The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 532
DEVICES ISSUED IN PAYMENT FOR LABOR

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 532

DEVICES ISSUED IN PAYMENT FOR LABOR

532.01 Payment by check, draft, or other order for payment.

532.02 Payment by other device.

532.04 Payment by direct deposit of funds.

532.01 Payment by check, draft, or other order for payment.—Any order, check, draft, note, memorandum, payroll debit card, or other acknowledgment of indebtedness issued in payment of wages or salary due or to become due must be negotiable and payable in cash, on demand, without discount, at some established place of business in the state, the name and address of which must appear on the instrument or in the payroll debit card issuing materials, and at the time of its issuance, and for a reasonable time thereafter, which must be at least 30 days, the maker or drawer must have sufficient funds or credit, arrangement, or understanding with the drawee for its payment.

History.—s. 1, ch. 6914, 1915; RGS 2522; CGL 3944; s. 1, ch. 18004, 1937; s. 1, ch. 71-324; s. 3, ch. 2009-140.

532.02 Payment by other device.—Any person issuing coupons, punch-outs, tickets, tokens, or other device in lieu of cash as payment for labor, whether redeemable either wholly or partially in goods or merchandise, at the person’s or any other place of business, shall, on demand of any legal holder thereof:

(1) Be liable for the full face value thereof in current money of the United States, on or after the 30th day succeeding the day of issuance.

(2) Be liable for payment in current money of the United States, notwithstanding any contrary stipulation or provision, which may be therein contained.

(3) Be subject to suit brought thereon in any court of competent jurisdiction, upon failure to comply with either subsection (1) or subsection (2), wherein any legal holder’s recovery shall include the full face value of any such device, with legal interest from demand and, in the court’s discretion, 10 percent of said amount as attorney’s fees in the same suit.

History.—s. 2, ch. 6914, 1915; RGS 2523; CGL 3945; s. 1, ch. 71-324; s. 732, ch. 97-103.

532.04 Payment by direct deposit of funds.—

(1) None of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed or construed to prohibit the payor of wages or salary from causing the amount of such wages or salary to be deposited directly to the account of the payee in a financial institution by electronic or other medium if such direct deposit has been authorized in writing by the payee and if the payee has designated in writing the financial institution of her or his choice in which such deposit is to be made. However, at the time the order for payment of such direct deposit is received by the drawee, the payor of such wages or salary must have sufficient funds or credit or an arrangement or understanding with the drawee for payment thereof.

(2) No employer or payor of wages or salary shall terminate the employment of any employee or payee solely for refusing to authorize such direct deposit of wages or salary.

(3) An employee or payee of wages or salary may bring a civil action against any person violating subsection (2). Upon rendition of a judgment or decree by any of the courts of this state against the person violating subsection (2) and in favor of the employee or payee of wages or salary, the trial court, or, in event of an appeal in which the employee or payee prevails, the appellate court, shall adjudge or decree against the person violating subsection (2) and in favor of the employee or payee a reasonable sum as fees for the employee’s or payee’s attorney prosecuting the suit in which the recovery is had. The court may, in its discretion, provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper, including enjoining the defendant from further violation of subsection (2). If it appears to the court that the suit brought by the plaintiff was ill-founded or brought for purposes of harassment, the plaintiff shall be liable for reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by the defendant. When so awarded, attorney’s fees shall be included in the judgment or decree rendered in the case.

History.—s. 1, ch. 77-296; s. 733, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 532 on Google Scholar

