Florida Statute 540.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 540
COMMERCIAL DISCRIMINATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 540.04

540.04 Department of State to revoke permit of corporation found guilty of discrimination.—If any corporation, foreign or domestic, authorized to do business in this state, is found guilty of unfair discrimination within the terms of this chapter, the Department of State shall immediately revoke the permit of such corporation to do business in this state.

History.—s. 5, ch. 6945, 1915; RGS 2520; CGL 3942; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 540.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 540.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 540.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 540.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 540.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 540.04

Total Results: 20

Florida Audubon Society v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-08-07

Citation: 171 So. 3d 790, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11808, 2015 WL 4680969

Snippet: billion (ppb) in 2003. Fla. Admin. Code R. 62-302.540(4). 3 And because the lOppb limit was not

Macar v. Macar

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-06

Citation: 803 So. 2d 707, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 799, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2282

Snippet: 540 and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540.4 In her motion, the wife alleged that the settlement

MacAr v. MacAr

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-06

Citation: 803 So. 2d 707, 2001 WL 1547904

Snippet: 540 and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540.[4] In her motion, the wife alleged that the settlement

Macar v. Macar

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-11-03

Citation: 779 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14092

Snippet: judgment only by direct appeal or pursuant to rule 1.540.4 Rule 1.540 simply does not incorporate the Casto

MacAr v. MacAr

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-11-03

Citation: 779 So. 2d 479, 2000 WL 1643828

Snippet: judgment only by direct appeal or pursuant to rule 1.540.[4] Rule 1.540 simply does not incorporate the Casto

Jones v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-26

Citation: 466 So. 2d 301, 24 Educ. L. Rep. 603

Snippet: burglary conviction upheld); Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691 (1941) (state's evidence deemed sufficient

Dubois v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-03-09

Citation: 410 So. 2d 646, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28942

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691 (1941); Martin v. State, 323 So.2d 666

Rigaud v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-10-06

Citation: 404 So. 2d 791

Snippet: circumstantial evidence. Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1941); Whetston v. State, 31 Fla

J.G. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-11-20

Citation: 376 So. 2d 1212, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21103

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691 (1941); Dewey v. State, 135 Fla. 443

Borders v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-04-01

Citation: 312 So. 2d 247

Snippet: 785, 788, and Chason v. State, 1941, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691. Proof of a formal agreement is not necessary

Brown v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-05-15

Citation: 294 So. 2d 128

Snippet: verdict of acquittal. See: Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691; Devlin v. State, Fla. App. 1965, 175

McGough v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-03-20

Citation: 293 So. 2d 147, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7615

Snippet: of innocence, e. g., Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691; Williams v. State, Fla. 1962, 143 So

Walker v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-06-27

Citation: 263 So. 2d 597, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6631

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691; City of Miami v. Nelson, Fla.App.1966

Hall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-12-01

Citation: 241 So. 2d 456, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5455

Snippet: Affirmed on the authority of Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691 (1941); Williams v. State, 73 Fla. 1198

Koenig v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-10-15

Citation: 214 So. 2d 627, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5010

Snippet: hypothesis of innocence. See Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691 (1941). Therefore, the requirement of

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-02-05

Citation: 206 So. 2d 446

Snippet: of the accused, Chason v. State, 1941, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691. The same formula is stated in different

Hennessy v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-04-18

Citation: 198 So. 2d 37, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4724

Snippet: Fla. 443, 186 So. 224; Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691; Daniels v. State, Fla.1959, 108 So.2d

Belk v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-07-10

Citation: 167 So. 2d 239, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4137

Snippet: provided in the case of Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691, which were lately *240employed by this

Pacetti v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-11-06

Citation: 157 So. 2d 445

Snippet: 193 So. 762. [2] Chason v. State, 1941, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691; Lee v. State, 1928, 96 Fla. 59, 117

Shaw v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-01-08

Citation: 108 So. 2d 766

Snippet: with his innocence. See Chason v. State, 148 Fla. 540, 4 So.2d 691. The judgment appealed from is hereby