Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 499.015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 499.015 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 499.015

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 499.015
499.015 Registration of drugs and devices; issuance of certificates of free sale.
1(1)(a) Except for those persons exempted from the definition of manufacturer in s. 499.003, any person who manufactures, packages, repackages, labels, or relabels a drug or device in this state must register such drug or device biennially with the department; pay a fee in accordance with the fee schedule provided by s. 499.041; and comply with this section. The registrant must list each separate and distinct drug or device at the time of registration.
(b) The department may not register any product that does not comply with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, or Title 21 C.F.R. Registration of a product by the department does not mean that the product does in fact comply with all provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended.
(2) The department may require the submission of a catalog and specimens of labels at the time of application for registration of drugs or devices packaged and prepared in compliance with the federal act, which submission constitutes a satisfactory compliance for registration of the products. With respect to all other drugs and devices, the department may require the submission of a catalog and specimens of labels at the time of application for registration, but the registration will not become effective until the department has examined and approved the label of the drug or device. This approval or denial must include written notification to the manufacturer.
(3) Except for those persons exempted from the definition of manufacturer in s. 499.003, a person may not sell any product that he or she has failed to register in conformity with this section. Such failure to register subjects such drug or device to seizure and condemnation as provided in s. 499.062, and subjects such person to the penalties and remedies provided in this part.
(4) Unless a registration is renewed, it expires 2 years after the last day of the month in which it was issued. Any product registration issued or renewed on or after July 1, 2016, shall expire on the same date as the manufacturer or repackager permit of the person seeking to register the product. If the first product registration issued to a person on or after July 1, 2016, expires less than 366 days after issuance, the fee for product registration shall be $15. If the first product registration issued to a person on or after July 1, 2016, expires more than 365 days after issuance, the fee for product registration shall be $30. The department may issue a stop-sale notice or order against a person that is subject to the requirements of this section and that fails to comply with this section within 31 days after the date the registration expires. The notice or order shall prohibit such person from selling or causing to be sold any drugs or devices covered by this part until he or she complies with the requirements of this section.
(5) A product regulated under this section which is not included in the biennial registration may not be sold until it is registered and complies with this section.
(6) The department may issue a certificate of free sale for any product that is required to be registered under this part.
(7) A product registration is valid only for the company named on the registration and located at the address on the registration. A person whose product is registered by the department under this section must notify the department before any change in the name or address of the establishment to which the product is registered. If a person whose product is registered ceases conducting business, the person must notify the department before closing the business.
(8) Notwithstanding any requirements set forth in this part, a manufacturer of medical devices that is registered with the federal Food and Drug Administration is exempt from this section and s. 499.041(6) if:
(a) The manufacturer’s medical devices are approved for marketing by, or listed with the federal Food and Drug Administration in accordance with federal law for commercial distribution; or
(b) The manufacturer subcontracts with a manufacturer of medical devices to manufacture components of such devices.
(9) However, the manufacturer must submit evidence of such registration, listing, or approval with its initial application for a permit to do business in this state, as required in s. 499.01, and any changes to such information previously submitted at the time of renewal of the permit. Evidence of approval, listing, and registration by the federal Food and Drug Administration must include:
(a) For Class II devices, a copy of the premarket notification letter (510K);
(b) For Class III devices, a federal Food and Drug Administration premarket approval number;
(c) For a manufacturer who subcontracts with a manufacturer of medical devices to manufacture components of such devices, a federal Food and Drug Administration registration number; or
(d) For a manufacturer of medical devices whose devices are exempt from premarket approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, a federal Food and Drug Administration registration number.
History.s. 34, ch. 82-225; s. 110, ch. 83-218; s. 1, ch. 83-265; s. 3, ch. 84-115; ss. 20, 52, ch. 92-69; s. 587, ch. 97-103; s. 36, ch. 98-151; s. 1, ch. 99-165; s. 41, ch. 2000-242; s. 12, ch. 2000-326; s. 18, ch. 2001-63; s. 33, ch. 2001-89; s. 88, ch. 2004-5; s. 18, ch. 2008-207; s. 63, ch. 2009-21; s. 36, ch. 2014-89; s. 10, ch. 2016-212; s. 33, ch. 2017-3; s. 1, ch. 2017-51; s. 8, ch. 2019-99.
1Note.Section 11, ch. 2019-99, which was codified as s. 499.02851, provides in part that “[i]mplementation of sections 2 through 10 of this act is contingent upon authorization granted under federal law, rule, or approval.” If the contingency occurs, subsection (1), as amended by s. 8, ch. 2019-99, will read:

