Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 625.82 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 625.82 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 625.82

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 625
ACCOUNTING, INVESTMENTS, AND DEPOSITS BY INSURERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 625.82
625.82 Rules.The commission may adopt such rules as are necessary for the execution of the functions vested in it by ss. 625.75-625.81 and may for such purpose classify domestic stock insurers, securities, and other persons or matters within its jurisdiction. No provision of ss. 625.75-625.77 imposing any liability shall apply to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any rule of the commission, notwithstanding that such rule may, after such act or omission, be amended or rescinded or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-18; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 141, 143, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 905, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 625.82 on Google Scholar

F.S. 625.82 on Casetext

Amendments to 625.82


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 625.82
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 625.82.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 625.82

Total Results: 2

Toro v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-09-02

Citation: 642 So. 2d 78, 1994 WL 474939

Snippet: for the admissibility of scientific opinions." 625 *82 So.2d at 829, n. 2. Since the Daubert opinion is

Conti v. International Precious Metals Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-08-17

Citation: 436 So. 2d 367, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22574

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We have considered each of the issues raised by appellant in these consolidated appeals and have concluded that reversible error has not been demonstrated in either appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the trial court. , ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.