Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 627.414 (2025)
Additional policy contents.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
627.414 Additional policy contents.—A policy may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this code and which are:
(1) Required to be inserted by the laws of the insurer’s domicile;
(2) Necessary, on account of the manner in which the insurer is constituted or operated, in order to state the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract; or
(3) Desired by the insurer and neither prohibited by law nor in conflict with any provisions required to be included therein.
History.—s. 463, ch. 59-205; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 377, 809(2nd), ch. 82-243; s. 79, ch. 82-386; s. 114, ch. 92-318.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2012–2013 · leading case: Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013).
Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013). “Geico’s authority to include this policy provision flows directly from section 627.414, Florida Statutes (2008), concerning “[a]dditional policy contents,” which states that a “policy may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this code and which are .”
Merly Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 685 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir. 2012). “” Fla. Stat. § 627.414 (3). Geico argues that EUOs are permitted as condition precedent to coverage under the PIP statute because they meet the Flores test.”
Merly Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 726 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2013). “Geico’s authority to include this policy provision flows directly from section 627.414, Florida Statutes (2008), concerning “[additional policy contents,” which states that a “policy may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this code and which are .”
— 627.414(3) — 2 cases
Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013). “Geico’s authority to include this policy provision flows directly from section 627.414, Florida Statutes (2008), concerning “[a]dditional policy contents,” which states that a “policy may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this code and which are .”
Merly Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 726 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2013). “Geico’s authority to include this policy provision flows directly from section 627.414, Florida Statutes (2008), concerning “[additional policy contents,” which states that a “policy may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this code and which are .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.