(1)(a) Except for those persons exempted from the definition of manufacturer in s. 499.003, any person who manufactures, packages, repackages, labels, or relabels a drug or device in this state must register such drug or device biennially with the department; pay a fee in accordance with the fee schedule provided by s. 499.041; and comply with this section. The registrant must list each separate and distinct drug or device at the time of registration.

(b) The department may not register any product that does not comply with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, or Title 21 C.F.R. Registration of a product by the department does not mean that the product does in fact comply with all provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended.

(c) Registration under this section is not required for prescription drugs imported under the International Prescription Drug Importation Program established in s. 499.0285.

F.S. 499.015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.015 on Casetext

Amendments to 499.015


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.015
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 499.015.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 499.015

Total Results: 14

Scoggins v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-01-21

Citation: 726 So. 2d 762, 1999 WL 20560

Snippet: 115 (Ark.1955); People v. Proctor, 4 Cal.4th 499, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 340, 842 P.2d 1100, 1122 (1992), aff'd

George A. Hormel & Co. v. Ackman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-09-17

Citation: 158 So. 171, 117 Fla. 419

Snippet: the facts of this case. McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 So. 231; Houston v. Bradford, 35 Fla. 490, 17 So

State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Avon Park

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-12-22

Citation: 151 So. 701, 117 Fla. 556

Snippet: of the judge himself. McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 So. 231; DeSoto Holding Company v. Boyer, 85 Fla

Vanderpool v. Spruell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-02-24

Citation: 139 So. 892, 104 Fla. 347

Snippet: decision. In the case of McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499,15 Sou. Rep. 231, this Court has held in effect that

DeSoto Holding Co. v. Boyer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-06-11

Citation: 85 Fla. 517, 97 So. 205

Snippet: motion for new trial. See McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231; Charlotte Harbor & N. R. Co. v

Live Oak, Perry & Gulf Railroad v. Holmes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-04-28

Citation: 85 Fla. 463, 96 So. 400

Snippet: 43 South. Rep. 755; McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231. Upon authority of these eases

Lanier v. Shayne

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-02-23

Citation: 85 Fla. 212, 95 So. 617

Snippet: term.” In the case of McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231, this court said: “What the judge

McClellan v. Wood

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-11-10

Citation: 78 Fla. 407, 83 So. 295

Snippet: 378, 80 South. Rep. 52; McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231. See also Aspen M. & S. Co. v.

Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. Buchan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-04-28

Citation: 71 Fla. 575, 71 So. 842

Snippet: heard in vacation. See McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231; Sec. 1343 Compiled Laws of 1914

Florida Railway Co. v. Dorsey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1910-01-15

Citation: 59 Fla. 260

Snippet: continued during a term. See McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla., 499, 15 South. Rep., 231. The judgment is affirmed. Taylor

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Mallard

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 515

Snippet: trial. In the case of McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231, we have held in effect that where

West v. Fleming

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-06-15

Citation: 36 Fla. 298

Snippet: plea of Henry Tison (McGee vs. Ancrum, 33 Fla., 499; 15 South. Rep. 231), still' no judgment should have

Houstoun v. Bradford & Ross

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-01-15

Citation: 35 Fla. 490

Snippet: heard or considered. In McGee vs. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 South. Rep. 231, the affidavit of illegality alleged

Crawford v. Feder

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1894-06-15

Citation: 34 Fla. 397

Snippet: L’Engle, 19 Fla., 714; McGee vs. Ancrum, 33 Fla.,. 499, 15 South. Rep., 231), a serious question presents-itself