Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 626.9541 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 626.9541 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 626.9541 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 626.9541

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 626
INSURANCE FIELD REPRESENTATIVES AND OPERATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 626.9541
626.9541 Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices defined.
(1) UNFAIR METHODS OF COMPETITION AND UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACTS.The following are defined as unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices:
(a) Misrepresentations and false advertising of insurance policies.Knowingly making, issuing, circulating, or causing to be made, issued, or circulated, any estimate, illustration, circular, statement, sales presentation, omission, comparison, or property and casualty certificate of insurance altered after being issued, which:
1. Misrepresents the benefits, advantages, conditions, or terms of any insurance policy.
2. Misrepresents the dividends or share of the surplus to be received on any insurance policy.
3. Makes any false or misleading statements as to the dividends or share of surplus previously paid on any insurance policy.
4. Is misleading, or is a misrepresentation, as to the financial condition of any person or as to the legal reserve system upon which any life insurer operates.
5. Uses any name or title of any insurance policy or class of insurance policies misrepresenting the true nature thereof.
6. Is a misrepresentation for the purpose of inducing, or tending to induce, the lapse, forfeiture, exchange, conversion, or surrender of any insurance policy.
7. Is a misrepresentation for the purpose of effecting a pledge or assignment of, or effecting a loan against, any insurance policy.
8. Misrepresents any insurance policy as being shares of stock or misrepresents ownership interest in the company.
9. Uses any advertisement that would mislead or otherwise cause a reasonable person to believe mistakenly that the state or the Federal Government is responsible for the insurance sales activities of any person or stands behind any person’s credit or that any person, the state, or the Federal Government guarantees any returns on insurance products or is a source of payment of any insurance obligation of or sold by any person.
10. Fails to disclose a third party that receives royalties, referral fees, or other remuneration for sponsorship, marketing, or use of third-party branding for a policy of health insurance as defined in s. 624.603.
(b) False information and advertising generally.Knowingly making, publishing, disseminating, circulating, or placing before the public, or causing, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, or placed before the public:
1. In a newspaper, magazine, or other publication,
2. In the form of a notice, circular, pamphlet, letter, or poster,
3. Over any radio or television station, or
4. In any other way,

an advertisement, announcement, or statement containing any assertion, representation, or statement with respect to the business of insurance, which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading.

(c) Defamation.Knowingly making, publishing, disseminating, or circulating, directly or indirectly, or aiding, abetting, or encouraging the making, publishing, disseminating, or circulating of, any oral or written statement, or any pamphlet, circular, article, or literature, which is false or maliciously critical of, or derogatory to, any person and which is calculated to injure such person.
(d) Boycott, coercion, and intimidation.Entering into any agreement to commit, or by any concerted action committing, any act of boycott, coercion, or intimidation resulting in, or tending to result in, unreasonable restraint of, or monopoly in, the business of insurance.
(e) False statements and entries.
1. Knowingly:
a. Filing with any supervisory or other public official,
b. Making, publishing, disseminating, circulating,
c. Delivering to any person,
d. Placing before the public,
e. Causing, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, delivered to any person, or placed before the public,

any false material statement.

2. Knowingly making any false entry of a material fact in any book, report, or statement of any person, or knowingly omitting to make a true entry of any material fact pertaining to the business of such person in any book, report, or statement of such person.
(f) Stock operations and advisory board contracts.Issuing or delivering, promising to issue or deliver, or permitting agents, officers, or employees to issue or deliver, agency company stock or other capital stock, benefit certificates or shares in any common-law corporation, or securities or any special or advisory board contracts or other contracts of any kind promising returns or profits as an inducement to insurance.
(g) Unfair discrimination.
1. Knowingly making or permitting unfair discrimination between individuals of the same actuarially supportable class and equal expectation of life, in the rates charged for a life insurance or annuity contract, in the dividends or other benefits payable thereon, or in any other term or condition of such contract.
2. Knowingly making or permitting unfair discrimination between individuals of the same actuarially supportable class, as determined at the time of initial issuance of the coverage, and essentially the same hazard, in the amount of premium, policy fees, or rates charged for a policy or contract of accident, disability, or health insurance, in the benefits payable thereunder, in the terms or conditions of such contract, or in any other manner.
3. For a health insurer, life insurer, disability insurer, property and casualty insurer, automobile insurer, or managed care provider to underwrite a policy, or refuse to issue, reissue, or renew a policy, refuse to pay a claim, cancel or otherwise terminate a policy, or increase rates based upon the fact that an insured or applicant who is also the proposed insured has made a claim or sought or should have sought medical or psychological treatment in the past for abuse, protection from abuse, or shelter from abuse, or that a claim was caused in the past by, or might occur as a result of, any future assault, battery, or sexual assault by a family or household member upon another family or household member as defined in s. 741.28. A health insurer, life insurer, disability insurer, or managed care provider may refuse to underwrite, issue, or renew a policy based on the applicant’s medical condition, but may not consider whether such condition was caused by an act of abuse. For purposes of this section, the term “abuse” means the occurrence of one or more of the following acts:
a. Attempting or committing assault, battery, sexual assault, or sexual battery;
b. Placing another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury by physical menace;
c. False imprisonment;
d. Physically or sexually abusing a minor child; or
e. An act of domestic violence as defined in s. 741.28.

This subparagraph does not prohibit a property and casualty insurer or an automobile insurer from excluding coverage for intentional acts by the insured if such exclusion is not an act of unfair discrimination as defined in this paragraph.

