The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 595
SCHOOL FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 595

SCHOOL FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICES

595.401 Short title.

595.402 Definitions.

595.403 State policy.

595.404 School food and other nutrition programs; powers and duties of the department.

595.405 School nutrition program requirements.

595.406 Florida Farm to School Program.

595.407 Children’s summer nutrition program.

595.408 Food distribution services; department responsibilities and functions.

595.409 Public records exemption.

595.420 Food recovery; legislative intent; department functions.

595.501 Corrective action plans; penalties.

595.601 Food and Nutrition Services Trust Fund.

595.401 Short title.—This chapter may be cited as the “Florida School Food and Nutrition Act.”

History.—s. 28, ch. 2013-226.

595.402 Definitions.—As used in this chapter, the term:

(1) “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of Agriculture.

(2) “Department” means the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

(3) “Program” means any one or more of the school food and nutrition service programs that the department has responsibility over including, but not limited to, the National School Lunch Program, the Special Milk Program, the School Breakfast Program, the Summer Food Service Program, the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, and any other program that relates to school nutrition.

(4) “School breakfast program” means a program authorized by s. 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, as amended, and administered by the department.

(5) “School district” means any of the 67 county school districts, including the respective district school board.

(6) “Sponsor” means any entity that is conducting a program under a current agreement with the department.

(7) “Summer nutrition program” means one or more of the programs authorized under 42 U.S.C. s. 1761.

(8) “Universal school breakfast program” means a program that makes breakfast available at no cost to all students regardless of their household income.

History.—s. 29, ch. 2013-226; s. 35, ch. 2016-61.

595.403 State policy.—The Legislature, in recognition of the demonstrated relationship between good nutrition and the capacity of students to develop and learn, declares that it is the policy of the state to provide standards for school food and nutrition services and to require each school district to establish and maintain an appropriate school food and nutrition service program consistent with the nutritional needs of students. To implement that policy, the state shall provide funds to meet the state National School Lunch Act matching requirements. The funds provided shall be distributed in such a manner as to comply with the requirements of the National School Lunch Act.

History.—s. 30, ch. 2013-226.

595.404 School food and other nutrition programs; powers and duties of the department.—The department has the following powers and duties:

(1) To conduct, supervise, and administer the program that will be carried out using federal or state funds, or funds from any other source.

(2) To conduct, supervise, and administer a farmers’ market nutrition program to provide participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) with locally grown fruits and vegetables that will be carried out using federal or state funds, or funds from any other source.

(3) To fully cooperate with the United States Government and its agencies and instrumentalities so that the department may receive the benefit of all federal financial allotments and assistance possible to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(4) To implement and adopt by rule, as required, federal regulations.

(5) To act as agent of, or contract with, the Federal Government, another state agency, any county or municipal government, or sponsor for the administration of the program, including the distribution of funds provided by the Federal Government to support the program.

(6) To provide a “severe need school” the highest rate of reimbursement to which it is entitled under 42 U.S.C. s. 1773 for each breakfast meal served.

(7) To develop and propose legislation necessary to implement the program, encourage the development of innovative school food and nutrition services, and expand participation in the program.

(8) To annually allocate among the sponsors, as applicable, funds provided from the school breakfast supplement in the General Appropriations Act based on each district’s total number of free and reduced-price breakfast meals served.

(9) To employ such persons as are necessary to perform its duties under this chapter.

(10) To adopt rules covering the administration, operation, and enforcement of the program and the farmers’ market nutrition program, as well as to implement the provisions of this chapter.

(11) To adopt and implement an appeal process by rule, as required by federal regulations, for applicants and participants under the programs implemented pursuant to this chapter, notwithstanding ss. 120.569 and 120.57-120.595.

(12) To assist, train, and review each sponsor in its implementation of the program.

(13) To advance funds from the program’s annual appropriation to a summer nutrition program sponsor, when requested, in order to implement the provisions of this chapter and in accordance with federal regulations.

(14) To collect data on food purchased through the programs defined and described in ss. 595.402(3) and 595.406 and to publish that data annually.

(15) To enter into agreements with federal or state agencies to coordinate and cooperate in the implementation of nutrition programs.

(16) To adopt and implement an exemption, waiver, and variance process by rule, as required by federal regulations, for sponsors under the programs implemented pursuant to this chapter, notwithstanding s. 120.542.

History.—s. 4, ch. 2011-217; s. 31, ch. 2013-226; s. 36, ch. 2016-61; s. 29, ch. 2023-154.

Note.—Former s. 570.98.

