Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 561.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 561.29 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 561.29

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 561
BEVERAGE LAW: ADMINISTRATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 561.29
561.29 Revocation and suspension of license; power to subpoena.
(1) The division is given full power and authority to revoke or suspend the license of any person holding a license under the Beverage Law, when it is determined or found by the division upon sufficient cause appearing of:
(a) Violation by the licensee or his or her or its agents, officers, servants, or employees, on the licensed premises, or elsewhere while in the scope of employment, of any of the laws of this state or of the United States, or violation of any municipal or county regulation in regard to the hours of sale, service, or consumption of alcoholic beverages or license requirements of special licenses issued under s. 561.20, or engaging in or permitting disorderly conduct on the licensed premises, or permitting another on the licensed premises to violate any of the laws of this state or of the United States. A conviction of the licensee or his or her or its agents, officers, servants, or employees in any criminal court of any violation as set forth in this paragraph shall not be considered in proceedings before the division for suspension or revocation of a license except as permitted by chapter 92 or the rules of evidence.
(b) Violation by the licensee or, if a corporation, by any officers thereof, of any laws of this state or any state or territory of the United States.
(c) Maintaining a nuisance on the licensed premises.
(d) Maintaining licensed premises that are unsanitary or are not approved as sanitary by the Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the county board of health, or the Department of Health, whichever has jurisdiction thereof.
(e) Violation by the licensee, or, if a corporation, by any officer or stockholder thereof, of any rule or rules promulgated by the division in accordance with the provisions of this chapter or of any law referred to in paragraph (a), or a violation of any such rule or law by any agent, servant, or employee of the licensee on the licensed premises or in the scope of such employment.
(f) A determination that a person who is interested directly or indirectly in the license or licensed business authorized to sell spirituous beverages is not qualified.
(g) A determination that any person required to be qualified by the division as a condition for the issuance of the license is not qualified.
(h) Failure by the holder of any license under s. 561.20(1) to maintain the licensed premises in an active manner in which the licensed premises are open for the bona fide sale of authorized alcoholic beverages during regular business hours of at least 6 hours a day for a period of 120 days or more during any 12-month period commencing 18 months after the acquisition of the license by the licensee, regardless of the date the license was originally issued. Every licensee must notify the division in writing of any period during which his or her license is inactive and place the physical license with the division to be held in an inactive status. This paragraph applies to all annual license periods commencing on or after July 1, 1981, but does not apply to licenses issued after September 30, 1988. The division shall, upon written request of the licensee, grant a one-time written waiver or extension of the requirements of this paragraph for a period not to exceed 12 months. Additionally, the division may, upon written request of the licensee, grant a waiver or extension of the requirements of this paragraph for a period not to exceed 12 months if the licensee demonstrates that:
1. The licensed premises has been physically damaged to such an extent that active operation of the business at the premises is impracticable;
2. Construction or remodeling is underway to relocate the license to another location;
3. The licensed premises is prohibited from making sales as the result of an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or the action or inaction of a governmental entity relating to the permitting, construction, or occupational capacity of the physical location of the licensed premises.
(i) Failure of a licensee having a license issued under s. 561.20(1) after September 30, 1988, to maintain the licensed premises in an active manner in which the licensed premises are open for business to the public for the bona fide retail sale of authorized alcoholic beverages during regular and reasonable business hours for at least 8 hours a day for a period of 210 days or more during any 12-month period commencing 6 months after the acquisition of the license by the licensee. It is the intent of this act that for purposes of compliance with this paragraph, a licensee shall operate the licensed premises in a manner so as to maximize sales and tax revenues thereon; this includes maintaining a reasonable inventory of merchandise, including authorized alcoholic beverages, and the use of good business practices to achieve the intent of this law. Any attempt by a licensee to circumvent the intent of this law shall be grounds for revocation or suspension of the alcoholic beverage