Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 599 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 599 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 599

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 599
VITICULTURE
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 599
CHAPTER 599
VITICULTURE
599.0005 Florida Viticulture Policy Act; short title.
599.001 Legislative declaration of public policy respecting viticulture.
599.002 Viticulture Advisory Council.
599.003 State Viticulture Plan.
599.004 Florida Farm Winery Program; registration; logo; fees.
599.012 Viticulture Trust Fund; creation.
599.0005 Florida Viticulture Policy Act; short title.This chapter may be cited as the “Florida Viticulture Policy Act.”
History.s. 1, ch. 85-111.
599.001 Legislative declaration of public policy respecting viticulture.
(1) The Legislature declares that viticulture, the production and utilization of grapes, is an underdeveloped agricultural commodity enterprise in this state. The Legislature recognizes that Florida possesses many resources and geographic advantages that favor the expansion and growth of present-day viticulture into a broad-based, economically viable industry. The growth potential of the present industry offers good opportunities for local economic development and supply trade. The development of viticulture is compatible with the economies, lifestyles, and interests of both rural and urban Florida.
(2) Further, the Legislature finds that factors such as minimal new grape cultivar development, lack of printed information on production and processing, minimal understanding of winemaking techniques and requirements that will capitalize on the unique characteristics of available grape cultivars, minimal understanding of grape juice processing requirements, lack of fresh fruit handling and processing technology specifically for muscadine grape cultivars, lack of quality standards for wine and other processed grapes, lack of assistance and printed information for overall business planning and marketing, and lack of coordination of the many diverse interests and expertises which could contribute to the further development of viticulture in the state are inhibitory to the development of viticulture to the potential of which it is reasonably capable, going into the 21st century.
(3) The Legislature further declares that, in order to effectively support the efficient and expeditious development and growth of viticulture into a broad-based, economically sound industry, there is a need for leadership and statewide viticultural planning.
History.ss. 2, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 6, ch. 94-296.
599.002 Viticulture Advisory Council.
(1) There is created within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services the Viticulture Advisory Council, to consist of eight members as follows: the president of the Florida Grape Growers’ Association or a designee thereof; a representative from the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences; a representative from the viticultural science program at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University; and five additional commercial members, to be appointed for a 2-year term each by the Commissioner of Agriculture, including a wine producer, a fresh fruit producer, a nonwine product (juice, jelly, pie fillings, etc.) producer, and a viticultural nursery operator.
(2) The meetings, powers and duties, procedures, and recordkeeping of the Viticulture Advisory Council shall be pursuant to s. 570.232.
(3) The primary responsibilities of the Viticulture Advisory Council are to submit to the Commissioner of Agriculture, annually, the industry’s recommendations for viticultural research, promotion, and education and, as necessary, the industry’s recommendations for revisions to the State Viticulture Plan.
History.ss. 3, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 4, ch. 85-62; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 85, ch. 93-169; s. 3, ch. 94-296; s. 29, ch. 94-335; s. 59, ch. 2011-206; s. 157, ch. 2014-150; s. 33, ch. 2023-154.
599.003 State Viticulture Plan.
(1) The Commissioner of Agriculture, in consultation with the Viticulture Advisory Council, shall develop and coordinate the implementation of the State Viticulture Plan, which shall identify problems and constraints of the viticulture industry, propose possible solutions to those problems, and develop planning mechanisms for the orderly growth of the industry, including:
(a) Criteria for viticultural research, service, and management priorities.
(b) Additional proposed legislation that may be required.
(c) Plans and goals to improve research and service capabilities at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University and the University of Florida in their efforts to address current and future needs of the industry.
(d) The potential for viticulture products in terms of market and needs for development.
(e) Evaluation of wine policy alternatives, including, but not limited to, continued improvement in wine quality, blending considerations, promotion and advertising, labeling and vineyard designations, and development of production and marketing strategies.
(f) Evaluation of production and fresh fruit policy alternatives, including, but not limited to, setting minimum grades and standards, promotion and advertising, development of production and marketing strategies, and setting minimum standards on types and quality of nursery plants.
(g) Evaluation of policy alternatives for nonwine processed products, including, but not limited to, setting minimum quality standards and development of production and marketing strategies.
(h) Research and service priorities for further development of the viticulture industry.
(i) The identification of state agencies and public and private institutions concerned with research, education, extension, services, planning, promotion, and marketing functions related to viticultural development and the delineation of contributions and responsibilities.
(j) Business planning, investment potential, financial risks, and economics of production and utilization.
(2) A revision and update of the State Viticulture Plan shall be submitted biennially to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the chairs of appropriate committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, and a progress report and budget request shall be submitted annually.
History.ss. 4, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 2, ch. 85-111; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 4, ch. 94-296.
599.004 Florida Farm Winery Program; registration; logo; fees.
(1) The Florida Farm Winery Program is established within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Under this program, a winery may qualify as a tourist attraction only if it is registered with and certified by the department as a Florida Farm Winery. A winery may not claim to be certified unless it has received written approval from the department.
(a) To qualify as a certified Florida Farm Winery, a winery must:
1. Produce or sell less than 250,000 gallons of wine annually of which 60 percent of the wine produced is made from state agricultural products.
2. Maintain a minimum of 5 acres of owned or managed land in Florida which produces commodities used in the production of wine.
3. Be open to the public for tours, tastings, and sales at least 30 hours each week.
4. Make annual application to the department for recognition as a Florida Farm Winery, on forms provided by the department.
5. Pay an annual application and registration fee of $100.
(b) To maintain certification and recognition as a Florida Farm Winery, a winery must comply with the qualifications provided in this section. The Commissioner of Agriculture is authorized to officially recognize a certified Florida Farm Winery as a state tourist attraction.
(2)(a) The department, in coordination with the Viticulture Advisory Council, shall develop and designate by rule a Florida Farm Winery logo, emblem, and directional sign to guide the public to certified Florida Farm Winery tourist attractions. The logo and emblem of certified Florida Farm Winery signs shall be uniform.
(b) Upon the request of a certified Florida Farm Winery, the Department of Transportation shall acquire and place Florida Farm Winery logo, emblem, and directional signs on the rights-of-way of interstate highways and primary and secondary roads. All costs for placing each sign shall be paid by the certified Florida Farm Winery requesting the sign. However, the cost of placing a sign shall not exceed $250 and the annual permit fee shall not exceed $50.
(c) Each certified Florida Farm Winery shall pay to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services a licensing fee of $10 each year for each Florida Farm Winery logo, emblem, and directional sign in place.
(3) All fees collected, except as otherwise provided by this section, shall be deposited into the Viticulture Trust Fund and used to develop consumer information on the native characteristics and proper use of wines.
History.s. 30, ch. 92-151; s. 10, ch. 2012-83.
599.012 Viticulture Trust Fund; creation.
(1) There is established the Viticulture Trust Fund within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The department shall use the moneys deposited in the trust fund pursuant to subsection (2) to do all the following:
(a) Develop and coordinate the implementation of the State Viticulture Plan.
(b) Promote viticulture products manufactured from products grown in the state.
(c) Provide grants for viticultural research.
(2) Fifty percent of the revenues collected from the excise taxes imposed under s. 564.06 on wine produced by manufacturers in this state from products grown in the state will be deposited in the Viticulture Trust Fund in accordance with that section.
History.s. 16, ch. 88-308; ss. 5, 6, ch. 94-296.