595.405 School nutrition program requirements.—

(1) Each district school board shall consider the recommendations of the district school superintendent and adopt policies to provide for an appropriate food and nutrition program for students consistent with federal law and department rules.

(2) Each district school board shall implement school breakfast programs that make breakfast meals available to all students in each school that serves any combination of grades kindergarten through 5.

(3) Each district school board must annually set prices for breakfast meals at rates that, combined with federal reimbursements and state allocations, are sufficient to defray costs of school breakfast programs without requiring allocations from the district’s operating funds, except if the district school board approves lower rates.

(4) Each school operating a breakfast program shall make a breakfast meal available if a student arrives at school on the school bus less than 15 minutes before the first bell rings and shall allow the student at least 15 minutes to eat the breakfast.

(5) Each district school board is encouraged to provide universal, free school breakfast meals to all students in each elementary, middle, and high school. A universal school breakfast program shall be implemented in each school in which 80 percent or more of the students are eligible for free or reduced-price meals, unless the district school board, after considering public testimony at two or more regularly scheduled board meetings, decides not to implement such a program in such schools.

(6) To increase school breakfast and universal school breakfast program participation, each district school board must, to the maximum extent practicable, make breakfast meals available to students through alternative service models as described in publications of the Food and Nutrition Service of the United States Department of Agriculture for the federal School Breakfast Program.

(7) Each district school board shall annually provide information prepared by the district’s food service administration regarding available school breakfast programs. The information shall be communicated through school announcements and notices sent to all parents.

(8) A district school board may operate a breakfast program providing for food preparation at the school site or in central locations with distribution to designated satellite schools, or any combination thereof.

History.—s. 271, ch. 2002-387; s. 1, ch. 2008-190; s. 16, ch. 2009-59; s. 5, ch. 2011-217; s. 32, ch. 2013-226; s. 37, ch. 2016-61.

Note.—Former s. 1006.06; s. 570.981(1)-(5).

595.406 Florida Farm to School Program.—

(1) In order to implement the Florida Farm to School Program, the department shall develop policies pertaining to school food services which encourage:

(a) Sponsors to buy fresh and high-quality foods grown in this state when feasible.

(b) Farmers in this state to sell their products to sponsors, school districts, and schools.

(d) Sponsors to make reasonable efforts to select foods based on a preference for those that have maximum nutritional content.

(2) The department shall provide outreach, guidance, and training to sponsors, schools, school food service directors, parent and teacher organizations, and students about the benefit of fresh food products from farms in this state.

(3) The department may recognize sponsors who purchase at least 10 percent of the food they serve from the Florida Farm to School Program.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2010-183; s. 5, ch. 2011-217; s. 33, ch. 2013-226; s. 38, ch. 2016-61.

Note.—Former s. 1006.06; s. 570.981(6).

595.407 Children’s summer nutrition program.—

(1) This section may be cited as the “Ms. Willie Ann Glenn Act.”

(2) Each school district shall develop a plan to sponsor or operate a summer nutrition program to operate sites in the school district as follows:

(a) Within 5 miles of at least one school that serves any combination of grades kindergarten through 5 at which 50 percent or more of the students are eligible for free or reduced-price school meals for the duration of 35 days between the end of the school year and the beginning of the next school year. School districts may exclude holidays and weekends.

(b) Within 10 miles of each school that serves any combination of grades kindergarten through 5 at which 50 percent or more of the students are eligible for free or reduced-price school meals, except as operated pursuant to paragraph (a).

(3)(a) A school district may be exempt from sponsoring a summer nutrition program pursuant to this section. A school district seeking such exemption must include the issue on an agenda at a regular or special school district meeting that is publicly noticed, provide residents an opportunity to participate in the discussion, and vote on whether to be exempt from this section. The school district shall notify the department within 10 days after it decides to become exempt from this section.

(b) Each year, the school district shall reconsider its decision to be exempt from the provisions of this section and shall vote on whether to continue the exemption from sponsoring a summer nutrition program. The school district shall notify the department within 10 days after each subsequent year’s decision to continue the exemption.

(c) If a school district elects to be exempt from sponsoring a summer nutrition program under this section, the school district may encourage not-for-profit entities to sponsor the program. If a not-for-profit entity chooses to sponsor the summer nutrition program but fails to perform with regard to the program, the school district and the department are not required to continue the program and shall be held harmless from any liability arising from the discontinuation of the summer nutrition program.

