Florida Statute 550.0555 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 550
PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 550.0555

550.0555 Greyhound dogracing permits; relocation within a county; conditions.—

(1) It is the finding of the Legislature that pari-mutuel wagering on greyhound dogracing provides substantial revenues to the state. It is the further finding that, in some cases, this revenue-producing ability is hindered due to the lack of provisions allowing the relocation of existing dogracing operations. It is therefore declared that state revenues derived from greyhound dogracing will continue to be jeopardized if provisions allowing the relocation of such greyhound racing permits are not implemented. This enactment is made pursuant to, and for the purpose of, implementing such provisions.

(2) Any holder of a valid outstanding permit for greyhound dogracing in a county in which there is only one dogracing permit issued, as well as any holder of a valid outstanding permit for jai alai in a county where only one jai alai permit is issued, is authorized, without the necessity of an additional county referendum required under s. 550.0651, to move the location for which the permit has been issued to another location within a 30-mile radius of the location fixed in the permit issued in that county, provided the move does not cross the county boundary, that such relocation is approved under the zoning regulations of the county or municipality in which the permit is to be located as a planned development use, consistent with the comprehensive plan, and that such move is approved by the commission after it is determined at a proceeding pursuant to chapter 120 in the county affected that the move is necessary to ensure the revenue-producing capability of the permittee without deteriorating the revenue-producing capability of any other pari-mutuel permittee within 50 miles; the distance shall be measured on a straight line from the nearest property line of one racing plant or jai alai fronton to the nearest property line of the other.

History.—s. 12, ch. 92-348; s. 14, ch. 2000-354; s. 13, ch. 2022-7.

F.S. 550.0555 on Google Scholar

F.S. 550.0555 on Casetext

Amendments to 550.0555

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 550.0555

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 550.0555.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 550.0555

Total Results: 19

H.S., the Father v. Department of Children & Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-03

Snippet: our” judicial system. Parr v. State, 247 So. 3d 550, 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting McFadden v. State

Jefferson Eugene Davis v. Gilchrist County Sheriff's Office

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-09-25

Snippet: continuance if needed. See Lopez v. Regaldo, 257 So. 3d 550, 555-56 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2018) (no due process violation

N.B. v. Dep't of Children of Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-05

Citation: 274 So. 3d 1163

Snippet: Gloria A., 213 Cal.App.4th 476, 152 Cal. Rptr. 3d 550, 555 (2013) (citation omitted); see § 61.502, Fla.

N.B. v. Dep't of Children of Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-05

Citation: 274 So. 3d 1163

Snippet: Gloria A., 213 Cal.App.4th 476, 152 Cal. Rptr. 3d 550, 555 (2013) (citation omitted); see § 61.502, Fla.

Terrence Boatman v. Thomas "Tommy" Hardee, in his official capacity etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-23

Citation: 254 So. 3d 604

Snippet: obvious meaning.” Clines v. State, 912 So. 2d 550, 555-56 (Fla. 2005) 1 We refer to the 2010 version

J.M. v. Gargett

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-04

Citation: 101 So. 3d 352, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 611, 2012 WL 4666695, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1925

Snippet: (Fla.2006) (citing Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla.2005)), superseded by statute on other grounds

Garrett v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-02-23

Citation: 80 So. 3d 447, 2012 WL 573538

Snippet: reviewable de novo. Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla. 2005). The Florida Pawnbroking Act provides

STIEH v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-01

Citation: 67 So. 3d 275, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4530, 2011 WL 309433

Snippet: de novo standard. Behanna v. State, 985 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Although the question of whether

Nicholas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-28

Citation: 47 So. 3d 297, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 2010 WL 2925114

Snippet: favorable to the State. Behanna v. State, 985 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), review denied, 988 So.2d 622

Bertoni v. Stock Bldg. Supply

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-07-30

Citation: 989 So. 2d 670, 2008 WL 2906898

Snippet: Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Neusser, 810 F.2d 550, 555-56 (6th Cir.1987). Second, the court must determine

Bankers Trust Co. v. Basciano

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-25

Citation: 960 So. 2d 773, 2007 WL 1514226

Snippet: and obvious meaning. Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555-56 (Fla. 2005). Here, the statute unambiguously

ABRAHAM K. KOHL, DC v. Blue Cross

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-21

Citation: 955 So. 2d 1140, 2007 WL 837176

Snippet: Blue Shield of Neb., 219 Neb. 199, 361 N.W.2d 550, 555-56 (1985). Anti-assignment clauses *1145 prohibiting

DADELAND DEPOT. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-21

Citation: 945 So. 2d 1216, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 882, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2953, 2006 WL 3741019

Snippet: its plain meaning."); Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla.2005) ("We have `repeatedly held that the

Gonzalez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-17

Citation: 941 So. 2d 1226, 2006 WL 3327609

Snippet: statutory construction.'" Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla.2005) (quoting Stoletz v. State, 875 So.2d

Tillman v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-06

Citation: 934 So. 2d 1263, 2006 WL 1837903

Snippet: review is de novo. Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla.2005). In construing statutes, we first consider

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-01

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1067, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 358, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 982, 2006 WL 1491542

Snippet: and obvious meaning." Clines v. State, 912 So.2d 550, 555-56 (Fla.2005) (quoting A.R. Douglass, Inc. v.

Marshall v. Crosby

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-26

Citation: 911 So. 2d 1129, 2005 WL 1243417

Snippet: in defense); but see Cade v. State, 658 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (holding trial court abused

Haynes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-03-30

Citation: 729 So. 2d 498, 1999 WL 168903

Snippet: significant way." See White v. State, 680 So.2d 550, 555-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), opinion quashed on other

Breakstone v. MacKenzie

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-09-14

Citation: 561 So. 2d 1164, 1989 WL 137619

Snippet: 1st DCA 1976); State v. Gillespie, 227 So.2d 550, 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), and which has heretofore applied