Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 563.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 563.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 563.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 563
BEER AND MALT BEVERAGES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 563.09
563.09 Malt beverage tastings by distributors and manufacturers.
(1) A manufacturer, distributor, or importer of malt beverages, or any contracted third-party agent thereof, may conduct sampling activities that include the tasting of malt beverage products on:
(a) The licensed premises of a vendor authorized to sell alcoholic beverages by the drink for consumption on premises; or
(b) The licensed premises of a vendor authorized to sell alcoholic beverages only in sealed containers for consumption off premises if:
1. The licensed premises is at an establishment with at least 10,000 square feet of interior floor space exclusive of storage space not open to the general public; or
2. The licensed premises is a package store licensed under s. 565.02(1)(a).
(2) A malt beverage tasting conducted under this section must be limited to and directed toward the general public of the age of legal consumption.
(3) For a malt beverage tasting conducted under this section on the licensed premises of a vendor authorized to sell alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises, each serving of a malt beverage to be tasted must be provided to the consumer by the drink in a tasting cup, glass, or other open container and may not be provided by the package in an unopened can or bottle or in any other sealed container.
(4) For a malt beverage tasting conducted under this section on the licensed premises of a vendor authorized to sell alcoholic beverages only in sealed containers for consumption off premises, the tasting must be conducted in the interior of the building constituting the vendor’s licensed premises and each serving of a malt beverage to be tasted must be provided to the consumer in a tasting cup having a capacity of 3.5 ounces or less.
(5) A manufacturer, distributor, or importer, or any contracted third-party agent thereof, may not pay a vendor, and a vendor may not accept, a fee or compensation of any kind, including the provision of a malt beverage at no cost or at a reduced cost, to authorize the conduct of a malt beverage tasting under this section.
(6)(a) A manufacturer, distributor, or importer, or any contracted third-party agent thereof, conducting a malt beverage tasting under this section, must provide all of the beverages to be tasted; must have paid all excise taxes on those beverages which are required of the manufacturer or distributor; and must return to the manufacturer’s or distributor’s inventory all of the malt beverages provided for the tasting that remain unconsumed after the tasting. More than one tasting may be held on the licensed premises each day, but only one manufacturer, distributor, importer, or contracted third-party agent thereof, may conduct a tasting on the premises at any one time.
(b) This subsection does not preclude a manufacturer, distributor, or importer, or any contracted third-party agent thereof, from buying the malt beverages that it provides for the tasting from a vendor at no more than the retail price, but all of the malt beverages so purchased and provided for the tasting which remain unconsumed after the tasting must be removed from the premises of the tasting and properly disposed of.
(7) A manufacturer, distributor, or importer of malt beverages that contracts with a third-party agent to conduct a malt beverage tasting under this section on its behalf is responsible for any violation of this section by such agent.
(8) This section does not preclude a vendor from conducting a malt beverage tasting on its licensed premises using malt beverages from its own inventory.
(9) This section is supplemental to and does not supersede any special act or ordinance.
(10) The division may, pursuant to ss. 561.08 and 561.11, adopt rules to implement, administer, and enforce this section.
History.s. 9, ch. 2015-12.

F.S. 563.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 563.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 563.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 563.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 563.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 563.09

Total Results: 6

State v. Worsham

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-29

Citation: 227 So. 3d 602, 2017 WL 1175880

Snippet: device can record multiple events. 49 C.F.R. § 563.9, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Gleicher v. Claims Verification Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-08-10

Citation: 908 So. 2d 560, 2005 WL 1875586

Snippet: relief is generally[1] not reviewable under rule *563 9.130(a)(3)(B) because such a deferred ruling neither

Florida Bar v. Siegel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-01-24

Citation: 462 So. 2d 1096, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 87, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 2902

Snippet: this opinion. Judgment for costs in the amount of $563.09 is hereby entered against respondent, for which

Bernstein v. Lily-Tulip Cup Corporation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-07-13

Citation: 177 So. 2d 362

Snippet: Playground Equipment Corp., Fla. 1962, 137 So.2d 563. [9] Matthews v. Lawnlite Company, Fla. 1956, 88 So

Sakolsky v. City of Coral Gables

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-02-20

Citation: 151 So. 2d 433

Snippet: v. Playground Equip. Co., Fla. 1962, 137 So.2d 563. [9] Text treatments of this decision in relation

City of Tarpon Springs v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-04-07

Citation: 81 Fla. 479, 88 So. 613

Snippet: Co. v. Springer, 185 U. S. 47, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 563; 9 C. J. 182, 193. In this case the land in controversy