(4) The superintendent of schools may collaborate with municipal and county governmental agencies and private, not-for-profit leaders in implementing the plan. Although schools have proven to be the optimal site for a summer nutrition program, any not-for-profit entity may serve as a site or sponsor. By April 15 of each year, each school district with a summer nutrition program shall report to the department the district’s summer nutrition program sites in compliance with this section.

(5) The department shall provide to each school district by February 15 of each year a list of local organizations that have filed letters of intent to participate in the summer nutrition program in order that a school district may determine how many sites are needed to serve the children and where to place each site.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-73; s. 6, ch. 2011-217; s. 34, ch. 2013-226; s. 39, ch. 2016-61.

Note.—Former s. 1006.0606; 570.982.

595.408 Food distribution services; department responsibilities and functions.—

(1)(a) The department shall conduct, supervise, and administer all food distribution services that will be carried on using federal or state funds, or funds from any other source, or food received and distributed from the United States or any of its agencies.

(b) The department shall determine the benefits each applicant or recipient of assistance is entitled to receive under this chapter, provided that each applicant or recipient is a resident of this state and a citizen of the United States or is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence or otherwise permanently residing in the United States under color of law.

(2) The department shall cooperate fully with the United States Government and its agencies and instrumentalities so that the department may receive the benefit of all federal financial allotments and assistance possible to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(3) The department may:

(a) Accept any duties with respect to food distribution services as are delegated to it by an agency of the Federal Government or any state, county, or municipal government.

(b) Act as agent of, or contract with, the federal government, state government, or any county or municipal government in the administration of food distribution services to secure the benefits of any public assistance that is available from the federal government or any of its agencies, and in the distribution of funds received from the federal government, state government, or any county or municipal government for food distribution services within the state.

(4) This chapter does not limit, abrogate, or abridge the powers and duties of any other state agency.

History.—s. 54, ch. 92-58; s. 4, ch. 93-169; s. 35, ch. 2013-226; s. 40, ch. 2016-61.

Note.—Former s. 570.072.

595.409 Public records exemption.—

(1) Personal identifying information of an applicant for or participant in a school food and nutrition service program, as defined in s. 595.402, held by the department or the Department of Education is exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution.

(2)(a) Such information shall be disclosed to:

1. Another governmental entity in the performance of its official duties and responsibilities; or

2. Any person who has the written consent of the applicant for or participant in such program.

(b) This section does not prohibit a participant’s legal guardian from obtaining confirmation of acceptance and approval, dates of applicability, or other information the legal guardian may request.

(3) This exemption applies to any information identifying a program applicant or participant held by the department or the Department of Education before, on, or after the effective date of this exemption.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2013-217; s. 1, ch. 2018-74.

595.420 Food recovery; legislative intent; department functions.—

(1) The Legislature finds that:

(a) Millions of pounds of surplus and slightly blemished fresh fruit and vegetables are destroyed each year, while many ¹residents of this state go each day without food.

(b) Food recovery programs can beneficially aid residents of this state who lack the means to purchase fresh fruit and vegetables by providing such surplus food to governmental agencies and local volunteer and nonprofit organizations for distribution to those in need, rather than continuing to see it destroyed.

(c) The state, through the Commissioner of Agriculture, should assist food recovery programs, when needed, to aid in their establishment and to support their continued and efficient operation.

(2) A food recovery program is a local, volunteer-based organization near an agricultural production area of the state that is established for the exclusive purpose of soliciting, collecting, packaging, and delivering surplus fresh fruit and vegetables for distribution in communities throughout the state. Distribution of the food to the needy would be accomplished by governmental agencies and volunteer and nonprofit organizations.

(3) In helping to coordinate the establishment of food recovery programs, the department may:

(a) Identify suppliers, volunteers, and nonprofit organizations in the community to ascertain the level of interest in establishing a food recovery program.

(b) Provide facilities and other resources for initial organizational meetings.

(c) Provide direct and indirect support for the fledgling program, upon demonstration of serious interest at the local level.

(4) The department may provide direct and indirect support to food recovery programs that are unable to obtain specific assistance from their communities or other sources by loaning equipment, facilities, and staff resources for the collection, packaging, storage, and transportation of donated food, as needed.

(5) The department shall account for the direct and indirect costs associated with supporting food recovery programs throughout the state. It shall submit an electronic report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by November 1, for the previous fiscal year, when state funds are spent for this purpose. The report must include, but need not be limited to, the identity of organizations receiving funds, the amount of funds disbursed to these organizations, other uses of food recovery funds, and estimates of the amount of fresh produce recovered.

