Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 622 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 622 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 622

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 622
FOREIGN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 622
CHAPTER 622
FOREIGN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
622.01 Qualification permissive.
622.02 Definitions.
622.03 Qualification.
622.04 Process.
622.05 Annual reports.
622.06 Name.
622.07 Powers.
622.01 Qualification permissive.Qualification in compliance with this chapter is not and shall not be mandatory, and is and shall be optional, as a permissive alternative to compliance with any other law or laws with respect to the trade, business, or fictitious name or style, and the recording, registration, or publication thereof, under which business may be transacted by an unincorporated association, company, or group of persons; but no foreign association, as defined hereinafter, shall enjoy or exercise the powers conferred by this chapter unless it shall have qualified in compliance herewith.
History.s. 1, ch. 23897, 1947.
622.02 Definitions.
(1) The term “foreign association” as used in this chapter shall mean and include any unincorporated joint stock association for profit, created and existing under the laws of any state other than this state, or of the District of Columbia, or of any territory or possession of the United States, engaged in any business or businesses other than the banking, trust, or insurance business, and having written articles of association, capital stock divided into shares, and a name including the word “company” or “association” or “society”; but shall not mean nor include any unincorporated association, company or group of persons engaged in the banking, trust, or insurance business.
(2) The term “association” as used in this chapter shall mean and include any foreign association that shall have qualified, in the manner permitted by this chapter, to transact business and acquire, hold, and dispose of property, and sue and be sued in this state.
History.s. 2, ch. 23897, 1947.
622.03 Qualification.Any foreign association may qualify to transact business and acquire, hold, and dispose of property, and sue and be sued in this state, by complying with all requirements of law, including but not limited to the paying of all fees, taxes, and other charges, now or hereafter prescribed for qualification by foreign corporations for profit to transact business in this state, and all laws heretofore or hereafter enacted prescribing requirements to be observed by foreign corporations for profit in so qualifying shall apply to and govern and control such qualification by foreign associations, except that in lieu of filing an authenticated copy of any charter, or certificate of incorporation, or articles of incorporation, the foreign association shall file a duly authenticated copy of its written articles of association.
History.s. 3, ch. 23897, 1947.
622.04 Process.Every association shall comply with all requirements of law, including but not limited to the paying of all fees and charges, now or hereafter prescribed for the designation and maintenance of an office for the service of process, the appointment of a resident agent upon whom process may be served, and the acceptance of such appointment, by foreign corporations for profit qualified to transact business in this state, and all laws heretofore or hereafter enacted with respect to such offices and agents shall apply to and govern and control all associations.
History.s. 4, ch. 23897, 1947; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949.
622.05 Annual reports.Every association shall comply with all requirements of law, including but not limited to the paying of all fees, taxes, and other charges, now or hereafter prescribed for the filing of annual reports by foreign corporations for profit qualified to transact business in this state, except railroad, pullman, telephone, telegraph, and insurance companies, and all laws heretofore or hereafter enacted with respect to such reports shall apply to and govern and control all associations.
History.s. 5, ch. 23897, 1947.
622.06 Name.Every association may transact business in this state in its name, without including as a part thereof, or displaying or publishing in connection or conjunction therewith, the words “not incorporated,” or any similar words, and without making any other showing or display of the fact that it is unincorporated, and without recording, registering, or publishing its name as a trade, business, or fictitious name. Any other law or laws heretofore or hereafter enacted with respect to an unincorporated association, company, or group of persons doing business under any trade, business, or fictitious name or style including the word “company” or “association” or “society,” or with respect to the recording, registration, or publication of any trade, business, or fictitious name or style, shall not apply to nor govern nor control an association, and every association is and shall be exempted from the provisions and requirements thereof.
History.s. 6, ch. 23897, 1947.
622.07 Powers.Every association shall have power and authority to transact business and acquire, hold, and dispose of property and sue and be sued in this state; provided that such association shall file with the Department of State a sworn statement setting forth the name under which such association is authorized to transact business and acquire, hold, and dispose of property, and the style by which it is prescribed that such association shall sue and be sued, under the law or laws under which it shall have been created and shall be existing.
History.s. 7, ch. 23897, 1947; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 622 on Google Scholar

F.S. 622 on Casetext

Amendments to 622


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 622
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 622.