F.S. 532 on Casetext

Amendments to 532

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 532

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 532.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 140 S.Ct. 951, 205 L.Ed.2d 532 (2020). . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 445, 446 N.Y.S.2d 196, 430 N.E.2d at 1252-1253 ; In re Grand Jury Subpoenas , 72 N.Y.2d 307, 315-316, 532 . . . In re Grand Jury Subpoenas for Locals 17, 135, and 608 , 72 N.Y.2d 307, 317, 532 N.Y.S.2d 722, 528 N.E . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 532, 538-539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019). . . . S. ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 532, 538-539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019) ). . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Marketing Displays, Inc. , 532 U.S. 23, 32, 121 S.Ct. 1255, 149 L.Ed.2d 164 (2001) (internal quotation . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 532 U.S. 59, 65-66, 121 S.Ct. 1276, 149 L.Ed.2d 197 (2001). . . . Reproductive Health Services , 492 U.S. 490, 532-537, 109 S.Ct. 3040, 106 L.Ed.2d 410 (1989) (Scalia, . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Zacharie & Turner , 6 Pet. 648, 654, 8 L.Ed. 532 (1832). . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 287, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Texas , 552 U.S. 491, 532, 128 S.Ct. 1346, 170 L.Ed.2d 190 (2008) (quoting Dames & Moore v. . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ---- - ----, 139 S.Ct. 532, 538-539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019) ; see Henson v. . . . . ----, ---- - ----, 139 S.Ct. 532, 538-539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019). . . . Virginia , 518 U.S. 515, 532-534, 116 S.Ct. 2264, 135 L.Ed.2d 735 (1996). . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Singletary , 520 U.S. 518, 532, n. 4, 117 S.Ct. 1517, 137 L.Ed.2d 771 (1997) (internal quotation marks . . .

NASRALLAH, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States Attorney General , 712 F.3d 517, 532 (CA11 2013), with Wanjiru v. . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . the motion "attacks the federal court's previous resolution of a claim on the merits." 545 U.S. at 532 . . . Id. , at 532, 125 S.Ct. 2641. . . . claim that, under Gonzalez , is subject to § 2244(b)(1) and must therefore be dismissed. 545 U.S. at 532 . . . Id. , at 532, 125 S.Ct. 2641. Rule 59(e) motions can do the same. . . . statute of limitations-does not count as a habeas petition at all, and so can proceed. 545 U.S. at 532 . . .

SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, v. NEWSOM,, 140 S. Ct. 1613 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lukumi , 508 U.S. at 531-532, 113 S.Ct. 2217. . . .

WEXFORD HEALTH, v. GARRETT, 140 S. Ct. 1611 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Churner , 532 U.S. 731, 741, n. 6, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 283 U.S. 359, 367, 51 S.Ct. 532, 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931) ). . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 286-287, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 287, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001), in the manner of a common-law court . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001), the dissent's logic suggests that a . . . determine whether it displays an intent to create not just a private right but also a private remedy." 532 . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 286, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) -whether a statute "displays an . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources , 532 U.S. 598, 603, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 . . . Buckhannon , 532 U.S. at 605, 121 S.Ct. 1835. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 90-101, 408 P.3d at 525-532. We granted certiorari. 587 U. . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bishop, Criminal Procedure § 761, p. 532 (1866). . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 286-287, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted . . .

L. ALLEN, v. A. COOPER, III,, 140 S. Ct. 994 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id., at 646, 119 S.Ct. 2199 (quoting Boerne , 521 U.S. at 532, 117 S.Ct. 2157 ). . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 287, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) ; J. I. Case Co. v. . . . See Alexander , 532 U.S. at 287, 121 S.Ct. 1511 (" 'Raising up causes of action where a statute has not . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001), explicitly repudiating the precedent . . . used to support Bivens , 532 U.S. at 287, 121 S.Ct. 1511 (abrogating Borak , 377 U.S. 426, 84 S.Ct. . . . substantive federal law itself, private rights of action to enforce federal law must be created by Congress." 532 . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d at 532. . . . Supp. 2d at 532. . . .

SCHINK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 935 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Astrue, 532 F.3d 606, 609 (7th Cir. 2008) ; accord Singletary v. . . .

F. SHARPE, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Maine , 532 U.S. 742, 750-51, 121 S.Ct. 1808, 149 L.Ed.2d 968 (2001) (setting forth factors that "typically . . .

SINGH, v. P. BARR,, 935 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 532-33. In Singh's case, the IJ found that he failed to satisfy each of these factors. . . . Dec. at 526, 532-33. . . . Dec. at 532. . . . Dec. at 532. . . .

