Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 627.414 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 627.414 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 627.414

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 627.414
627.414 Additional policy contents.A policy may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this code and which are:
(1) Required to be inserted by the laws of the insurer’s domicile;
(2) Necessary, on account of the manner in which the insurer is constituted or operated, in order to state the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract; or
(3) Desired by the insurer and neither prohibited by law nor in conflict with any provisions required to be included therein.
History.s. 463, ch. 59-205; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 377, 809(2nd), ch. 82-243; s. 79, ch. 82-386; s. 114, ch. 92-318.

F.S. 627.414 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.414 on Casetext

Amendments to 627.414


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 627.414
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 627.414.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NUNEZ, a. k. a. v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 726 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . Geico’s authority to include this policy provision flows directly from section 627.414, Florida Statutes . . . The majority’s only consideration of section 627.414(3) comes in connection with the recitation of a . . . Having set forth the text of section 627.414(3) and recognizing the requirement of “consistency” that . . . The majority thus effectively abrogates the unambiguous statutory enactment contained in section 627.414 . . . When the EUO provision is evaluated under the authorization contained in section 627.414(3), no basis . . . Additionally, Section 627.414(3) expressly authorizes insurers to include any “additional provisions . . . STAT. § 627.414(3). Nunez, 685 F.3d at 1209. . . . said in Custer and Flores, in this case, we are abrogating unambiguous provisions found in section 627.414 . . . The dissent notes, “[Those opinions] do not so much as acknowledge the existence of section 627.414(3 . . . We point out that while Custer and Flores do not address section 627.414(3), those opinions indeed address . . .

NUNEZ a k a v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Geico’s authority to include this policy provision flows directly from section 627.414, Florida Statutes . . . The majority’s only consideration of section 627.414(3) comes in connection with the recitation of a . . . Having set forth the text of section 627.414(3) and recognizing the requirement of “consistency” that . . . The majority thus effectively abrogates the unambiguous statutory enactment contained in section 627.414 . . . When the EUO provision is evaluated under the authorization contained in section 627.414(3), no basis . . . Additionally, Section 627.414(3) expressly authorizes insurers to include any “additional provisions . . . STAT. § 627.414(3). Nunez, 685 F.3d at 1209. . . . said in Custer and Flores, in this case, we are abrogating unambiguous provisions found in section 627.414 . . . The dissent notes, “[Those opinions] do not so much as acknowledge the existence of section 627.414(3 . . . We point out that while Custer and Flores do not address section 627.414(3), those opinions indeed address . . .

NUNEZ, a. k. a. v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 685 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . Additionally, Section 627.414(3) expressly authorizes insurers to include any “additional provisions . . . Stat. § 627.414(3). . . .