Cases from cite.case.law:

SULLIVAN, v. CITY OF AUGUSTA,, 625 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . Sullivan $478.55 more for traffic control than its actual overtime payments and that this charge was . . . in-person meeting requirements of the parade ordinance are constitutionally defective and ... that the $478.55 . . . Sullivan in the amount of $478.55 and that the overcharge amounted to a violation of his constitutional . . . sought — a declaration that no fee could be required of indigent applicants' — their entitlement to a $478.55 . . .

SULLIVAN E. v. CITY OF AUGUSTA,, 511 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2007)

. . . the parade ordinance are constitutionally defective and affirm the district court’s ruling that the $478.55 . . . Sullivan $478.55 more than its actual overtime payments” to the officers who served on the detail assigned . . . In the present case, the original estimate exceeded by $478.55 the cost of paying the officers who took . . . The district court found that Augusta charged Sullivan $478.55 more than the City’s actual overtime payments . . . We affirm, however, the district court’s holding that the $478.55 fee overcharge to Sullivan was unconstitutional . . .

SULLIVAN v. CITY OF AUGUSTA,, 406 F. Supp. 2d 92 (D. Me. 2005)

. . . Sullivan $478.55 more than its actual overtime payments. PSMF at ¶ 44; RPSF at ¶ 44. . . .

In LUMBER INCORPORATED,, 124 F. Supp. 302 (D. Or. 1954)

. . . the claims filed in this proceeding may be classified as follows: (a) Priority tax claims (paid) $ 478.55 . . .