Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (2025)

Definitions.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
688.002 Definitions.As used in ss. 688.001-688.009, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) “Improper means” includes theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage through electronic or other means.
(2) “Misappropriation” means:
(a) Acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or
(b) Disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent by a person who:
1. Used improper means to acquire knowledge of the trade secret; or
2. At the time of disclosure or use, knew or had reason to know that her or his knowledge of the trade secret was:
a. Derived from or through a person who had utilized improper means to acquire it;
b. Acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use; or
c. Derived from or through a person who owed a duty to the person seeking relief to maintain its secrecy or limit its use; or
3. Before a material change of her or his position, knew or had reason to know that it was a trade secret and that knowledge of it had been acquired by accident or mistake.
(3) “Person” means a natural person, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision or agency, or any other legal or commercial entity.
(4) “Trade secret” means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that:
(a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and
(b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
History.s. 2, ch. 88-254; s. 750, ch. 97-102.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 130 cases (45 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. Westpoint Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (M.D. Fla. 2001).
Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. Westpoint Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (M.D. Fla. 2001). · cites it 9× “Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (4). This Court adopts Judge Jenkins’ conclusion that Plaintiff Liberty American’s rating software is a trade secret under Florida law.”
Compulife Software Inc. v. Moses Newman, 959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020). · cites it 7× “Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (4). “[W]hether something is a trade secret is a question typically ‘resolved by a fact finder after full presentation of evidence from each side.”
Advantor Sys. Corp. v. DRS Technical Servs., Inc., 678 F. App'x 839 (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 11× “DRS allegedly used the latter two sets of information to successfully maintain Advantor equipment without having to subcontract with Advantor.”
Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. Barker Boatworks, LLC, 898 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2018). · cites it 4× “2017) (citing Fla. Stat. § 688.002 ; Am. Red Cross v. Palm Beach Blood Bank, Inc.”
Sentry Data Sys., Inc. v. CVS Health, 361 F. Supp. 3d 1279 (S.D. Fla. 2018). · cites it 6× “§ 1836 and Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (Counts VI-VII); Florida common law conversion of confidential information and proprietary information (Count VIII); and Florida common law unfair competition (Count IX).”
DynCorp Int'l v. AAR Airlift Grp., Inc., 664 F. App'x 844 (11th Cir. 2016). · cites it 5× “” Fla. Stat. §§ 688.002-688.004 . “Misappropriation” means: (a) Acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or (b) Disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or…”
Vas Aero Servs., LLC v. Arroyo, 860 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (S.D. Fla. 2012). · cites it 7× “2001) (quoting Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (2) (2011)). i. Trade Secret In order to be classified as a trade secret, the information at issue— which can include a formula, pattern, compilation, program, devices, method, technique, or process — must: (a) [derive] independent economic…”
Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc., 136 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (S.D. Fla. 2001). · cites it 4× “See Fla. Stat. § 688.002 . To qualify as a trade secret, the information that the plaintiff seeks to protect must derive economic value from not being readily ascertainable by others and must be the subject of reasonable efforts to protect its secrecy.”
Sensormatic Elec. Corp. v. TAG CO. US, LLC, 632 F. Supp. 2d 1147 (S.D. Fla. 2008). · cites it 10× “Fla. Stat. § 688.002 . 279. Sensormatic’s specifications are trade secrets.”
Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc., 148 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (S.D. Fla. 2001). · cites it 4× “See Fla.Stat. § 688.002(2) (defining misappropriation); Cal.”
Alphamed Pharm. Corp. v. Arriva Pharm., Inc., 432 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2006). · cites it 3× “On the subject of statutory construction, AlphaMed contends that “the legislature’s decision to forgo mention of damages in the definition of ‘misappropriation’ [in Fla. Stat. § 688.002 ] in fact evidences that it specifically intended to exclude damages as an element of a prima…”
M.C. Dean, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 199 F. Supp. 3d 1349 (S.D. Fla. 2016). · cites it 4× “Fla. Stat. § 688.002 . “In a trade secret action, the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating both that the specific information it seeks to protect is secret and that it has taken reasonable steps to protect this secrecy.”
— 688.002(1) — 5 cases
Compulife Software Inc. v. Moses Newman, 959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020). “Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (4). “[W]hether something is a trade secret is a question typically ‘resolved by a fact finder after full presentation of evidence from each side.”
Spigot, Inc. v. Hoggatt (M.D. Fla. 2020).
— 688.002(2) — 14 cases
Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc., 148 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (S.D. Fla. 2001). “See Fla.Stat. § 688.002(2) (defining misappropriation); Cal.”
Vas Aero Servs., LLC v. Arroyo, 860 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (S.D. Fla. 2012). “2001) (quoting Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (2) (2011)). i. Trade Secret In order to be classified as a trade secret, the information at issue— which can include a formula, pattern, compilation, program, devices, method, technique, or process — must: (a) [derive] independent economic…”
Spigot, Inc. v. Hoggatt (M.D. Fla. 2020).
— 688.002(2)(a) — 6 cases
Arch Aluminum & Glass Co., Inc. v. Haney, 964 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
— 688.002(2)(b) — 2 cases
Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc., 136 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (S.D. Fla. 2001). “See Fla. Stat. § 688.002 . To qualify as a trade secret, the information that the plaintiff seeks to protect must derive economic value from not being readily ascertainable by others and must be the subject of reasonable efforts to protect its secrecy.”
— 688.002(2)(b)(1) — 2 cases
— 688.002(2)(b)(2)(a) — 2 cases
— 688.002(2)(b)(2)(b) — 3 cases
Arthrex, Inc. v. Hilton (M.D. Fla. 2022).
— 688.002(2)(b)(2)(c) — 2 cases
— 688.002(2)(b)(3) — 2 cases
— 688.002(4) — 44 cases
Am. Exp. Travel Related Servs., Inc. v. Cruz, 761 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc., 148 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (S.D. Fla. 2001). “See Fla.Stat. § 688.002(2) (defining misappropriation); Cal.”
Arko Plumbing Corp. v. Rudd, 230 So. 3d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
Allegiance Healthcare Corp. v. Coleman, 232 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (S.D. Fla. 2002).
— 688.002(4)(a) — 3 cases
Spigot, Inc. v. Hoggatt (M.D. Fla. 2020).
Couture v. Noshirvan (M.D. Fla. 2024).
— 688.002(4)(b) — 4 cases
Compulife Software Inc. v. Moses Newman, 959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020). “Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (4). “[W]hether something is a trade secret is a question typically ‘resolved by a fact finder after full presentation of evidence from each side.”
Sepro Corp. v. Florida Dep't of Env't Prot., 839 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
Cubic Transp. Sys. v. Miami-dade Cnty., 899 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
Spigot, Inc. v. Hoggatt (M.D. Fla. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.