Civil Citations / Citable Offenses under S622
R or S next to points is Mandatory Revocation or Suspension

S316.622 (1) FARM LABOR VEHICLES - Failure to conform to vehicle safety standards - Points on Drivers License: 0
S316.622 (2) Farm Labor Vehicle - Proper Seat Belt assembly not installed for each passenger in vehicle with GVWR under 10,000 lbs. Or less - Points on Drivers License: 0
S316.622 (3) FARM LABOR VEHICLE - No/not clearly displayed sticker authorizing the transport of farm workers [sticker per s. 450.33(12)] - Points on Drivers License: 0
S316.622 (4) FARM LABOR VEHICLE - No/not clearly displayed seat belt notification instructions - Points on Drivers License: 0


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id ., at 621, 622. An unsuccessful petition for rehearing en banc ensued. Judge Ryan D. . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . FCC , 512 U.S. 622, 658, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994) ). . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See id., at 620-622, 98 S.Ct. 1322. . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Baird , 443 U.S. 622, 99 S.Ct. 3035, 61 L.Ed.2d 797 (1979) ; Roe v. . . .

ST. HUBERT v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1727 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mississippi , 481 U.S. 648, 651, n. 1, 107 S.Ct. 2045, 95 L.Ed.2d 622 (1987) (citing Edelman v. . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 622(2)(A), "that will result in immediate or future outlays of government funds," GAO Redbook 2-1 . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Pol'y & L. 622, 669 (2001); R. Hastie, S. Penrod, & N. . . . Pol'y & L. 622, 690-707 (2001). The reliance in this case also far exceeds that in Arizona v. . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . State , 467 S.W.3d 622, 636 (Tex. App. 2015) ; State v. . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mensing , 564 U.S. 604, 622, 131 S.Ct. 2567, 180 L.Ed.2d 580 (2011) (plurality opinion). . . .

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, v. M. SULYMA, 140 S. Ct. 768 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Owens Corning Investment Review Comm. , 622 F.3d 564, 571 (CA6 2010) ("Actual knowledge does not require . . .

S. BELL, v. PENNSYLVANIA., 140 S. Ct. 934 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-622 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rey , 622 F.3d 1251, 1258-60 (9th Cir. 2010) (describing how courts have found informational standing . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Schwarzenegger , 622 F.3d 1058, 1070 (9th Cir. 2010). . . . See Armstrong , 622 F.3d at 1071. . . . See Armstrong , 622 F.3d at 1071. . . . See Armstrong , 622 F.3d at 1070. B. . . .

UNITED STATES v. V. GILLIAM,, 934 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ellis , 622 F.3d 784, 794 (7th Cir. 2010) (intentionally directing the actions of a person with physical . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hernandez-Rodriguez , 975 F.2d 622, 627 (9th Cir. 1992) ). . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 183 F.3d 619, 622 (7th Cir. 1999) ("Illinois uses an objective theory of contract ... .") . . .

TURCO v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY,, 935 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Borough of Carlisle , 622 F.3d 248, 253 (3d Cir. 2010). Id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . The two things differ toto coelo . 116 U.S. 616, 622-23, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), overruled . . .

BAUGHMAN, v. HICKMAN K. M., 935 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Independence , 445 U.S. 622, 635-38, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980). Further, Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. BROWN, v. N., 934 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Duzac , 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir. 1980) ); 3 Weinstein & Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 606.04 . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . F.C.C. , 512 U.S. 622, 627, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994). . . .

SMITH, OSF v. OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,, 933 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Redbox Automated Retail, LLC , 770 F.3d 618, 622-23 (7th Cir. 2014). . . .

SHIFFLETT, v. Mr. KORSZNIAK, SCI Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. P., 934 F.3d 356 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Williams , 622 F.3d 315, 324-25 (3d Cir. 2010). III. Analysis A. . . .

MARTIN, v. MARINEZ,, 934 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Educ. , 599 F.3d 617, 622 (7th Cir. 2010) ). . . .

MOGARD, v. CITY OF MILBANK,, 932 F.3d 1184 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Independence , 445 U.S. 622, 650, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980) (city not immune from . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d at 622 ; see also United States v. . . .

FURGESS, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 933 F.3d 285 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Schwarzenegger , 622 F.3d 1058, 1068 (9th Cir. 2010). Kiman v. N.H. . . .

MORALES- MORALES, v. P. BARR, U. S., 933 F.3d 456 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder , 622 F.3d 357, 359 (5th Cir. 2010) (holding that the BIA's "interpretation and application of . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Bustos-Useche , 273 F.3d 622, 626 (5th Cir. 2001). . . . Only three opinions of Courts of Appeals, Gonzalez , 311 F.3d 440, Bustos-Useche , 273 F.3d 622, and . . . The reasoning of the Fifth Circuit in Bustos-Useche , 273 F.3d 622, was far simpler than in Miranda. . . . Bustos-Useche , 273 F.3d 622, 626 (5th Cir. 2001). But see United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. RIVERA- CARRASQUILLO, a k a KX, a k a a k a a k a n V a k a, 933 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Harwood, 69 F.3d 622, 627 (1st Cir. 1995). . . .