license. A licensee shall notify the division in writing of any period during which his or her license is inactive and place the physical license with the division to be held in an inactive status. For the purpose of calculating compliance with the requirements of this paragraph, a license that is acquired in a transaction that is not an arm’s length transaction, including transfers from relatives, affiliates, subsidiaries, and other related entities, retains and is subject to the first related transferor’s date of acquisition and related periods of operation. The division shall, upon written request of the licensee, grant a one-time written waiver or extension of the requirements of this paragraph for a period not to exceed 12 months. Additionally, the division may, upon written request of the licensee, grant a waiver or extension of the requirements of this paragraph for a period not to exceed 12 months if the licensee demonstrates that:
1. The licensed premises has been physically damaged to such an extent that active operation of the business at the premises is impracticable;
2. Construction or remodeling is underway to relocate the license to another location;
3. The licensed premises has been prohibited from making sales as the result of any order of any court of competent jurisdiction, or any action or inaction of a governmental entity relating to the permitting, construction, or occupational capacity of the physical location of the licensed premises.
(j) Failure of any licensee issued a license under s. 561.20(1) to maintain records of all monthly sales and all monthly purchases of alcoholic beverages and to produce such records for inspection by any division employee within 10 days of written request therefor.
(k) Failure by the holder of any license issued under the Beverage Law to comply with a stipulation, consent order, or final order.
(l) Maintaining a licensed premises that admits a child to an adult live performance in violation of s. 827.11.
1. A violation of this paragraph constitutes an immediate, serious danger to the public health, safety, or welfare for the purposes of s. 120.60(6).
2. The division may issue a $5,000 fine for a first violation of this paragraph.
3. The division may issue a $10,000 fine for a second or subsequent violation of this paragraph.
(2) The division, or any employee designated by it, shall have the power and authority to examine into the business, books, records, and accounts of any licensee, to issue subpoenas to said licensee or any other person from whom information is desired, and to take depositions of witnesses within or without of the state. The division, or any employee designated by it, may administer oaths and issue subpoenas. The provisions of the civil law of the state in relation to enforcing obedience to a subpoena lawfully issued by a judge or other person duly authorized to issue subpoenas under the laws of the state, to issue subpoenas in civil cases, shall apply to a subpoena issued by the division, or any employee designated by it, as authorized in this section, and may be enforced by writ of attachment to be issued by the division, or any employee designated by it, for such witness to compel him or her to attend before the division, or any employee designated by it, and give his or her testimony and to bring and produce such books, papers, and documents as may be required for examination; and the division, or any employee designated by it, may punish any willful refusal to so appear or give testimony by citation of any witness before the circuit court who shall punish such witness for contempt as in cases of refusal to obey the orders and process of the circuit court. The division may in such cases pay such attendance and mileage fees as are permitted to be paid to witnesses in civil cases appearing before the circuit court.
(3) The division may impose a civil penalty against a licensee for any violation mentioned in the Beverage Law, or any rule issued pursuant thereto, not to exceed $1,000 for violations arising out of a single transaction. If the licensee fails to pay the civil penalty, his or her license shall be suspended for such period of time as the division may specify. The funds so collected as civil penalties shall be deposited in the state General Revenue Fund.
(4) The division may compromise any alleged violations of the Beverage Law, by accepting from the licensee involved an amount not to exceed $1,000 for violations arising out of a single transaction. All funds so collected are to be deposited in the state General Revenue Fund.
(5) The division may suspend the imposition of any penalty conditioned upon terms the division should in its discretion deem appropriate.
History.s. 1, ch. 16774, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4151(227); s. 1A, ch. 19301, 1939; s. 4, ch. 21839, 1943; s. 7, ch. 22663, 1945; s. 3, ch. 23746, 1947; s. 5, ch. 29786, 1955; s. 23, ch. 57-420; s. 5, ch. 61-219; s. 1, ch. 61-397; ss. 16, 19, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 69-267; s. 207, ch. 71-377; s. 1, ch. 72-230; s. 460, ch. 77-147; s. 4, ch. 77-471; s. 9, ch. 78-95; s. 29, ch. 79-4; s. 17, ch. 79-11; s. 8, ch. 81-158; s. 3, ch. 81-166; s. 4, ch. 88-308; s. 2, ch. 89-309; s. 216, ch. 94-218; s. 8, ch. 95-346; s. 845, ch. 97-103; s. 253, ch. 99-8; s. 7, ch. 2000-191; s. 4, ch. 2016-190; s. 3, ch. 2023-94.

