Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 627.0628 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 627.0628 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 627.0628

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 627.0628
627.0628 Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology; public records exemption; public meetings exemption.
(1) LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND INTENT.
(a) Reliable projections of hurricane losses are necessary in order to assure that rates for residential property insurance meet the statutory requirement that rates be neither excessive nor inadequate. The ability to accurately project hurricane losses has been enhanced greatly in recent years through the use of computer modeling. It is the public policy of this state to encourage the use of the most sophisticated actuarial methods to assure that consumers are charged lawful rates for residential property insurance coverage.
(b) The Legislature recognizes the need for expert evaluation of computer models and other recently developed or improved actuarial methodologies for projecting hurricane losses, in order to resolve conflicts among actuarial professionals, and in order to provide both immediate and continuing improvement in the sophistication of actuarial methods used to set rates charged to consumers.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature to create the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology as a panel of experts to provide the most actuarially sophisticated guidelines and standards for projection of hurricane losses possible, given the current state of actuarial science. It is the further intent of the Legislature that such standards and guidelines must be used by the State Board of Administration in developing reimbursement premium rates for the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, and, subject to paragraph (3)(d), must be used by insurers in rate filings under s. 627.062 unless the way in which such standards and guidelines were applied by the insurer was erroneous, as shown by a preponderance of the evidence.
(d) It is the intent of the Legislature that such standards and guidelines be employed as soon as possible, and that they be subject to continuing review thereafter.
(e) The Legislature finds that the authority to take final agency action with respect to insurance ratemaking is vested in the Office of Insurance Regulation and the Financial Services Commission, and that the processes, standards, and guidelines of the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology do not constitute final agency action or statements of general applicability that implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy; accordingly, chapter 120 does not apply to the processes, standards, and guidelines of the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology.
(2) COMMISSION CREATED.
(a) There is created the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology, which is assigned to the State Board of Administration. For the purposes of this section, the term “commission” means the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology. The commission shall be administratively housed within the State Board of Administration, but it shall independently exercise the powers and duties specified in this section.
(b) The commission shall consist of the following 12 members:
1. The insurance consumer advocate.
2. The senior employee of the State Board of Administration responsible for operations of the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund.
3. The Executive Director of the Citizens Property Insurance Corporation or the executive director’s designee. The executive director’s designee must be a full-time employee of the corporation and have actuarial science experience.
4. The Director of the Division of Emergency Management or the director’s designee. The director’s designee must be a full-time employee of the division.
5. The actuary member of the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Advisory Council.
6. An employee of the office who is an actuary responsible for property insurance rate filings and who is appointed by the director of the office.
7. Five members appointed by the Chief Financial Officer, as follows:
a. An actuary who is employed full time by a property and casualty insurer that was responsible for at least 1 percent of the aggregate statewide direct written premium for homeowner insurance in the calendar year preceding the member’s appointment to the commission.
b. An expert in insurance finance who is a full-time member of the faculty of the State University System and who has a background in actuarial science.
c. An expert in statistics who is a full-time member of the faculty of the State University System and who has a background in insurance.
d. An expert in computer system design who is a full-time member of the faculty of the State University System.
e. An expert in meteorology who is a full-time member of the faculty of the State University System and who specializes in hurricanes.
8. A licensed professional structural engineer who is a full-time faculty member in the State University System and who has expertise in wind mitigation techniques. This appointment shall be made by the Governor.
(c) Members designated under subparagraphs (b)1.-5. shall serve on the commission as long as they maintain the respective offices designated in subparagraphs (b)1.-5. The member appointed by the director of the office under subparagraph (b)6. shall serve on the commission until the end of the term of office of the director who appointed him or her, unless removed earlier by the director for cause. Members appointed by the Chief Financial Officer under subparagraph (b)7. shall serve on the commission until the end of the term of office of the Chief Financial Officer who appointed them, unless earlier removed by the Chief Financial Officer for cause. Vacancies on the commission shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(d) The State Board of Administration shall annually appoint one of the members of the commission to serve as chair.
(e) Members of the commission shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for per diem and travel expenses pursuant to s. 112.061.
(f) The State Board of Administration shall, as a cost of administration of the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, provide for travel, expenses, and staff support for the commission.
(g) There shall be no liability on the part of, and no cause of action of any nature shall arise against, any member of the commission, any member of the State Board of Administration, or any employee of the State Board of Administration for any action taken in the performance of their duties under this section. In addition, the commission may, in writing, waive any potential cause of action for negligence of a consultant, contractor, or contract employee engaged to assist the commission.
(3) ADOPTION AND EFFECT OF STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES.
(a) The commission shall consider any actuarial methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges that have the potential for improving the accuracy of or reliability of the hurricane loss projections used in residential property insurance rate filings and flood loss projections used in rate filings for personal lines residential flood insurance coverage. The commission shall, from time to time, adopt findings as to the accuracy or reliability of particular methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges.
(b) The commission shall consider any actuarial methods, principles, standards, or models that have the potential for improving the accuracy of or reliability of projecting probable maximum loss levels. The commission shall adopt findings as to the accuracy or reliability of particular methods, principles, standards, or models related to probable maximum loss calculations.
(c) In establishing reimbursement premiums for the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, the State Board of Administration must, to the extent feasible, employ actuarial methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges found by the commission to be accurate or reliable.
(d) With respect to a rate filing under s. 627.062, an insurer shall employ and may not modify or adjust actuarial methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges found by the commission to be accurate or reliable in determining hurricane loss factors and probable maximum loss levels for use in a rate filing under s. 627.062. An insurer may employ a model in a rate filing until 120 days after the expiration of the commission’s acceptance of that model and may not modify or adjust models found by the commission to be accurate or reliable in determining probable maximum loss levels. This paragraph does not prohibit an insurer from using a straight average of model results or output ranges for the purposes of a rate filing for personal lines residential flood insurance coverage under s. 627.062.
(e) The commission shall adopt actuarial methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges for personal lines residential flood loss no later than July 1, 2017.
(f) The commission shall revise previously adopted actuarial methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges every odd-numbered year for hurricane loss projections. The commission shall revise previously adopted actuarial methods, principles, standards, models, or output ranges no less than every 4 years for flood loss projections.
(g)1. A trade secret, as defined in s. 688.002, which is used in designing and constructing a hurricane or flood loss model and which is provided pursuant to this section, by a private company, to the commission, office, or consumer advocate appointed pursuant to s. 627.0613 is confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution.
2.a. That portion of a meeting of the commission or of a rate proceeding on an insurer’s rate filing at which a trade secret made confidential and exempt by this paragraph is discussed is exempt from s. 286.011 and s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. The closed meeting must be recorded, and no portion of the closed meeting may be off the record.
b. The recording of a closed portion of a meeting is exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution.
History.s. 6, ch. 95-276; s. 6, ch. 96-194; s. 3, ch. 97-55; s. 4, ch. 2000-333; s. 1066, ch. 2003-261; s. 79, ch. 2004-390; s. 4, ch. 2005-111; s. 3, ch. 2005-264; s. 12, ch. 2006-12; s. 145, ch. 2008-4; s. 11, ch. 2008-66; s. 83, ch. 2009-21; s. 10, ch. 2009-70; s. 16, ch. 2009-87; s. 1, ch. 2010-89; s. 431, ch. 2011-142; s. 76, ch. 2012-5; s. 5, ch. 2013-60; s. 2, ch. 2014-80; s. 1, ch. 2014-98; s. 2, ch. 2015-135; s. 1, ch. 2017-142; s. 1, ch. 2019-35; s. 4, ch. 2023-217.

