Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 542.331 (2025)
Applicability of s. 542.33.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: Corp. Exp. Off. Prods., Inc. v. Phillips, 847 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2003).
Corp. Exp. Off. Prods., Inc. v. Phillips, 847 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2003). “[2] Section 542.331, Florida Statutes (2002), specifically provides that the repeal of section 542.”
Proudfoot Consulting Co. v. Gordon, 576 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2009). “33 (2)(a), which does not apply to the Agreement, Fla. Stat. § 542.331 . Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (l)(h), which governs this case, states that “[t]he violation of an enforceable restrictive covenant creates a presumption of irreparable injury to the person seeking enforcement of a…”
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. v. Waxman, 95 So. 3d 928 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). “The Florida Supreme Court stated in pertinent part the following: This statutory provision applies to non-compete agreements entered into before July 1, 1996, at which time section 542.”
Lotenfoe v. Pahk, 747 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). “On February 5, 1999, Lotenfoe sent a letter to Pahk terminating their relationship because they had been unable to reach agreement on several issues concerning the proposed partnership. Pahk then filed suit for breach of the noncompetition clause in the employment agreement.”
Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). “§§ 542.331, 542.335(1). See generally John A.”
Gray v. Prime Mgmt. Grp., Inc., 912 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). “See § 542.331, Fla. Stat. The instant contract began in July 1997.”
Protherapy Assocs., LLC v. Afs of Bastian, Inc., 782 F. Supp. 2d 206 (W.D. Va. 2011). “See Fla. Stat. § 542.331 . Moreover, Florida Statutes § 542.”
King v. Jessup, 698 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). “See §§ 542.331, 542.335, Florida Statutes (Supp.”
Amer. Residential Serv. v. Event Tech., 715 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). “We conclude that the applicable legal standard has been satisfied, see §§ 542.331, .335, Fla. Stat. (1997), and the record supports the relief granted.”
Rauch, Weaver, Norfleet, Kurtz & Co, Inc. v. Garnan Enter., LLC & Nancy Legault (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). “” § 542.331, Fla. Stat. (2014). In enacting section 542.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.