(6) It is the intent of the Legislature that each potential donor, to the greatest extent possible and practicable, make available to any bona fide charitable or nonprofit organization, to any representative or volunteer acting on behalf of such an organization, to an uncompensated person acting in a philanthropic manner providing services similar to those of such an organization, or to a transporter any surplus or excess canned or perishable food for use by such an organization or person to feed homeless persons or other persons who are in need of food and are otherwise unable to provide food for themselves. In achieving this intent, the following provisions must be followed:

(a) Each donor shall make every reasonable effort to contact bona fide charitable or nonprofit organizations in the community in which the donor operates in order to provide for the collection by such organizations of any surplus or excess canned food or perishable food from the donor.

(b) Each bona fide charitable or nonprofit organization in this state which provides, as a part of the services that the organization provides to the community in which it operates, food for persons who are in need of food or are otherwise unable to provide food for themselves, or which collects and transports such food to such organizations, shall make every reasonable effort to contact any donors within the organization’s area of operations for purposes of collecting any surplus or excess canned food or perishable food for use in providing such services.

(7) For public information purposes, the department shall develop a public information brochure detailing the need of food recovery programs, the benefit of food recovery programs, the manner in which such organizations may become involved in food recovery programs, the protection afforded to such programs under s. 768.136, and the food recovery entities or food banks that exist in the state. This brochure must be updated annually.

History.—s. 2, ch. 94-234; s. 13, ch. 94-335; s. 1, ch. 98-283; s. 154, ch. 2010-102; s. 61, ch. 2014-150.

¹Note.—As created by s. 2, ch. 94-234. The enactment by s. 13, ch. 94-335, used the term “Florida citizens” instead of the term “residents of this state.”

Note.—Former s. 570.0725.

595.501 Corrective action plans; penalties.—

(1) When a corrective action plan is issued by the department or a federal agency, each sponsor is required to complete the corrective action plan to be in compliance with the program.

(2) Any person or sponsor that violates any provision of this chapter or any rule adopted thereunder or otherwise does not comply with the program is subject to a suspension or revocation of their agreement, loss of reimbursement, or a financial penalty in accordance with federal or state law, or both. This section does not restrict the applicability of any other law.

History.—s. 36, ch. 2013-226; s. 41, ch. 2016-61.

595.601 Food and Nutrition Services Trust Fund.—Chapter 99-37, Laws of Florida, recreated the Food and Nutrition Services Trust Fund to record revenue and disbursements of Federal Food and Nutrition funds received by the department as authorized in ss. 595.404 and 595.408.

History.—s. 589, ch. 2002-387; s. 7, ch. 2011-217; s. 37, ch. 2013-226; s. 42, ch. 2016-61.

Note.—Former s. 1010.77; s. 570.983.

F.S. 595 on Google Scholar

F.S. 595 on Casetext

Amendments to 595

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 595

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 595.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Whitmer , 963 F.3d 595, 597 (C.A.6 2020). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Doe , 486 U.S. 592, 595, 601, 108 S.Ct. 2047, 100 L.Ed.2d 632 (1988) (concluding that decision to fire . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id., at 595-597, 422 P.3d at 68-70. We granted Kansas' petition for a writ of certiorari, 587 U. . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Payne , 194 U.S. 106, 109, 24 S.Ct. 595, 48 L.Ed. 894 (1904) (distinguishing between "mixed questions . . .

L. ALLEN, v. A. COOPER, III,, 140 S. Ct. 994 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Duchesne , 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 197, 15 L.Ed. 595 ; Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. . . .

O DAY, v. CHATILA,, 140 S. Ct. 934 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-595 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF IBM, v. W. JANDER,, 140 S. Ct. 592 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See ante, at 595 (KAGAN, J., concurring). . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Knowles , 568 U.S. 588, 595, 133 S.Ct. 1345, 185 L.Ed.2d 439 (2013), plaintiffs are free to seek relief . . .

COMPERE, v. NUSRET MIAMI, LLC, d b a a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1197 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . HL-A Co. , 595 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 1239 (S.D. Ala. 2008) ("If ... . . . reasonable basis for determining that there are other similarly situated employees."); Longcrier , 595 . . .

B. VANZANT v. HILL S PET NUTRITION, INC., 934 F.3d 730 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . plaintiffs' purchases "occurred after the allegedly fraudulent statements." 221 Ill.Dec. 389, 675 N.E.2d at 595 . . .

