Florida Statute 565.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO

Chapter 565
LIQUOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 565.04

565.04 Package store restrictions.—

(1) Vendors licensed under s. 565.02(1)(a) shall not in said place of business sell, offer, or expose for sale any merchandise other than such beverages, and such places of business shall be devoted exclusively to such sales; provided, however, that such vendors shall be permitted to sell bitters; grenadine; nonalcoholic mixer-type beverages, not to include fruit juices produced outside this state; fruit juices produced in this state; home bar and party supplies and equipment, including but not limited to glassware and party-type foods; miniatures of no alcoholic content; nicotine products; and tobacco products. Such places of business shall have no openings permitting direct access to any other building or room, except to a private office or storage room of the place of business from which patrons are excluded.

(2) Notwithstanding any other law, when delivering alcoholic beverages to a vendor licensed under s. 565.02(1)(a), a licensed distributor may transport the beverages through another premises owned in whole or in part by the vendor.

History.—s. 11, ch. 16774, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4151(237); s. 1, ch. 20830, 1941; s. 13, ch. 23746, 1947; s. 1, ch. 29964, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-327; s. 1, ch. 65-143; s. 1, ch. 67-257; s. 5, ch. 72-230; s. 9, ch. 2016-190; s. 9, ch. 2023-211; s. 48, ch. 2024-2.

Note.—Former s. 562.09.

F.S. 565.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 565.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 565.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 565.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 565.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 565.04

Total Results: 20

TAVARIS JAMAL EVANS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-07-29

Snippet: that the sanctions are “unsuitable,” section 985.565(4)(c) states that the trial court “may revoke the

CARLTON DEVONTA JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-12-04

Snippet: motion, prompting this appeal. Section 985.565(4)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2018), provides “the court

KELVIN DORCELY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Citation: 257 So. 3d 1050

Snippet: for children prosecuted as adults. Section 985.565(4)(b) allows the court to impose juvenile sanctions

Brown v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1101

Snippet: and J10-1212. Citing to section 985.565(4)(c) of the Florida Statutes,2 the written plea

KELVIN DORCELY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-12

Snippet: for children prosecuted as adults. Section 985.565(4)(b) allows the court to impose juvenile sanctions

Mendoza-Magadan v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-04-26

Citation: 217 So. 3d 112, 2017 WL 1492989, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5789

Snippet: specially. Prior to the enactment of section 985.565(4)(a)4, Florida Statutes (2014), Florida law required

Davis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-04

Citation: 218 So. 3d 890, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 60

Snippet: commitment program and probation under section 985.565(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), without ordering a

State v. Tumlinson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-18

Citation: 224 So. 3d 766, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17231, 2016 WL 6810975

Snippet: evidence of the offense’s commission. Cf. § 92.565(4). Thus, the absence of a corpus delicti appears

Arrington v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-01-18

Citation: 113 So. 3d 20, 2012 WL 130276, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 536

Snippet: have had alternative sentencing options. See § 985.565(4). Obviously, even less harsh options would have

Kirkland v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-08-04

Citation: 67 So. 3d 1147, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12248, 2011 WL 3331232

Snippet: juvenile sanctions, as required by section 985.565(4)(a)2., Florida Statutes. The trial court corrected

Henderson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-05-27

Citation: 61 So. 3d 494, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7710, 2011 WL 2119560

Snippet: imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile. Compare § 985.565(4)(a)(4) (“Any sentence imposing adult sanctions is

MIRUTIL v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-24

Citation: 30 So. 3d 588, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2094, 2010 WL 624179

Snippet: committed a new violation of law." However, Section 985.565(4)(c), Florida Statutes, allows a "court [to] revoke

State v. Allen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-04-15

Citation: 8 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3208, 2009 WL 996815

Snippet: 958; or c. As a juvenile under this section. § 985.565(4)(a). Reading these sentencing statutes together

Beatty v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-06

Citation: 983 So. 2d 701, 2008 WL 2309012

Snippet: pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. See § 985.565(4)(a). The defense sought juvenile sanctions. The

Green v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-31

Citation: 975 So. 2d 1090, 2008 WL 248413

Snippet: trial judges have discretion under section 985.565(4)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2006), to sentence defendants

Hernandez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-01-26

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1270, 2007 WL 188417

Snippet: fact on the record in support of its ruling. § 92.565(4). See Bradley, 918 So.2d at 340; State v. Dionne

Osceola Fish Farm. Ass'n, Inc. v. Div., of Admin. Hear.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-11-20

Citation: 830 So. 2d 932, 2002 WL 31557666

Snippet: statement as an unadopted rule under section 120.565(4) becomes moot when the administrative agency complies

State v. Dionne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-03-15

Citation: 814 So. 2d 1087, 2002 WL 396766

Snippet: on the record to support his or her ruling. § 92.565(4), Fla. Stat. (2000). Thus, in these limited circumstances

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-05-26

Snippet: beverages. See ss.565.04, 565.045, F.S. Pursuant to the proviso contained in s.565.04, F.S., vendors licensed

Skaggs-Albertson's v. ABC Liquors, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-09-07

Citation: 363 So. 2d 1082, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4898

Snippet: liquor to the main grocery store pursuant to Section 565.04, Florida Statutes (1975), which requires *1084