Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
(including 2025 Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2025-02-07
Snippet: became final before the issuance of Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), Asay, 210 So. 3d at 22, nor does
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2025-01-30
Snippet: waived it. See generally United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 629 (2002) (“[T]he law ordinarily considers
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2025-01-28
Snippet: U.S. at 106 (overruling Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545 (2002), and explaining that McMillan was
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2025-01-23
Snippet: that act.” Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 (2002). In Morgan, the Supreme
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2025-01-22
Snippet: questions of fact. See Barnett v. State, 181 So. 3d 534, 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We defer to those credibility
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2025-01-15
Snippet: 2d 907 (Fla. 1984); see also Johnson v. State, 536 So. 2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 1988) (“The time limitation
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-13
Snippet: 2d DCA 2009) (quoting Rivera v. State, 561 So. 2d 536, 539 (Fla. 1990)). Simply put, Panaro gets the benefit
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11
Snippet: Hillsboro Plantation v. Plunkett, 55 So. 2d 534, 536 (Fla. 1951) (“A judgment is ‘final’ for the purposes
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11
Snippet: Hillsboro Plantation v. Plunkett, 55 So. 2d 534, 536 (Fla. 1951) (“A judgment is ‘final’ for the purposes
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-25
Snippet: relief. See Miranda v. Volvo N. Am. Corp., 763 So. 2d 536, 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (observing that Florida Rule
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-24
Snippet: S. Supreme Court’s decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). See Mosley, 209 So. 3d at 1278
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-17
Snippet: general in the circumstances.” United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 629 (2002) (emphasis omitted); see Figueroa-Sanabria
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16
Snippet: 3d DCA 2015) and Snow v. State, 352 So. 3d 529, 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)). See also State v. Quevedo
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-09
Snippet: Rental, LLC v. Vercon Constr. Mgmt., Inc., 60 So. 3d 536, 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “However, waiver of the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-05
Snippet: Sys./Sunbelt, Inc. v. Machalek, 383 So. 3d 534, 536 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (quoting Univ. of Fla. Bd. of
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-29
Snippet: U.S. Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), holding that “death is not a suitable
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-23
Snippet: 1990) (citing Quince v. State, 477 So. 2d 535, 536 (Fla. 1985)) (holding it is inappropriate to use
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-20
Snippet: Sys./Sunbelt, Inc. v. Machalek, 383 So. 3d 534, 536–37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (quoting Univ. of Fla. Bd
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-20
Snippet: Sys./Sunbelt, Inc. v. Machalek, 383 So. 3d 534, 536–37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (quoting Univ. of Fla. Bd
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-20
Snippet: Sys./Sunbelt, Inc. v. Machalek, 383 So. 3d 534, 536–37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (quoting Univ. of Fla. Bd