Florida Statute 565.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO

Chapter 565
LIQUOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 565.04

565.04 Package store restrictions.—

(1) Vendors licensed under s. 565.02(1)(a) shall not in said place of business sell, offer, or expose for sale any merchandise other than such beverages, and such places of business shall be devoted exclusively to such sales; provided, however, that such vendors shall be permitted to sell bitters; grenadine; nonalcoholic mixer-type beverages, not to include fruit juices produced outside this state; fruit juices produced in this state; home bar and party supplies and equipment, including but not limited to glassware and party-type foods; miniatures of no alcoholic content; nicotine products; and tobacco products. Such places of business shall have no openings permitting direct access to any other building or room, except to a private office or storage room of the place of business from which patrons are excluded.

(2) Notwithstanding any other law, when delivering alcoholic beverages to a vendor licensed under s. 565.02(1)(a), a licensed distributor may transport the beverages through another premises owned in whole or in part by the vendor.

History.—s. 11, ch. 16774, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4151(237); s. 1, ch. 20830, 1941; s. 13, ch. 23746, 1947; s. 1, ch. 29964, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-327; s. 1, ch. 65-143; s. 1, ch. 67-257; s. 5, ch. 72-230; s. 9, ch. 2016-190; s. 9, ch. 2023-211; s. 48, ch. 2024-2.

Note.—Former s. 562.09.

F.S. 565.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 565.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 565.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 565.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 565.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 565.04

Total Results: 20

TAVARIS JAMAL EVANS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-07-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: in the department.” § 985.565(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2018). Section 985.565(4)(c) also gives the grounds …that the sanctions are “unsuitable,” section 985.565(4)(c) states that the trial court “may revoke the …suitable.” Brown, 260 So. 3d at 1105 (quoting § 985.565(4)(c), Fla. Stat.). However, because juvenile sanction… revocation proceedings pursuant to section 985.565(4)(c) contain analogous procedures to probation revocation…to recognize that the process under section 985.565(4)(c), similar to probation violation hearings, is

CARLTON DEVONTA JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-12-03T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: motion, prompting this appeal. Section 985.565(4)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2018), provides “the court…error in the sentence has been alleged. Section 985.565(4)(a)4. provides that any sentence imposing adult

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: and J10-1212. Citing to section 985.565(4)(c) of the Florida Statutes,2 the written plea …was not eligible for juvenile proceedings. §985.565(4)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2016). 2 This section reads…demonstrate a failure of juvenile sanctions. § 985.565(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). …December of 2015, the State, pursuant to section 985.565(4)(c), filed a request in case F12-1352 (the instant…order. A. The relevant statute – section 985.565(4)(c) The Florida Legislature has provided

KELVIN DORCELY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: for children prosecuted as adults. Section 985.565(4)(b) allows the court to impose juvenile sanctions…If juvenile sanctions fail, however, section 985.565(4)(c) allows the court to “revoke the previous adjudication…this case, Dorcely was sentenced under section 985.565(4)(b) to juvenile probation. His disposition order… “affidavit of unsuitability” under section 985.565(4)(c), alleging that Dorcely was unsuitable for juvenile…terms of his juvenile probation. Section 985.565(4)(c) requires “a hearing” and allows the court to

KELVIN DORCELY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-09-12T00:53:00-07:00

Mendoza-Magadan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 112, 2017 WL 1492989, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5789

Snippet: specially. Prior to the enactment of section 985.565(4)(a)4, Florida Statutes (2014), Florida law required… its decision to impose adult sanctions.” § 985.565(4)(a)4; see also Henderson v. State, 61 So.3d 494,…majority notes, the presumption that section 985.565(4)(a)4 is constitutional carries the day.

Davis v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 218 So. 3d 890, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 60

Snippet: 985.565(4)(b)1 & 2, when those provisions are read together, or (2) under section 985.565(4)(b)3.…sections 985.565(4)(b)1 & 2, we disagree with appellant’s interpretation of section 985.565(4)(b)3. Section…under section 985.565(4)(b). This sentence was lawful either (1) under sections 985.565(4)(b)l & 2, when…commitment program and probation under section 985.565(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), without ordering a…1120, 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Under section 985.565(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), a criminal court may

State v. Tumlinson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 224 So. 3d 766, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17231, 2016 WL 6810975

Snippet: evidence of the offense’s commission. Cf. § 92.565(4). Thus, the absence of a corpus delicti appears …including the defendant’s statements. Section 92.565(4) requires the circuit court to “make specific findings…Tumlinson’s statements were untrustworthy. Cf § 92.565(4) (“The court shall make specific findings of fact

Arrington v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 113 So. 3d 20, 2012 WL 130276, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 536

Snippet: have had alternative sentencing options. See § 985.565(4). Obviously, even less harsh options would have

Kirkland v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-08-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 67 So. 3d 1147, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12248, 2011 WL 3331232

Snippet: juvenile sanctions, as required by section 985.565(4)(a)2., Florida Statutes. The trial court corrected

Henderson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-05-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 61 So. 3d 494, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7710, 2011 WL 2119560

Snippet: imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile. Compare § 985.565(4)(a)(4) (“Any sentence imposing adult sanctions is

MIRUTIL v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-02-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 30 So. 3d 588, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2094, 2010 WL 624179

Snippet: new violation of law." However, Section 985.565(4)(c), Florida Statutes, allows a "court [to]

State v. Allen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-04-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 8 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3208, 2009 WL 996815

Snippet: to section 985.565(4)(a)(2)(a); b. as a youthful offender pursuant to section 985.565(4)(a)(2)(b); or … to section 985.565(4)(a)(2)(a); as a youthful offender pursuant to section 985.565(4)(a)(2)(b); or as…; or c. As a juvenile under this section. § 985.565(4)(a). Reading these sentencing statutes together,…or c. as a juvenile pursuant to section 985.565(4)(a)(2)(c). However, if the court chose to impose juvenile…juvenile sanctions under section 985.565(4)(a)(2)(c), it was required to commit Allen to a high-risk or

Beatty v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-06-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 983 So. 2d 701

Snippet: pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. See § 985.565(4)(a). The defense sought juvenile sanctions. The …departure from the sentencing guidelines. Section 985.565(4)(a)4. provides that any sentence imposing adult

Green v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-01-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 975 So. 2d 1090

Snippet: trial judges have discretion under section 985.565(4)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2006), to sentence defendants

Hernandez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1270

Snippet: fact on the record in support of its ruling. § 92.565(4). See Bradley, 918 So.2d at 340; State v. Dionne…the basis of the trial court's ruling. § 92.565(4). Here, the trial court's finding is conclusory

Osceola Fish Farm. Ass'n, Inc. v. Div., of Admin. Hear.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-11-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 830 So. 2d 932

Snippet: statement as an unadopted rule under section 120.565(4) becomes moot when the administrative agency complies

State v. Dionne

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-03-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 814 So. 2d 1087

Snippet: on the record to support his or her ruling. § 92.565(4), Fla. Stat. (2000). Thus, in these limited circumstances

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1981-05-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: beverages. See ss.565.04, 565.045, F.S. Pursuant to the proviso contained in s.565.04, F.S., vendors licensed…engaged in the sale of other merchandise. See ss. 565.04 and 565.045, F.S. Section 561.342(3), F.S., does

Skaggs-Albertson's v. ABC Liquors, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-09-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 363 So. 2d 1082

Snippet: liquor to the main grocery store pursuant to Section 565.04, Florida Statutes (1975), which requires *1084