F.S. 561.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 561.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 561.29


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 561.29
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 561.29.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 561.29

Total Results: 20

Parrot Heads, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-10-01

Citation: 741 So. 2d 1231, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13135, 1999 WL 776089

Snippet: presentation, contrary to Section 832.05, within 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes. Check number 241 had apparently

Silver Show Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation of the State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-04-22

Citation: 763 So. 2d 348, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4847, 1998 WL 188294

Snippet: 60(l)-(3) and 561.17, with §§ 120.60(5)-(6) and 561.29, Fla. Stat. (1997). The licensing statutes deal

The Florida Bar v. Porter

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-12-19

Citation: 684 So. 2d 810, 1996 WL 726860

Snippet: chattel mortgage in favor of another party for $16,561.29. Porter represented the client in the sale of the

Morey's Lounge v. State, Dept. of Bus.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-08

Citation: 673 So. 2d 538

Snippet: appeal challenges the constitutionality of section 561.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), under the void

McCoy Restaurants, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-03-30

Citation: 616 So. 2d 545, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3611, 1993 WL 88655

Snippet: the issuance of a new license. See also, section 561.-29(l)(g). And section 561.15(2) precludes the issuance

Pic N'Save v. Dept. of Business Reg.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-05-28

Citation: 601 So. 2d 245, 1992 WL 110917

Snippet: discipline. Although the statutory language in section 561.29(1) has since 1957 spoken in terms of the Division's

Pinacoteca Corp. v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS REG.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-05

Citation: 580 So. 2d 881, 1991 WL 92954

Snippet: Regulation, 371 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Sections 561.29(1)(a) and (c), Florida Statutes (1989), provide

Bajrangi v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS REG.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-05-10

Citation: 561 So. 2d 410, 1990 WL 59231

Snippet: A range of penalties is available in sections 561.29(1) and (3), Florida Statutes, and the recommendation

Freeze v. Dept. of Business Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-15

Citation: 556 So. 2d 1204, 1990 WL 11981

Snippet: substances contrary to sections 823.01, 823.10, and 561.29(1)(c), Florida Statutes, and that she was negligent

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1989-01-27

Snippet: the Beverage Law. As you note in your letter, s. 561.29, F.S., authorizes the Division of Alcoholic Beverages

Redner v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-07-13

Citation: 532 So. 2d 8, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1669, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3022, 1988 WL 72248

Snippet: discussion. Petitioner contends that since section 561.29(6), Florida Statutes (1981), grants an automatic

Surf Attractions v. Dept. of Business Reg.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-16

Citation: 480 So. 2d 1354

Snippet: was therefore subject to sanctions under section 561.29(1) and (3). He concluded that since the violation

G.G.P., Inc. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-05

Citation: 479 So. 2d 797, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2686, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17195

Snippet: license (Section 561.29(1)(a), (b), and (e)) and to impose a civil penalty (Section 561.29(3)) for a violation

Heifetz v. Dept. of Business Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-09-13

Citation: 475 So. 2d 1277, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2142

Snippet: supervision or lack of diligence, in violation of section 561.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983).[3] *1280 The Division

Wheeler v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-15

Citation: 472 So. 2d 847, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1715

Snippet: in a manner similar to that placed upon Section 561.29(1), Florida Statutes, allowing the Division of

Olhausen v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-18

Citation: 472 So. 2d 514, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1531, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14917

Snippet: Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. 2. Section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Division

Fresh Start, Inc. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-05-29

Citation: 469 So. 2d 244, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1352, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14228

Snippet: Lee, 147 So.2d 359, 364 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); § 561.-29(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983). This court is without

Simmons v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-13

Citation: 465 So. 2d 578, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 663, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13014

Snippet: appellants, through their employees, violated section 561.29(l)(c), Florida Statutes, by maintaining a public

Charlotte County Lodge v. State, Department of Business Regulations, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-07

Citation: 463 So. 2d 1208, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 370, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12342

Snippet: 1983, alleging appellant’s violation of Section 561.29(l)(a) and Chapter 849, Florida Statutes (1981)

Village Saloon v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEV.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-12-03

Citation: 463 So. 2d 278

Snippet: charges against each appellant pursuant to section 561.29, Florida Statutes, alleging that on September 3