Syfert Injury Law Firm

TERRELL EUGENE TUMBLIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-09-02

Snippet: subsection (2).” (emphasis added). Section 90.616(2)(d) provides, in pertinent part, “[a] witness may

Jefferson Eugene Davis v. Gilchrist County Sheriff's Office

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-09-25

Snippet: prior to testifying. Appellant, citing section 90.616(2)(c), asserted his expert was essential to the presentation

Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-20

Snippet: 4 The trial 3. Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2()16); Hurst v. State, 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016)

Joel Lebron v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-21

Snippet: Const. This right has been codified in section 90.616(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides that

Heady v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-31

Citation: 215 So. 3d 164, 2017 WL 1201899, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4479

Snippet: determined that her presence was prejudicial. § 90.616(2)(d), Fla. Stat.

Daughtry v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-25

Citation: 211 So. 3d 84, 2017 WL 361128, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 790

Snippet: such person’s presence to be prejudicial. § 90.616(2)(d). Here, the trial court ruled that the victim’s

Twine v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-03-09

Citation: 188 So. 3d 44, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3573, 2016 WL 899277

Snippet: and sparingly, Berman, 751 So.2d at 616, 2 and the punishment should fit the crime

Hilton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-03-21

Citation: 117 So. 3d 742, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 486, 2013 WL 1149715

Snippet: v. State, 133 So.2d 729 (Fla.1961)). Section 90.616(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1997), allows an exception

Benjamin v. Tandem Healthcare, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-06-27

Citation: 93 So. 3d 1076, 2012 WL 2400880, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10488

Snippet: whom the sequestration rule did not apply. § 90.616(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). Furthermore, Tandem contends

Fernandez v. GUARDIANSHIP OF FERNANDEZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-02

Citation: 36 So. 3d 175, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7604, 2010 WL 2178831

Snippet: course, were not subject to exclusion. Id. § 90.616(2)(a). The other fact witnesses were all relatives

Hernandez v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-30

Citation: 4 So. 3d 642, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 149, 2009 WL 217972

Snippet: is demandable as a matter of right, section 90.616(2)(c) provides that a court may not exclude a witness

J.R. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-03-29

Citation: 923 So. 2d 1269, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4359, 2006 WL 778619

Snippet: *1272“If sequestration is invoked, section 90.616(2) provides that four categories of witnesses ...

Cain v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-05-31

Citation: 758 So. 2d 1257, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6553, 2000 WL 690136

Snippet: accused. See Art. I, § 16(b), Fla. Const.; § 90.616(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (1999). While next-of-kin have the

Rider v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-23

Citation: 724 So. 2d 617, 1998 WL 890369

Snippet: child's mother to be exempt from the rule, Sec. 90.616(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (1997), appellant nevertheless requested

Knight v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-11-12

Citation: 746 So. 2d 423, 1999 WL 184502

Snippet: Evidence § 616.1, at 506 (1998 ed.). Section 90.616(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1997), allows an exception

Knight v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-11-12

Citation: 721 So. 2d 287

Snippet: Evidence § 616.1, at 506 (1998 ed.). Section 90.616(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1997), allows an exception

Strausser v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-10-17

Citation: 682 So. 2d 539, 1996 WL 683268

Snippet: "essential to the presentation of the ... cause." § 90.616(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993). Walczak was a court-appointed

First Union v. Goodwin Beach Partnership

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-09-16

Citation: 644 So. 2d 1361, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8865, 1994 WL 501294

Snippet: at the trial. First Union also cited section 90.616(2)(c) of the Florida Evidence Code that a person whose

Black v. Sears

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-05-12

Citation: 621 So. 2d 712, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5253

Snippet: officer nor an employee of appellee, and section 90.616(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), clearly provides that