Florida Statute 662.127 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVIII
BANKS AND BANKING

Chapter 662
FAMILY TRUST COMPANIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 662.127

662.127 Segregation of books, records, and assets; fiduciary assets not liable.—

(1) Each family trust company and licensed family trust company shall maintain its fiduciary books and records separate and distinct from other records of the company and shall segregate all assets held in any fiduciary capacity from other assets of the company.

(2) Assets received or held in a fiduciary capacity by a family trust company or licensed family trust company are not subject to the debts or obligations of the company.

History.—s. 18, ch. 2014-97.

F.S. 662.127 on Google Scholar

F.S. 662.127 on Casetext

Amendments to 662.127

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 662.127

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 662.127.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 662.127

Total Results: 20

The Florida Bar v. Diamond

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-09-14

Citation: 548 So. 2d 1107, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 459, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1291, 1989 WL 106350

Snippet: 758, 761 (Fla. 1972); Gould v. State, [99 Fla. 662], 127 So. 309 (Fla. 1930). D. The other personal hardships

Taylor v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION, BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-11-18

Citation: 534 So. 2d 782, 1988 WL 122614

Snippet: Department's reliance upon Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309 (1930) in which the Supreme Court held

Farzad v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-30

Citation: 443 So. 2d 373

Snippet: response, appellee relies on Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309 (1930), in which the Supreme Court stated

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge [Joseph A. BOYD, Jr.] No. 74-18

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-02-04

Citation: 308 So. 2d 13, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3710

Snippet: 43 So. 925 (1907) and Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309 (1930). Lawyers are disbarred only in

In Re Dekle

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-02-04

Citation: 308 So. 2d 5

Snippet: 43 So. 925 (1907), and Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309 (1930). The penalty assessed should not

In Re Boyd

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-02-04

Citation: 308 So. 2d 13

Snippet: 43 So. 925 (1907) and Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309 (1930). Lawyers are disbarred only in

The Florida Bar v. Thomson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-11-22

Citation: 271 So. 2d 758

Snippet: 43 So. 925 (1907), and Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309 (1930). The penalty assessed should not

Jorge v. Rosen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-03-26

Citation: 208 So. 2d 644, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5802

Snippet: Fla. 342, 59 So. 133; Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699; Whittle v. Ellis, Fla

Florida Bar v. Rose

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-03-16

Citation: 187 So. 2d 329, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3696

Snippet: Fla., 103 So.2d 873; Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. *331699; State ex rel. Florida

The Florida Bar v. Wilkes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-10-13

Citation: 179 So. 2d 193, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2840

Snippet: public interest. Gould v. State, 1930, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699; Rule 11.02, Integration

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Delves

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-11-20

Citation: 160 So. 2d 114

Snippet: “reprehensible in a high degree”, Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699 (1930), that the material

In re McCarey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-09-09

Citation: 105 So. 2d 813

Snippet: 278, 95 Am.Dec. 314; Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699; Petition of Florida State

Hickey v. Wells

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-11-07

Citation: 91 So. 2d 206

Snippet: Fla. 302, 11 So. 500; Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 *210 A.L.R. 699. See also Vol. 3 Florida

State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. Grant

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-02-10

Citation: 85 So. 2d 232

Snippet: Fla. 302, 11 So. 500; Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699. See also Vol. 3 Florida

State ex rel. Sheiner v. Giblin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-07-20

Citation: 73 So. 2d 851, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1738

Snippet: such administration.” Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 311, 69 A.L.R. 699. Although a proceeding

Fuller v. Watts

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-07-06

Citation: 74 So. 2d 676, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1153

Snippet: admission to the bar. Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699. See also cases cited in

Brass v. Reed

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-04-10

Citation: 64 So. 2d 646, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1214

Snippet: business dealings. See Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, 69 A.L.R. 699. It is further urged by

Richardson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-01-02

Citation: 192 So. 876, 141 Fla. 218, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 763

Snippet: disbar under oath. In Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, text 311, it is said, "the court exercises

Petition State Bar Association Re: Proposed Court Rules

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-01-08

Citation: 186 So. 280, 134 Fla. 851, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1201

Snippet: Kirke, 12 Fla. 278, and Gould v. State,99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309, may at first blush appear contrary to

Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Assn.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-01-12

Citation: 139 So. 132, 104 Fla. 21

Snippet: in business dealings." Gould v. State, 99 Fla. 662, 127 So. 309,312; R. C. L. 966. In the case of Williams