NORTH PENSION FUND v. NUTRITION MANAGEMENT SERVICES COMPANY,, 935 F.3d 93 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Maverick Tube Corp. , 595 F.3d 458, 467 (2d Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 595-96. But they do not discuss or cite the portions of the opinion relevant to these rules. . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Citicorp USA, Inc. , 137 Ill.App.3d 1035, 92 Ill.Dec. 780, 485 N.E.2d 591, 595 (1985) (citing RESTATEMENT . . .

A. CARVELLI, v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, M. R. Jr., 934 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . In one unpublished securities case, IBEW Local 595 Pension & Money Purchase Pension Plans v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. WAGUESPACK,, 935 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez-Rios , 595 F.3d 581, 584 (5th Cir. 2010). . . .

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, INC. v. LITCHFIELD HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION,, 934 F.3d 238 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . County of Schenectady , 595 F.3d 411, 416 (2d Cir. 2010) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Nat'l Basketball Ass'n , 95 F.3d 593, 595 (7th Cir. 1996) ( Bulls II ) (same); Kingray, Inc. v. . . .

PAUL G. a BY AND THROUGH STEVE G. v. MONTEREY PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 933 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . of the student's request for online classes was directly related to the student's IEP. 900 F.3d 587, 595 . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 595 F.3d 549, 556 (4th Cir. 2010). . . . (emphasis omitted)); Gao, 595 F.3d at 556 ("Given that the statute makes all aggravated felonies per . . . to anticipate every adjudication by promulgating a regulation covering each particular crime"); Gao, 595 . . . See Delgado, 648 F.3d at 1104 ; Gao, 595 F.3d at 555 ; N-A-M, 587 F.3d at 1056. . . . See Delgado, 648 F.3d at 1102-04 ; Gao, 595 F.3d at 554-55 ; N-A-M, 587 F.3d at 1056 ; Nethagani, 532 . . . (citing Ali , 468 F.3d at 469 ). 595 F.3d 549 (4th Cir. 2010). Id. at 556. Id. at 556-57. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TREVINO,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 901 (W.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Yakes, 226 Wis.2d 425, 595 N.W.2d 108, 111-12 (Wis. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. HODGE, 933 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Daubert , 509 U.S. at 595, 113 S.Ct. 2786. . . .

CHAVEZ, De E. De De De v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 933 F.3d 186 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Associated Univs., Inc. , 130 A.D.3d 592, 595, 12 N.Y.S.3d 286, 289 (2d Dep't 2015) (explaining that . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Baird , 438 F.3d 595, 602 (6th Cir. 2006) ). . . .

ALBANY AIRPORT HIE, LLC HIE LLC, v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Maverick Tube Corp., 595 F.3d 458, 465 (2d Cir. 2010) ("[T]he initial question for the court on a motion . . .

MALDONADO L. Jr. v. RODRIGUEZ, Jr., 932 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Haverda , 723 F.3d at 595-96 ("Courts deciding the causation issues by summary disposition have generally . . .

N. TIMM K. v. GOODYEAR DUNLOP TIRES NORTH AMERICA, LTD., 932 F.3d 986 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Akzo Nobel Paints , LLC , 721 F.3d 426, 431 (7th Cir. 2013) (citing Daubert , 509 U.S. at 595, 113 S.Ct . . .

KELLER LOGISTICS GROUP, INC. v. NAVISTAR, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 774 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . REV. 595, 625 (2019) (collecting bad-faith-exception cases and noting the "incongruity" of their evidentiary . . .

O. CAMPOS, v. COOK COUNTY,, 932 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . or her appointment comes to light-to Merit Board decisions. 427 Ill.Dec. 379, 118 N.E.3d 580, 591, 595 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Williams , 341 U.S. 58, 65, 71 S.Ct. 595, 95 L.Ed. 747 (1951) ("The District Court had jurisdiction of . . .

UNITED STATES v. BONNELL,, 932 F.3d 1080 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Appx. 594, 595 (8th Cir. 2016) ("The district court's thorough discussion of the § 3553(a) factors leaves . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESCALANTE,, 933 F.3d 395 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Davis , 875 F.3d 592, 595 (11th Cir. 2017) (observing that the categorical approach carries judges "down . . .

KNUTSON, v. VILLAGE OF LAKEMOOR,, 932 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Com'n , 463 U.S. 582, 595, 103 S.Ct. 3221, 77 L.Ed.2d 866 (1983) ("Whether a litigant has a cause of . . .

UNITED STATES v. PORTER,, 933 F.3d 226 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Prosise , 462 U.S. 306, 320, 103 S.Ct. 2368, 76 L.Ed.2d 595 (1983) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOSYK,, 933 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Di Re , 332 U.S. 581, 595, 68 S.Ct. 222, 92 L.Ed. 210 (1948) ("We have had frequent occasion to point . . .

