The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Plaintiff claims that it should be classified as semiprecious stones under item 520.39 of the TSUS and . . . is a semiprecious stone within the meaning of that term, and is properly described as such in item 520.39 . . .
. . . Item 520.39 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, with duty at the . . .
. . . semiprecious stones, cut but not set, and suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry, under item 520.39 . . . semiprecious stones, cut but not set, and suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry: * * * * * X 520.39 . . . prohibits the classification of jewelry under that subpart, thus precluding classification under item 520.39 . . .
. . . semiprecious stones, out but not set, and suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry, under item 520.39 . . . semiprecious stones, cut but not set, and suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry: * # * * * # * 520.39 . . . prohibits the classification of jewelry under that subpart, thus precluding classification under item 520.39 . . .
. . . semiprecious stones, cut but not set, and suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry: Hi Hi H< ❖ ❖ Hi Hi 520.39 . . . we do not reach the question whether carved ivory is a semiprecious stone within the meaning of item 520.39 . . .