Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-08-22
Citation: 988 So. 2d 1232, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 2008 WL 3876007
Snippet: alleged violations of section 542.19 of the Florida Statutes which provides: 542.19. Monopolization; attempts
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-23
Citation: 973 So. 2d 600, 2008 WL 183408
Snippet: & T and ABC, violation of sections 542.18, and 542.19, Florida Statutes (the "State Antitrust Counts")
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-14
Citation: 951 So. 2d 966
Snippet: property by reason of any violation of s. 542.18 or s. 542.19 may sue therefor in the circuit courts of this
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-21
Citation: 945 So. 2d 1216, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 882, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2953, 2006 WL 3741019
Snippet: 184 So. 97 (1938); Gato v. Warrington, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883 (1896). See also Crabtree [v. Aetna Cas
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-17
Citation: 875 So. 2d 650, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3290, 2004 WL 575695
Snippet: prohibit restraints of trade. See §§ 542.16, 542.18, 542.19, Fla. Stat. (1995). Florida's antitrust laws apply
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-06-16
Citation: 760 So. 2d 1037, 2000 WL 770513
Snippet: or commerce in this state is unlawful." Section 542.19, Florida Statutes (1997), states: "It is unlawful
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-16
Citation: 766 So. 2d 264, 2000 WL 173091
Snippet: anti-trust claim against FPL pursuant to section 542.19 of Florida's Antitrust Act of 1980.[3] In this
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-09-16
Citation: 742 So. 2d 433, 1999 WL 743540
Snippet: of trade or commerce in this state." §§ 542.18, 542.19, Fla.Stat. (1997). [2] See 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1011-1015
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-05-18
Citation: 600 So. 2d 1159, 1992 WL 102914
Snippet: sub-issues related to alleged violations of section 542.19, Florida Statutes (1989) (anti-trust) and section
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-01-02
Citation: 593 So. 2d 195, 1992 WL 151
Snippet: 184 So. 97 (1938); Gato v. Warrington, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883 (1896). See also Crabtree, 438 So.2d at
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-19
Citation: 564 So. 2d 1182, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5358, 1990 WL 102719
Snippet: 2d 315 (Fla.1966); Gato v. Warrington, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883 (1896); and 38 C.J.S. Guaranty § 72. He
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-09-01
Citation: 530 So. 2d 1037, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2034, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3955, 1988 WL 91212
Snippet: (1980). . A section two violation under Section 542.19, Florida Statutes, need not affect interstate commerce
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-11-26
Citation: 505 So. 2d 443, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2472
Snippet: IV alleged a monopoly action pursuant to section 542.19, Florida Statutes, stating that the appellees attempted
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-10-16
Citation: 497 So. 2d 1261
Snippet: §§ 542.18 & 542.22, Fla. Stat. (1981). [2] §§ 542.19 & 542.22, Fla. Stat. (1981). [3] 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-10-15
Citation: 496 So. 2d 875, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2192
Snippet: Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., 62 Ill. App.3d 542, 19 Ill.Dec. 547, 550, 379 N.E.2d 62, 65 (1978), wherein
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-05-04
Citation: 457 So. 2d 1028
Snippet: of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1), and section 542.19, Florida Statutes (1981) (the counterpart of section
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-08-24
Citation: 179 So. 2d 573, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3784
Snippet: from liability. Gato v. Warrington, 1896, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883. There being no denial of the material
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-12-08
Citation: 135 So. 2d 252
Snippet: same august tribunal, in Coppell v. Hall, 7 Wall. 542 [19 L.Ed. 244], says: "`"Whenever the illegality appears
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-01-09
Citation: 62 So. 2d 416, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 2075
Snippet: Affirmed on authority of Gato v. Warrington, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883. TERRELL, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, MATHEWS
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-07-08
Citation: 59 So. 2d 849
Snippet: 375, 78 So. 284; Gato v. Warrington, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883; Jennings v. Landrum, 51 Fla. 643, 40 So