LONGORIA, v. HUNTER EXPRESS, LIMITED, 932 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Moore , 711 S.W.2d 622, 624 (Tex. 1986) (explaining that factual sufficiency of the evidence is the " . . .

UNITED STATES v. PORTER,, 933 F.3d 226 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Ruiz , 536 U.S. 622, 628, 122 S.Ct. 2450, 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2002) ). . . .

MITCHELL, v. MACLAREN,, 933 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 622, 124 S.Ct. 2601 (Kennedy, J., concurring) (emphases added). . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 347 ¶ 622. . . . Id. at 347 ¶ 622; see id. at 352-58 ¶¶ 646-77. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORNETTE,, 932 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Green , 135 Ga.App. 622, 218 S.E.2d 456, 457 (1975), the Georgia Supreme Court dismissed an indictment . . .

UNITED STATES v. CEASAR,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 194 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Muhammad's (and his followers') migration from Mecca-his place of birth and upbringing-to Medina in 622 . . .

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 392 F. Supp. 3d 410 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Iroquois Mem'l Hosp., 622 F.3d 745, 753 (7th Cir. 2010) ("To be liable under § 2511(1)(c) or § 2511(1 . . .

ORTIZ, v. ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 236 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . MSNBC Cable L.L.C. , 622 F.3d 104, 111 (2d Cir. 2010). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BONIN,, 932 F.3d 523 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . FCC , 512 U.S. 622, 642, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994) ). . . .

DIXON, v. L. RYAN,, 932 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Missouri , 544 U.S. 622, 626, 125 S.Ct. 2007, 161 L.Ed.2d 953 (2005). . . .

DEXTER, a k a v. DEALOGIC, LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 233 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . NetCentric Corp., 433 Mass. 465, 744 N.E.2d 622, 629 (2001) ), the implied covenant "requires that neither . . .

Z. J. a BY AND THROUGH Je JONES, v. KANSAS CITY BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS,, 931 F.3d 672 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Independence , 445 U.S. 622, 638, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980) ; Szabla v. . . .

WEST, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, 931 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ocheltree , 622 F.2d 992 (9th Cir. 1980) ; and an unpublished district court decision that is not precedential . . . the meantime; that is, in effect the agent threatened an arrest and detention without probable cause. 622 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MUSCHETTE, 392 F. Supp. 3d 282 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Trial Tr. 622-27. . . .

HAHN, v. MOSELEY,, 931 F.3d 295 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 622, 118 S.Ct. 1604. . . . Id. at 622-23, 118 S.Ct. 1604. . . . Id. at 622, 118 S.Ct. 1604. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. NELSON,, 931 F.3d 588 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pineda-Buenaventura , 622 F.3d 761 (7th Cir. 2010), for the proposition that a waiver is unknowing when . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORRALES- VAZQUEZ,, 931 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cabaccang , 332 F.3d 622, 625 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). . . . Cabaccang , 332 F.3d 622, 627 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (rejecting the government's interpretation of . . .

BRINDLEY, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, 934 F.3d 461 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Cincinnati , 622 F.3d 524, 534-36 (6th Cir. 2010). . . . Miller , 622 F.3d at 534 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

HARTMAN v. THOMPSON, 931 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Cincinnati , 622 F.3d 524, 534-35 (6th Cir. 2010). . . . Miller , 622 F.3d at 535. . . . City of Cincinnati , 622 F.3d 524, 534-35 (6th Cir. 2010). . . . City of Cincinnati , 622 F.3d 524, 536 (6th Cir. 2010) ; see also Pleasant Grove City , 555 U.S. at 470 . . . Miller , 622 F.3d at 536. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS,, 930 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ellis , 622 F.3d 784, 791 (7th Cir. 2010). We agree with the Tenth and Seventh Circuits. . . . Loud Hawk , 474 U.S. at 316-17, 106 S.Ct. 648 ; Ellis , 622 F.3d at 791. . . .

WEEKS, a. k. a. v. UNITED STATES, 930 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Burke, 390 Mass. 480, 481-82, 457 N.E.2d 622, 623-24 (1983). . . .

