Syfert Injury Law Firm

S.M., the Mother v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-03

Snippet: condition for return as required by section 39.521(2). As a result, the Mother

Florida Department of Children & Families v. S.D.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-16

Citation: 983 So. 2d 655, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6963, 2008 WL 2066612

Snippet: placement to be in the child’s best interest. See § 39.521(2)(r), Fla. Stat. (2007). The trial court departed

JH v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-12-30

Citation: 890 So. 2d 476, 2004 WL 3015096

Snippet: (2) a home study by the department, section 39.521(2)(r), Florida Statutes. The order at arraignment

Department of Children and Families v. TL

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-09-17

Citation: 854 So. 2d 819, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13982, 2003 WL 22136255

Snippet: pursuant to this chapter. (emphasis added). Section 39.521(2)(r) provides the home study criteria required by

HP v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-01-10

Citation: 838 So. 2d 583, 2003 WL 69505

Snippet: with the parent after a home study. Section 39.521(2)(r) places the burden on DCF to conduct the study

Availability, Inc. v. Riley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-08-27

Citation: 336 So. 2d 668, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15373

Snippet: Inc. v. Snodgrass (Fla.App.2d, 1976), 333 So.2d 521. [2] See Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth (Fla. 1974)

Huffman v. Radiation, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-05-15

Citation: 294 So. 2d 645, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3955

Snippet: the left foot entitling him to compensation for 521/2 weeks.” It is our view from a careful review of

South Florida Art Theaters, Inc. v. State ex rel. Mounts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-06-19

Citation: 224 So. 2d 706, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5558

Snippet: motion picture films permitted by § 521.02.” F.S. 1967, Section 521.02, F.S.A., provides that no motion

SOUTH FLA. ART THEATERS, INC. v. State Ex Rel. Mounts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-06-19

Citation: 224 So. 2d 706

Snippet: motion picture films permitted by § 521.02." F.S. 1967, Section 521.02, F.S.A., provides that no motion

Central Theatres, Inc. v. State ex rel. Braren

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-02-21

Citation: 161 So. 2d 558

Snippet: heading, “Exhibition of Motion Pictures.” In Sec. 521.-02 it is provided that it is unlawful for any person

Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Jaeger

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-04-01

Citation: 119 So. 2d 689, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2385

Snippet: disability of the body as a whole, constituting 521/2 weeks to be paid in excess of the 10 per cent permanent

Nolan v. Lunsford

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-04-30

Citation: 196 So. 193, 142 Fla. 671, 128 A.L.R. 649, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1437

Snippet: case of Walker v. Close,98 Fla. 1103, 125 So. 521; (2) Sun City Holding Co. v. Schoenfeld, 97 Fla. 777