4. For a personal lines property or personal lines automobile insurer to:
a. Refuse to issue, reissue, or renew a policy; cancel or otherwise terminate a policy; or charge an unfairly discriminatory rate in this state based on the lawful use, possession, or ownership of a firearm or ammunition by the insurance applicant, insured, or a household member of the applicant or insured. This sub-subparagraph does not prevent an insurer from charging a supplemental premium that is not unfairly discriminatory for a separate rider voluntarily requested by the insurance applicant to insure a firearm or a firearm collection whose value exceeds the standard policy coverage.
b. Disclose the lawful ownership or possession of firearms of an insurance applicant, insured, or household member of the applicant or insured to a third party or an affiliated entity of the insurer unless the insurer discloses to the applicant or insured the specific need to disclose the information and the applicant or insured expressly consents to the disclosure, or the disclosure is necessary to quote or bind coverage, continue coverage, or adjust a claim. For purposes of underwriting and issuing insurance coverage, this sub-subparagraph does not prevent the sharing of information between an insurance company and its licensed insurance agent if a separate rider has been voluntarily requested by the policyholder or prospective policyholder to insure a firearm or a firearm collection whose value exceeds the standard policy coverage.
(h) Unlawful rebates.
1. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, or in an applicable filing with the office, knowingly:
a. Permitting, or offering to make, or making, any contract or agreement as to such contract other than as plainly expressed in the insurance contract issued thereon;
b. Paying, allowing, or giving, or offering to pay, allow, or give, directly or indirectly, as inducement to such insurance contract, any unlawful rebate of premiums payable on the contract, any special favor or advantage in the dividends or other benefits thereon, or any valuable consideration or inducement whatever not specified in the contract;
c. Giving, selling, or purchasing, or offering to give, sell, or purchase, as inducement to such insurance contract or in connection therewith, any stocks, bonds, or other securities of any insurance company or other corporation, association, or partnership, or any dividends or profits accrued thereon, or anything of value whatsoever not specified in the insurance contract.
2. Nothing in paragraph (g) or subparagraph 1. of this paragraph shall be construed as including within the definition of discrimination or unlawful rebates:
a. In the case of any contract of life insurance or life annuity, paying bonuses to all policyholders or otherwise abating their premiums in whole or in part out of surplus accumulated from nonparticipating insurance; provided that any such bonuses or abatement of premiums is fair and equitable to all policyholders and for the best interests of the company and its policyholders.
b. In the case of life insurance policies issued on the industrial debit plan, making allowance to policyholders who have continuously for a specified period made premium payments directly to an office of the insurer in an amount which fairly represents the saving in collection expenses.
c. Readjustment of the rate of premium for a group insurance policy based on the loss or expense thereunder, at the end of the first or any subsequent policy year of insurance thereunder, which may be made retroactive only for such policy year.
d. Issuance of life insurance policies or annuity contracts at rates less than the usual rates of premiums for such policies or contracts, as group insurance or employee insurance as defined in this code.
e. Issuing life or disability insurance policies on a salary savings, bank draft, preauthorized check, payroll deduction, or other similar plan at a reduced rate reasonably related to the savings made by the use of such plan.
3.a. No title insurer, or any member, employee, attorney, agent, or agency thereof, shall pay, allow, or give, or offer to pay, allow, or give, directly or indirectly, as inducement to title insurance, or after such insurance has been effected, any rebate or abatement of the premium or any other charge or fee, or provide any special favor or advantage, or any monetary consideration or inducement whatever.
b. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be construed as prohibiting the payment of fees to attorneys at law duly licensed to practice law in the courts of this state, for professional services, or as prohibiting the payment of earned portions of the premium to duly appointed agents or agencies who actually perform services for the title insurer. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be construed as prohibiting a rebate or abatement of an attorney fee charged for professional services, or that portion of the premium that is not required to be retained by the insurer pursuant to s. 627.782(1), or any other agent charge or fee to the person responsible for paying the premium, charge, or fee.
c. No insured named in a policy, or any other person directly or indirectly connected with the transaction involving the issuance of such policy, including, but not limited to, any mortgage broker, real estate broker, builder, or attorney, any employee, agent, agency, or representative thereof, or any other person whatsoever, shall knowingly receive or accept, directly or indirectly, any rebate or abatement of any portion of the title insurance premium or of any other charge or fee or any monetary consideration or inducement whatsoever, except as set forth in sub-subparagraph b.; provided, in no event shall any portion of the attorney fee, any portion of the premium that is not required to be retained by the insurer pursuant to s. 627.782(1), any agent charge or fee, or any other monetary consideration or inducement be paid directly or indirectly for the referral of title insurance business.
4.a. Paragraph (g) or subparagraph 1. may not be construed as including within the definition of unfair discrimination or unlawful rebates the offer or provision by a life or health insurer or a life or health agent of the life or health insurer, including by or through an employee, an affiliate, or a third-party representative, of a value-added product or service at no or reduced cost when such product or service is not specified in the life or health insurance policy, if the product or service relates to the insurance coverage and is primarily designed to do one or more of the following:
(I) Provide loss mitigation or loss control;
(II) Reduce claim costs or claim settlement costs;
(III) Provide education about liability risks or risk of loss to persons or property;
(IV) Monitor or assess risk, identify sources of risk, or develop strategies for eliminating or reducing risk;
(V) Enhance health;
(VI) Enhance financial wellness through items such as education or financial planning services;
(VII) Provide post-loss services;
(VIII) Incentivize behavioral changes to improve the health or reduce the risk of death or disability of a policyholder, potential policyholder, certificateholder, potential certificateholder, insured, potential insured, or applicant; or
(IX) Assist in the administration of employee or retiree benefit insurance coverage.
b. The cost to the life or health insurer or life or health agent offering the product or service to a customer must be reasonable in comparison to the customer’s premiums or life or health insurance coverage for the policy class.
c. If the life or health insurer or life or health agent is providing the product or service, the life or health insurer or life or health agent must ensure that the customer is provided with contact information to assist the customer with questions regarding the product or service.
d. The availability of the product or service must be based on documented objective evidence, and the product or service must be offered in a manner that is not unfairly discriminatory. The documented evidence must be maintained by the life or health insurer or life or health agent and produced upon request by the office or the department.
e. If a life or health insurer or life or health agent has a good faith belief, but does not have sufficient evidence to demonstrate, that the product or service meets any of the criteria in sub-sub-subparagraphs a.(I)-(IX), the life or health insurer or life or health agent may provide the product or service in a manner that is not unfairly discriminatory as part of a pilot or testing program for up to 1 year. The life or health insurer or life or health agent must notify the office or department, as applicable, of such pilot or testing program offered to consumers in this state before commencing the program. The life or health insurer or life or health agent may commence the program unless the office or department, as applicable, objects to the program within 21 days after receiving the notice.
f. A life or health insurer, life or health agent, or representative thereof may not offer or provide life or health insurance as an inducement to the purchase of another policy or otherwise use the words “free,” “no cost,” or similar words in an advertisement.
g. The commission may adopt rules to administer this subparagraph to ensure consumer protection. Such rules, consistent with applicable law, may address, among other issues, consumer data protections and privacy, consumer disclosure, and unfair discrimination.
(i) Unfair claim settlement practices.
1. Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application, when serving as a binder or intended to become a part of the policy, or any other material document which was altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the insured;
2. A material misrepresentation made to an insured or any other person having an interest in the proceeds payable under such contract or policy, for the purpose and with the intent of effecting settlement of such claims, loss, or damage under such contract or policy on less favorable terms than those provided in, and contemplated by, such contract or policy;
3. Committing or performing with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice any of the following:
a. Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims;
b. Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue;
c. Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims;
d. Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information;
e. Failing to affirm or deny full or partial coverage of claims, and, as to partial coverage, the dollar amount or extent of coverage, or failing to provide a written statement that the claim is being investigated, upon the written request of the insured within 30 days after proof-of-loss statements have been completed;
f. Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement;
g. Failing to promptly notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim;
h. Failing to clearly explain the nature of the requested information and the reasons why such information is necessary;
i. Failing to pay personal injury protection insurance claims within the time periods required by s. 627.736(4)(b). The office may order the insurer to pay restitution to a policyholder, medical provider, or other claimant, including interest at a rate consistent with the amount set forth in s. 55.03(1), for the time period within which an insurer fails to pay claims as required by law. Restitution is in addition to any other penalties allowed by law, including, but not limited to, the suspension of the insurer’s certificate of authority; or
j. Altering or amending an insurance adjuster’s report without:
(I) Providing a detailed explanation as to why any change that has the effect of reducing the estimate of the loss was made; and
(II) Including on the report or as an addendum to the report a detailed list of all changes made to the report and the identity of the person who ordered each change; or
(III) Retaining all versions of the report, and including within each such version, for each change made within such version of the report, the identity of each person who made or ordered such change; or
4. Failing to pay undisputed amounts of partial or full benefits owed under first-party property insurance policies within 60 days after an insurer receives notice of a residential property insurance claim, determines the amounts of partial or full benefits, and agrees to coverage, unless payment of the undisputed benefits is prevented by factors beyond the control of the insurer as defined in s. 627.70131(5).
(j) Failure to maintain complaint-handling procedures.Failure of any person to maintain a complete record of all the complaints received since the date of the last examination. For purposes of this paragraph, “complaint” means any written communication primarily expressing a grievance.
(k) Misrepresentation in insurance applications.
1. Knowingly making a false or fraudulent written or oral statement or representation on, or relative to, an application or negotiation for an insurance policy for the purpose of obtaining a fee, commission, money, or other benefit from any insurer, agent, broker, or individual.
2. Knowingly making a material omission in the comparison of a life, health, or Medicare supplement insurance replacement policy with the policy it replaces for the purpose of obtaining a fee, commission, money, or other benefit from any insurer, agent, broker, or individual. For the purposes of this subparagraph, a material omission includes the failure to advise the insured of the existence and operation of a preexisting condition clause in the replacement policy.
