Florida Statute 559.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 559
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, AND INVESTMENTS, GENERALLY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 559.01

559.01 Definitions.—As used in this part:

(1) The term “trading stamp” means any stamp or similar device issued in connection with the retail sale of merchandise or service, as a cash discount or for any other marketing purpose, which entitles the rightful holder, on its due presentation for redemption, to receive merchandise, service, or cash. This term, however, shall not mean any redeemable device used by the manufacturer or packer of an article, in advertising or selling it, or any redeemable device issued and redeemed by a newspaper, magazine or other publication.

(2) The term “trading stamp company” means any person engaged in distributing trading stamps for retail issuance by others, or in redeeming trading stamps for retailers, in any way or under any guise.

(3) The term “person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other organization.

History.—s. 1, ch. 59-311.

F.S. 559.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 559.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 559.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 559.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 559.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 559.01

Total Results: 17

State, Agency for Health Care Administration v. Hunt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-06-24

Citation: 165 So. 3d 868, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9563, 2015 WL 3875546

Snippet: $162,000 settlement amount and the Estate’s $15,559.01 in costs.” At the final hearing, however, the Hunts

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1990-03-20

Snippet: joint negligence of the Railway. 8 Compare, s. 255.559(1), F.S., authorizing state agencies or political

Roma Construction Co. v. Goodman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-12-19

Citation: 557 So. 2d 58, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7139, 1989 WL 153777

Snippet: see, e.g., Florida Util. Co. v. Wester, 146 Fla. 559, 1 So.2d 561 *59(1941); Eassa v. Palmer, 140 Fla.

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1989-09-15

Snippet: of asbestos-containing materials.5 Section 255.559(1), F.S., provides: State agencies or political

Austin v. Stovall

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-09-24

Citation: 475 So. 2d 1014, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15978

Snippet: made by the arbitrator to the plaintiffs was $559,001.95, which included amounts for slander, mental

Kolb v. Levy

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-07-15

Citation: 104 So. 2d 874

Snippet: 372; State ex rel. North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559, 1 So.2d 175; In re Weltner's Estate, 154 Fla. 292

Blanton v. State Ex Rel. McManus

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-04-01

Citation: 29 So. 2d 865, 158 Fla. 667, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 609

Snippet: 846; State ex rel North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559,1 So.2d 175; in re Estate of Niernsee, 147 Fla. 388

Estate of Monks v. Florida National Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-11-28

Citation: 19 So. 2d 796, 155 Fla. 240, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 514

Snippet: 846; State ex rel. North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559, 1 So.2d 175; In re: Estate of Niernsee, 147 Fla.

Ulitzsch v. Tolton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-03-17

Citation: 154 Fla. 292, 17 So. 2d 396, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 682

Snippet: 170; State ex rel. North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559, 1 So. (2nd) 175; Tyre v. Wright, 144 Fla. 90, 197

In Re: Weltner Estate

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-03-17

Citation: 17 So. 2d 396, 154 Fla. 292

Snippet: 170; State ex rel. North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559, 1 So.2d 175; Tyre v. Wright, 144 Fla. 90, 197 So

Krivitsky v. Nye

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-03-23

Citation: 12 So. 2d 595, 152 Fla. 614, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 984

Snippet: ex rel. North, et al., v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559,1 So.2d 175. We do not rule on the question of whether

Russ v. Solomon

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-02-02

Citation: 12 So. 2d 121, 152 Fla. 348, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 911

Snippet: See State ex rel. North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559, 1 So.2d 175. The order of the circuit court of April

Thompson v. Harris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-05-01

Citation: 7 So. 2d 854, 150 Fla. 471, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1014

Snippet: 202; State ex rel. North v. Whitehurst, 145 Fla. 559, 1 So.2d 175. *Page 475 The question posed for adjudication

De Pass v. the Kansas Masonic Home Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-04-25

Citation: 181 So. 410, 132 Fla. 455

Snippet: following authorities: Blagge v. Miles, 3 Fed. Cases, 559, 1 Story 426, 4 Law. R. 256; Bennett v. Abburrow,

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Taylor

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1924-04-14

Citation: 87 Fla. 398, 100 So. 163

Snippet: Western Union Tel. Co., 136 N. C. 82, 48 S. E. Rep. 559, 1 Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 359; Kernodle v. Western Union

McMillan v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1910-06-15

Citation: 60 Fla. 131

Snippet: Western Union Tel. Co., 136 N. C. 82, 48 S. E. Rep. 559, 1 Am. & Eng. Anno. Cas., 359 and notes; Harrison

Hildreth v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-06-15

Citation: 56 Fla. 387

Snippet: Western Union Tel. Co., 136 N. C. 82, 48 S. E. Rep. 559, 1 Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 359; Kernodle v. Western Union