Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 627.6515 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 627.6515 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 627.6515

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 627.6515
627.6515 Out-of-state groups.
(1) Any group health insurance policy issued or delivered outside this state under which a resident of this state is provided coverage shall comply with the provisions of this part in the same manner as group health policies issued in this state.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this part, this part does not apply to a group health insurance policy issued or delivered outside this state under which a resident of this state is provided coverage if:
(a) The policy is issued to an employee group the composition of which is substantially as described in s. 627.653; a labor union group or association group the composition of which is substantially as described in s. 627.654; an additional group the composition of which is substantially as described in s. 627.656; a group insured under a blanket health policy when the composition of the group is substantially in compliance with s. 627.659; a group insured under a franchise health policy when the composition of the group is substantially in compliance with s. 627.663; an association group to cover persons associated in any other common group, which common group is formed primarily for purposes other than providing insurance; a group that is established primarily for the purpose of providing group insurance, provided the benefits are reasonable in relation to the premiums charged thereunder and the issuance of the group policy has resulted, or will result, in economies of administration; or a group of insurance agents of an insurer, which insurer is the policyholder;
(b) Certificates evidencing coverage under the policy are issued to residents of this state and contain in contrasting color and not less than 10-point type the following statement: “The benefits of the policy providing your coverage are governed primarily by the law of a state other than Florida”; and
(c) The policy provides the benefits specified in ss. 627.419, 627.6574, 627.6575, 627.6579, 627.6612, 627.66121, 627.66122, 627.6613, 627.667, 627.6675, 627.6691, and 627.66911, and complies with the requirements of s. 627.66996.
(d) Applications for certificates of coverage offered to residents of this state must contain, in contrasting color and not less than 12-point type, the following statement on the same page as the applicant’s signature:

“This policy is primarily governed by the laws of   (insert state where the master policy is filed)  . As a result, all of the rating laws applicable to policies filed in this state do not apply to this coverage, which may result in increases in your premium at renewal that would not be permissible under a Florida-approved policy. Any purchase of individual health insurance should be considered carefully, as future medical conditions may make it impossible to qualify for another individual health policy. For information concerning individual health coverage under a Florida-approved policy, consult your agent or the Florida Department of Financial Services.”

This paragraph applies only to group certificates providing health insurance coverage which require individualized underwriting to determine coverage eligibility for an individual or premium rates to be charged to an individual except for the following:

1. Policies issued to provide coverage to groups of persons all of whom are in the same or functionally related licensed professions, and providing coverage only to such licensed professionals, their employees, or their dependents;
2. Policies providing coverage to small employers as defined by s. 627.6699. Such policies shall be subject to, and governed by, the provisions of s. 627.6699;
3. Policies issued to a bona fide association, as defined by s. 627.6571(5), provided that there is a person or board acting as a fiduciary for the benefit of the members, and such association is not owned, controlled by, or otherwise associated with the insurance company; or
4. Any accidental death, accidental death and dismemberment, accident-only, vision-only, dental-only, hospital indemnity-only, hospital accident-only, cancer, specified disease, Medicare supplement, products that supplement Medicare, long-term care, or disability income insurance, or similar supplemental plans provided under a separate policy, certificate, or contract of insurance, which cannot duplicate coverage under an underlying health plan, coinsurance, or deductibles or coverage issued as a supplement to workers’ compensation or similar insurance, or automobile medical-payment insurance.
(3) Section 624.428 is not applicable when residents of this state are enrolled for coverage under a policy or certificate issued in accordance with subsection (2).
(4) Prior to solicitation in this state, a copy of the master policy and a copy of the form of the certificate evidencing coverage that will be issued to residents of this state shall be filed with the office for informational purposes.
(5) Prior to solicitation in this state, an officer of the insurer shall truthfully certify to the office that the policy and certificates evidencing coverage have been reviewed and approved by the state in which the group policy is issued.
(6) Any insurer who provides coverage under certificates of insurance issued to residents of this state shall designate one Florida-licensed resident agent as agent of record for the service of such certificates, unless the policy is issued to a group substantially as described in s. 627.653, s. 627.654, s. 627.656, s. 627.659, or s. 627.663.
(7) No group, franchise, or blanket health insurance policy issued or delivered outside this state, under which policy a resident of this state is provided coverage for any diagnostic or surgical procedure involving bones or joints of the skeleton, shall discriminate against coverage for any similar diagnostic or surgical procedure involving bones or joints of the jaw and facial region, if, under accepted medical standards, such procedure or surgery is medically necessary to treat conditions caused by congenital or developmental deformity, disease, or injury. This subsection shall not be construed to affect any other coverage under this part or to restrict the scope of coverage under any policy, plan, or contract. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to discourage appropriate nonsurgical procedures or to prohibit the continued coverage of nonsurgical procedures in the treatment of a bone or joint of the jaw and facial region. Furthermore, nothing in this subsection requires coverage for care or treatment of the teeth or gums, for intraoral prosthetic devices, or for surgical procedures for cosmetic purposes.
(8) For purposes of this subsection, dental treatment or surgery shall be considered necessary when the dental condition is likely to result in a medical condition if left untreated. Any group, franchise, or blanket health insurance policy issued or delivered outside this state, under which policy a resident of this state is provided coverage for general anesthesia and hospitalization services to a covered person, shall not preclude such coverage in assuring the safe delivery of necessary dental care provided to a covered person who:
(a) Is under 8 years of age and is determined by a licensed dentist, and the child’s physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, to require necessary dental treatment in a hospital or ambulatory surgical center due to a significantly complex dental condition or a developmental disability in which patient management in the dental office has proved to be ineffective; or
(b) Has one or more medical conditions that would create significant or undue medical risk for the individual in the course of delivery of any necessary dental treatment or surgery if not rendered in a hospital or ambulatory surgical center.

