The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Finding that the growth on the berm was in violation of City Ordinance § 622.02(a), the Officer warned . . . Ordinance § 622.02. . . . scant; it included only the fact that the City was charging Shoemaker with having violated “Ord. § 622.02 . . . The Code Officer had twice sent a more detailed letter explaining the substance of § 622.02 in both May . . . residence and left a door-hanger notice informing Shoemaker that his lawn was in violation of City Code § 622.02 . . . City Code § 622.02(a). . . . City Code § 622.02(e). . . .
. . . BACKGROUND The City of Howell, Michigan (“the City”) enacted a version of City Ordinance § 622.02 (“the . . . Ordinance § 622.02(a). . . . Ordinance § 622.02(d). The instant case centers on whether the Ordinance is constitutionally valid. . . .
. . . capacity is eight hundred eighty-three thousand six hundred twenty-two dollars and two cents ($883,-622.02 . . .
. . . See § 622.02, Fla. Stat. (1947). . . . .
. . . A proof of claim from Myron Herman Co. in the amount of $622.02 was received by the bankruptcy clerk’ . . .