YOUNG, v. WINKLER,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 868 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . City of Detroit , 595 F. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOE,, 932 F.3d 279 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lightfoot , 724 F.3d 593, 595 (5th Cir. 2013) ). . . .

O. KOEPKE, v. M. KOEPKE,, 275 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 853 So. 2d 595, 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("[F]ailure to strictly follow the dictates of Rule 3.840 . . .

STATE BY AND THROUGH TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kozlowski , 914 F.2d 593, 595 (4th Cir. 1990). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORRALES- VAZQUEZ,, 931 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rincon-Jimenez , 595 F.2d 1192, 1193-94 (9th Cir. 1979). . . . Rincon-Jimenez , 595 F.2d 1192 (9th Cir. 1979). Not so. . . . Rincon-Jimenez , 595 F.2d 1192, 1193 (9th Cir. 1979) ; see also 8 C.F.R. § 235.1(a) ("Application to . . .

J. UCCARDI, v. LAZER SPOT, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 911 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . ACEO, Inc. , 276 F.R.D. 592, 595-96 (N.D. Ill. 2011). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS,, 930 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Seltzer , 595 F.3d 1170, 1177-78 (10th Cir. 2010). . . .

GARCIA, v. VERTICAL SCREEN, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 598 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . HL-A Co. , 595 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 1225 (S.D. Ala. 2008) ). . . .

BRAEBURN INC. v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Study Grp., Inc. , 438 U.S. 59, 78, 98 S.Ct. 2620, 57 L.Ed.2d 595 (1978) ("Nothing in our prior cases . . .

BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 336 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Maverick Tube Corp., 595 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2010). . . .

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CHICAGO TRUST COMPANY, THE BABY FOLD,, 930 F.3d 910 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Security Insurance , 258 F.3d 595, 600-02 (7th Cir. 2001). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUTIERREZ- RAMIREZ,, 930 F.3d 963 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Littlewind , 595 F.3d 876, 881 (8th Cir. 2010) (internal quotations omitted). . . .

M. CROCE, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Jr., 930 F.3d 787 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lincoln Publ'g (Ohio), Inc. , 114 Ohio App.3d 595, 683 N.E.2d 823, 837-38 (1996) ; Painter , 148 N.E.2d . . .

In CRANBERRY GROWERS COOPERATIVE, v. S. LAYNG,, 930 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rednour , 627 F.3d 586, 595 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

MEZA- LOPEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 1041 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brown, 331 F.3d 591, 595 (8th Cir. 2003) ("We have held that facts gathered from the prosecutor's summarization . . .

PHILLIPS, v. V. SPENCER,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 136 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Jackson, 595 F. . . .

STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY, v. BRIGHTSTAR CORP., 388 F. Supp. 3d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Maverick Tube Corp., 595 F.3d 458, 468 (2d Cir. 2010) ; Int'l Multifoods Corp. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. DESOTELL,, 929 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Prosise , 462 U.S. 306, 321, 103 S.Ct. 2368, 76 L.Ed.2d 595 (1983) (a valid guilty plea "results in the . . .

A. L. v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 819 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 488 So. 2d 595, 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. FINCHER,, 929 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rea , 621 F.3d 595, 606 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HASSAN- SALEH- MOHAMAD,, 930 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Dávila-González, 595 F.3d 42, 49 (1st Cir. 2010). . . .

CARROZZA, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. d b a CVS, 391 F. Supp. 3d 136 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Daubert , 509 U.S. at 595, 113 S.Ct. 2786. . . . Corp. , 358 S.C. 449, 595 S.E.2d 493, 494-96 (2004) (holding that when filling prescriptions, pharmacies . . .

ATHENA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. LTD. E. V. v. MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, LLC,, 927 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Mayo , 566 U.S. at 72, 132 S.Ct. 1289 ; see Myriad , 569 U.S. at 595-96, 133 S.Ct. 2107. . . .

PARTRIDGE, v. CITY OF BENTON, ARKANSAS, 929 F.3d 562 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Schnarr , 502 F.2d 588, 595 (8th Cir. 1974). . . .

JOHNSON, v. A. LEONARD, M. DDS,, 929 F.3d 569 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holten , 817 F.3d 595, 597 (8th Cir. 2016) ("Where an appellant specifies one order of the district court . . .

LARSON, v. CITY OF ALGOOD, TENNESSEE, v. v., 390 F. Supp. 3d 874 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Banks, 344 F.3d 587, 595 (6th Cir. 2003). . . .