(l) Twisting.Knowingly making any misleading representations or incomplete or fraudulent comparisons or fraudulent material omissions of or with respect to any insurance policies or insurers for the purpose of inducing, or tending to induce, any person to lapse, forfeit, surrender, terminate, retain, pledge, assign, borrow on, or convert any insurance policy or to take out a policy of insurance in another insurer.
(m) Advertising and promotional gifts and charitable contributions permitted.
1. The provisions of paragraph (f), paragraph (g), or paragraph (h) do not prohibit a licensed insurer or its agent from:
a. Giving to insureds, prospective insureds, or others any article of merchandise, goods, wares, store gift cards, gift certificates, event tickets, anti-fraud or loss mitigation services, or other items having a total value of $100 or less per insured or prospective insured in any calendar year.
b. Making charitable contributions, as defined in s. 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, on behalf of insureds or prospective insureds, of up to $100 per insured or prospective insured in any calendar year.
2. The provisions of paragraph (f), paragraph (g), or paragraph (h) do not prohibit a title insurance agent or title insurance agency, as those terms are defined in s. 626.841, or a title insurer, as defined in s. 627.7711, from giving to insureds, prospective insureds, or others, for the purpose of advertising, any article of merchandise having a value of not more than $25. A person or entity governed by this subparagraph is not subject to subparagraph 1.
(n) Free insurance prohibited.
1. Advertising, offering, or providing free insurance as an inducement to the purchase or sale of real or personal property or of services directly or indirectly connected with such real or personal property.
2. For the purposes of this paragraph, “free” insurance is:
a. Insurance for which no identifiable and additional charge is made to the purchaser of such real property, personal property, or services.
b. Insurance for which an identifiable or additional charge is made in an amount less than the cost of such insurance as to the seller or other person, other than the insurer, providing the same.
3. Subparagraphs 1. and 2. do not apply to:
a. Insurance of, loss of, or damage to the real or personal property involved in any such sale or services, under a policy covering the interests therein of the seller or vendor.
b. Blanket disability insurance as defined in s. 627.659.
c. Credit life insurance or credit disability insurance.
d. Any individual, isolated, nonrecurring unadvertised transaction not in the regular course of business.
e. Title insurance.
f. Any purchase agreement involving the purchase of a cemetery lot or lots in which, under stated conditions, any balance due is forgiven upon the death of the purchaser.
g. Life insurance, trip cancellation insurance, or lost baggage insurance offered by a travel agency as part of a travel package offered by and booked through the agency.
4. Using the word “free” or words which imply the provision of insurance without a cost to describe life or disability insurance, in connection with the advertising or offering for sale of any kind of goods, merchandise, or services.
(o) Illegal dealings in premiums; excess or reduced charges for insurance.
1. Knowingly collecting any sum as a premium or charge for insurance, which is not then provided, or is not in due course to be provided, subject to acceptance of the risk by the insurer, by an insurance policy issued by an insurer as permitted by this code.
2. Knowingly collecting as a premium or charge for insurance any sum in excess of or less than the premium or charge applicable to such insurance, in accordance with the applicable classifications and rates as filed with and approved by the office, and as specified in the policy; or, in cases when classifications, premiums, or rates are not required by this code to be so filed and approved, premiums and charges collected from a Florida resident in excess of or less than those specified in the policy and as fixed by the insurer. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this provision shall not be deemed to prohibit the charging and collection, by surplus lines agents licensed under part VIII of this chapter, of the amount of applicable state and federal taxes, or fees as authorized by s. 626.916(2), in addition to the premium required by the insurer or the charging and collection, by licensed agents, of the exact amount of any discount or other such fee charged by a credit card facility in connection with the use of a credit card, as authorized by subparagraph (q)3., in addition to the premium required by the insurer. This subparagraph shall not be construed to prohibit collection of a premium for a universal life or a variable or indeterminate value insurance policy made in accordance with the terms of the contract.
3.a. Imposing or requesting an additional premium for a policy of motor vehicle liability, personal injury protection, medical payment, or collision insurance or any combination thereof or refusing to renew the policy solely because the insured was involved in a motor vehicle accident unless the insurer’s file contains information from which the insurer in good faith determines that the insured was substantially at fault in the accident.
b. An insurer which imposes and collects such a surcharge or which refuses to renew such policy shall, in conjunction with the notice of premium due or notice of nonrenewal, notify the named insured that he or she is entitled to reimbursement of such amount or renewal of the policy under the conditions listed below and will subsequently reimburse him or her or renew the policy, if the named insured demonstrates that the operator involved in the accident was:
(I) Lawfully parked;
(II) Reimbursed by, or on behalf of, a person responsible for the accident or has a judgment against such person;
(III) Struck in the rear by another vehicle headed in the same direction and was not convicted of a moving traffic violation in connection with the accident;
(IV) Hit by a “hit-and-run” driver, if the accident was reported to the proper authorities within 24 hours after discovering the accident;
(V) Not convicted of a moving traffic violation in connection with the accident, but the operator of the other automobile involved in such accident was convicted of a moving traffic violation;
(VI) Finally adjudicated not to be liable by a court of competent jurisdiction;
(VII) In receipt of a traffic citation which was dismissed or nolle prossed; or
(VIII) Not at fault as evidenced by a written statement from the insured establishing facts demonstrating lack of fault which are not rebutted by information in the insurer’s file from which the insurer in good faith determines that the insured was substantially at fault.
c. In addition to the other provisions of this subparagraph, an insurer may not fail to renew a policy if the insured has had only one accident in which he or she was at fault within the current 3-year period. However, an insurer may nonrenew a policy for reasons other than accidents in accordance with s. 627.728. This subparagraph does not prohibit nonrenewal of a policy under which the insured has had three or more accidents, regardless of fault, during the most recent 3-year period.
4. Imposing or requesting an additional premium for, or refusing to renew, a policy for motor vehicle insurance solely because the insured committed a noncriminal traffic infraction as described in s. 318.14 unless the infraction is:
a. A second infraction committed within an 18-month period, or a third or subsequent infraction committed within a 36-month period.
b. A violation of s. 316.183, when such violation is a result of exceeding the lawful speed limit by more than 15 miles per hour.
5. Upon the request of the insured, the insurer and licensed agent shall supply to the insured the complete proof of fault or other criteria which justifies the additional charge or cancellation.
6. No insurer shall impose or request an additional premium for motor vehicle insurance, cancel or refuse to issue a policy, or refuse to renew a policy because the insured or the applicant is a handicapped or physically disabled person, so long as such handicap or physical disability does not substantially impair such person’s mechanically assisted driving ability.
7. No insurer may cancel or otherwise terminate any insurance contract or coverage, or require execution of a consent to rate endorsement, during the stated policy term for the purpose of offering to issue, or issuing, a similar or identical contract or coverage to the same insured with the same exposure at a higher premium rate or continuing an existing contract or coverage with the same exposure at an increased premium.
8. No insurer may issue a nonrenewal notice on any insurance contract or coverage, or require execution of a consent to rate endorsement, for the purpose of offering to issue, or issuing, a similar or identical contract or coverage to the same insured at a higher premium rate or continuing an existing contract or coverage at an increased premium without meeting any applicable notice requirements.
9. No insurer shall, with respect to premiums charged for motor vehicle insurance, unfairly discriminate solely on the basis of age, sex, marital status, or scholastic achievement.
10. Imposing or requesting an additional premium for motor vehicle comprehensive or uninsured motorist coverage solely because the insured was involved in a motor vehicle accident or was convicted of a moving traffic violation.
11. No insurer shall cancel or issue a nonrenewal notice on any insurance policy or contract without complying with any applicable cancellation or nonrenewal provision required under the Florida Insurance Code.
12. No insurer shall impose or request an additional premium, cancel a policy, or issue a nonrenewal notice on any insurance policy or contract because of any traffic infraction when adjudication has been withheld and no points have been assessed pursuant to s. 318.14(9) and (10). However, this subparagraph does not apply to traffic infractions involving accidents in which the insurer has incurred a loss due to the fault of the insured.
(p) Insurance cost specified in “price package”.
1. When the premium or charge for insurance of or involving such property or merchandise is included in the overall purchase price or financing of the purchase of merchandise or property, the vendor or lender shall separately state and identify the amount charged and to be paid for the insurance, and the classifications, if any, upon which based; and the inclusion or exclusion of the cost of insurance in such purchase price or financing shall not increase, reduce, or otherwise affect any other factor involved in the cost of the merchandise, property, or financing as to the purchaser or borrower.
2. This paragraph does not apply to transactions which are subject to the provisions of part I of chapter 520, entitled “The Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act.”
3. This paragraph does not apply to credit life or credit disability insurance which is in compliance with s. 627.681(4).
(q) Certain insurance transactions through credit card facilities prohibited.
1. Except as provided in subparagraph 3., no person shall knowingly solicit or negotiate insurance; seek or accept applications for insurance; issue or deliver any policy; receive, collect, or transmit premiums, to or for an insurer; or otherwise transact insurance in this state, or relative to a subject of insurance resident, located, or to be performed in this state, through the arrangement or facilities of a credit card facility or organization, for the purpose of insuring credit card holders or prospective credit card holders. The term “credit card holder” as used in this paragraph means a person who may pay the charge for purchases or other transactions through the credit card facility or organization, whose credit with such facility or organization is evidenced by a credit card identifying such person as being one whose charges the credit card facility or organization will pay, and who is identified as such upon the credit card by name, account number, symbol, insignia, or other method or device of identification. This subparagraph does not apply as to health insurance or to credit life, credit disability, or credit property insurance.
2. If any person does or performs in this state any of the acts in violation of subparagraph 1. for or on behalf of an insurer or credit card facility, such insurer or credit card facility shall be deemed to be doing business in this state and, if an insurer, shall be subject to the same state, county, and municipal taxes as insurers that have been legally qualified and admitted to do business in this state by agents or otherwise are subject, the same to be assessed and collected against such insurers; and such person so doing or performing any of such acts is personally liable for all such taxes.
3. A licensed agent or insurer may solicit or negotiate insurance; seek or accept applications for insurance; issue or deliver any policy; receive, collect, or transmit premiums, to or for an insurer; or otherwise transact insurance in this state, or relative to a subject of insurance resident, located, or to be performed in this state, through the arrangement or facilities of a credit card facility or organization, for the purpose of insuring credit card holders or prospective credit card holders if:
a. The insurance or policy which is the subject of the transaction is noncancelable by any person other than the named insured, the policyholder, or the insurer;
b. Any refund of unearned premium is made to the credit card holder by mail or electronic transfer; and
c. The credit card transaction is authorized by the signature of the credit card holder or other person authorized to sign on the credit card account.

