Florida Statute 499.035 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 499.035

499.035 Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); labeling and advertising.—

(1) Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) not approved for drug use must be clearly marked in at least 12-point boldfaced type: “May be unsafe. Not approved for human use.”

(2) All advertisements for the sale of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) not approved for drug use must contain, within the advertisement and in bold lettering, the following statement: “Warning. May be unsafe. Not approved for human use.”

History.—s. 34, ch. 82-225; s. 26, ch. 82-402; s. 1, ch. 83-265; ss. 32, 52, ch. 92-69; ss. 1, 5, 8, ch. 94-309.

F.S. 499.035 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.035 on Casetext

Amendments to 499.035

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.035

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 499.035.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 499.035

Total Results: 12

Brown v. Estate of Stuckey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-08-26

Citation: 749 So. 2d 490, 1999 WL 669205

Snippet: over the next five to six years to be between *499 $35,000 and $40,000. Even assuming Mrs. Stuckey's projection

Powell v. Etter Powell v. Etter

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-11-20

Citation: 10 So. 2d 441, 151 Fla. 866

Snippet: Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Tilgham, 237 U.S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. 653, 59 L.Ed. 1069; Davis v. Cain, 86

Loftin v. Crowley's Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-06-23

Citation: 8 So. 2d 909, 150 Fla. 836, 142 A.L.R. 626, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1090

Snippet: 56 Law Ed. 327, S.A.L. Ry. v. Tilgham,237 U.S. 499, 35, Sup. Ct. 653, 59 Law Ed. 1069, Secs. 7051-2 C

State Ex Rel. Gallaway v. Henderson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-10-31

Citation: 184 So. 654, 134 Fla. 731

Snippet: be paid in five equal annual installments of $20,499.35. It was agreed in the contract that all deferred

Powell v. Jackson Grain Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-10-24

Citation: 184 So. 492, 134 Fla. 596, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1149

Snippet: 688, 74 So. 799; S.A.L. v. Tilghman,237 U.S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. 653, 59 L. Ed. 1069; Davis v. Cain, 86

Peninsular Telephone Co. v. Dority

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-04-26

Citation: 174 So. 446, 128 Fla. 106, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1224

Snippet: 136 So. 639; S.A.L. Ry. v. Tilghman,237 U.S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. 653. "Where damages are to be apportioned

Germak v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-05-30

Citation: 117 So. 391, 95 Fla. 991

Snippet: So.2d 799; S. A. L. Ry. v. Tighlman, 237 U.S. 499, 35 Sup Ct. 654, 57 L.Ed. 1096, Ann Cas. 1914 C. 172;

Triay v. Seals

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-07-21

Citation: 109 So. 427, 92 Fla. 310

Snippet: negligence. Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilgham, 237 U.S. 499,35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 635; Norfolk W. R. Co. v. Earnest

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shouse

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-02-02

Citation: 83 Fla. 156, 91 So. 90

Snippet: 982; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U. S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653. If liability appears and the

Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-04-12

Citation: 81 Fla. 512, 88 So. 303

Snippet: 799; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U. S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653. The presumption of negligence

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Good

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-04-24

Citation: 79 Fla. 589, 84 So. 733

Snippet: 654; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U. S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v

Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Callan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-03-21

Citation: 73 Fla. 688, 74 So. 799

Snippet: 1914; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Tilghman, 237 U. S. 499, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653; Newkirk v. Pryor, — Mo. —, 183