Florida Statute 627.635 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 627.635

627.635 Excess insurance.—

(1) No provision of this chapter shall be deemed to prohibit an insurer from issuing a health insurance policy as, or including in a policy a provision providing for, excess insurance; that is, to the effect that the insurer’s liability for benefits payable on account of expense incurred for any hospitalization, medical, surgical, and other services resulting from covered sickness or injury of the insured shall be limited to that part of that expense, if any, which is in excess of all benefits payable on account thereof by the same insurer under any other policy or policies covering the same insured and by all other insurers and service organizations by whom benefits are payable as to the same such expense.

(2) Any excess insurance policy, or any policy containing any excess insurance provision, shall have imprinted or stamped conspicuously upon the face thereof the designation “excess insurance” or appropriate words of similar import approved by the office.

History.—s. 578, ch. 59-205; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 484, 497, 809(2nd), ch. 82-243; s. 79, ch. 82-386; s. 114, ch. 92-318; s. 1149, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 627.635 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.635 on Casetext

Amendments to 627.635

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 627.635

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 627.635.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 627.635

Total Results: 9

Scott v. Busch

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-07-29

Citation: 907 So. 2d 662, 2005 WL 1787451

Snippet: Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp., 431 So.2d 627, 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). [10] Owner's Adjustment

Pleasures II Adult Video, Inc. v. City of Sarasota

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-12-11

Citation: 833 So. 2d 185, 2002 WL 31757000

Snippet: Need for Legislative Reform, 25 Stetson L.Rev. 627, 635-39 (Spring 1996); cf. Bd. of County Comm'rs of

Christian v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-12-21

Citation: 537 So. 2d 623, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 9, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5581, 1988 WL 135345

Snippet: 627.-736(4)(f). We disagree and reverse. Section 627.635, Florida Statutes (1985) permits, with certain

Jonas v. Central Life Assurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-07-13

Citation: 528 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1645, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3003, 1988 WL 70664

Snippet: the face of the policy as required by section 627.635, Florida Statutes. The policy provided for payment

Brown v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-10-12

Citation: 440 So. 2d 588, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22491

Snippet: Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp., 431 So.2d 627, 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). The motion for rehearing

Republic National Life Insurance v. Hiatt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-10

Citation: 400 So. 2d 854, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20530

Snippet: Section 627.635, Florida Statutes (1975)1 and since the policy did not comply with Section 627.635(2), the

ITT Continental Baking Co. v. Davila

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-09-10

Citation: 388 So. 2d 1254

Snippet: 306 U.S. 240, 256, 59 S.Ct. 490 [496, 83 L.Ed. 627, 635,], 123 A.L.R. 599, "But this recognition of `the

Brown v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-08

Citation: 343 So. 2d 91, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15425

Snippet: "excess insurance" within the purview of Section 627.635, Florida Statutes (1975)[1] and that Gulf Life

State ex rel. Springer v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-09-02

Citation: 189 So. 2d 846, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823

Snippet: respondent have referred this court to 168 A.L.R. 627, 635. However, Florida follows the general rule as