ZACARIAS v. STANFORD INTERNATIONAL BANK, LIMITED, L. v. S. S. v. a a v. De v. S. v. L. v. S. C. v. WGH De De De La v. De De De v. a a De v., 931 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wencke , 622 F.2d 1363, 1372 (9th Cir. 1980). SEC v. . . .

TRUE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, v. M. AZAR, II,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 656 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Ringer , 466 U.S. 602, 615, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984). . . . Ringer , 466 U.S. 602, 614, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984). . . .

TRUE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, v. M. AZAR, II,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 666 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Ringer , 466 U.S. 602, 615, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984). . . . Ringer , 466 U.S. 602, 614, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984). . . .

BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 336 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Rptr. 2d 622, 628 (1996) ; see Valley Proteins, Inc. v. Hulsey Envtl. . . .

CABRERA, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 627 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 855 F.3d 622, 625 (4th Cir. 2017). . . .

EBBE, v. CONCORDE INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC G. M. a k a M., 392 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Raytheon Co., 416 Mass. 395, 622 N.E.2d 1066, 1068 (1993) ). . . .

M. CROCE, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY Jr., 930 F.3d 787 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Compl. at ¶ 80) (Page ID #622). Many of these internet commenters had harsh words for Dr. Croce. . . .

R. BRADLEY, v. VILLAGE OF UNIVERSITY PARK, ILLINOIS,, 929 F.3d 875 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Independence , 445 U.S. 622, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980), the Supreme Court made clear . . . City of Independence , 445 U.S. 622, 627 & n.4, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1979) ( § 1983 liability . . .

APACHE DEEPWATER, L. L. C. v. W T OFFSHORE, INCORPORATED,, 930 F.3d 647 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 622 F.3d 384, 392 (5th Cir. 2010) (internal citation omitted). Gebreyesus v. F.C. . . .

ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, v. VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG, a, 930 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . See In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litig. , 630 F.3d 622, 628-29 (7th Cir. 2010) ; see also, e.g. , Kleen . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Commc'ns Comm'n , 512 U.S. 622, 642, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994) (emphasizing the danger of . . .

UNITED STATES v. CAREY,, 929 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cabaccang , 332 F.3d 622, 624-25 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)). . . . Republic Ins. , 987 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1993) (quoting In re Yagman , 796 F.2d 1165, 1179 (9th Cir . . .

BAATZ, v. COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC,, 929 F.3d 767 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'rs of Scioto Cty. , 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 622 N.E.2d 1153, 1161-62 (1993). . . . See Williams , 659 N.E.2d at 382-83 ; Brown , 622 N.E.2d at 1161-62. . . .

VYLOHA, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder , 749 F.3d 622, 626 (7th Cir. 2014). . . .

H. WILSON, v. SAFELITE GROUP, INC., 930 F.3d 429 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 622-23. . . . Id. at 622. . . .

GN NETCOM, INC. v. PLANTRONICS, INC., 930 F.3d 76 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Justice , 622 F.3d 540, 555 (6th Cir. 2010) (noting that "an adverse inference is usually only . . .

FORREST, v. PARRY, PHM PHM I- IV, 930 F.3d 93 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Taken together, Camden sustained about 1% (7 of 622) of the complaints alleging serious misconduct from . . . Petersen , 622 F.3d 196, 208 (3d Cir. 2010) ). . . .

FCS ADVISORS, LLC L. P. v. MISSOURI, 929 F.3d 618 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bank Nat'l Ass'n , 605 F.3d 617, 622 (8th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); see also Fed. R. Civ. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. HAMILTON, 929 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Worman , 622 F.3d 969, 977 (8th Cir. 2010) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 930 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Hutcher , 622 F.2d 1083, 1087 (2d Cir. 1980) (quoting United States v. . . .

SAMANTHA S. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 174 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . R. at 622-26. The ALJ partially discounted Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES EX REL. DILDINE, v. D. PANDYA, M. D. a k a D. M. D. D. M. D. P. C., 389 F. Supp. 3d 1214 (N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . Ringer, 466 U.S. 602, 617, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984) (emphasis added). . . .

UNITED STATES v. IN U. S. CURRENCY, By W,, 929 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Richard , 622 So. 2d 1154, 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOLEYN v. v. v. v., 929 F.3d 932 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Eason, 643 F.3d 622, 623 (8th Cir. 2011) (USSG). . . .

ROSARIO, v. UNITED STATES,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 122 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . United States , 523 U.S. 614, 622, 118 S.Ct. 1604, 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998) ; see also Oakes v. . . . Ruiz , 536 U.S. 622, 628-29, 122 S.Ct. 2450, 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2001) (holding that "the Constitution does . . .