The conditions enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-c. do not apply to health insurance or to credit life, credit disability, or credit property insurance; and sub-subparagraph c. does not apply to property and casualty insurance if the transaction is authorized by the insured.

4. No person may use or disclose information resulting from the use of a credit card in conjunction with the purchase of insurance if such information is to the advantage of the credit card facility or an insurance agent, or is to the detriment of the insured or any other insurance agent; except that this provision does not prohibit a credit card facility from using or disclosing such information in a judicial proceeding or consistent with applicable law on credit reporting.
5. Such insurance may not be sold through a credit card facility in conjunction with membership in any automobile club. The term “automobile club” means a legal entity that, in consideration of dues, assessments, or periodic payments of money, promises its members or subscribers to assist them in matters relating to the ownership, operation, use, or maintenance of a motor vehicle; however, the term does not include persons, associations, or corporations that are organized and operated solely for the purpose of conducting, sponsoring, or sanctioning motor vehicle races, exhibitions, or contests upon racetracks, or upon race courses established and marked as such for the duration of such particular event. The words “motor vehicle” used herein shall be the same as defined in chapter 320.
(r) Interlocking ownership and management.
1. Any domestic insurer may retain, invest in, or acquire the whole or any part of the capital stock of any other insurer or insurers, or have a common management with any other insurer or insurers, unless such retention, investment, acquisition, or common management is inconsistent with any other provision of this code, or unless by reason thereof the business of such insurers with the public is conducted in a manner which substantially lessens competition generally in the insurance business.
2. Any person otherwise qualified may be a director of two or more domestic insurers which are competitors, unless the effect thereof is substantially to lessen competition between insurers generally or materially tend to create a monopoly.
3. Any limitation contained in this paragraph does not apply to any person who is a director of two or more insurers under common control or management.
(s) Prohibited arrangements as to funerals.
1. No life insurer shall designate in any life insurance policy the person to conduct the funeral of the insured, or organize, promote, or operate any enterprise or plan to enter into any contract with any insured under which the freedom of choice in the open market of the person having the legal right to such choice is restricted as to the purchase, arrangement, and conduct of a funeral service or any part thereof for any individual insured by the insurer. No life insurer shall designate in any life insurance policy the person to conduct the funeral of the insured as the owner of the policy.
2. No insurer shall contract or agree to furnish funeral merchandise or services in connection with the disposition of any person upon the death of any person insured by such insurer.
3. No insurer shall contract or agree with any funeral director or direct disposer to the effect that such funeral director or direct disposer shall conduct the funeral of any person insured by such insurer.
4. No insurer shall provide, in any insurance contract covering the life of any person in this state, for the payment of the proceeds or benefits thereof in other than legal tender of the United States and of this state, or for the withholding of such proceeds or benefits, all for the purpose of either directly or indirectly providing, inducing, or furthering any arrangement or agreement designed to require or induce the employment of a particular person to conduct the funeral of the insured.
(t) Certain life insurance relations with funeral directors prohibited.
1. No life insurer shall permit any funeral director or direct disposer to act as its representative, adjuster, claim agent, special claim agent, or agent for such insurer in soliciting, negotiating, or effecting contracts of life insurance on any plan or of any nature issued by such insurer or in collecting premiums for holders of any such contracts except as prescribed in s. 626.785(3).
2. No life insurer shall:
a. Affix, or permit to be affixed, advertising matter of any kind or character of any licensed funeral director or direct disposer to such policies of insurance.
b. Circulate, or permit to be circulated, any such advertising matter with such insurance policies.
c. Attempt in any manner or form to influence policyholders of the insurer to employ the services of any particular licensed funeral director or direct disposer.
3. No such insurer shall maintain, or permit its agent to maintain, an office or place of business in the office, establishment, or place of business of any funeral director or direct disposer in this state.
(u) False claims; obtaining or retaining money dishonestly.
1. Any agent, physician, claimant, or other person who causes to be presented to any insurer a false claim for payment, knowing the same to be false; or
2. Any agent, collector, or other person who represents any insurer or collects or does business without the authority of the insurer, secures cash advances by false statements, or fails to turn over when required, or satisfactorily account for, all collections of such insurer,

shall, in addition to the other penalties provided in this act, be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree and, upon conviction thereof, shall be subject to the penalties provided by s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(v) Proposal required.If a person simultaneously holds a securities license and a life insurance license, he or she shall prepare and leave with each prospective buyer a written proposal, on or before delivery of any investment plan. “Investment plan” means a mutual funds program, and the proposal shall consist of a prospectus describing the investment feature and a full illustration of any life insurance feature. The proposal shall be prepared in duplicate, dated, and signed by the licensee. The original shall be left with the prospect, the duplicate shall be retained by the licensee for a period of not less than 3 years, and a copy shall be furnished to the department upon its request. In lieu of a duplicate copy, a receipt for standardized proposals filed with the department may be obtained and held by the licensee.
(w) Soliciting or accepting new or renewal insurance risks by insolvent or impaired insurer or receipt of certain bonuses by an officer or director of an insolvent insurer prohibited; penalty.
1. Whether or not delinquency proceedings as to the insurer have been or are to be initiated, but while such insolvency or impairment exists, no director or officer of an insurer, except with the written permission of the office, shall authorize or permit the insurer to solicit or accept new or renewal insurance risks in this state after such director or officer knew, or reasonably should have known, that the insurer was insolvent or impaired.
2. Regardless of whether delinquency proceedings as to the insurer have been or are to be initiated, but while such insolvency or impairment exists, a director or an officer of an impaired insurer may not receive a bonus from such insurer, nor may such director or officer receive a bonus from a holding company or an affiliate that shares common ownership or control with such insurer.
3. As used in this paragraph, the term:
a. “Bonus” means a payment, in addition to an officer’s or a director’s usual compensation, which is in addition to any amounts contracted for or otherwise legally due.
b. “Impaired” includes impairment of capital or surplus, as defined in s. 631.011(12) and (13).
4. Any such director or officer, upon conviction of a violation of this paragraph, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(x) Refusal to insure.In addition to other provisions of this code, the refusal to insure, or continue to insure, any individual or risk solely because of:
1. Race, color, creed, marital status, sex, or national origin;
2. The residence, age, or lawful occupation of the individual or the location of the risk, unless there is a reasonable relationship between the residence, age, or lawful occupation of the individual or the location of the risk and the coverage issued or to be issued;
3. The insured’s or applicant’s failure to agree to place collateral business with any insurer, unless the coverage applied for would provide liability coverage which is excess over that provided in policies maintained on property or motor vehicles;
4. The insured’s or applicant’s failure to purchase noninsurance services or commodities, including motor vehicle services as defined in s. 624.124 except for motor vehicle services purchased from a membership organization that, as of January 1, 2018, is affiliated with an admitted property and casualty insurer;
5. The fact that the insured or applicant is a public official; or
6. The fact that the insured or applicant had been previously refused insurance coverage by any insurer, when such refusal to insure or continue to insure for this reason occurs with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice.
(y) Powers of attorney.Except as provided in s. 627.842(2):
1. Requiring, as a condition to the purchase or continuation of an insurance policy, that an applicant for insurance or an insured execute a power of attorney in favor of an insurance agent or agency or employee thereof; or
2. Presenting to the applicant or the insured, as a routine business practice, a form that authorizes the insurance agent or agency to sign the applicant’s or insured’s name on any insurance-related document or application for the purchase of motor vehicle services as described in s. 624.124. To be valid, a power of attorney must be an act or practice other than as described in this paragraph, must be a separate writing in a separate document, must be executed with the full knowledge and consent of the applicant or insured who grants the power of attorney, must be in the best interests of the insured or applicant, and a copy of the power of attorney must be provided to the applicant or insured at the time of the transaction.
(z) Sliding.Sliding is the act or practice of any of the following:
1. Representing to the applicant that a specific ancillary coverage or product is required by law in conjunction with the purchase of insurance when such coverage or product is not required.
2. Representing to the applicant that a specific ancillary coverage or product is included in the policy applied for without an additional charge when such charge is required.
3. Charging an applicant for a specific ancillary coverage or product, in addition to the cost of the insurance coverage applied for, without the informed consent of the applicant.
4. Initiating, effectuating, binding, or otherwise issuing a policy of insurance without the prior informed consent of the owner of the property to be insured.
5. Mailing, transmitting, or otherwise submitting by any means an invoice for premium payment to a mortgagee or escrow agent, for the purpose of effectuating an insurance policy, without the prior informed consent of the owner of the property to be insured. However, this subparagraph does not apply in cases in which the mortgagee or escrow agent is renewing insurance or issuing collateral protection insurance, as defined in s. 624.6085, pursuant to the mortgage or other pertinent loan documents or communications regarding the property.
1(aa) Churning.
1. Churning is the practice whereby policy values in an existing life insurance policy or annuity contract, including, but not limited to, cash, loan values, or dividend values, and in any riders to that policy or contract, are directly or indirectly used to purchase another insurance policy or annuity contract with that same insurer for the purpose of earning additional premiums, fees, commissions, or other compensation:
a. Without an objectively reasonable basis for believing that the replacement or extraction will result in an actual and demonstrable benefit to the policyholder;
b. In a fashion that is fraudulent, deceptive, or otherwise misleading or that involves a deceptive omission;
c. When the applicant is not informed that the policy values including cash values, dividends, and other assets of the existing policy or contract will be reduced, forfeited, or used in the purchase of the replacing or additional policy or contract, if this is the case; or
d. Without informing the applicant that the replacing or additional policy or contract will not be a paid-up policy or that additional premiums will be due, if this is the case.

Churning by an insurer or an agent is an unfair method of competition and an unfair or deceptive act or practice.