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST. LOUIS REGION, INC. P. D. O. M. S. C. I. F. A. C. O. G, v. L. PARSON,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 631 (W.D. Mo. 2019)

. . . Commissioner of the Indiana State Dept. of Health, 917 F.3d 532 (2018). . . .

BIRD, v. i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS, R., 935 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . BMG Music Publ'g , 512 F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir. 2008) ), the district court did not err in denying Bird . . .

HUEBNER, v. BRADSHAW,, 935 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Lago Vista , 532 U.S. 318, 346-55, 121 S.Ct. 1536, 149 L.Ed.2d 549 (2001) (recognizing that a . . .

BELLITTO, v. SNIPES,, 935 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 286, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001). . . .

R. PESCI, v. BUDZ, LLC, LLC,, 935 F.3d 1159 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Murphy , 532 U.S. 223, 229, 121 S.Ct. 1475, 149 L.Ed.2d 420 (2001) (quoting Turner , 482 U.S. at 89, . . . See, e.g. , Beard , 548 U.S. at 532-33, 126 S.Ct. 2572 ; Crime Justice & Am., Inc. v. . . . Shaw , 532 U.S. at 229-30, 121 S.Ct. 1475 (quoting Turner , 482 U.S. at 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254 ). . . . Beard , 548 U.S. at 532, 126 S.Ct. 2572 ("That circumstance is also inherent in the nature of the Policy . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Adams , 532 U.S. 105, 118-19, 121 S.Ct. 1302, 149 L.Ed.2d 234 (2001). . . .

R. MEIER v. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, CITY OF s St. H. St. St. St. St. G. a St. St. P. O. DSN, 934 F.3d 824 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Trs. of Hamline Univ., 747 F.3d 532, 536 (8th Cir. 2014) (holding that "a mutual understanding, or a . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dart Container Corp. of Cal. , 229 Cal.Rptr.3d 347, 411 P.3d 528, 532 (Cal. 2018). . . .

HARVILLE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, MISSISSIPPI,, 935 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Breeden , 532 U.S. 268, 273, 121 S.Ct. 1508, 149 L.Ed.2d 509 (2001). Gorman v. . . .

NEW YORK STATE CITIZENS COALITION FOR CHILDREN, v. J. POOLE,, 935 F.3d 56 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 287, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001). . . .

A. CARVELLI, v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, M. R. Jr., 934 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 288-89, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (declining to find an implied . . .

ZEHENTBAUER FAMILY LAND, LP LP v. CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L. L. C. L. L. C. E P USA,, 935 F.3d 496 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 693 F.3d 532, 536 (6th Cir. 2012) ). . . .

IN RE MATTHEWS, In In In In III,, 934 F.3d 296 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Matthews , 532 F. App'x 211 (3d Cir. 2013). . . .

IN RE JOHNSON, v., 935 F.3d 284 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Crosby , 545 U.S. at 532 n.5, 125 S.Ct. 2641. . . .

JEFFERIES, v. UNC REGIONAL PHYSICIANS PEDIATRICS, 392 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2019)

. . . Johnson, 532 F.3d 291, 297 (4th Cir. 2008) (quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. . . . of material fact through mere speculation or the building of one inference upon another.' " Emmett, 532 . . .

MUHAMMAD, v. MAYFIELD,, 933 F.3d 993 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Churner , 532 U.S. 731, 737-38, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (emphasis added); see also . . . an inmate must exhaust are the "procedural means" to relief and "not the particular relief" itself. 532 . . .

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DEERFIELD CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. J., 933 F.3d 806 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. 3d 443, 449, 126 Ill.Dec. 669, 532 N.E.2d 354 (1988) (same when insureds did not reasonably believe . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Mukasey, 532 F.3d 150, 156 (2d Cir. 2008) ("The Attorney General (or his agents) may determine that a . . . See Delgado, 648 F.3d at 1102-04 ; Gao, 595 F.3d at 554-55 ; N-A-M, 587 F.3d at 1056 ; Nethagani, 532 . . .