As provided herein, all terms and conditions of the covered person’s health insurance policy shall apply to such services, and this section does not require coverage for the diagnosis or treatment of dental disease. An insurer may require prior authorization for general anesthesia and hospital services required under this section in the same manner the insurer requires prior authorization for hospitalization for other covered services. This subsection shall not apply to Medicare supplement, long-term care, disability, limited benefit, accident only, or specified disease policies.

(9) Any insured shall be able to terminate membership or affiliation with the group to whom the master policy is issued. An insured that elects to terminate his or her membership or affiliation with the group shall provide written notice to the insurer. Upon providing the written notice, the member shall be entitled to the rights and options provided by s. 627.6675.
(10) Any pricing structure that results, or is reasonably expected to result, in rate escalations resulting in a death spiral, which is a rate escalation caused by segmenting healthy and unhealthy lives resulting in an ultimate pool of primarily less healthy insureds, is considered a predatory pricing structure and constitutes unfair discrimination as provided in s. 626.9541(1)(g). The Financial Services Commission may adopt rules to define other unfairly discriminatory or predatory health insurance rating practices.
History.ss. 499, 809(2nd), ch. 82-243; s. 79, ch. 82-386; s. 110, ch. 83-216; s. 3, ch. 84-202; s. 5, ch. 86-122; s. 2, ch. 89-190; s. 7, ch. 90-249; s. 2, ch. 90-255; ss. 129, 149, ch. 92-33; s. 114, ch. 92-318; s. 5, ch. 96-282; s. 3, ch. 96-361; s. 6, ch. 97-48; s. 2, ch. 98-66; s. 2, ch. 98-312; s. 3, ch. 2003-139; s. 1164, ch. 2003-261; s. 1, ch. 2004-7; s. 4, ch. 2011-111; s. 152, ch. 2014-17.

F.S. 627.6515 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.6515 on Casetext

Amendments to 627.6515


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 627.6515
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 627.6515.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. FRIEDMAN, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 985 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 627.6515(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . Out-of-state policies are exempt if they comply with certain mandatory provisions found in section 627.6515 . . . appellant’s breach of contract claim, she argues that the insurance policy does not comply with sections 627.6515 . . .

LUTZ, v. PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 951 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . that the group policy issued by Protective Life failed to meet the statutory conditions in section 627.6515 . . . private right of action for an insured to enforce compliance with an insurer’s violation of sections 627.6515 . . . that Lutz sought a declaration that Protective Life failed to comply with the conditions of section 627.6515 . . . See § 627.6515(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . VII of the Florida Insurance Code if it complies with certain mandatory provisions found in section 627.6515 . . .

FREEDOM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a v. WALLANT, 891 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . an out-of-state group health insurance program, administered by CIA, under Florida Statutes section 627.6515 . . . Stat. § 627.6515(2) and whose certificates contained adhesion language pertaining to dispute resolution . . . of the complaint, the representatives alleged breach of contract, based on Florida Statutes sections 627.6515 . . . Part VII of the Florida Insurance Code regarding claim payment due to noncomplianee ' with section 627.6515 . . .

L. MATHASON, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,, 855 So. 2d 261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 627.6515, Fla. Stat. (1999). These were delivered to him in Florida. . . .

MODDER v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,, 113 F.3d 201 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida: Does the exclusionary provision of Section 627.6515 . . . Eleventh Circuit’s certified question in the affirmative and hold that the clear language of section 627.6515 . . . of section 627.6698, like the rest of part VII, is not applicable to policies described in section 627.6515 . . . and (2) that ANTEX [American National Life Insurance Company of Texas] also has complied with section 627.6515 . . . providing health insurance coverage to the Modders comes within the exclusionary provision of Section 627.6515 . . .

MODDER v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,, 688 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1997)

. . . ANTEX opposed the motion, arguing the exclusionary provision of section 627.6515(2) precluded attorney . . . At the outset, we must determine whether the exclusionary provision of section 627.6515(2) exempts an . . . Section 627.6515, within part VII of chapter 627, Florida Statutes (1995), and entitled “Out-of-state . . . The Modders argue that the exclusionary provision of section 627.6515(2), Florida Statutes (1995), does . . . Section 627.6515(2) clearly states: “This part [part VII] does not apply to a group health insurance . . .

MODDER v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,, 86 F.3d 1070 (11th Cir. 1996)

. . . FACTS Appellants, Arthur Modder and Gail Modder, contend the exclusionary provision of section 627.6515 . . . provision after the exclusionary provision, the legislature could not have contemplated that section 627.6515 . . . that the National and Business Association (NBA), came within the exclusionary provision of section 627.6515 . . . formed for purposes other than providing insurance and comprises an association group under section 627.6515 . . . No Florida court has addressed the application, if any, of the exclusionary provision of section 627.6515 . . .

K. TATUM, v. BOKOFSKY, 842 F. Supp. 521 (S.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . Under Florida Statute 627.6515, the Defendant argues, its insurance policy meets the test for exclusion . . . Court doubts whether the statute actually applies to the Defendant’s plan pursuant to Florida Statute 627.6515 . . . Both parties dispute the application of Florida Statute 627.6515(2). . . . In this ease, the Defendant contends, through motion and affidavit, that section 627.6515(2) controls . . . Given the possible application of Florida Statute 627.6515(2), the relevancy of section 627.666 remains . . .