2. Each insurer shall comply with sub-subparagraphs 1.c. and 1.d. by disclosing to the applicant at the time of the offer on a form designed and adopted by rule by the commission if, how, and the extent to which the policy or contract values (including cash value, dividends, and other assets) of a previously issued policy or contract will be used to purchase a replacing or additional policy or contract with the same insurer. The form must include disclosure of the premium, the death benefit of the proposed replacing or additional policy, and the date when the policy values of the existing policy or contract will be insufficient to pay the premiums of the replacing or additional policy or contract.
3. Each insurer shall adopt written procedures to reasonably avoid churning of policies or contracts that it has issued, and failure to adopt written procedures sufficient to reasonably avoid churning shall be an unfair method of competition and an unfair or deceptive act or practice.
(bb) Deceptive use of name.Using the name or logo of a financial institution, as defined in s. 655.005(1), or its affiliates or subsidiaries when marketing or soliciting existing or prospective customers if such marketing materials are used without the written consent of the financial institution and in a manner that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the material or solicitation originated from, was endorsed by, or is related to or the responsibility of the financial institution or its affiliates or subsidiaries.
(cc) Unfair rate increases for persons in military service.Charging an increased premium for reinstating a motor vehicle insurance policy that was canceled or suspended by the insured solely for the reason that he or she was transferred out of this state while serving in the United States Armed Forces or on active duty in the National Guard or United States Armed Forces Reserve. It is also an unfair practice for an insurer to charge an increased premium for a new motor vehicle insurance policy if the applicant for coverage or his or her covered dependents were previously insured with a different insurer and canceled that policy solely for the reason that he or she was transferred out of this state while serving in the United States Armed Forces or on active duty in the National Guard or United States Armed Forces Reserve. For purposes of determining premiums, an insurer shall consider such persons as having maintained continuous coverage.
(dd) Life insurance limitations based on past foreign travel experiences or future foreign travel plans.
1. An insurer may not refuse life insurance to; refuse to continue the life insurance of; or limit the amount, extent, or kind of life insurance coverage available to an individual based solely on the individual’s past lawful foreign travel experiences.
2. An insurer may not refuse life insurance to; refuse to continue the life insurance of; or limit the amount, extent, or kind of life insurance coverage available to an individual based solely on the individual’s future lawful travel plans unless the insurer can demonstrate and the Office of Insurance Regulation determines that:
a. Individuals who travel are a separate actuarially supportable class whose risk of loss is different from those individuals who do not travel; and
b. Such risk classification is based upon sound actuarial principles and actual or reasonably anticipated experience that correlates to the risk of travel to a specific destination.
3. The commission may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 necessary to implement this paragraph and may provide for limited exceptions that are based upon national or international emergency conditions that affect the public health, safety, and welfare and that are consistent with public policy.
4. Each market conduct examination of a life insurer conducted pursuant to s. 624.3161 shall include a review of every application under which such insurer refused to issue life insurance; refused to continue life insurance; or limited the amount, extent, or kind of life insurance issued, based upon future lawful travel plans.
5. The administrative fines provided in s. 624.4211(2) and (3) shall be trebled for violations of this paragraph.
6. The Office of Insurance Regulation shall report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by March 1, annually, on the implementation of this paragraph. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the number of applications under which life insurance was denied, continuance was refused, or coverage was limited based on future travel plans; the number of insurers taking such action; and the reason for taking each such action.
1(ee) Fraudulent signatures on an application or policy-related document.Willfully submitting to an insurer on behalf of a consumer an insurance application or policy-related document bearing a false or fraudulent signature.
1(ff) Unlawful use of designations; misrepresentation of agent qualifications.
1. A licensee may not, in any sales presentation or solicitation for insurance, use a designation or title in such a way as to falsely imply that the licensee:
a. Possesses special financial knowledge or has obtained specialized financial training; or
b. Is certified or qualified to provide specialized financial advice to senior citizens.
2. A licensee may not use terms such as “financial advisor” in such a way as to falsely imply that the licensee is licensed or qualified to discuss, sell, or recommend financial products other than insurance products.
3. A licensee may not, in any sales presentation or solicitation for insurance, falsely imply that he or she is qualified to discuss, recommend, or sell securities or other investment products in addition to insurance products.
4. A licensee who also holds a designation as a certified financial planner (CFP), chartered life underwriter (CLU), chartered financial consultant (ChFC), life underwriter training council fellow (LUTC), or the appropriate license to sell securities from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) may inform the customer of those licenses or designations and make recommendations in accordance with those licenses or designations, and in so doing does not violate this paragraph.
(gg) Out-of-network reimbursement.Willfully failing to comply with s. 627.64194 with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice.
(hh) Sales practices for pet wellness programs.
1. A pet insurance agent may not market a wellness program as pet insurance.
2. If a wellness program is sold by a pet insurance agent:
a. The purchase of the wellness program may not be a prerequisite to the purchase of pet insurance;
b. The costs of the wellness program must be separate and identifiable from any pet insurance policy sold by the pet insurance agent;
c. The terms and conditions of the wellness program must be separate from any pet insurance policy sold by the agent;
d. The products or coverages available through the wellness program may not duplicate the products or coverages available through the pet insurance policy; and
e. The advertising of the wellness program must not be misleading.
(2) ALTERNATIVE RATES OF PAYMENT.Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an insurer or insurers from negotiating or entering into contracts with licensed health care providers for alternative rates of payment, or from limiting payments under policies pursuant to agreements with insureds, as long as the insurer offers the benefit of such alternative rates to insureds who select designated providers.
(3) INPATIENT FACILITY NETWORK.This section may not be construed to prohibit a Medicare supplement insurer from granting a premium credit to insureds for using an in-network inpatient facility.
(4) PARTICIPATION IN A WELLNESS OR HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
(a) Authorization to offer rewards or incentives for participation.An insurer issuing a group or individual health benefit plan may offer a voluntary wellness or health improvement program and may encourage or reward participation in the program by authorizing rewards or incentives, including, but not limited to, merchandise, gift cards, debit cards, premium discounts, contributions to a member’s health savings account, or modifications to copayment, deductible, or coinsurance amounts. Any advertisement of the program is not subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (1)(m).
(b) Verification of medical condition by nonparticipants due to medical condition.An insurer may require a member of a health benefit plan to provide verification, such as an affirming statement from the member’s physician, that the member’s medical condition makes it unreasonably difficult or inadvisable to participate in the wellness or health improvement program in order for that nonparticipant to receive the reward or incentive.
(c) Disclosure requirement.A reward or incentive offered under this subsection shall be disclosed in the policy or certificate.
(d) Other incentives.This subsection does not prohibit insurers from offering other incentives or rewards for adherence to a wellness or health improvement program if otherwise authorized by state or federal law.
(5) LOSS CONTROL AND LOSS MITIGATION.This section does not prohibit an insurer or agent from offering or giving to an insured, for free or at a discounted price, services or other merchandise, goods, wares, or other items of value that relate to loss control or loss mitigation with respect to the risks covered under the policy.
History.s. 9, ch. 76-260; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 19, ch. 77-468; s. 1, ch. 78-377; s. 1, ch. 79-289; s. 1, ch. 80-152; s. 1, ch. 80-373; s. 1, ch. 82-235; s. 807, ch. 82-243; s. 90, ch. 83-216; ss. 1, 2, ch. 83-342; s. 1, ch. 84-157; s. 14, ch. 85-62; s. 3, ch. 85-182; s. 1, ch. 85-233; s. 4, ch. 86-160; s. 27, ch. 87-226; s. 13, ch. 88-370; ss. 60, 65, ch. 89-360; s. 1, ch. 90-85; s. 33, ch. 90-119; ss. 186, 206, 207, ch. 90-363; s. 58, ch. 91-110; s. 256, ch. 91-224; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 38, ch. 92-146; s. 6, ch. 95-187; s. 1, ch. 95-219; s. 314, ch. 97-102; s. 24, ch. 99-3; s. 5, ch. 99-286; s. 1, ch. 99-388; s. 2, ch. 2000-192; s. 1, ch. 2001-178; s. 2, ch. 2002-25; s. 7, ch. 2002-55; s. 65, ch. 2002-206; s. 88, ch. 2003-1; s. 2, ch. 2003-139; s. 1028, ch. 2003-261; ss. 4, 65, ch. 2003-267; ss. 58, 80, ch. 2003-281; s. 4, ch. 2004-340; s. 87, ch. 2004-390; s. 1, ch. 2005-41; s. 2, ch. 2006-277; s. 2, ch. 2007-44; s. 8, ch. 2008-66; s. 7, ch. 2008-237; s. 6, ch. 2010-175; s. 1, ch. 2011-167; s. 10, ch. 2012-151; s. 5, ch. 2012-197; s. 7, ch. 2014-103; s. 1, ch. 2014-180; s. 14, ch. 2015-180; s. 11, ch. 2016-222; s. 83, ch. 2018-110; s. 1, ch. 2018-149; s. 1, ch. 2018-153; s. 11, ch. 2019-108; s. 12, ch. 2021-104; s. 54, ch. 2022-4; s. 7, ch. 2022-271; s. 12, ch. 2023-130; s. 14, ch. 2023-172; s. 2, ch. 2023-216; s. 2, ch. 2025-11; s. 7, ch. 2025-145.
1Note.Section 12, ch. 2008-237, provides in part that “[e]ffective [June 30, 2008,] the Department of Financial Services may adopt rules to implement this act.”

