Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 542.18 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 542.18 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 542.18

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 542
COMBINATIONS RESTRICTING TRADE OR COMMERCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 542.18
542.18 Restraint of trade or commerce.Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.
History.s. 1, ch. 80-28.

F.S. 542.18 on Google Scholar

F.S. 542.18 on Casetext

Amendments to 542.18


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 542.18
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S542.18 - ANTITRUST - CONTRACT IN RESTRAINT TRADE COMMERCE - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 542.18

Total Results: 20

Data Payment Systems v. Caso

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-01

Citation: 253 So. 3d 53

Snippet: entirety, as follows: (1) Notwithstanding s. 542.18 and subsection (2), enforcement of contracts

& SC16-400 Elizabeth White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting Services of Southeast Florida, LLC., and Americare Home Therapy, Inc., etc. v. Carla Hiles

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-09-14

Citation: 226 So. 3d 774

Snippet: restraint of trade .are generally unlawful. See § 542.18, Fla. Stat. (2016) (“Every contract, combination

Collier HMA Physician Management, LLC v. Brian Menichello, M.D.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-31

Citation: 223 So. 3d 334, 2017 WL 2364675, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7772

Snippet: provides as follows: (1) Notwithstanding s. 542.18 and subsection (2), enforcement of contracts that

Allied Universal Corp. v. Given

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-15

Citation: 223 So. 3d 1040, 2017 WL 1018502, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3459

Snippet: (2016) provides: (1) Notwithstanding s. 542.18 and subsection (2), enforcement of contracts that

C.P. Motion, Inc. v. Goldblatt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-27

Citation: 193 So. 3d 39, 2016 WL 1660028, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6337

Snippet: assignee or successor: (1) Notwithstanding s. 542.18 and subsection (2), enforcement of contracts that

MYD Marine Distributor, Inc. v. International Paint Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-12-14

Citation: 76 So. 3d 42, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19927, 2011 WL 6183519

Snippet: 542.15, Fla. Stat. (2005). Pursuant to section 542.18, Florida Statutes, “[e]very contract, combination

Rigterink v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-06-16

Citation: 66 So. 3d 866, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 273, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1343, 2011 WL 2374188

Snippet: (1966) (citing Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532, 542, 18 S.Ct. 183, 42 L.Ed. 568 (1897)). This right extends

Miller v. Preefer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-02-18

Citation: 1 So. 3d 1278, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 2009 WL 383565

Snippet: judgment is "void" or merely "voidable." Section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1993), generally prohibits any

Kapila v. at & T Wireless Services, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-23

Citation: 973 So. 2d 600, 2008 WL 183408

Snippet: Counts") by both AT & T and ABC, violation of sections 542.18, and 542.19, Florida Statutes (the "State Antitrust

Humane Soc. of Broward v. Fl Humane Soc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-14

Citation: 951 So. 2d 966

Snippet: business or property by reason of any violation of s. 542.18 or s. 542.19 may sue therefor in the circuit courts

Henao v. Professional Shoe Repair, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-26

Citation: 929 So. 2d 723, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8244, 2006 WL 1459553

Snippet: public policy." 483 So.2d at 484. Indeed, section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1983), stated (and continues

Colucci v. Kar Kare Automotive Group, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-01-25

Citation: 918 So. 2d 431, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 780, 2006 WL 167939

Snippet: was the result of a scrivener's error. [2] See § 542.18, Fla. Stat. (2005) ("Every contract, combination

Duck Tours Seafari, Inc. v. City of Key West

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-17

Citation: 875 So. 2d 650, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3290, 2004 WL 575695

Snippet: violations of the state antitrust laws. See §§ 542.18-.19, § 542.235(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). Duck Tours

Oce Printing Systems USA, Inc. v. MAILERS DATA SERV. INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-06-16

Citation: 760 So. 2d 1037, 2000 WL 770513

Snippet: of a nationwide class in this instance. Section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1997), states: "Every contract

Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-09-16

Citation: 742 So. 2d 433, 1999 WL 743540

Snippet: any part of trade or commerce in this state." §§ 542.18, 542.19, Fla.Stat. (1997). [2] See 15 U.S.C.A

Davis v. Washington County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-20

Citation: 670 So. 2d 136, 1996 WL 119490

Snippet: were passed to execute the contract. [2] Under § 542.18, Fla.Stat., every contract, combination or conspiracy

Parts Depot Co. v. Florida Auto Supply

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-13

Citation: 669 So. 2d 321

Snippet: 144 (1982). While the appellee sued under section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1989), which prohibits conspiracies

Greenberg v. Mount Sinai Medical Center

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-12-14

Citation: 629 So. 2d 252, 1993 WL 517227

Snippet: of sections 542.18 and 542.22, Florida Statutes (1991), and related statutes. Section 542.18 provides that

Accent Homes, Inc. v. Narco Realty, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-11

Citation: 566 So. 2d 5, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4971, 1990 WL 95374

Snippet: unreasonable restraint of trade under Sections 542.18 and 542.22, Florida Statutes. We find the trial

Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-14

Citation: 542 So. 2d 1010, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1349, 1989 WL 21430

Snippet: violation of the Florida Antitrust Act, section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1985). I do not agree with the