Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 550.334 (2025)
Quarter horse racing; substitutions.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
550.334 Quarter horse racing; substitutions.—
(1) The operator of any licensed racetrack is authorized to lease such track to any quarter horse racing permitholder located within 35 miles of such track for the conduct of quarter horse racing under this chapter. However, a quarter horse facility located in a county where a referendum was conducted to authorize slot machines pursuant to s. 23, Art. X of the State Constitution is not subject to the mileage restriction if they lease from a licensed racetrack located within a county where a referendum was conducted to authorize slot machines pursuant to s. 23, Art. X of the State Constitution.
(2) All other provisions of this chapter, including s. 550.054, apply to, govern, and control such racing, and the same must be conducted in compliance therewith.
(3) Quarter horses participating in such races must be duly registered by the American Quarter Horse Association, and before each race such horses must be examined and declared in fit condition by a qualified person designated by the commission.
(4) Any quarter horse racing days permitted under this chapter are in addition to any other racing permitted under the license issued the track where such quarter horse racing is conducted.
(5) Any quarter horse racing permitholder operating under a valid permit issued by the commission is authorized to substitute races of other breeds of horses which are, respectively, registered with the American Paint Horse Association, Appaloosa Horse Club, Arabian Horse Registry of America, Palomino Horse Breeders of America, United States Trotting Association, Florida Cracker Horse Association, or Jockey Club for no more than 50 percent of the quarter horse races during its meet.
(6) Except as provided in s. 550.3345, a quarter horse permit issued pursuant to this section is not eligible for transfer or conversion to another type of pari-mutuel operation.
(7) Any nonprofit corporation, including, but not limited to, an agricultural cooperative marketing association, organized and incorporated under the laws of this state may apply for a quarter horse racing permit and operate racing meets under such permit, provided all pari-mutuel taxes and fees applicable to such racing are paid by the corporation. However, insofar as its pari-mutuel operations are concerned, the corporation shall be considered to be a corporation for profit and is subject to taxation on all property used and profits earned in connection with its pari-mutuel operations.
History.—s. 37, ch. 92-348; s. 11, ch. 95-390; s. 789, ch. 97-103; s. 3, ch. 2005-288; s. 14, ch. 2009-170; ss. 4, 5, ch. 2010-29; s. 41, ch. 2011-4; s. 20, ch. 2021-271; s. 33, ch. 2022-7.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2005–2011 · leading case: Ft. Myers Real Est. Holdings, LLC v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 53 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
Ft. Myers Real Est. Holdings, LLC v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 53 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). “The grounds for denial were that, contrary to the requirements of section 550.334(1), Florida Statutes (2009), the amended application 1) failed to demonstrate that the location of Appellant’s proposed facility was available for use for quarter horse racing, and 2) failed to…”
Florida Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg. v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, 967 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2007). “See § 550.334(4), Fla. Stat. It is at least conceivable, they argue, that someone could obtain a permit to hold quarter horse races near enough to a thoroughbred permit holder and at least one other horse racing permit holder to trigger the prohibition against inter-track…”
State, Dept. of Bus. v. Gulfstream, 912 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). “See § 550.334(4), Fla. Stat. It is at least conceivable, they argue, that someone could obtain a permit to hold quarter horse races near enough to a thoroughbred permit holder and at least one other horse racing permit holder to trigger the prohibition against intertrack…”
Gadsden Jai Alai, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 26 So. 3d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). “These standards include exclusion from (1) mileage restriction between pari-mutuel facilities; (2) requirements relating to zoning; (3) requirements for financial stability; and (4) requirements for approval by county referendum.”
— 550.334(1) — 2 cases
Ft. Myers Real Est. Holdings, LLC v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 53 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). “The grounds for denial were that, contrary to the requirements of section 550.334(1), Florida Statutes (2009), the amended application 1) failed to demonstrate that the location of Appellant’s proposed facility was available for use for quarter horse racing, and 2) failed to…”
Gadsden Jai Alai, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 26 So. 3d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). “These standards include exclusion from (1) mileage restriction between pari-mutuel facilities; (2) requirements relating to zoning; (3) requirements for financial stability; and (4) requirements for approval by county referendum.”
— 550.334(4) — 2 cases
Florida Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg. v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, 967 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2007). “See § 550.334(4), Fla. Stat. It is at least conceivable, they argue, that someone could obtain a permit to hold quarter horse races near enough to a thoroughbred permit holder and at least one other horse racing permit holder to trigger the prohibition against inter-track…”
State, Dept. of Bus. v. Gulfstream, 912 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). “See § 550.334(4), Fla. Stat. It is at least conceivable, they argue, that someone could obtain a permit to hold quarter horse races near enough to a thoroughbred permit holder and at least one other horse racing permit holder to trigger the prohibition against intertrack…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.