F.S. 626.9541 on Google Scholar

F.S. 626.9541 on CourtListener

Amendments to 626.9541


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 626.9541
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S626.9541 1u1 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - PRESENT FALSE CLAIM TO INSURER - M: S
S626.9541 1u2 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - TO OBTAIN CASH ADVANCE KEEP MONEY - M: S
S626.9541 1w2 - ANTITRUST - INSUR REP SOL ACCEPT RISKS BY IMPAIRED INSURER - F: T

Cases Citing Statute 626.9541

Total Results: 109

PNR, Inc. v. Beacon Property Management, Inc.

842 So. 2d 773, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 229, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 380, 2003 WL 1088575

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2003 | Docket: 1440333

Cited 75 times | Published

as to indicate a general business practice." § 626.9541(1)(i)3, Fla. Stat. (2002). No such language qualifies

Talat Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

753 So. 2d 1278, 2000 WL 232303

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2000 | Docket: 1729118

Cited 62 times | Published

violation of any of the following provisions: 1. Section 626.9541(9), (15), or (24); 2. Section 626.9551; 3

DADELAND DEPOT. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine

945 So. 2d 1216, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 882, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2953, 2006 WL 3741019

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 2451707

Cited 49 times | Published

THE LANGUAGE IN § 624.155(1)(b)(3) ELIMINATE § 626.9541's REQUIREMENT OF PROOF OF A GENERAL BUSINESS

Stanley Glasser, Miriam Glasser, His Wife v. Amalgamated Workers Union Local 88, R.W.D.S.U., Afl-Cio

806 F.2d 1539

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 1987 | Docket: 968265

Cited 30 times | Published

claims under the Florida Insurance Code (Fla.Stat. § 626.9541 et seq.) and the Florida Consumer Protection

Time Ins. Co., Inc. v. Burger

712 So. 2d 389, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 309, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1157, 1998 WL 309272

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 1737236

Cited 26 times | Published

by Time Insurance, pursuant to Florida Statute § 626.9541. Burger, 115 F.3d at 881. The question reads

Talat Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

952 F. Supp. 773, 1996 WL 785444

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1996 | Docket: 905537

Cited 21 times | Published

624.155(1)(b)(1), but also under Fla.Stat.Ann. § 626.9541(1)(i) and § 624.155(1)(a)(1) pertaining to unfair

State, Dept. of Ins. v. Ins. Services Office

434 So. 2d 908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1983 | Docket: 2534128

Cited 18 times | Published

specific practices which are prohibited by Section 626.9541, Florida Statutes (1979) (which defines unfair

Werner v. STATE, DEPT. OF INS.

689 So. 2d 1211, 1997 WL 108941

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1997 | Docket: 2517173

Cited 17 times | Published

any insurance policy to obtain a commission. § 626.9541(1)(a) and (k), Fla. Stat. (1989). It would have

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

944 F. Supp. 886, 1997 A.M.C. 1419, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16941, 1996 WL 663715

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 1624554

Cited 16 times | Published

Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Act, Fla.Stat. § 626.9541 et seq. (1995), and Florida's Bad Faith Statute

Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

483 F.3d 1265, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8384, 2007 WL 1075181

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 12, 2007 | Docket: 213235

Cited 15 times | Published

stated that in order for a plaintiff to bring a § 626.9541(l)(i) action against an insurer — through the

Inacio v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

550 So. 2d 92, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2269, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 1989 WL 113230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1989 | Docket: 1718783

Cited 15 times | Published

Farm's unfair trade practices in violation of section 626.9541, Florida Statutes (1987). The claims against

Dept. of Ins. v. Dade Cty. Consumer Adv.

492 So. 2d 1032, 90 A.L.R. 4th 193

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1986 | Docket: 478295

Cited 15 times | Published

offering to divide his commission with another. Section 626.9541(1) reads, in pertinent part, as follows: UNFAIR

Zarrella v. Pacific Life Insurance

755 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119552, 2010 WL 4663296

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 273184

Cited 14 times | Published

negligence per se claim is based on Florida Statutes § 626.9541(1)(a)1[6] and (b)4.[7] The Florida legislature

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Conquest

658 So. 2d 928, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 312, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1124, 1995 WL 392866

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1995 | Docket: 439324

Cited 14 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x)... . Bonita Conquest alleged

Cardenas v. Miami-Dade Yellow Cab Co.

538 So. 2d 491, 1989 WL 6168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 1517117

Cited 14 times | Published

following provisions by the insurer: *495 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i) ...;[1] (b) By the commission of any

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Zebrowski

706 So. 2d 275, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 726, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1965, 1997 WL 730719

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1997 | Docket: 2513787

Cited 13 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x); 2. Section 626.9551; 3

Hutchison v. Prudential Ins. Co.

645 So. 2d 1047, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 81, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10786, 1994 WL 617194

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1654432

Cited 13 times | Published

in unfair trade practices in violation of section 626.9541, Florida Statutes (1991) by misrepresenting

Bowe v. Public Storage

106 F. Supp. 3d 1252, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71088, 2015 WL 3440418

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 19, 2015 | Docket: 64302170

Cited 12 times | Published

Fla. Stat. § 626.9541(1)(a)(1) and (b). This lawsuit clearly does not concern Section 626.9541(1)(a)(1)

Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Butler

770 So. 2d 1210, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 899, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2034, 2000 WL 1535354

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2000 | Docket: 1778893

Cited 11 times | Published

anti-rebate provisions in section 626.9541 with regard to legal fees, see, e.g., § 626.9541(1)(h)3.a. (providing

GENERAL STAR INDEM. v. Anheuser-Busch

741 So. 2d 1259, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13363, 1999 WL 817183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1999 | Docket: 1511150

Cited 10 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x); [wrongful refusal to settle]

United Guaranty Residential Insurance v. Alliance Mortgage Co.

644 F. Supp. 339, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19821

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1986 | Docket: 1639904

Cited 10 times | Published

claims settlement practices" described in Fla.Stat. 626.9541(1)(i). It argues that the legislature's failure

Home Ins. Co. v. Owens

573 So. 2d 343, 1990 WL 175784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 479030

Cited 9 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x); 2. Section 626.9551; 3

Jones v. Continental Insurance

670 F. Supp. 937, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9092

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1987 | Docket: 252058

Cited 9 times | Published

624.155(1)(a)(1) (incorporating by reference Section 626.9541(1)(i) "Unfair Claim Settlement Practices")

Sentry Ins. v. Brown

424 So. 2d 780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1982 | Docket: 1708213

Cited 9 times | Published

made evident by reading the provisions of Section 626.9541(15)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), in pari materia

HARTFORD INS. v. Mainstream Const. Group, Inc.

864 So. 2d 1270, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1148, 2004 WL 220977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2004 | Docket: 1727642

Cited 8 times | Published

claim settlement practices in violation of section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2002). In response

Whitaker v. Department of Ins. and Treasurer

680 So. 2d 528, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6219, 1996 WL 316537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1996 | Docket: 138315

Cited 8 times | Published

finding him guilty of failure to insure under section 626.9541(1)(x)4., Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and

Conquest v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

637 So. 2d 40, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4554, 1994 WL 180553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1994 | Docket: 422517

Cited 8 times | Published

interpretation of section 624.155, in combination with section 626.9541(1)(i), requires that we reverse the dismissal

Hogan v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

665 F. Supp. 2d 1273, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95921

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2009 | Docket: 2379872

Cited 7 times | Published

good faith to settle claims; (2) violation of § 626.9541(1)(e)(1), Florida Statutes, for the knowing making

Jones Ex Rel. Estate of Jones v. Continental Insurance

716 F. Supp. 1456, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8663

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1989 | Docket: 2215924

Cited 7 times | Published

624.155(1)(a)(1) (incorporating by reference Section 626.9541(1)(i) "Unfair Claim Settlement Practices")

Kathy Johnson v. Omega Insurance Company

200 So. 3d 1207, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 415, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2148, 2016 WL 5477795

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2016 | Docket: 4448478

Cited 6 times | Published

judgment. Id. She further alleged a claim under section 626.9541(1), Florida Statutes (2006), or Florida’s

Weinberg v. Advanced Data Processing, Inc.

147 F. Supp. 3d 1359, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165077, 2015 WL 8098555

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2015 | Docket: 64305597

Cited 6 times | Published

action for alleged violations of [Fla. Stat.] § 626.9541(l)(a)l, and (b)4 because the legislature has

United Wis. Life Ins. Co. v. Office of Ins.

849 So. 2d 417, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10377, 2003 WL 21554509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2003 | Docket: 1509383

Cited 6 times | Published

issues: 1) Whether the Department proved that section 626.9541(1)(g)2., Florida Statutes, prohibits tier

Christopher B. Keehn, Stephanie K. Haley, Gordon Charles Keehn, Robert Franklin Keehn v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.