ABDULLAYEVA, v. ATTENDING HOMECARE SERVICES LLC,, 928 F.3d 218 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Maverick Tube Corp. , 595 F.3d 458, 467 (2d Cir. 2010) -unambiguously requires that employees with claims . . . Co. , 595 F.3d at 467. . . .

BARGHER, v. WHITE,, 928 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Henagan , 595 F.3d 610, 619 (5th Cir. 2010) (holding that when plaintiff "was incarcerated when he brought . . .

GRAHAM, v. CITY OF MANASSAS SCHOOL BOARD, d b a v. d b a, 390 F. Supp. 3d 702 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Payne, 270 Va. 129, 613 S.E.2d 592, 595 (2005), and Colby v. . . . Couplin, 613 S.E.2d at 595 (quoting Colby, 400 S.E.2d at 186 ). . . .

IN RE C. LLOYD, J. v. T., 603 B.R. 247 (Bankr. Mass. 2019)

. . . House Report No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 367 (1977); Senate Report No. 95-989, 95th Cong., 2d Sess . . . House Report 95-595 at 368. . . .

DOMINION ENERGY, INC. v. CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. GMBH, v. GMBH, v., 928 F.3d 325 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Knowles , 568 U.S. 588, 595, 133 S.Ct. 1345, 185 L.Ed.2d 439 (2013) (describing CAFA's objective). . . . Knowles , 568 U.S. 588, 595, 133 S.Ct. 1345, 185 L.Ed.2d 439 (2013) ; S. Rep. . . . Co. , 568 U.S. at 595, 133 S.Ct. 1345 (explaining CAFA's objective) ; N.Y. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PORTER,, 928 F.3d 947 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . New Mexico , 916 F.2d 595, 598 (10th Cir. 1990) (quotations omitted). . . .

IN RE DENNIS T., 927 F.3d 1015 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Halbert , 576 B.R. at 595, citing In re Hickey , 473 B.R. 361, 364 (Bankr. D. Or. 2012). . . . In re Halbert, 576 B.R. at 595, citing 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.14A, at 96.1. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FURLOW,, 928 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Davis , 855 F.3d 587, 595-96 (4th Cir. 2017) (explaining that error is plain if, "at the time of appellate . . .

INTERIOR GLASS SYSTEMS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 927 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Commissioner , 283 U.S. 589, 595, 597-98, 51 S.Ct. 608, 75 L.Ed. 1289 (1931) ; Franceschi v. . . .

BILINSKY, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., 928 F.3d 565 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. , 883 F.3d 595, 603-05 (6th Cir. 2018). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLASER,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1306 (D. Kan. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d at 595 ("The plain language of the Adam Walsh Amendments, specifically the unenumerated paragraph . . .

LEFEBURE v. BOEKER, D. D J. Co., 390 F. Supp. 3d 729 (M.D. La. 2019)

. . . City of Torrington , 595 F.Supp. 1521 (D.Conn.1984). . . . violative acts or omission to perform required acts pursuant to the police officer's duty to protect.' 595 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PATTON,, 927 F.3d 1087 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gibson , 595 F. . . .

GELITA USA, INC. v. HAMMOND WATER WORKS DEPARTMENT,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 901 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Hyatt Corp. , 862 F.3d 588, 595 (7th Cir. 2017). . . .

AMBELLU v. RE ESE ADBARAT DEBRE SELAM KIDIST MARIAM,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 71 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Wolf , 443 U.S. 595, 607-08, 99 S.Ct. 3020, 61 L.Ed.2d 775 (1979) (discussing the potential resolution . . .

HARRIS v. BLUE RIDGE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., 388 F. Supp. 3d 633 (M.D.N.C. 2019)

. . . Mgmt., Inc., 221 N.C.App. 369, 727 S.E.2d 595, 599 (2012) (quoting Shoaf v. . . .

BEERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES E. ATF B. ATF, 927 F.3d 150 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Heller , 554 U.S. at 595, 128 S.Ct. 2783. . . .

AMERICAN LEGION, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, v., 139 S. Ct. 2067 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Id., at 578-580, 134 S.Ct. 1811 ; see id., at 595, 134 S.Ct. 1811 (ALITO, J., concurring). . . .

IN RE L. FULTON, In S. In In, 926 F.3d 916 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Nu2u Auto World , 595 B.R. 184, 188 (D.N.J. 2018) ; a court "must have the power to compensate victims . . .

MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L. P. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 392 F. Supp. 3d 731 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Fund , 595 Pa. 574, 939 A.2d 312 (2007) )). Maxim cites the Deductible Endorsement as well. . . .

AYOS, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 178 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Id. at 595. . . .

SILBERMAN, v. MIAMI DADE TRANSIT,, 927 F.3d 1123 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . M.C. , 100 So.3d 587, 595 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARELLANO- BANUELOS,, 927 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez-Rios , 595 F.3d 581, 584 (5th Cir. 2010). . . . See Martinez-Rios , 595 F.3d at 586. . . . New Mexico , 564 U.S. 647, 652, 131 S.Ct. 2705, 180 L.Ed.2d 610 (2011) ; see also Martinez-Rios , 595 . . .

UNITED STATES v. M NDEZ- B EZ,, 927 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Dávila-González, 595 F.3d 42, 49 (1st Cir. 2010). . . .

VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC. v. WARREN,, 139 S. Ct. 1894 (U.S. 2019)

. . . S. 582, 594-595, 131 S.Ct. 1968, 179 L.Ed.2d 1031 (2011) ; Geier v. . . .

C. PAZOL, C. J. v. TOUGH MUDDER INCORPORATED, LLC, BK LLC,, 384 F. Supp. 3d 191 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Bass River Golf Management, Inc. , 92 Mass.App.Ct. 595, 606, 93 N.E.3d 852 (2018) ("[M]ere breach of . . .

NAVARRO CARRILO, M. G. v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,, 384 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 324, 334 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) (internal quotation removed), aff'd in part, vacated in part, 905 F.2d 595 . . .

GRIHAM, v. UNITED STATES, 389 F. Supp. 3d 986 (N.D. Ala. 2019)

. . . App'x 170, 171 (3d Cir. 2013) ; In re Flowers , 595 F.3d 204, 205 (5th Cir. 2009) ; Altman v. . . .

J. D. FIELDS CO. INC. v. SHORING ENGINEERS,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Shute , 499 U.S. 585, 595, 111 S. Ct. 1522, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991), and M/S Bremen v. . . .

IN RE BULLOCK, s, 603 B.R. 411 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . In the Matter of 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership , 190 B.R. 595, 598 (N.D. Ill. 1995). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORTES- GOMEZ,, 926 F.3d 699 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Seltzer , 595 F.3d 1170, 1176 (10th Cir. 2010) ("[T]he length of the delay crossed the threshold from . . .

KOCOUREK, v. W. SHRADER, C. G. R., 391 F. Supp. 3d 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . LLC , 595 F.3d 86, 92-93 (2d Cir. 2010) (quoting Azrielli v. . . .

FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NEWLIN, 273 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Tarmac Am., Inc., 752 So. 2d 592, 595-96 (Fla. 2000) ; see also Burns v. . . . Freund, 49 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 1950) ("The purpose of the cross-examination is to test the truth of . . .

PERERA, v. DIOLIFE LLC, a, 274 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Decker , 72 N.Y. 595, 599 (N.Y. 1878) ). • First, "the seller may treat the stock as belonging to the . . .

IN RE SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION, 389 F. Supp. 3d 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . LLC , 595 F.3d 86, 92-93 (2d Cir. 2010) ). . . . Cigna , 918 F.3d at 63 (quoting Operating Local 649 , 595 F.3d at 92 ) (brackets omitted). . . . (quoting Operating Local 649 , 595 F.3d at 92 ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COOPER,, 926 F.3d 718 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Caraballo , 595 F.3d 1214, 1226 (11th Cir. 2010). . . . Caraballo , 595 F.3d at 1229 n.1 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). a. . . . officer's questioning in determining whether the information elicited is testimonial," Caraballo , 595 . . . See, e.g. , Caraballo , 595 F.3d at 1229. . . . Caraballo , 595 F.3d at 1229 n.1. c. . . .

EATON CORPORATION, v. WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, AIU v. Co., 387 F. Supp. 3d 931 (E.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . Case Corp. , 227 Wis. 2d 1, 10-11, 595 N.W.2d 380 (1999). . . . Sharp , 227 Wis. 2d at 11, 595 N.W.2d 380. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GANDY R., 926 F.3d 248 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holmes , 595 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2010), the defendant similarly argued that the government failed to . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. TERRONEZ,, 926 F.3d 390 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Curby , 595 F.3d 794, 797 (7th Cir. 2010) (per curiam))). . . .

TRUJILLO, v. ROCKLEDGE FURNITURE LLC,, 926 F.3d 395 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland , 595 F.2d 711, 727-29 (D.C. . . .