MARTINEAU, v. WIER, 934 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Maine , 532 U.S. 742, 749-50, 121 S.Ct. 1808, 149 L.Ed.2d 968 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted . . . 26, 29 (4th Cir. 1995) (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord New Hampshire , 532 . . . New Hampshire , 532 U.S. at 750-51, 121 S.Ct. 1808 (quoting Allen v. Zurich Ins. . . . there is a "risk of inconsistent court determinations" if she is not estopped in the district court. 532 . . . factor, it is not clear that Martineau "derive[d] an unfair advantage or impose[d] an unfair detriment," 532 . . .

PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE M. W. a F. D. S. S. a S. Y. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS J., 934 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 740, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Drywall Dynamics, Inc. , 823 F.3d 524, 532 (9th Cir. 2016) ; F.T.C. v. . . .

A. LAVITE, v. J. DUNSTAN,, 932 F.3d 1020 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Loudermill , 470 U.S. 532, 542, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). . . .

C. CHILDRESS, ALDA St. HLAA- StL A v. FOX ASSOCIATES, LLC, C. CHILDRESS, ALDA St. HLAA- StL A v. LLC,, 932 F.3d 1165 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martin, 532 U.S. 661, 675, 121 S.Ct. 1879, 149 L.Ed.2d 904 (2001) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON,, 932 F.3d 965 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 166 F.2d 532, 534 (10th Cir. 1948) ("[A]ssuming, without deciding, that appellant is . . .

CHAVEZ, De E. De De De v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 933 F.3d 186 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d at 532. . . .

J. DOHERTY, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 932 F.3d 978 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gleicher , 393 Ill.App.3d 31, 331 Ill.Dec. 711, 911 N.E.2d 532, 537 (2009) (quoting Rein, 216 Ill.Dec . . .

BERGAMATTO, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NYSA ILA PENSION FUND, 933 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Am., Inc. , 532 F.3d 940, 945 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Moran v. Aetna Life Ins. . . .

HAIDAK, v. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS- AMHERST, 933 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 283, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) (holding that there is no private . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS,, 933 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 532 U.S. 59, 121 S.Ct. 1276, 149 L.Ed.2d 197 (2001) (which holds that § 3742(e) 's deference . . . Buford , 532 U.S. at 60, 121 S.Ct. 1276. It did not answer "both." . . . standard may turn on whether an appellate court or a district court is "better position[ed]," Buford , 532 . . . Buford , 532 U.S. at 64, 121 S.Ct. 1276. . . .

KODIAK OIL GAS USA INC. HRC LLC v. BURR S. EOG S., 932 F.3d 1125 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Shirley , 532 U.S. 645, 647, 655, 121 S.Ct. 1825, 149 L.Ed.2d 889 (2001) ; then quoting Strate , 520 . . . necessary to protect tribal self-government or to control internal relations.' " Atkinson Trading , 532 . . . necessary to protect tribal self-government or to control internal relations.' " Atkinson Trading , 532 . . .

O. CAMPOS, v. COOK COUNTY,, 932 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Loudermill , 470 U.S. 532, 541, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) ; Hudson , 374 F.3d at 559. . . .

C. CORDARO, v. UNITED STATES, 933 F.3d 232 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 532 (McLaine). . . .

CANT v. M. MOODY S. S., 933 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275, 286-87, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001) ; see also Malesko , 534 U.S. . . .

HUBBELL, v. FEDEX SMARTPOST, INC., 933 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Express Corp. , 415 F.3d 516, 532-33 (6th Cir. 2005). . . .

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BANK, A N. A. CDO CDO v. LANSUPPE FEEDER, LLC,, 933 F.3d 99 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . (quoting Sandoval , 532 U.S. at 289, 121 S.Ct. 1511 ) (alterations omitted). . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. at 286, 121 S.Ct. 1511 ("[S]tatutory intent ... is determinative."). . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. at 290, 121 S.Ct. 1511. . . . See Sandoval , 532 U.S. at 286, 121 S.Ct. 1511 ("Statutory intent ... is determinative."). . . . Sandoval , 532 U.S. at 287-88, 121 S.Ct. 1511. . . .

