Florida Statute 647.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 647
TRAVEL INSURANCE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 647.03

647.03 Premium tax.—

(1) As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Primary certificateholder” means an individual who purchases travel insurance under a group policy.

(b) “Primary policyholder” means an individual who purchases individual travel insurance.

(2) A travel insurer shall pay the premium tax, as required under s. 624.509, on travel insurance premiums paid by any of the following:

(a) A primary policyholder who is a resident of this state.

(b) A primary certificateholder who is a resident of this state.

1. Who is a resident in this state;

2. Who has his or her principal place of business in this state; or

3. Whose affiliate or subsidiary who has purchased blanket travel insurance for eligible blanket group members has his or her principal place of business in this state.

The premium tax under this subsection is subject to any apportionment rules that apply to an insurer across multiple taxing jurisdictions or that authorize an insurer to allocate premium on an apportioned basis in a reasonable and equitable manner in those jurisdictions.

(3) A travel insurer shall:

(a) Document the state of residence or principal place of business of the policyholder or certificateholder, or an affiliate or subsidiary thereof, as required under subsection (2).

(b) Report as premium only the amount allocable to travel insurance and not any amounts received for travel assistance services or cancellation fee waivers.

History.—s. 17, ch. 2020-63.

F.S. 647.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 647.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 647.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 647.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 647.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 647.03

Total Results: 5

Cordrey v. Cordrey

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-01-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 206 So. 2d 234

Snippet: The case of McAllister v. McAllister, [147 Fla. 647,] 3 So.2d 351, relied upon by the plaintiff, does not

Moskovits v. Moskovits

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-06-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 112 So. 2d 875

Snippet: 104 So.2d 871; McAllister v. McAllister, 147 Fla. 647, 3 So.2d 351. [5] In re Lawrence's Estate, Fla

City of Miami v. Lee

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-05-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 112 So. 2d 24, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898

Snippet: .2d 116, appeal dismissed 359 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 647, 3 L.Ed.2d 634. The court there restated its holding

Harper v. Galloway

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1909-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 58 Fla. 255

Snippet: also State v. Poole, 93 Minn. 148, 100 N. W. Rep. 647, 3 Am. & Eng. Anno. Cas. 12, and notes as to punishments

O'Connor v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1860-07-01T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 9 Fla. 215

Snippet: Waterman on New Trials, 1406; Chitty’s Crim. Law, 635, 647; 3 Black. Com., 378; 3 Graham & Waterman on New