Florida Statute 622.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Chapter 622
FOREIGN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 622.01

622.01 Qualification permissive.—Qualification in compliance with this chapter is not and shall not be mandatory, and is and shall be optional, as a permissive alternative to compliance with any other law or laws with respect to the trade, business, or fictitious name or style, and the recording, registration, or publication thereof, under which business may be transacted by an unincorporated association, company, or group of persons; but no foreign association, as defined hereinafter, shall enjoy or exercise the powers conferred by this chapter unless it shall have qualified in compliance herewith.

History.—s. 1, ch. 23897, 1947.

F.S. 622.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 622.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 622.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 622.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 622.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 622.01

Total Results: 17

CW v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-01

Citation: 944 So. 2d 481, 2006 WL 3452410

Snippet: with the parents, as required under subsections 39.622(1) and (2); second, the order did not include the

PR v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-08-23

Citation: 936 So. 2d 754, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14038, 2006 WL 2419109

Snippet: include reunification with the parents." See § 39.622(1)-(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). Further, pursuant to section

Lf v. Dept. of Children & Family Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-02-19

Citation: 837 So. 2d 1098, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1840

Snippet: of the adult having long-term custody. See § 39.622(1)-(2). In this case, reunification was a dual goal

CF v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-08-02

Citation: 822 So. 2d 571, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10895, 2002 WL 1769000

Snippet: adoption by the relative or other adult." §§ 39.622(1) and (2), Fla. Stat. (2001). The case plan signed

LLC v. Dept. of Children & Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-08-10

Citation: 790 So. 2d 1239

Snippet: plan. L.L.C. argues that pursuant to section 39.622(1), the court did not have the option of disposing

Jacob v. Bernatek

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-08-09

Citation: 764 So. 2d 874, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10119, 2000 WL 1140496

Snippet: after the shares are already issued. Section 607.0622(1) addresses that issue directly: [a] holder of,

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1996-05-06

Snippet: section to corporations or partnerships; s. 475. 622(1), Fla. Stat. (1995), providing for the display and

Nelson v. Nelson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-14

Citation: 651 So. 2d 1252, 1995 WL 103329

Snippet: following amounts from his gross salary of $208,622: (1) potential lost earnings of $58,283 while preparing

In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor—Dual Office-Holding

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-01-20

Citation: 630 So. 2d 1055, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 40, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 619, 1994 WL 11615

Snippet: , Advisory Opinion to the Governor, [146 Fla. 622,] 1 So.2d 636 (Fla.1941); In re Advisory Opinion to

Burdick v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-07-25

Citation: 584 So. 2d 1035, 1991 WL 138126

Snippet: surplusage. Cf., Advisory Opinion to Governor, 146 Fla. 622, 1 So.2d 636, 638 (1941). See also 49 Fla.Jur.2d Statutes

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-05-04

Snippet: 585 (Fla. 1943), and Gaston v. State,106 So.2d 622 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1958), as to the rule under s. 924

Wilcox v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-09-28

Citation: 267 So. 2d 15

Snippet: , concur. NOTES [1] Young v. State, 167 So.2d 622 (1 Fla. App. 1964), cited with approval in Smith v

Orange County v. Gillespie

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-09-03

Citation: 239 So. 2d 132, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5756

Snippet: Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 1941, 146 Fla. 622, 1 So.2d 636, is dispositive of this point. In that

Larson v. Harrison

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-06-13

Citation: 142 So. 2d 727, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 2691

Snippet: 794; Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 146 Fla. 622, 1 So.2d 636. It does not appear that this court has

Hakam v. City of Miami Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-01-28

Citation: 108 So. 2d 608

Snippet: .See Advisory Opinion to Governor, 146 Ela. 622, 1 So.2d 636; State ex rel. Swearingen v. Jones, 79

Caulk v. Fox

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1869-07-01

Citation: 13 Fla. 148

Snippet: first and other sons in fee tail. 1 P. Williams, 622; 1 Ves., 238 ; 2 Atk., 39 ; 2 Bro. P. C., 122; 1 Bro

Gladden v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1868-07-01

Citation: 12 Fla. 562

Snippet: should not be heard at all. 5 Barb., 406; 1 Cowen, 622; 1 Hill, 91; 1 Wendell, 418; 12 Wendell, 504. It is