Florida Statute 545.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 545
COMBINATIONS RESTRICTING FINANCING OF MOTOR VEHICLES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 545.11

545.11 Remedy for persons injured by violation of law.—In addition to the criminal and civil penalties herein provided, any person who is injured in her or his business or property by any other person, by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this chapter, may sue therefor in any court having jurisdiction thereof in the county where the defendant resides or is found, or any agent resides or is found, or where service may be obtained, and recover twofold the damages sustained by her or him, and the costs of suit. When it shall appear to the court before whom any proceeding under this chapter is pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be made parties defendant and summoned, whether they reside in the county where such action is pending, or not.

History.—s. 12, ch. 18031, 1937; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(469); s. 761, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 545.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 545.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 545.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 545.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 545.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 545.11

Total Results: 7

Bruce Construction Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-01-25

Citation: 139 So. 209, 104 Fla. 93

Snippet: Hundred Forty-five Dollars and Eleven Cents ($31,545.11), and the only question presented here is whether

State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of Equalizers

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-11-20

Citation: 84 Fla. 592

Snippet: State ex rel. Norman v. D ’Alemberte, 30 Fla. 545, 11 South. Rep. 905; McKinnon v. State ex rel. Davis

Howland v. State ex rel. Zirklebach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-06-15

Citation: 56 Fla. 422

Snippet: 427; State ex rel. Norman v. D'Alemberte, 30 Fla. 545, 11 South. Rep. 905; State ex rel. Hubbard v. Holmes

State ex rel. Hubbard v. Holmes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 226

Snippet: 600; State ex rel. Norman v. D’Alemberte, 30 Fla. 545, 11 South. Rep. 905. In the case of Marbury v. Madison

State ex rel. Walker v. Stewart

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1905-01-15

Citation: 49 Fla. 259

Snippet: 1; State ex rel. Norman v. D’Alemberte, 30 Fla. 545, 11 South. Rep. 905. The judgment of the Circuit Court

Strickland v. Knight

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1904-01-15

Citation: 47 Fla. 327

Snippet: State ex rel. Norman v. D’Alemberte, 30 Fla. 545, 11 South. Rep. 905. If a permit be unlawfully granted

Bonacker v. State ex rel. McFarlane

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1900-06-15

Citation: 42 Fla. 348

Snippet: State ex rel. Norman v. D’Alemberte, 30 Fla. 545, 11 South. Rep. 905. It is true that the first section