Florida Statute 601.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.09

601.09 Citrus districts.—

(1) For purposes of this chapter, the state is divided into six districts composed of:

(a) Citrus District One: Collier, Hendry, and Lee Counties.

(b) Citrus District Two: Charlotte and DeSoto Counties.

(d) Citrus District Four: Hardee, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pinellas, and Sarasota Counties.

(e) Citrus District Five: Citrus, Hernando, Levy, Osceola, Pasco, Polk, and Sumter Counties.

(f) Citrus District Six: Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Flagler, Indian River, Lake, Marion, Martin, Miami-Dade, Monroe, Orange, Palm Beach, Putnam, St. Johns, Seminole, St. Lucie, and Volusia Counties.

(2) The Legislature intends that the citrus districts be reviewed and, if necessary to maintain substantially equal volumes of citrus production within each district, redistricted every 5 years. The commission may, once every 5 years, review the citrus districts based on the total boxes produced within each district during the preceding 5 years and, based on the commission’s findings, submit recommendations to the Legislature for redistricting in accordance with this subsection.

History.—s. 9, ch. 25149, 1949; s. 2, ch. 85-49; s. 2, ch. 90-127; s. 1, ch. 95-174; s. 1, ch. 2000-205; s. 1, ch. 2005-6; s. 14, ch. 2011-56; s. 12, ch. 2012-182; s. 3, ch. 2022-117.

F.S. 601.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.09

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.09

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.09

Total Results: 11

PR v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-08-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 936 So. 2d 754

Snippet: . Stat. (2005). Further, pursuant to section 39.601(9)(f), when the trial court amends a case plan, "

HG v. Department of Children & Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-01-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 916 So. 2d 1006

Snippet: plan at a hearing. Florida Statutes section 39.601(9)(f) requires that "competent evidence [support

RC v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-12-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 917 So. 2d 241

Snippet: adjudicatory hearing." On the other hand, section 39.601(9)(f), Florida Statutes, provides that the case plan

DS v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-03-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 900 So. 2d 628

Snippet: 18. (emphasis added) [7] See § 39.601(9)(f). [8] See § 39.601(9)(f). [9] See 5th Amend. U.S. Const

CF v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-08-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 822 So. 2d 571

Snippet: long-term custody, did not comply with section 39.601(9)(f) which provides, in pertinent part: The case

MW v. Davis

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-01-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 722 So. 2d 966

Snippet: any time to meet the needs of the child. §§ 39.601(9)(f) and 39.603(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). M.W.

In Re Guardianship of Browning

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-04-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 543 So. 2d 258

Snippet: does not require that death be imminent. § 400.601(9), Fla. Stat. (1987). [11] Courts and commentators

Herbert ex rel. Browning v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-04-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 543 So. 2d 258, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 956, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1960

Snippet: does not require that death be imminent. § 400.601(9), Fla.Stat. (1987). .Courts and commentators have

Brooks v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-10-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 457 So. 2d 601, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2224, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15408

Snippet: Barfield, Joanos, Wigginton 18 October 1984 457 So. 2d 601, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2224, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15408

In the Interest of S.R.P. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-09-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 455 So. 2d 601, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1895, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816

Snippet: Cowart, Dauksch, Sharp 6 September 1984 455 So. 2d 601, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1895, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816

Butler v. Carter

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1960-09-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 123 So. 2d 313

Snippet: Public Utilities Commission, Fla. 1959, 108 So.2d 601. [9] Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. United States