Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 542.18 (2025)
Restraint of trade or commerce.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session Cite as: Fla. Stat. § 542.18 (2025)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
542.18 Restraint of trade or commerce.—Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.
History.—s. 1, ch. 80-28.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: & SC16-400 Elizabeth White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting Services of Southeast Florida, LLC., and Americare Home Therap
& SC16-400 Elizabeth White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting Services of Southeast Florida, LLC., and Americare Home Therap (2017)
“See § 542.18, Fla. Stat. (2016) (“Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful,”).”
St. Petersburg Yacht Charters v. Morgan Yacht (1984)
“The violations are alleged to involve section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1981) (the counterpart of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.”
JES Properties, Inc. v. USA Equestrian, Inc. (2006)
“Counts V-VIII raised claims of violations of the Florida Antitrust Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 542.18 and 542.19. Count IX- alleged violations of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
Colucci v. Kar Kare Automotive Group, Inc. (2006)
“[2] See § 542.18, Fla. Stat. (2005) ("Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restrain of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.”
Jet 1 Center, Inc. v. City of Naples Airport Authority (In Re Jet 1 Center, Inc.) (2005)
“§ 2 ), V (Florida Antitrust Act, Fla. Stat. § 542.18 ) and VI (Florida Antitrust Act, Fla.”
In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litigation (2009)
“The Florida Antitrust Act reads, in relevant parts: “[e]very contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful;” and “[i]t is unlawful for any person to monopolize, attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person…”
Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v. Anthem, Inc. (2017)
“§ 1 , and the Florida Antitrust Act, Fla. Stat. § 542.18 . Anthem and Blue Cross move to dismiss these counts for failing to state claims for relief; Defendants contend that Hill does not allege a prohibited agreement.”
Miller v. Preefer (2009)
“” Section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1993), generally prohibits any contract in restraint of trade or commerce.”
Greenberg v. Mount Sinai Medical Center (1993)
“Section 542.18 provides that "[e]very contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.”
Henao v. Professional Shoe Repair, Inc. (2006)
“Indeed, section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1983), stated (and continues to state) the general rule in Florida that contracts in restraint of trade are unlawful.”
In Re Chicken Antitrust Litigation American Poultry (1982)
“Fla.Stat. §§ 542.18-542.23 (1980) (state may sue parens patriae for violations of state antitrust laws).”
Oce Printing Systems USA, Inc. v. MAILERS DATA SERV. INC. (2000)
“Section 542.18, Florida Statutes (1997), states: "Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.