758 F.2d 1522, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29414

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1985 | Docket: 507564

Cited 6 times | Published

951 et seq., specifically, Fla.Stat. § 626.9541(24)(c) (1977). Concluding that UITPA did

316, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

625 F. Supp. 2d 1187, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64269

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2008 | Docket: 2147395

Cited 5 times | Published

illegitimate monies" under § 624.155 (Civil Remedy) and § 626.9541 (Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices Prohibited)

The Florida Bar v. Beach

699 So. 2d 657, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 490, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1049, 1997 WL 417239

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1997 | Docket: 1694159

Cited 5 times | Published

insurance," id., and several provisions of section 626.9541, which generally proscribes falsity in advertising

Harvey Burger, Gail Burger v. Time Insurance Company, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation, Cross-Appellee

115 F.3d 880, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 14881, 1997 WL 299681

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 20, 1997 | Docket: 209109

Cited 5 times | Published

by Time Insurance, pursuant to Florida Statute § 626.9541. 3 . Erie Railroad Co

Butler v. State, Dept. of Ins.

680 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 587866

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 467099

Cited 5 times | Published

reasons as those cited in challenging the rule. Section 626.9541(1)(h)3.a.[2] prohibits a title insurance agent

Howell-Demarest v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

673 So. 2d 526, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401, 1996 WL 210119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1996 | Docket: 1671256

Cited 5 times | Published

basis alleged in the insured's complaint is section 626.9541(1)(i) 2 and 3, Florida Statutes (1991)[2]

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Zalay

581 So. 2d 178, 1991 WL 38137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1991 | Docket: 1683925

Cited 5 times | Published

associated with the company's insurance policies. § 626.9541(1), Fla. Stat. (1977). An insurance company cannot

Ticor Title Insurance v. University Creek, Inc.

767 F. Supp. 1127, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8682, 1991 WL 114127

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 1632019

Cited 5 times | Published

Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Act, Fla.Stat. § 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c), (f). University Creek asserts a

Davis v. Travelers Indemnity Company Of America

800 F.2d 1050, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31406

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 30, 1986 | Docket: 971117

Cited 5 times | Published

9541(1)(a) and Fla.Stat. Sec. 626.9541(1)(i). Section 626.9541(1)(a) provides in pertinent part:

Progressive American Ins. Co. v. Rural/Metro Corp.

994 So. 2d 1202, 2008 WL 4889128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2008 | Docket: 2576598

Cited 4 times | Published

requested in this case. Section 626.9541, Florida Statutes RMA argues that section 626.9541, Florida Statutes

Beckett v. Department of Financial Services

982 So. 2d 94, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133, 2008 WL 2026154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2008 | Docket: 1208183

Cited 4 times | Published

labeled an unfair or deceptive practice under section 626.9541(1)(z)3, Florida Statutes (2004). Appellant

Scott v. Progressive Express Ins. Co.

932 So. 2d 475, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947, 2006 WL 1541047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2006 | Docket: 1684874

Cited 4 times | Published

notice claimed that this conduct violated section 626.9541(1)(i)(2). Progressive responded to Scott's

Shannon R. Ginn Construction Co. v. Reliance Insurance

51 F. Supp. 2d 1347, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11132, 1999 WL 360538

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1999 | Docket: 2364545

Cited 4 times | Published

general business practice, in violation of section 626.9541(1)(i)(3), Florida Statutes (1997). Based on

Lucente v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

591 So. 2d 1126, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 113, 1992 WL 1331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1992 | Docket: 541191

Cited 4 times | Published

State Farm for its failure to comply with section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1989). Section 624

Dyer v. DEPT. OF INS. & TREASURER

585 So. 2d 1009, 1991 WL 163060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1991 | Docket: 1293885

Cited 4 times | Published

rather were premised on Dyer's violations of section 626.9541(1). Sections 626.9521 and 626.9541 are found

Reliance Insurance v. Barile Excavating & Pipeline Co.

685 F. Supp. 839, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4896, 1988 WL 55289

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1988 | Docket: 1495295

Cited 4 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x); ... or (b) By the commission

Fessenden v. State

52 So. 3d 1, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16342, 2010 WL 4260952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2010 | Docket: 2408580

Cited 3 times | Published

was morally improper. See id. at 1201 (citing § 626.9541, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1986)) (recognizing that Amos's

Shoemaker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

890 So. 2d 1195, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 46, 2005 WL 170879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2005 | Docket: 1288130

Cited 3 times | Published

(1991) (civil remedy statute); violations of section 626.9541, Florida Statutes (1991) (unfair claim settlement

Silhan v. Allstate Insurance

236 F. Supp. 2d 1303, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23748, 2002 WL 31740441

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2002 | Docket: 2206813

Cited 3 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x); .... Fla. Stat. Ann. §

Chilton v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

124 F. Supp. 2d 673, 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2257, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20092, 2000 WL 1874222

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2000 | Docket: 2435454

Cited 3 times | Published

claim — an allegation that Prudential violated section 626.9541(1)(o)1., Florida Statutes (1998), part of

Chiroff v. Life Insurance Co. of North America

142 F. Supp. 2d 1360, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21008

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2000 | Docket: 2175973

Cited 3 times | Published

that ERISA preempts claim asserted pursuant to § 626.9541). Further weakening Plaintiff's argument, the

Amos v. State

711 So. 2d 1197, 1998 WL 210954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1998 | Docket: 1700430

Cited 3 times | Published

the 1986-90 period of Amos's activities was section 626.9541, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986), which provided:

Conquest v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

773 So. 2d 71, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3642, 1998 WL 158608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1998 | Docket: 1291688

Cited 3 times | Published

Auto-Owners violated the following provisions of section 626.9541(1)(I)(3) of the Unfair Insurance Trade Practices

John J. Jerue Truck Broker v. Ins. Co.

646 So. 2d 780, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11476, 1994 WL 665395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1994 | Docket: 1405263

Cited 3 times | Published

unfair claim settlement practices set forth in Section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes. Ch. 82-243, § 9,

DADE CTY. CONSUMER ADVOCATE'S v. Dept. of Ins.

457 So. 2d 495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1984 | Docket: 426327

Cited 3 times | Published

argue that the practical result of declaring section 626.9541(1)(h)1 unconstitutional would be far broader

Mathurin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

285 F. Supp. 3d 1311

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2018 | Docket: 64316546

Cited 2 times | Published

that the insurer had violated Florida Statute § 626.9541(1)(i) by engaging in unfair settlement practices

Clark v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

95 F. Supp. 3d 1335, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38498, 2015 WL 1403936

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2015 | Docket: 64301257

Cited 2 times | Published

intentional breach of statutory duties in Fla. Stat. § 626.9541 (defining unfair methods of competition and unfair

Heritage Corp. of S. Fla. v. NAT. UNION FIRE INS.

580 F. Supp. 2d 1294, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107341, 2008 WL 4449272

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2008 | Docket: 2513661

Cited 2 times | Published

person is damaged by an insurer's violation of section 626.9541(1)(i) (dealing with unfair claims settlement

Porcelli v. OneBeacon Ins. Co., Inc.

635 F. Supp. 2d 1312, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75415, 2008 WL 2776725

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2008 | Docket: 917435

Cited 2 times | Published

"unfair claims practices" pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 626.9541(1)(a) (1999); and (3) "unfair and deceptive trade

Lane v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

71 F. Supp. 2d 1255, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15714, 1999 WL 803973

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1999 | Docket: 2368815

Cited 2 times | Published

and Section 624.155(1)(a)1, which incorporates § 626.9541(1)(i), provide for causes of action arising from

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Halifax Insurance Plan, Inc.

961 F. Supp. 271, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5167, 1997 WL 189089

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1997 | Docket: 1852234

Cited 2 times | Published

investigation of available information." Fla. Stat. § 626.9541. Defendant argues that before a plaintiff may

CAPITAL NAT. FINANCIAL v. Dept. of Ins.

690 So. 2d 1335, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2137, 1997 WL 115318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 436930

Cited 2 times | Published

of the practice of "sliding" as defined in section 626.9541(1)(z), Fla.Stat. (1993).[2] The collection

Zebrowski v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

673 So. 2d 562, 1996 WL 267929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1996 | Docket: 1671221

Cited 2 times | Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x); 2. Section 626.9551; 3

Mary Bottini v. GEICO

859 F.3d 987, 2017 WL 2589986, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 2017 | Docket: 6075023

Cited 1 times | Published

damaged [b]y a violation of ... Section 626.9541(1)©.” Section 626.9541(1)© prohibits [cjommitting

Barton v. Capitol Preferred Insurance Co.

208 So. 3d 239, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2016 | Docket: 4553787

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida Statutes (2013). 4 . Section 626.9541(l)(i)3, Florida Statutes (2013), provides:

Kondell v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

187 F. Supp. 3d 1348, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91838, 2016 WL 3554922

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 9, 2016 | Docket: 64308891

Cited 1 times | Published

terms of any insurance policy.”- See Fla. Stat. § 626.9541(l)(a). - However, the Code does not provide a

State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Colella

95 So. 3d 891, 2012 WL 1448576, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2012 | Docket: 60311331

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida’s Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Act, section 626.9541(1), Florida Statutes (2006), and for “bad

Sandalwood Estates Homeowner's Ass'n v. Empire Indemnity Insurance

665 F. Supp. 2d 1355, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102985, 2009 WL 3427973

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2009 | Docket: 2379818

Cited 1 times | Published

Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act (Fla.Stat. § 626.9541). Sandalwood alleges that Zurich's bad faith

316, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

625 F. Supp. 2d 1179, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41049, 2008 WL 2157084

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 21, 2008 | Docket: 2268219

Cited 1 times | Published

damages is DENIED AS MOOT. NOTES [1] Fla. Stat. § 626.9541 defines unfair methods of competition and unfair

Buell v. Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc.