F.S. 627.0628 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.0628 on Casetext

Amendments to 627.0628


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 627.0628
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 627.0628.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 627.0628

Total Results: 20

J.J.J. v. D.G. and A.G.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-24

Snippet: Stat. (2023); see also, J.C. v. State, 293 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). That one of the witnesses

C.W.R.K. v. Stewart-Marchman-Act-Behavioral Healthcare (SMA), Deland Men's Residential Treatment Center (DMRT)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-12

Snippet: law reviewed de novo. J.C. v. State, 293 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

J. W. vs R. W.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-12-02

Snippet: treatment under chapter 397. J.C. v. State, 293 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). Chapter 397, otherwise known

MICHAEL LOVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-02-02

Snippet: to the evidence.” Williams v. State, 850 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); see Toole v. State, 270 So

DE SOLEIL SOUTH BEACH RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. DE SOLEIL SOUTH BEACH ASSOCIATION, INC., etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-02

Snippet: Condominium Act. 4 Kaufman v. Shere, 347 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (holding condominium declaration

DANIA BEACH BOAT CLUB CONDO ASSN, INC. v. PIERRE FORCIER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-02-12

Snippet: this argument. 2 1 Kaufman v. Shere, 347 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (holding the association’s

WILLIAM E. BYNES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-01-29

Snippet: in good faith. See Gaston v. State, 141 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). We therefore conclude that

Gissendanner v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-10

Citation: 273 So. 3d 213

Snippet: evidence); see also Williams v. State, 850 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (reversing for new restitution

Gissendanner v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-10

Citation: 273 So. 3d 213

Snippet: evidence); see also Williams v. State, 850 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (reversing for new restitution

Machin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-10

Citation: 267 So. 3d 1098

Snippet: sentence. See, e.g. , *1101D.B. v. State , 222 So.3d 627, 628-29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; Hawks v. State , 226

Machin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-10

Citation: 267 So. 3d 1098

Snippet: sentence. See, e.g. , *1101D.B. v. State , 222 So.3d 627, 628-29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; Hawks v. State , 226

JAMES A. MACHIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-10

Snippet: sentence. See, e.g., D.B. v. State, 222 So. 3d 627, 628–29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); Hawks v. State, 226 So

KEVIN ROLAND v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-03

Citation: 267 So. 3d 449

Snippet: judicial processes.” Gaston v. State, 141 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); see also Bivins v. State

The Local Door Coupons Franchise v. Mayers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-19

Citation: 261 So. 3d 726

Snippet: Perlberg v. Lubercy Asia Holdings, LLC, 247 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co.

RESTORATION 1 OF PORT ST. LUCIE, a/a/o JOHN and LIZA SQUITIERI v. ARK ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-05

Citation: 255 So. 3d 344

Snippet: State, Office of Ins. Regulation, 177 So. 3d 627, 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“On this point we find an

Kraig Alexander Williams v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-16

Citation: 258 So. 3d 502

Snippet: state attorney who was trying the case. 609 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). And in Henry v. State, the

Dimitri v. Commercial Center of Miami Master Assoc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-08

Citation: 253 So. 3d 715

Snippet: amendments. See, e.g., Kaufman v. Shere, 347 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (“[T]he provisions of the Condominium

Security First Ins. Co. v. Florida Office of Ins. Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-27

Snippet: properly addressed to the Legislature. 177 So. 3d 627, 628-29 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We agree that the asserted

Jason Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-07-14

Citation: 224 So. 3d 288, 2017 WL 2989036, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10097

Snippet: summary denial order. See Pullum v. State, 893 So.2d 627, 628-29 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Joshua Walker v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-23

Citation: 223 So. 3d 388, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9130

Snippet: summary denial order. See Pullum v. State, 893 So.2d 627, 628-29 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Nonetheless, we considered