Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 622.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 622.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 622.01

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 622
FOREIGN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 622.01
622.01 Qualification permissive.Qualification in compliance with this chapter is not and shall not be mandatory, and is and shall be optional, as a permissive alternative to compliance with any other law or laws with respect to the trade, business, or fictitious name or style, and the recording, registration, or publication thereof, under which business may be transacted by an unincorporated association, company, or group of persons; but no foreign association, as defined hereinafter, shall enjoy or exercise the powers conferred by this chapter unless it shall have qualified in compliance herewith.
History.s. 1, ch. 23897, 1947.

F.S. 622.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 622.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 622.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 622.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 622.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 622.01

Total Results: 20

CW v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-11-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 944 So. 2d 481

Snippet: with the parents, as required under subsections 39.622(1) and (2); second, the order did not include the …plan for the custodian as required by section 39.622(1). The original case plan lists the custodian as

PR v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-08-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 936 So. 2d 754

Snippet: reunification with the parents." See § 39.622(1)-(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). Further, pursuant to section

Lf v. Dept. of Children & Family Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-02-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 837 So. 2d 1098

Snippet: of the adult having long-term custody. See § 39.622(1)-(2). In this case, reunification was a dual goal

CF v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-08-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 822 So. 2d 571

Snippet: adoption by the relative or other adult." §§ 39.622(1) and (2), Fla. Stat. (2001). The case plan signed

LLC v. Dept. of Children & Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-08-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 790 So. 2d 1239

Snippet: plan. L.L.C. argues that pursuant to section 39.622(1), the court did not have the option of disposing…not in the best interest of the child." § 39.622(1), Fla. Stat. See S.J. v. Department of Health and

Jacob v. Bernatek

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-08-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 764 So. 2d 874, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10119, 2000 WL 1140496

Snippet: after the shares are already issued. Section 607.0622(1) addresses that issue directly: [a] holder of,

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1996-05-06T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: section to corporations or partnerships; s. 475. 622(1), Fla. Stat. (1995), providing for the display and

Nelson v. Nelson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-03-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 651 So. 2d 1252

Snippet: following amounts from his gross salary of $208,622: (1) potential lost earnings of $58,283 while preparing

In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor—Dual Office-Holding

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1994-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 630 So. 2d 1055, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 40, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 619, 1994 WL 11615

Snippet: ., Advisory Opinion to the Governor, [146 Fla. 622,] 1 So.2d 636 (Fla.1941); In re Advisory Opinion to

Burdick v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-07-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 584 So. 2d 1035

Snippet: surplusage. Cf., Advisory Opinion to Governor, 146 Fla. 622, 1 So.2d 636, 638 (1941). See also 49 Fla.Jur.2d Statutes

City of Miami v. St. Joe Paper Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-10-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 364 So. 2d 439

Snippet: District, that its decision reported in 347 So.2d 622 is one which involves a question of great public interest

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1977-05-04T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 585 (Fla. 1943), and Gaston v. State,106 So.2d 622 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1958), as to the rule under s. 924.17

Wilcox v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-09-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 267 So. 2d 15

Snippet: ., concur. NOTES [1] Young v. State, 167 So.2d 622 (1 Fla. App. 1964), cited with approval in Smith v

Salas v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-04-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 246 So. 2d 621

Snippet: for the illegal possession of an amphetamine. *622 One evening in May, 1970, two plain clothes detectives

Orange County v. Gillespie

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-09-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 239 So. 2d 132, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5756

Snippet: Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 1941, 146 Fla. 622, 1 So.2d 636, is dispositive of this point. In that

Larson v. Harrison

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1962-06-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 142 So. 2d 727, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 2691

Snippet: 794; Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 146 Fla. 622, 1 So.2d 636. It does not appear that this court has

Hakam v. City of Miami Beach

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1959-01-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 2d 608

Snippet: . .See Advisory Opinion to Governor, 146 Ela. 622, 1 So.2d 636; State ex rel. Swearingen v. Jones, 79

Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Helwig

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-01-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 2d 620

Snippet: with gasoline, but it was from fifty minutes *622 to one hour and forty-five minutes. The expert witnesses

Caulk v. Fox

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1869-07-01T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 13 Fla. 148

Snippet: first and other sons in fee tail. 1 P. Williams, 622; 1 Ves., 238 ; 2 Atk., 39 ; 2 Bro. P. C., 122; 1 Bro

Gladden v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1868-07-01T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 12 Fla. 562

Snippet: should not be heard at all. 5 Barb., 406; 1 Cowen, 622; 1 Hill, 91; 1 Wendell, 418; 12 Wendell, 504. It is