488 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44059

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2007 | Docket: 2293945

Cited 1 times | Published

violating the specific sliding provisions of section 626.9541(1)(z). The Florida legislature expressed its

Dadeland Depot, Inc., Dadeland Station Associates, Ltd. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., American Home Assurance Company

479 F.3d 799, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4141, 2007 WL 562862

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 26, 2007 | Docket: 752879

Cited 1 times | Published

stated that in order for a plaintiff to bring a § 626.9541(l)(i) action against an insurer—through the conduit

Nowak v. Lexington Insurance

464 F. Supp. 2d 1248, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92675, 2006 WL 3617929

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 2350931

Cited 1 times | Published

sixty-day safe harbor to do so, and (3) evidence of § 626.9541(1)(i) violations are simply a way of demonstrating

Dadeland Depot v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.

483 F.3d 1265, 2007 WL 1075181

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 13, 2004 | Docket: 1118864

Cited 1 times | Published

under both § 624.155(1)(b)(1) and § 626.9541(1)(i).2 Section 626.9541(1)(i) explicitly requires proof of

Bristol Hotel Management Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

20 F. Supp. 2d 1345, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16583, 1998 WL 663354

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 2295602

Cited 1 times | Published

charges specified in the policy. See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 626.9541(1)(o). Section 624.155 provides for a private

James Mitchell & Co. v. FL. DEPT. OF INS.

679 So. 2d 334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1996 | Docket: 1665965

Cited 1 times | Published

department's regulatory authority pursuant to section 626.9541, Florida Statutes. James K. Mitchell is a

Krohngold v. National Health Insurance

825 F. Supp. 996, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9343, 1993 WL 254378

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1993 | Docket: 875275

Cited 1 times | Published

sometimes called "rolling" in insurance matters. Section 626.9541(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that the unfair

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. West Naze

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70453012

Published

definition of “bad faith” or claims handling. Section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2024), classifies

Progressive Select Insurance Company v. Lloyd's of Shelton Auto Glass, L L C, A/A/O Bruce Farlow

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455317

Published

to conclude that Progressive had violated section 626.9541(1)(i)2, which provides it is bad faith to

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY v. LLOYD'S OF SHELTON AUTO GLASS, L L C, A/A/O BRUCE FARLOW

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2024 | Docket: 68407978

Published

to conclude that Progressive had violated section 626.9541(1)(i)2, which provides it is bad faith to

Susan Cingari v. First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2024 | Docket: 68132297

Published

settle the claim properly and promptly, and section 626.9541(1)(i)3.a., Florida Statutes (2020), by failing

CHAD LORD vs FEDNAT INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2023 | Docket: 68034481

Published

Appellant alleged violations of section 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) and (c)—failure to implement standards

Government Employees Insurance Company v. Jason Wilemon

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 6, 2023 | Docket: 66790695

Published

explanation for why it isn’t pay- ing. See id. § 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(e)–(f). If, within thirty days, the

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KEITH H. BUCHALTER, D.C d/b/a SOUTH BROWARD CHIROPRACTIC CENTER a/a/o MARIA GARCIA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2022 | Docket: 64865319

Published

civil action against the insurer for violating section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x)—i.e., unfair claim settlement

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Manor House, LLC

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2021 | Docket: 33123345

Published

of certain statutory provisions, including section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2019), which prohibits

PATTI FORTUNE AND JEREMY DOMIN v. FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2020 | Docket: 18411936

Published

violations of section 624.155(1)(b)(1) and section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2017). One of those

Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Calonge

246 So. 3d 447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2018 | Docket: 6366308

Published

insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x)[.] Section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes

Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Calonge

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2018 | Docket: 6374239

Published

insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x)[.] Section 626.9541(1)(i), Florida Statutes

Montoya v. PNC Bank, N.A.

94 F. Supp. 3d 1293, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35792, 2015 WL 1311482

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2015 | Docket: 64301174

Published

policy terms in § 626.9541(l)(a), false statements relating to insurance in § 626.9541(l)(b) & (e), and

Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Ass'n v. QBE Insurance

734 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94420, 2010 WL 3385982

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2010 | Docket: 2340871

Published

alleges in this *1303 case that QBE violated Fla. Stat. 626.9541(1) by not attempting in good faith to settle

Ottaviano v. Nautilus Ins. Co.

660 F. Supp. 2d 1315, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92703, 2009 WL 3064614

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2009 | Docket: 2141513

Published

deceptive trade practice prohibited by Fla. Stat., § 626.9541 (Doc. 11, pp. 18-19). However, such a claim is

Heritage Corp. of S. Fl v. National Union Fire In.

463 F. Supp. 2d 1364, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78366, 2006 WL 3422423

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2006 | Docket: 2188377

Published

the following provisions by the insurer: 1. Section 626.9541(1)(i) . . . or (b) By the commission of any

Nowak v. Lexington Insurance

464 F. Supp. 2d 1241, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95413, 2006 WL 3613623

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2006 | Docket: 2351233

Published

Lexington violated six subsections of Fla. Stat. § 626.9541(1)(i) by: a) Failing to adopt and implement standards

Ingraham v. Travelers Indem. Co.

925 So. 2d 377, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3232, 2006 WL 544552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 1516923

Published

based upon allegations that Travelers violated section 626.9541(1)(i)3, Fla. Stat. (1998) by furnishing allegedly

Home Quality Management, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance

381 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17894

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2005 | Docket: 2149709

Published

two claims alleging a violation of Fla. Stat. § 626.9541(o)(2) (Count I) and breach of contract (Count

Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

383 F.3d 1273, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19176, 2004 WL 2029765

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 13, 2004 | Docket: 65656514

Published

under both § 624.155(1)(b)(1) and § 626.9541(l)(i).2 Section 626.9541(1)(i) explicitly requires proof of

Franklin v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

97 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7176

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 19, 2000 | Docket: 65994097

Published

unfair claim settlement practices set forth in § 626.9541(1)©, or by the commission by the insurer of any

Otero v. Midland Life Insurance Co.

753 So. 2d 579, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 64795916

Published

*580against an insurer who, in violation of section 626.9541(l)(x)l, Florida Statutes (1997),1 refuses

Burger v. Time Insurance Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 16, 1998 | Docket: 74852

Published

by Time Insurance, pursuant to Florida Statute § 626.9541. it did not alter case law which recognized mental

Mitchell v. Florida Department of Insurance & Treasurer

679 So. 2d 334, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1996 | Docket: 64767202

Published

department’s regulatory authority pursuant to section 626.9541, Florida Statutes. James K. Mitchell is a

Ganter v. Department of Insurance

620 So. 2d 202, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5886, 1993 WL 177935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1993 | Docket: 64697031

Published

any insurer, agent, broker or individual. [Section 626.9541(l)(k)l., Florida Statutes] (k) Knowingly collecting

Lidsky v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

604 So. 2d 869, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645, 1992 WL 191617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1992 | Docket: 64669560

Published

contains sufficient proof of fault for the accident. § 626.9541(l)(o )(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). Lidsky relies upon

Jones v. Continental Insurance

920 F.2d 847

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 1991 | Docket: 66260175

Published

Additionally, the jury found a violation of § 626.9541(l)(i), to the extent that Continental failed

National Foundation Life Insurance Co. v. Ward

524 So. 2d 689, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 847, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1348, 1988 WL 25436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1988 | Docket: 64634621

Published

the bad faith claim) alleging violation of section 626.9541(l)(i)3., Florida Statutes (1985), for engaging

Davis v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America

800 F.2d 1050

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 30, 1986 | Docket: 66219508

Published

here are Fla.Stat. § 626.9541(1)(a) and Fla.Stat. § 626.9541(1)(i). Section 626.-9541(1)(a) provides in

T.D.S. Inc. v. Shelby Mutual Insurance

760 F.2d 1520

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 1985 | Docket: 66205907

Published

Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Act, Fla.Stat. § 626.9541 (1984). The first count, in paragraph 12, sought

National Ben Franklin Life Insurance Corp. v. Cohen

464 So. 2d 1256, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 463, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1985 | Docket: 64610437

Published

concurs with opinion. . Section 626.9541 has been renumbered to Section 626.9541(l)(h), Florida Statutes

Escrow Disbursement Insurance Agency, Inc. v. American Title & Insurance

551 F. Supp. 302, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 1767, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15750

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1982 | Docket: 2266722

Published

sell title insurance as prohibited by Fla.Stat. § 626.9541(8)(c)(1), when they offer immediate disbursement