Florida Statute 520.69 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 520
RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 520.69

520.69 Scope of license authority; scope of provisions.—

(1) All persons engaged in the home improvement business as defined herein shall be required to obtain a license under this act as well as any other licenses required by law.

(2) No mortgage broker’s license shall be required pursuant to chapter 494 of a person whose business is exclusively in home improvement contracts or related instruments.

(3) This act may not be construed to limit or restrict the power of a city or county to regulate the quality, performance, or character of work of contractors, including requiring submission to and approval by the city or county of plans and specifications for an installation before commencement of construction of the installation, inspection of work done, and regulation by a system of permits and inspections which are designed to secure compliance with, and aid in the enforcement of, applicable state and local building laws, or enforcement of other laws necessary for the protection of the public health and safety.

(4) Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize a city or county to enact ordinances or regulations relating to the qualifications necessary to engage in the home improvement business.

History.—s. 1, ch. 69-44; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 21, ch. 80-256; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 35, 36, ch. 90-103; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 520.69 on Google Scholar

F.S. 520.69 on Casetext

Amendments to 520.69

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 520.69

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 520.69.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 520.69

Total Results: 4

Hendrick v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-02-14

Citation: 575 So. 2d 709, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1244, 1991 WL 17926

Snippet: safeguards. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U.S. 520, 69 S.Ct. 275, 93 L.Ed 208 (1949); Minneapolis, St

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Jackson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-12-23

Citation: 256 So. 2d 568, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5592

Snippet: . See Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U.S. 520, 69 S.Ct. 275, 93 L.Ed. 208, 210 (1949), stating: “Liability

DeLoach v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-03-13

Citation: 232 So. 2d 765, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859

Snippet: this Court. The appeals in cases Nos. 69-519, 69-520, 69-521, 69-522, 69-523, 69-524, 69-525, 69-526 and

Laughlin v. Loftin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-12-22

Citation: 62 So. 2d 745, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1936

Snippet: 614; Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U.S. 520, 69 S.Ct. 275, 93 L.Ed. 208. In Camp v. Atlantic Coast