F.S. 599 on Google Scholar

F.S. 599 on Casetext

Amendments to 599


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 599
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S599.9335 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F
S599.9335 4 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F
S599.9335 9 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F
S599.9335 10 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F
S599.9335 11a - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F
S599.9335 11b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F
S599.9335 11c - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 599

Total Results: 20

SafePoint Insurance Company v. Sonia Schnepel, A/K/A Sonia Miller

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-18

Snippet: Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 228 So. 3d 596, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (“When an insurance carrier investigates

Debose v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: where a trial may be held.” Smith v. United States, 599 U.S. 236, 245 (2023).

Oracle America, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: important disputes.’” (quoting United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. 670, 675 (2023))); cf. Planned Parenthood of

Oracle America, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: important disputes.’” (quoting United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. 670, 675 (2023))); cf. Planned Parenthood of

Oracle America, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: important disputes.’” (quoting United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. 670, 675 (2023))); cf. Planned Parenthood of

Gaskins v. Bahour

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: prejudice. See Obermark v. Obermark, 392 So. 3d 598, 599 (Fla. 5th DCA 023); Delgado v. Morejon, 295 So. 3d

All Purpose Title, LLC V.Edyta Knobloch

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: United Am. Bank of Cent. Fla., Inc. v. Seligman, 599 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). “An escrow

City of Miami Beach v. Steven Kwartin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 912 So. 2d 595, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“With limited exceptions not

North Broward Hospital District, Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida, Inc., and Naples Community Hospital, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-06

Snippet: Ass’n, Inc. v. Tampa Bay Downs, Inc., 948 So. 2d 599, 606 (Fla. 2006). Applying the trial court’s interpretation

Atlantic Coast Conference v. Florida State University Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-04

Snippet: Mission Ins. Co. v. Puritan Fashions Corp., 706 F.2d 599, 602 (5th Circ. 1983) (affirming the dismissal of

Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-30

Snippet: ”); State v. Galindo, 315 Neb. 1, 994 N.W.2d 562, 599-600 (2023) (“[Young] was not decided based on the

Veronica Bourlakova v. Nikolai Kazakov

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: ” Abeid-Saba v. Carnival Corp., 184 So. 3d 593, 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). 2 “An abuse of discretion occurs

Shridhar D. Marathe v. Molina Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 912 So. 2d 595, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“With limited exceptions not

Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Teesha Adams, Etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-11

Snippet: R. Civ. P. 1.061(a); Abeid-Saba, 184 So. 3d at 599 (“The defendant attempting to dismiss the action

Philip Regala, M.D., Philip Regala, M.D. P.L., F/K/A Philip Regala, M.D., P.A. and v. Michael McDonald

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-06

Snippet: legislature sought to encourage.” Cruger v. Love, 599 So. 2d 111, 113-14 (Fla. 1992) (quoting Holly v

Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. Trade Link Capital, Inc., and Taste Trackers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-04

Snippet: guidance. See O’Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc., 599 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“Florida courts

William Huether, III, M.D., and Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Adventhealth Altamonte Springs F/K/A Florida Hospital Altamonte, Huether, III, M.D. v. Valeria Baroni

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-20

Snippet: added) (quoting Sterling v. Feldbaum, 980 So. 2d 596, 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)). In doing so, Florida law protects

William Huether, III, M.D., and Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Adventhealth Altamonte Springs F/K/A Florida Hospital Altamonte, Huether, III, M.D. v. Valeria Baroni

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-20

Snippet: added) (quoting Sterling v. Feldbaum, 980 So. 2d 596, 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)). In doing so, Florida law protects

William Huether, III, M.D., and Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Adventhealth Altamonte Springs F/K/A Florida Hospital Altamonte, Huether, III, M.D. v. Valeria Baroni

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-20

Snippet: added) (quoting Sterling v. Feldbaum, 980 So. 2d 596, 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)). In doing so, Florida law protects

Sherley Joseph v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14

Snippet: bias, prejudice, or sympathy.” Jackson v. State, 599 So. 2d 103, 107 (Fla. 1992); Lewis v. State, 530