Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 522.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 522.04 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 522.04

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 522
COMMISSION MERCHANTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 522.04
522.04 Liability of broker in case of failure to return account sales.In any suit for accounting against any person, doing the business of fruit or produce broker or commission merchant receiving pineapples in carlots or less, grown in this state for shipment or consignment, and who has not returned an account sales showing the cost and expenses charged against the returns, with the name and address of the purchaser, within 10 days of the sale, such person shall be held accountable to the shipper or consignee of said carlots, or less, of fruit for the full market price at the time of the receipt by such person of the said shipment or consignment.
History.s. 5, ch. 6235, 1911; RGS 4941; CGL 7028.

F.S. 522.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 522.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 522.04


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 522.04
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 522.04.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 522.04

Total Results: 7

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES v. M.D., THE MOTHER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-18

Snippet: from the mother’s home pursuant to section 39.522(4), Florida Statutes (2020), due to safety concerns

Surna Construction, Inc. v. Morrill

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-03

Citation: 50 So. 3d 47, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18334, 2010 WL 4903569

Snippet: land or the common element of a subdivision. § 197.522(4)(h), Fla. Stat. (2007).2 Pursuant to section 197

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2001-07-17

Snippet: 2 621 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). 3 Id. at 522. 4 See, Taylor v. Tampa Electric Co., 356 So.2d 260

State v. Brady

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-08-19

Citation: 745 So. 2d 954, 1999 WL 628779

Snippet: (quoting Coston, 139 Fla. at 253-54, 190 So. at 522). [4] Several jurisdictions have applied the doctrine

Pallas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-05-03

Citation: 636 So. 2d 1358, 1994 WL 162755

Snippet: States v. Raines, [362 U.S. 17, 21, 80 S.Ct. 519, [522], 4 L.Ed.2d 524 (1960)], we noted the "incontrovertible

Moorman v. DEPT. OF COMM. AFFAIRS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-11-23

Citation: 626 So. 2d 1108, 1993 WL 482186

Snippet: States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17, 21, 80 S.Ct. 519, 522, 4 L.Ed.2d 524 (1960)), based upon the record before

Lewis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-24

Citation: 597 So. 2d 842, 1992 WL 55233

Snippet: Hunter, 586 So.2d at 319 and Cruz 465 So.2d at 522. [4] new entrapment statute codifies the subjective