Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 626.727 (2025)
Scope of this part.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
626.727 Scope of this part.—This part applies only to general lines agents, customer representatives, service representatives, and managing general agents, all as defined in s. 626.015. Provisions of this part which apply to general lines agents and applicants also apply to personal lines agents and applicants, except where otherwise provided.
History.—s. 251, ch. 59-205; s. 17, ch. 71-86; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 3, ch. 81-282; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 241, 807, 810, ch. 82-243; ss. 64, 206, 207, ch. 90-363; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 35, ch. 98-199; ss. 19, 72, ch. 2002-206; s. 20, ch. 2004-374.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2022 · leading case: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet, 658 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1995).
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet, 658 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1995). “In the chapter law under which section 626.727(10) was enacted, the Legislature directed that the statute applied retrospectively to 1982, the effective date of section 624.”
Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co., 570 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1990). “The district court found that section 626.727(8), Florida Statutes (1985), does limit the fee awardable under section 627.”
Boynton v. Allstate Ins. Co., 443 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984). “The court said: The sole issue is whether the Hansen vehicle was "an uninsured vehicle" within the meaning of that term as used in F.S. 626.727. We hold that it was, and therefore affirm.”
Coney v. Gen. Ins. Co., 445 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984). “[2] Until the 1980 amendment to the statute, Section 626.727(1) provided in part: ... Unless the name insured, or lessee having the privilege of rejecting uninsured motorist coverage, requests such coverage in writing, the coverage need not be provided in or supplemental to a…”
Am. S. Home Ins. Co. v. Louis Philip Lentini, etc. (Fla. 2019). “Section 626.727 governs “motor vehicle insurance; uninsured and underinsured vehicle coverage; [and] insolvent insurer protection.”
Pflug v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. (M.D. Fla. 2022). “§ 626.727(1), F.S. However, an insured may reject UM coverage, select stacking coverage with limits lower than the bodily injury limits, or select non- stacking UM coverage authorized by § 627.”
— 626.727(1) — 2 cases
Coney v. Gen. Ins. Co., 445 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984). “[2] Until the 1980 amendment to the statute, Section 626.727(1) provided in part: ... Unless the name insured, or lessee having the privilege of rejecting uninsured motorist coverage, requests such coverage in writing, the coverage need not be provided in or supplemental to a…”
Pflug v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. (M.D. Fla. 2022). “§ 626.727(1), F.S. However, an insured may reject UM coverage, select stacking coverage with limits lower than the bodily injury limits, or select non- stacking UM coverage authorized by § 627.”
— 626.727(10) — 1 case
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet, 658 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1995). “In the chapter law under which section 626.727(10) was enacted, the Legislature directed that the statute applied retrospectively to 1982, the effective date of section 624.”
— 626.727(8) — 1 case
Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co., 570 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1990). “The district court found that section 626.727(8), Florida Statutes (1985), does limit the fee awardable under section 627.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.