Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 626.99245 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 626.99245 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 626.99245 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 626.99245

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 626
INSURANCE FIELD REPRESENTATIVES AND OPERATIONS
View Entire Chapter
626.99245 Conflict of regulation of viaticals.
(1) A viatical settlement provider who from this state enters into a viatical settlement contract with a viator who is a resident of another state that has enacted statutes or adopted regulations governing viatical settlement contracts shall be governed in the effectuation of that viatical settlement contract by the statutes and regulations of the viator’s state of residence. If the state in which the viator is a resident has not enacted statutes or regulations governing viatical settlement agreements, the provider shall give the viator notice that neither Florida nor his or her state regulates the transaction upon which he or she is entering. For transactions in those states, however, the viatical settlement provider is to maintain all records required as if the transactions were executed in Florida. The forms used in those states need not be approved by the office.
(2) This section does not affect the requirement of ss. 626.9911(14) and 626.9912(1) that a viatical settlement provider doing business from this state must obtain a viatical settlement license from the office. As used in this subsection, the term “doing business from this state” includes effectuating viatical settlement contracts from offices in this state, regardless of the state of residence of the viator.
History.s. 7, ch. 2000-344; s. 6, ch. 2001-207; s. 6, ch. 2001-247; s. 1054, ch. 2003-261; s. 78, ch. 2004-390; s. 24, ch. 2005-237; s. 7, ch. 2017-178.

F.S. 626.99245 on Google Scholar

F.S. 626.99245 on CourtListener

Amendments to 626.99245


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 626.99245

Total Results: 2  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Am. United Life Ins. v. Martinez, 480 F.3d 1043 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 311 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5274, 2007 WL 677729

...viatical settlement for a policy that was obtained through material misrepresentations or omissions. Fla. Stat. § 626.99275(1)(a). However, the Act also contains a conflict of law provision that applies to settlements transacted with out-of-state viators. Section 626.99245(2) the Act provides that: “A viatical settlement provider who from this state enters into a viatical settlement contract with a viator who is a resident of another state that has enacted statutes or adopted regulations governing v...
...If the state in which the viator is a resident has not enacted statutes or regulations governing viatical settlement agreements, the provider shall give the viator notice that neither Florida nor his or her state regulates the transaction upon which he or she is entering.” Fla. Stat. § 626.99245(2). 2 Mutual Benefits Corporation (“MBC”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida in 1994....
...the policy’s insurer. Fla. Stat. § 626.99275(1)(a) (2004). Since MBC, the entity that purchased the viaticals at issue in this case, is a Florida viatical settlement provider, the insurers assert that it is subject to the FVSA. However, section 626.99245 of the Act, which addresses “Conflict of regulation of viaticals,” limits the effect of this provision to in-state viatical 28 settlement companies who contract with in-state residents. According to Fla. Stat.§ 626.99245(2): A viatical settlement provider who from this state enters into a viatical settlement contract with a viator who is a resident of another state that has enacted statutes or adopted regulations governing viati...
Copy

McCloskey v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., 172 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12559, 2015 WL 4950094

...The new law included a thirty-day grace period for individuals with life insurance licenses to complete any pending viatical transactions. Ch. 2005-237, § 32, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 626.99295, Fla. Stat. (2005)). Prior to July 1, 2005, viatical settlements and viaticáis were regulated as insurance. See § 626.99245(4), Fla....
...4th DCA 2004); Accelerated Benefits Carp., 813 So.2d 117, 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). In amendments adopted by the Legislature, effective July 1, 2004, viaticáis were regulated exclusively as insurance until the 2005 legislative amendments defined them as securities. Ch. 2004-390, § 78, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 626.99245(4), Fla....
...to retroactively apply securities rules to viati-cáis that were closed or pending before July 1, 2005. 9 See McCloskey, 115 So.3d at 444 . When DFS filed the administrative complaint on June 7, 2011, sections 626.99295, Florida Statutes (2005), and 626.99245(4), Florida Statutes (2004), had been readily available for review for six years....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.