CARROZZA, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. d b a CVS, 391 F. Supp. 3d 136 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Ct. 622, 624, 418 N.E.2d 620 (1981). . . .

EVANS, v. SANDY CITY, a R. P. C. C. J. E. I- XX,, 928 F.3d 1171 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . FCC, 512 U.S. 622, 664, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994) (plurality opinion). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COURTADE,, 929 F.3d 186 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 523 U.S. 614, 622, 118 S.Ct. 1604, 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998) (holding that a defendant may . . .

R. OBERDORF A. v. AMAZON. COM INC. a, 930 F.3d 136 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 622 F.2d 657, 663 (3d Cir. 1980) (internal citation omitted). . . . McKenna , 622 F.2d at 663. . . .

LARSON, v. CITY OF ALGOOD, TENNESSEE, v. v., 390 F. Supp. 3d 874 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Methodist Hosp., 701 S.W.2d 622, 625 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985). . . .

R. BROWN, E. R. A. v. COLLIER, R. R. A. v., 929 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 616, 622 (S.D. Tex. 2014). Id . at 623. Id . at 624. ROA 2894. ROA 2894-2895. ROA 2903. . . . Supp. 3d 616, 622 (S.D. Tex. 2014). Parties Joint Ex. 18. Brown , 17 F. Supp. 3d at 629. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JONES, v., 930 F.3d 366 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Juarez , 866 F.3d 622, 627 (5th Cir. 2017). . . .

TD BANK N. A. v. W. HILL, II,, 928 F.3d 259 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . GE Consumer & Indus., Inc. , 622 F.3d 361, 366 (5th Cir. 2010). . . .

E. D. v. SHARKEY BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC, 928 F.3d 299 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Independence, Mo. , 445 U.S. 622, 650, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980) (under § 1983, a . . .

W. HOLMES, v. GROOMS,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 536 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 616, 622 (E.D. . . . Mich. 2002) (rejecting reliance on Sabolsky where no verified complaint had been filed); id. at 622 ( . . .

DOE, v. PURDUE UNIVERSITY,, 928 F.3d 652 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lucas , 827 F.3d 622, 629 (7th Cir. 2016) (citation omitted). . . .

CLAIBORNE, v. BLAUSER, S., 928 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Missouri, 544 U.S. 622, 626, 125 S.Ct. 2007, 161 L.Ed.2d 953 (2005). . . .

RAULERSON, Jr. v. WARDEN,, 928 F.3d 987 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . individual diminished personal culpabilities and the varying degrees of deterrence possible." 587 S.E.2d at 622 . . .

CLAIBORNE, v. BLAUSER, S., 934 F.3d 885 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Missouri , 544 U.S. 622, 626, 125 S.Ct. 2007, 161 L.Ed.2d 953 (2005). . . .

ESTATE OF MENDEZ, Sr. Jr. v. CITY OF CERES,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1189 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . County of San Diego , 57 Cal. 4th 622, 160 Cal.Rptr.3d 684, 305 P.3d 252 (2013) ). . . .

DIVISION SIX SPORTS, INC. FINISH LINE, INC., 928 F.3d 631 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lawrenceburg Conservancy Dist. , 616 F.3d 618, 622 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

GREEN, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 68 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . FCC , 512 U.S. 622, 662, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994) (citing Ward v. . . .

P. MITCHELL, v. WISCONSIN, 139 S. Ct. 2525 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Railway Labor Executives' Assn. , 489 U.S. 602, 621-622, 109 S.Ct. 1402, 103 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) ; see . . .

FAIELLA, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 928 F.3d 141 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 622(8). . . .

BIEL, v. ST. JAMES SCHOOL, a a St. a, 926 F.3d 1238 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Biel , 911 F.3d at 616-20, 622 (concluding the ministerial exception applied because of substance . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARE, Jr., 385 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Blackburn , 806 F.2d 613, 622 (5th Cir. 1986) (holding informant asking, "What ring?" . . .

ESTATE OF OSUNA, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, s, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . County of San Diego , 57 Cal. 4th 622, 629, 160 Cal.Rptr.3d 684, 305 P.3d 252 (2013) (brackets omitted . . .

WORLD WATER WORKS HOLDINGS, INC. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. W. Jr. Co. v., 392 F. Supp. 3d 923 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 622 F.2d 657, 663 (3d Cir. 1980) ). . . .

IN RE VANTAGE DRILLING INTERNATIONAL f k a Su v., 603 B.R. 538 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . in June 2018, VDI (through two of its subsidiaries) obtained an award in the approximate amount of $622 . . .