Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 480.044 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 480.044 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 480.044

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 480
MASSAGE THERAPY PRACTICE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 480.044
480.044 Fees; disposition.
(1) The board shall set fees according to the following schedule:
(a) Massage therapist application and examination fee: not to exceed $250.
(b) Massage therapist initial licensure fee: not to exceed $150.
(c) Establishment application fee: not to exceed $200.
(d) Establishment licensure fee: not to exceed $150.
(e) Biennial establishment renewal fee: not to exceed $150.
(f) Biennial massage therapist licensure renewal fee: not to exceed $200.
(g) Massage therapist reexamination fee: not to exceed $250.
(h) Fee for apprentice: not to exceed $100.
(i) Colonics examination fee: not to exceed $100.
(j) Colonics reexamination fee: not to exceed $100.
(k) Application and reactivation for inactive status of a massage therapist license fee: not to exceed $250.
(l) Renewal fee for inactive status: not to exceed $250.
(2) The department shall impose a late fee not to exceed $150 on a delinquent renewal of a massage establishment license.
(3) The board may establish by rule an application fee not to exceed $100 for anyone seeking approval to provide continuing education courses and may provide by rule for a fee not to exceed $50 for renewal of providership.
(4) The department is authorized to charge the cost of any original license or permit, as set forth in this chapter, for the issuance of any duplicate licenses or permits requested by any massage therapist or massage establishment.
(5) All moneys collected by the department from fees authorized by this act shall be paid into the Medical Quality Assurance Trust Fund in the department and shall be applied in accordance with the provisions of s. 456.025. The Legislature may appropriate any excess moneys from this fund to the General Revenue Fund.
History.s. 13, ch. 78-436; ss. 13, 15, 25, 30, 34, 55, 62, ch. 80-406; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 7, 12, 13, ch. 85-280; s. 24, ch. 88-205; s. 54, ch. 89-162; s. 55, ch. 89-374; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 157, ch. 97-264; s. 127, ch. 98-166; s. 187, ch. 2000-160.

F.S. 480.044 on Google Scholar

F.S. 480.044 on Casetext

Amendments to 480.044


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 480.044
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 480.044.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 480.044

Total Results: 10

DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFC., O/B/O SABRINA K. SAJET v. BILL OLSON JEAN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-13

Snippet: FMCE-04- 000962 (44), FMCE-13-011756 (44), FMCE-10-000480 (44), FMCE-15- 012067 (44), FMCE-97-013149 (44),

Brown, Et Ux. v. City of Palatka

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-03-04

Citation: 181 So. 529, 132 Fla. 260

Snippet: Fla. 192, 105 So.2d 404; Lowe v. DeLaney, 54 Fla. 480,44 So.2d 710." We have examined the evidence adduced

Picot v. Picot

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-03-29

Citation: 173 So. 433, 127 Fla. 591, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1493

Snippet: Higgins, 19 Fla. 103; Lowe v. DeLaney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 Sou. Rep. 710; Brooks v. Miami Bank Trust Co.

Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-05-29

Citation: 155 So. 157, 115 Fla. 141, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1472

Snippet: Fla. 470, 27 So. 297; Lowe v. DeLaney,54 Fla. 480, 44 So. 710; Buch v. All Parties, 86 Fla. 86,97 So

Mitchell v. Mason

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-07-24

Citation: 105 So. 404, 90 Fla. 192

Snippet: 23 South. Rep. 591; Lowe v. DeLaney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 South. Rep. 710. Even if the appeal as taken with

McJunkins v. Stevens

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-01-08

Citation: 88 Fla. 559, 1925 Fla. LEXIS 496, 102 So. 756

Snippet: new parties appellant” (Lowe v. Delaney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 South. Rep. 710), nor is the entry of the appeal

Buck v. All Parties Claiming Interest in the Property Involved as Heirs, Devisees, Grantees or Other Under Mitchel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-06-20

Citation: 86 Fla. 86, 97 So. 313

Snippet: Rep. 13. In the case of Lowe v. DeLaney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 South. Rep. 710, this court held that an amendment

Vincent v. Hines

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-04-21

Citation: 79 Fla. 564, 84 So. 614

Snippet: 27 South. Rep. 297; Lowe v. DeLaney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 South. Rep. 710. Assuming that M. L. Yincent alone

Gifford v. Plummer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-05-14

Citation: 73 Fla. 1065, 75 So. 536

Snippet: for W. P. Gifford.” In Lowe v. DeLaney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 South. Rep. 710. we held: “The use of the Latin

Todd v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1914-07-01

Citation: 68 Fla. 205

Snippet: 58 South. Rep. 186; Lowe v. De Laney, 54 Fla. 480, 44 South. Rep. 710; State ex rel., Andreu v. Canfield