Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 495.001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 495.001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 495.001

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 495
REGISTRATION AND PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 495.001
495.001 Short title.This chapter may be cited as the “Registration and Protection of Trademarks Act.”
History.s. 1, ch. 2006-191.

F.S. 495.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 495.001 on Casetext

Amendments to 495.001


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 495.001
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 495.001.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 495.001

Total Results: 20

Rodriguez and Caballero v. Ocean Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-23

Citation: 208 So. 3d 221, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476

Snippet: favor of Ocean Bank (a) for a deficiency of $196,495.01 following a sale of the Rodriguezes’ property and

MW v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-05-04

Citation: 756 So. 2d 90, 2000 WL 551038

Snippet: treatment programs. See §§ 394.492(5)-(7), .493(1), .495(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). Under the Department's

Cohen v. Dauphinee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-15

Citation: 739 So. 2d 68, 1999 WL 236248

Snippet: § 12, at 1196, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 768.495(1), Fla. Stat. (1987)). Good faith could be substantiated

Citron v. Shell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-03-26

Citation: 689 So. 2d 1288, 1997 WL 133789

Snippet: investigation and certification requirements of section 768.495(1). We note, however, that counsel for the defendants

Kukral v. Mekras

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-06-13

Citation: 679 So. 2d 278, 1996 WL 316134

Snippet: investigation and certification requirements of section 768.495(1) is not jurisdictional. Id. at 224. This same rule

In Re Estate of Danese

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-07-29

Citation: 641 So. 2d 423, 1994 WL 391336

Snippet: file a claim pursuant to Florida Probate Rule 5.495.[1] The creditor alleged that despite his status as

Comnenos v. Family Practice Medical Group, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-14

Citation: 588 So. 2d 629, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10027, 1991 WL 204593

Snippet: 1986 complaint, thus satisfying the section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes (1985), requirements of “reasonable

Ingersoll v. Hoffman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-09-26

Citation: 589 So. 2d 223, 1991 WL 188305

Snippet: respect to Warren Hoffman as required by section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes (1987). The certified question

Williams v. Brochu

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-25

Citation: 578 So. 2d 491, 1991 WL 61807

Snippet: 00 per hour equals $5,315.00, a difference of *495 $1,085. Rather than remanding for further judicial

Hospital Corp. of America v. Lindberg

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-12-06

Citation: 571 So. 2d 446, 1990 WL 198320

Snippet: investigation and certification requirements of section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes (1985). The defendants argued

Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. v. Hegwood

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-10-11

Citation: 569 So. 2d 1295, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7775, 1990 WL 152595

Snippet: as disciplinary review by the Florida Bar. § 768.495(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). This restriction could foreclose

Ingersoll v. Hoffman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-04-10

Citation: 561 So. 2d 324, 1990 WL 40352

Snippet: in accordance with the provisions of Section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes (1987), was ever supplied as

Lindberg v. Hosp. Corp. of America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-07-12

Citation: 545 So. 2d 1384, 1989 WL 75737

Snippet: (1985) and by failing to comply with section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes (1985). The motions also alleged

Jones v. Mental Health Services of Orange County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-15

Citation: 544 So. 2d 1177, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1477, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3407, 1989 WL 64697

Snippet: appellees, which awards were made under section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes which provides in pertinent part:

Cardenas v. Miami-Dade Yellow Cab Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-01-31

Citation: 538 So. 2d 491, 1989 WL 6168

Snippet: any of the following provisions by the insurer: *495 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i) ...;[1] (b) By the commission

Nash v. Humana Sun Bay Community Hosp., Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-06-17

Citation: 526 So. 2d 1036, 1988 WL 60470

Snippet: faith in the complaint as required by section 768.495(1), Florida Statutes (1985). The appellees, however

Whitehall Boca v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & R. SERV.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-05

Citation: 456 So. 2d 928

Snippet: facilities and health service providers, section 381.495(1), and to issue, revoke, or deny certificates of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-05-28

Snippet: with the training program provided for in s. 163.495(1), F.S., and the qualifications for employment prescribed

Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-11-21

Citation: 135 So. 2d 26

Snippet: lubricating oils at retail in Florida, that Section 495.01[2] precludes Standard from claiming any right to

General Telephone Company of Florida v. Carter

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-11-13

Citation: 115 So. 2d 554, 31 P.U.R.3d 497

Snippet: "additional gross revenue in the sum of $1,620,495".[1] (4) Thus, the petitioner is entitled to increase