Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 501.213 (2025)
Effect on other remedies.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
501.213 Effect on other remedies.—
(1) The remedies of this part are in addition to remedies otherwise available for the same conduct under state or local law.
(2) This part is supplemental to, and makes no attempt to preempt, local consumer protection ordinances not inconsistent with this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: MacK v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 673 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
MacK v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 673 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). “For example, the cumulative remedy provision of Florida's DTPA, section 501.213, Florida Statutes (1993), as well as the cumulative remedy provision of the Florida Antitrust Act, [9] are very different from the cumulative remedy provisions in the similar Texas statutes.”
Comptech Intern., Inc. v. Milam Com. Park, Ltd., 753 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 1999). “As we stated above, the Legislature has made it abundantly clear in unambiguous language that the statutory remedy for violation of the building code is available "notwithstanding any other civil remedies available.”
JDI HOLDINGS, LLC v. Jet Mgmt., Inc., 732 F. Supp. 2d 1205 (N.D. Fla. 2010). “FDUTPA is a separate cause of action intended to be an additional remedy, see Fla. Stat. § 501.213 (1), and it is aimed toward making consumers whole for losses caused by fraudulent consumer practices.”
In re Santa Fe Nat. Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 288 F. Supp. 3d 1087 (D.N.M. 2017). “§ 6-1-105 (c) ; Fla. Stat. § 501.213 ; Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.”
Delgado v. Jw Courtesy Pont. Gmc-truck, 693 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). “" § 501.213(1). We note at this juncture that the 1973 provisions of the FDUTPA which we have quoted and analyzed are found virtually word for word in the 1991 version which is at issue in this case.”
Tempay, Inc. v. Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLC, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 2013). “” Fla. Stat. § 501.213 (1). . Defendants raised as an "affirmative defense” that Count VI of the Amended Complaint (Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses incorrectly refer to Count VII of the Amended Complaint) failed to state a claim because TemPay failed to allege that they engaged…”
Pinellas Cnty., Etc. v. Castle, 392 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1980). “Specifically, section 501.213 of the Little FTC Act provides: (1) The remedies of this part are in addition to remedies otherwise available for the same conduct under state or local law.”
Gardner v. Nimnicht Chevrolet Co., 532 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “Further, section 501.213 states that the remedies of the Act are in addition to those remedies otherwise available for the same conduct under either state or local law.”
— 501.213(1) — 2 cases
Comptech Intern., Inc. v. Milam Com. Park, Ltd., 753 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 1999). “As we stated above, the Legislature has made it abundantly clear in unambiguous language that the statutory remedy for violation of the building code is available "notwithstanding any other civil remedies available.”
Delgado v. Jw Courtesy Pont. Gmc-truck, 693 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). “" § 501.213(1). We note at this juncture that the 1973 provisions of the FDUTPA which we have quoted and analyzed are found virtually word for word in the 1991 version which is at issue in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.