YARBROUGH, v. DECATUR HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 931 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 291, 121 S. Ct. 1511, 1522, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001). . . .

D. TORRY, Q. I. v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 932 F.3d 579 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Nehme , 632 F.3d 526, 532 (9th Cir. 2011) ("Where the parties file cross-motions for summary judgment . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. RIVERA- CARRASQUILLO, a k a KX, a k a a k a a k a n V a k a, 933 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Munyenyezi, 781 F.3d 532, 541 (1st Cir. 2015). . . .

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC., 931 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Garvey , 532 U.S. 504, 508 n.1, 121 S.Ct. 1724, 149 L.Ed.2d 740 (2001) (per curiam) (noting Supreme Court . . . Garvey , 532 U.S. 504, 508 n.1, 121 S.Ct. 1724, 149 L.Ed.2d 740 (2001) (per curiam) ("[W]e have authority . . .

K. W. P. By v. KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS In In, 931 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Agric. , 532 F.3d 805, 808 (8th Cir. 2008). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLLIER,, 932 F.3d 1067 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Whitehill , 532 F.3d 746, 751 (8th Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. . . .

ORDUNO, v. PIETRZAK, v., 932 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 693 F.3d 532, 538 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Randleman v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. . . .

COLE, v. CRST VAN EXPEDITED, INC. CRST,, 932 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . is relieved of all duty during the 30-minute period meal period." 139 Cal.Rptr.3d 315, 273 P.3d at 532 . . .

CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL PENSION FUND,, 932 F.3d 91 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 532, 539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019). . . .

FLORES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 353 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . City of New York, 996 F.2d 522, 532 (2d Cir. 1993) ; see also Scotto v. . . .

IN RE HOUSTON REGIONAL SPORTS NETWORK, L. P. s, 603 B.R. 804 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Id. at 532. . . . In re Houston Reg'l Sports Network, L.P., 886 F.3d 523 at 532. . . . In re Houston Reg'l Sports Network, L.P. , 886 F.3d at 532. . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. Iv n Ra l A. B. n III G. M. a J. R. J. A. Jr., 931 F.3d 111 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm. on the Judiciary, 100th Cong. 532 (1988) (statement of James E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PINEDA- DUARTE,, 933 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 550 U.S. 192, 222, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007) ("which of various possible . . .

J. FAST, v. CASH DEPOT, LTD., 931 F.3d 636 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Virginia Dep't of Health & Human Res. , 532 U.S. 598, 603-05, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001). . . . See Buckhannon , 532 U.S. at 601-05, 121 S.Ct. 1835. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOCKE,, 932 F.3d 196 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . U.S. , 532 U.S. 374, 378, 121 S.Ct. 1578, 149 L.Ed.2d 590 (2001). . . . U.S. , 532 U.S. 374, 381, 121 S.Ct. 1578, 149 L.Ed.2d 590 (2001) ; U.S. v. Weston , 681 Fed. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DITOMASSO,, 932 F.3d 58 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Best , 219 F.3d 192, 201 (2d Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 1007 . . .

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 392 F. Supp. 3d 410 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Vopper, the Court addressed the issue of civil liability for publishing stolen information. 532 U.S. . . . Bartnicki, 532 U.S. at 517-18, 121 S.Ct. 1753 ; see also Boehner v. . . . Bartnicki, 532 U.S. at 517, 121 S.Ct. 1753. . . . Bartnicki, 532 U.S. at 533-34, 121 S.Ct. 1753. So too in this case. . . .

CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA De S. A. D. C. In De S. A., 932 F.3d 126 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Petroleos Mexicanos , 962 F.2d 528, 532-38 (5th Cir. 1992) (doing the same to determine whether the district . . .

UNITED STATES v. GALECKI, v., 932 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n , 532 U.S. 1, 8, 121 S.Ct. 1060, 149 L.Ed.2d 87 (2001) (noting the . . .

