Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 565.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 565.10 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 565.10

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 565
LIQUOR
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 565.10
565.10 Distilled spirits container limit.It is unlawful for any distributor or vendor to sell or distribute distilled spirits in any size container in excess of 1.75 liters or 59.18 ounces. The division is authorized to make reasonable rules in accordance with chapter 120 governing the standards of fill of distilled spirits containers, which rules shall not conflict with or be more stringent than the federal regulations pertaining to such standards of fill of distilled spirits containers.
History.s. 11, ch. 16774, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4151(237); s. 1, ch. 20830, 1941; s. 1, ch. 57-327; s. 1, ch. 61-447; s. 1, ch. 65-142; s. 1, ch. 67-524; s. 148, ch. 71-355; s. 5, ch. 72-230; s. 1, ch. 73-328; s. 2, ch. 75-96; s. 2, ch. 79-143.
Note.Former s. 562.08.

F.S. 565.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 565.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 565.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 565.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S565.10 - LIQUOR-SELL - IN ILLEGAL CONTAINER SIZE 1ST OFF - M: S
S565.10 - LIQUOR-SELL - IN ILLEGAL CONTAINER SIZE SUBSQ OFF - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 565.10

Total Results: 7

Khianthalat v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-01-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 974 So. 2d 359

Snippet: irrespective of consent. See MeKinny v. State, 29 Fla. 565, 10 So. 732, 733 (1892). In 1892, the legislature enacted

Khianthalat v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-08-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 935 So. 2d 583

Snippet: irrespective of consent. See McKinny v. State, 29 Fla. 565, 10 So. 732, 733 (1892). In 1892, the legislature enacted…Commentaries at *212; see also McKinny v. State, 29 Fla. 565, 10 So. 732, 733 (1892) (explaining that because it

Caulder v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-12-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 500 So. 2d 1362

Snippet: So. at 347. See also McKinney v. State, 29 Fla. 565, 10 So. 732 (1892). Other authorities have reached

Miller v. Greene

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1958-07-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 104 So. 2d 457

Snippet: Bader v. Hiscox, 1919, 188 Iowa 986, 174 N.W. 565, 10 A.L.R. 316, the court said that if a promise be

State v. Bowden

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1944-06-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 18 So. 2d 478, 154 Fla. 511, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 748

Snippet: Fla. 112, 111 So. 515; McKinny v. State,29 Fla. 565, 10 So. 732, 30 Am. S.R. 140. Since unmarried women

Schang v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1901-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 43 Fla. 561

Snippet: completed crime itself. McKinney v. State, 29 Fla. 565, 10 South. Rep. 732; People v. Lourintz, 114 Cal. 628

Chism v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1900-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 42 Fla. 232

Snippet: State, 20 Fla. 777, and McKinney v. State, 29 Fla. 565, 10 South. Rep. 732. Several American courts have refused