tolliver v. . . . Stachura , 477 U.S. 299, 306, 106 S.Ct. 2537, 91 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986). . . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 483, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) (quoting Stachura , 477 U.S. at . . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 484, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) ) (available damages for false arrest . . .
. . . Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . . See Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548. . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . . Celotex Corp. , 477 U.S. at 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548. . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 ). . . .
. . . Taveraz , 477 F.3d 767, 783 (6th Cir. 2007) ; see also Miccosukee Tribe of Indians , 607 F.3d at 1275 . . .
. . . Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. , 477 F.3d 583, 592 (8th Cir. 2007). . . . See Matrix , 477 F.3d at 592. . . .
. . . Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 308 n.11, 106 S.Ct. 2537, 91 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986) (explaining that "nominal damages . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ("Factual disputes that . . .
. . . and (3) "the defendant must knowingly and substantially assist the principal violation." 705 F.2d at 477 . . . Halberstam , 705 F.2d at 477. . . .
. . . Brock, 477 U.S. 274, 287, 106 S.Ct. 2523, 91 L.Ed.2d 228 (1986) (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 515-16, 95 . . .
. . . (R. 477). . . . (R. 364, 369, 370, 477). . . . three levels (R. 594), muscle spasm (R. 349), and radiculopathy (positive straight leg raising) (R. 477 . . . diabetic neuropathy (R. 364, 369), paresthesia and decreased sensation in her hands and feet (R. 370, 477 . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; Yahnke v. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986), at this juncture we cannot . . .
. . . Patrickson , 538 U.S. 468, 477, 123 S.Ct. 1655, 155 L.Ed.2d 643 (2003). . . .
. . . Cont'l Bank Corp ., 494 U.S. 472, 477, 110 S.Ct. 1249, 108 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990) (citation omitted). . . .
. . . Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) (citing FED. R. CIV. . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . . Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see also Jeffreys v. . . . Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505. . . . Anderson, 477 U.S. at 250 n.4, 106 S.Ct. 2505. . . .
. . . (Trial Tr. at 477 (Munsell).) . . .
. . . Hoffman , 318 U.S. 109, 119, 63 S.Ct. 477, 87 L.Ed. 645 (1943) ("In fairness to the trial court and to . . .
. . . Long Term Disability Plan , 477 F.3d 833, 843 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing Minadeo v. . . .
. . . Sweet , 630 F.3d 477, 484 (6th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) ). . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). 2. . . .
. . . Thompson , 359 F.3d 470, 477 (7th Cir. 2004). . . .
. . . Knorr , 477 F.3d 75, 81 (3d Cir. 2007) ; and (4) the criminal proceeding must have been resolved in the . . . Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 484, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . . Celotex Corp. , 477 U.S. at 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548. IV. . . .
. . . Borgsmiller , 477 F.2d 586, 587 (CCPA 1973) (noting that the marks in question had "a difference not . . .
. . . Harris , 523 F.3d 477, 497 (5th Cir. 2008). Yet our law is again inconsistent. . . .
. . . Op. at 477.) . . .
. . . offense, including the extent of [the defendant's] participation in the conduct," Miller, 567 U.S. at 477 . . . Miller, 567 U.S. at 477, 132 S.Ct. 2455. . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 253, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; T.W. Elec. . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 254, 106 S.Ct. 2505, T.W. Elect. Service Inc. , 809 F.2d at 630. . . .
. . . Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) ; Gallo v. . . . Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548. . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Vinson , 477 U.S. 57, 63-69, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986). . . . Id. , citing Meritor , 477 U.S. at 68, 106 S.Ct. 2399. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . .
. . . Winsted , 923 F.3d at 477 (quoting O'Connor-Spinner v. . . . See 923 F.3d at 477 ("Because the ALJ did not include Winsted's difficulties with concentration, persistence . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Hugh v. Butler Cty. . . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (internal citations omitted). Walden v. . . .
. . . Comm'n, 888 F.3d 477, 482 (D.C. . . .
. . . Blendheim (In re Blendheim) , 803 F.3d 477, 493 (9th Cir. 2015). . . .
. . . App'x 477, 478 (9th Cir. 2017). . . . Flores-Ortega , 528 U.S. 470, 477, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000) ). . . .
. . . Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 327, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) ("Summary judgment procedure is properly . . .
. . . . § 2254. 512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) (footnote omitted). . . .
. . . Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). . . .
. . . Id . at 477, 105 S.Ct. 2174 (second alteration in original) (quoting World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. . . . "the plaintiff's interest in obtaining convenient and effective relief," Burger King , 471 U.S. at 477 . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; Payne v. . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; Lapre v. . . . Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a) ; Anderson , 477 U.S. at 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; Lapre , 911 F.3d at 430. A. . . . Downey , 581 F.3d 467, 477 (7th Cir. 2009) (same); Fillmore v. . . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 255-56, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; Whitley , 475 U.S. at 320-21, 106 S.Ct. 1078. . . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 256, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Jackson, 477 F. Supp. 2d 361, 363-64 (D. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). . . .
. . . Astrue , 477 F.3d 1037, 1042 (8th Cir. 2007). . . . Astrue , 477 F.3d at 1042. . . . Travis , 477 F.3d at 1042. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm. The Honorable Tony N. . . .
. . . App'x 475, 477 (7th Cir. 2003) ("[T]he amendment to § 1983 limits the type of relief available to plaintiffs . . .
. . . Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, 477 Mass. 456, 78 N.E.3d 37, 50 (2017). . . .
. . . United States , 271 U.S. 204, 206-207, 46 S.Ct. 477, 70 L.Ed. 906 (1926) ; Sutton v. . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). III. A. . . .
. . . Rivera , 477 U.S. 561, 576-77, 106 S.Ct. 2686, 91 L.Ed.2d 466 (1986). . . . Rivera , 477 U.S. at 568, 106 S.Ct. 2686 (citation omitted). . . .
. . . Armontrout , 477 F.3d 962, 967 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Mayorga v. . . .
. . . Children's Mercy Hosp. , 477 S.W.3d 727, 735 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015) (second emphasis added). . . .