IN RE KARA HOMES, INC. v., 603 B.R. 286 (Bankr. N.J. 2019)

. . . Fauver , 288 F.3d 532, 535 (3d Cir. 2002) (citation omitted); see also Grimes v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAILEY,, 931 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Klups , 514 F.3d 532, 538 (6th Cir. 2008) ; see also Fed. R. Crim. . . .

IN RE BROWN,, 932 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 97-532, at 31 (1982), as reprinted in 1982 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2515, 2537, and so "that sentencing courts . . .

SMITH, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 932 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rinkle , 532 S.W.2d 947, 949 (Tex. 1986) ] (false credit report could not be discovered until credit . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. WISEMAN, Jr., 932 F.3d 411 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ayoub , 498 F.3d 532, 547 (6th Cir. 2007). . . .

P. J. BY THROUGH MR. MRS. W. J. L. G. MR. MRS. L. G. M. L. MR. MRS. J. L. Mr. v. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 931 F.3d 156 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources , 532 U.S. 598, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 . . . as one who has obtained a "judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties." 532 . . . in court, could nevertheless be deemed a "prevailing party" for purposes of fee-shifting statutes. 532 . . . Buckhannon , 532 U.S. at 602-03 & n.4, 121 S.Ct. 1835 ; see also N.Y. . . . See 532 U.S. at 608, 121 S.Ct. 1835. . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION v. DEWINE, 931 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Health & Human Res. , 532 U.S. 598, 605, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001). . . . on a "catalyst" theory, and thus it is not precluded from prevailing-party status under Buckhannon . 532 . . . Compare Buckhannon , 532 U.S. at 605, 121 S.Ct. 1835. . . .

PETERSON, v. HEYMES,, 931 F.3d 546 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 168 U.S. 532, 18 S.Ct. 183, 42 L.Ed. 568 (1897) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COONCE, Jr., 932 F.3d 623 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 532, 539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019) (ellipses in original) (quoting Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORRALES- VAZQUEZ,, 931 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 532, 539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019) ("It's a 'fundamental canon of statutory construction' that words . . .

DOE, v. TRUMP CORPORATION,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 265 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 503 U.S. 258, 268, 112 S.Ct. 1311, 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992) ; accord Empire Merchants, LLC v. . . .

E. CHAMBERS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 77 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 821, 100 S.Ct. 2486, 65 L.Ed.2d 532 (1980) ); see also id. . . .

WHITTINGHAM v. HSBC BANK USA, NA AS TRUSTEE FOR HOLDERS OF DEUTSCHE ALT- A SECURITIES MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES, 275 So. 3d 850 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 751, 121 S.Ct. 1808, 149 L.Ed.2d 968 (2001) )). . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cromartie , 532 U.S. 234, 242, 121 S.Ct. 1452, 149 L.Ed.2d 430 (2001) (noting that clear error requires . . .

L. FRANCWAY, Jr. v. WILKIE,, 930 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Sanders , 556 U.S. 396, 129 S.Ct. 1696, 173 L.Ed.2d 532 (2009). . . .

W. EATON, v. PACHECO,, 931 F.3d 1009 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kempthorne , 532 F.3d 1108, 1110 (10th Cir. 2008) ("We review the district court's denial of a Rule 59 . . .

OBASI INVESTMENT LTD Wu v. TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS, INC Yu Z. L. III Co. L. L. P. L. III,, 931 F.3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 532, 539, 202 L.Ed.2d 536 (2019). . . .

HARTMAN v. THOMPSON, 931 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sullivan , 532 U.S. 769, 771-72, 121 S.Ct. 1876, 149 L.Ed.2d 994 (2001). . . . City of Lago Vista , 532 U.S. 318, 354, 121 S.Ct. 1536, 149 L.Ed.2d 549 (2001) ("If an officer has probable . . .

DIAZ- QUIRAZCO, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 830 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . In addition to being fined $532, Diaz-Quirazco was confined in jail for nine days with credit for time . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GOODRIDGE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 159 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . United States , 550 U.S. 192, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007), and Sykes v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS,, 930 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 532, 92 S.Ct. 2182. The fourth factor is whether the defendant was prejudiced by the delay. . . .