Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 499.041 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 499.041 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 499.041

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 499.041
499.041 Schedule of fees for drug, device, and cosmetic applications and permits, product registrations, and free-sale certificates.
(1) The department shall assess applicants requiring a manufacturing permit an annual fee within the ranges established in this section for the specific type of manufacturer.
(a) The fee for a prescription drug manufacturer permit may not be less than $500 or more than $750 annually.
(b) The fee for a device manufacturer permit may not be less than $500 or more than $600 annually.
(c) The fee for a cosmetic manufacturer permit shall be sufficient to cover the costs of administering the cosmetic manufacturer permit program.
(d) The fee for an over-the-counter drug manufacturer permit may not be less than $300 or more than $400 annually.
(e) The fee for a prescription drug repackager permit may not be less than $500 or more than $750 annually.
(f) A manufacturer may not be required to pay more than one fee per establishment to obtain an additional manufacturing permit, but each manufacturer must pay the highest fee applicable to his or her operation in each establishment.
(2) The department shall assess an applicant that is required to have a wholesaling permit an annual fee within the ranges established in this section for the specific type of wholesaling.
(a) The fee for a prescription drug wholesale distributor permit may not be less than $300 or more than $800 annually.
(b) The fee for an out-of-state prescription drug wholesale distributor permit may not be less than $300 or more than $800 annually.
(c) The fee for a nonresident prescription drug manufacturer permit may not be less than $300 or more than $500 annually.
(d) The fee for a retail pharmacy drug wholesale distributor permit may not be less than $35 or more than $50 annually.
(e) The fee for a freight forwarder permit may not be less than $200 or more than $300 annually.
(f) The fee for a veterinary prescription drug wholesale distributor permit may not be less than $300 or more than $500 annually.
(g) The fee for a limited prescription drug veterinary wholesale distributor permit may not be less than $300 or more than $500 annually.
(h) The fee for a third party logistics provider permit may not be less than $200 or more than $300 annually.
(3) The department shall assess an applicant that is required to have a retail establishment permit an annual fee within the ranges established in this section for the specific type of retail establishment.
(a) The fee for a veterinary prescription drug retail establishment permit may not be less than $200 or more than $300 annually.
(b) The fee for a health care clinic establishment permit may not be less than $125 or more than $250 annually.
(4) The department shall assess an applicant that is required to have a restricted prescription drug distributor permit an annual fee of not less than $200 or more than $300.
(5) In addition to the fee charged for a permit required by this part, the department shall assess applicants an initial application fee of $150 for each new permit issued by the department which requires an onsite inspection.
(6) A person that is required to register drugs or devices under s. 499.015 shall pay an annual product registration fee of not less than $5 or more than $15 for each separate and distinct product in package form. The registration fee is in addition to the fee charged for a free-sale certificate.
(7) The department shall assess an applicant that requests a free-sale certificate a fee of $25. A fee of $2 will be charged for each signature copy of a free-sale certificate that is obtained at the same time the free-sale certificate is issued.
(8) The department shall assess an out-of-state prescription drug wholesale distributor applicant or permittee an onsite inspection fee of not less than $1,000 or more than $3,000 annually, to be based on the actual cost of the inspection if an onsite inspection is performed by agents of the department.
(9) The department shall assess each person applying for certification as a designated representative a fee of $150, plus the cost of processing the criminal history record check.
(10) The department shall assess other fees as provided in this part.
History.s. 34, ch. 82-225; s. 116, ch. 83-218; s. 1, ch. 83-265; ss. 10, 14, ch. 88-159; s. 4, ch. 89-296; ss. 35, 52, ch. 92-69; s. 591, ch. 97-103; s. 16, ch. 2000-326; s. 20, ch. 2003-155; s. 5, ch. 2004-328; s. 5, ch. 2006-92; s. 27, ch. 2008-207; s. 6, ch. 2014-89; s. 3, ch. 2017-51.

F.S. 499.041 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.041 on Casetext

Amendments to 499.041


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.041
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 499.041.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 499.041

Total Results: 4

Armstrong v. Richards

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-05-28

Citation: 175 So. 340, 128 Fla. 561

Snippet: Gillespie, et al., v. Gibbs, et al., 147 Ala. 499, 41 So. 868, the Supreme Court of Alabama said: "The

State Ex Rel. Floyd v. Noel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-07-20

Citation: 169 So. 549, 124 Fla. 852

Snippet: 159, 89 P. 987; Bloss v. Lewis, 109 Cal. 493, 499, 41 P. 1081; State of Ohio, ex rel. Lloyd, v. Dollison

State Ex Rel. Bennett v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-03-12

Citation: 166 So. 565, 123 Fla. 252

Snippet: Cal. A. 159, 89 P. 987; Bloss v. Lewis, 109 Cal. 499, 41 P. 1081; Ohio, ex rel. Lloyd, v. Dollison, 194

Byrne Realty Co. v. South Florida Farms Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-06-06

Citation: 81 Fla. 805

Snippet: See, however, Emmet County v. Allen, 76 Iowa 499, 41 N. W. Rep. 201, as upholding the validity of such